AFRM vs FCFS vs HTT Stock Comparison

Affirm Holdings, FirstCash Holdings and High Templar Tech Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$72.68 +1.6% 1M -4.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.51B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$185.35 -14.8% 1M +23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$7.95B
P/E
19.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
0.91%
Consumer Lending Financial Services
6 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.93 -19.6% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$816.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

FirstCash Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (FirstCash Holdings 6, Affirm Holdings 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFRMFCFSHTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.51B $7.95B $816.15M AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.6x 19.6x — AFRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.9x 16.2x — FCFS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +22.9% — AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.3% 9.5% — AFRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% 8.7% — FCFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.3x — AFRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.91% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.9% +23.0% -60.1% FCFS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.8%/yr +15.3%/yr +2.7%/yr FCFS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.8% 36.5% 56.8% FCFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 59/100 — FCFS

Percentile Scorecard

AFRMFCFSHTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFRMFCFSHTT
Valuation 31 #117 of 169 46 #91 of 169 –
Growth 99 #3 of 160 74 #42 of 160 –
Profitability 64 #54 of 149 77 #35 of 149 –
Financial Health 61 #62 of 158 66 #55 of 158 93 #12 of 158
Shareholder Returns 13 #118 of 136 30 #96 of 136 –
Overall 54 59 –
  • AFRM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FCFS ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFRMFCFSHTTSPY
1 month +1.6%-14.8%-19.6% -0.2%
3 months +0.4%-10.3%-20.9% +3.9%
6 months +15.1%-13.4%-20.2% +8.2%
Year to date -2.4%+16.3%-45.6% +12.9%
1 year -4.9%+23.0%-60.1% +12.3%
3 years +329.3%+73.1%+7.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +62.6%+20.1%+2.4% +23.3%
5 years -55.1%+104.0%+14.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -14.8%+15.3%+2.7% +10.9%
10 years —+273.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+14.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAFRMFCFSHTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.8%36.5%56.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.3%40.6%59.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.610.701.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.080.63-1.06 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-33.9%-64.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.3%-21.6%-61.0% -1.2%
52-week high $85.78$236.43$4.95 $779.14
52-week low $42.53$148.05$1.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFRMFCFSHTT
P/E now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 11.1x 19.6xmedian 11.1x —median 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 2.6x 1.9xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 35.0xmedian 13.5x 14.9xmedian 13.5x —median 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.7xmedian 7.0x 15.3xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.23median 0.32 0.86median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFRMFCFSHTT
Revenue $4.26B $4.29B –
Gross profit – $2.15B –
Operating income $416.98M $553.59M –
Net income $1.93B $406.49M –
Free cash flow $992.63M $518.18M –
EPS (diluted) $5.53 $9.38 –
Cash & equivalents $1.63B $203.16M $561.74M
Total debt $10.58B $2.45B $879.65M
Shares (diluted) 348.85M 43.34M 500.73M
Enterprise value $18.20B $7.32B -$2.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSHTT
P/E 12.6x 19.6x –
P/FCF 24.7x 15.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 19.9x 11.7x –
P/S 5.8x 1.9x –
P/B 4.5x 3.5x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 3.8x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA 35.0x 14.9x –
EV/EBIT 62.9x 18.4x –
EV/Revenue 6.2x 2.4x –
EV/FCF 26.4x 19.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.3x 15.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.23 0.86 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSHTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 22.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.0% 12.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 577.8% 33.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 22.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 3,598% 31.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.2% 20.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 3,515% 34.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.1% 22.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.1% 17.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 365.8% 13.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.0% 14.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 123.3% 8.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSHTT
Gross margin – 50.2% –
EBITDA margin 17.6% 16.0% –
Operating margin 9.8% 12.9% –
Pretax margin 11.6% 12.9% –
Net margin 45.3% 9.5% –
FCF margin 23.3% 12.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 28.9% 15.8% –
Return on equity 41.6% 17.7% –
Return on assets 13.3% 7.4% –
Return on invested capital 5.6% 8.7% –
Return on capital employed – 10.9% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSHTT
Debt / assets 21.1% 44.0% 16.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.3x –
Debt / FCF 3.4x 4.7x –
Liabilities / assets 65.3% 59.1% 21.2%
Equity / assets 34.7% 40.9% 78.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x 3.9x –
Current ratio – 4.8x 4.8x
Quick ratio – 0.5x 2.4x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 2.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.39 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSHTT
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield -0.6% 3.5% –
Shareholder yield -0.6% 4.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFRMFCFSHTT
Forward P/E 38.9xFY2027 16.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.87FY2027 $11.43FY2026 $-0.04FY2024
EPS growth, next FY -66.2%FY2027 +30.5%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024
EPS growth, the year after +44.4% +8.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2027 $4.25BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2027 +16.2%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024
Revenue growth, the year after +24.0% +2.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFRMFCFSHTT
Held by institutions 77.1% 97.2% 2.2%
Institutions holding 658 500 42
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% +2.9% -26.1%
Institutions buying 401 253 14
Institutions selling 173 166 21
Buyers to sellers 2.32 1.52 0.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFRMFCFSHTT
AFRM 1.00 0.09 0.26
FCFS 0.09 1.00 0.09
HTT 0.26 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFRM, FCFS and HTT?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.51B, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $7.95B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $816.15M.

Which stock is cheaper, AFRM, FCFS and HTT?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 12.6x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 19.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) is cheapest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 38.9x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 16.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.2%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has the highest net margin (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 45.3%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%). On return on invested capital, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 5.6%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) returned the most: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -4.9%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +23.0%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -60.1%. Over five years, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) compounded fastest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.8%/yr, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +15.3%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 0.91%. Affirm Holdings (AFRM) and High Templar Tech (HTT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) has been the steadiest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.8%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.5%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFRM, FCFS and HTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.