AFL vs BRK-B vs NSC Stock Comparison

Aflac, Berkshire Hathaway and Norfolk Southern Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AFL Aflac Inc
$123.54 +8.7% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$62.80B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.07B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
5 wins
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc
$541.90 +7.9% 1M +13.9% 1Y
Market cap
$783.54M
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$384.69B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
3 wins
NSC Norfolk Southern Corp
$342.19 +9.2% 1M +22.4% 1Y
Market cap
$76.93B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.96B
Div. yield
0.02%
Railroads Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Aflac leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Aflac 5, Norfolk Southern 3, Berkshire Hathaway 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFLBRK-BNSCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $62.80B $783.54M $76.93B NSC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.9x 0.0x 28.7x BRK-B
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.0x — 28.0x AFL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.9% +3.9% +6.0% AFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.9% 22.3% 20.7% AFL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.7% -10.4% 9.7% NSC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.4x 2.7x BRK-B
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% +13.9% +22.4% NSC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +18.2%/yr +13.6%/yr +3.2%/yr AFL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.6% 14.6% 21.0% BRK-B
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 28/100 33/100 AFL

Percentile Scorecard

AFLBRK-BNSC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFLBRK-BNSC
Valuation 12 #105 of 119 15 #101 of 119 9 #124 of 136
Growth 44 #64 of 114 30 #80 of 114 43 #70 of 121
Profitability 46 #58 of 106 30 #75 of 106 63 #42 of 112
Financial Health 35 #68 of 104 55 #47 of 104 30 #98 of 140
Shareholder Returns 85 #17 of 105 8 #97 of 105 19 #65 of 80
Overall 44 28 33
  • AFL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • BRK-B ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • NSC ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFLBRK-BNSCSPY
1 month +8.7%+7.9%+9.2% +0.7%
3 months -3.0%+6.3%+2.5% +3.7%
6 months +8.7%+14.4%+8.3% +7.1%
Year to date +12.0%+7.8%+18.5% +12.8%
1 year +16.9%+13.9%+22.4% +11.9%
3 years +59.6%+60.6%+82.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.9%+17.1%+22.2% +22.8%
5 years +130.2%+88.8%+16.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +18.2%+13.6%+3.2% +10.9%
10 years +260.6%+276.3%+270.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.7%+14.2%+14.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAFLBRK-BNSCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.6%14.6%21.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 17.1%14.2%20.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.23-0.020.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.960.951.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -20.4%-26.6%-38.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.6%-1.2%-3.1% -1.2%
52-week high $129.53$548.72$352.99 $779.14
52-week low $105.70$465.40$278.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFLBRK-BNSC
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 10.7x 0.0xmedian 10.7x 28.6xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 1.4x 3.0xmedian 1.4x 5.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.5x -9.6xmedian 7.5x 16.7xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 8.5x 48.2xmedian 8.5x 46.7xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.5x 1.6xmedian 1.5x 4.6xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.97median 0.60 —median 0.60 3.19median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFLBRK-BNSC
Revenue $18.07B $384.69B $12.96B
Gross profit $11.05B $215.64B –
Operating income -$1.24B -$111.18B $4.09B
Net income $4.86B $86.08B $2.68B
Free cash flow $2.65B $24.22B $1.65B
EPS (diluted) $9.62 – $11.92
Cash & equivalents $6.12B $40.61B $1.60B
Total debt $8.73B $128.60B $16.61B
Shares (diluted) 505.58M – 225.20M
Enterprise value $38.01B -$1.42T $71.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFLBRK-BNSC
P/E 12.8x 0.0x 28.6x
P/FCF 23.4x 48.2x 46.7x
P/Operating cash flow 23.4x 25.0x 20.3x
P/S 3.4x 3.0x 5.9x
P/B 2.0x 1.6x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.6x 4.6x
EV/EBITDA – -9.6x 16.7x
EV/EBIT -52.3x -8.4x 22.5x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 2.4x 7.1x
EV/FCF 24.4x 38.5x 55.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.4x 20.0x 24.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.97 – 3.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFLBRK-BNSC
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.9% 3.9% 6.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 4.9% 1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 25.3% 2.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.5% 1.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 68.3% -4.9% -10.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.2% -8.5% 8.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.5% 35.9% -9.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% -0.5% 8.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 112.5% – -9.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.5% – 9.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 2.2% 70.1% -11.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% 2.6% 4.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.2% 194.4% -21.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% -2.5% 13.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFLBRK-BNSC
Gross margin 61.1% 56.1% –
EBITDA margin – -25.3% 42.5%
Operating margin -6.8% -28.9% 31.5%
Pretax margin 32.0% 29.2% 26.4%
Net margin 26.9% 22.3% 20.7%
FCF margin 14.6% 6.3% 12.7%
Operating cash flow margin 14.6% 12.1% 29.2%
Return on equity 16.1% 11.6% 16.3%
Return on assets 4.2% 6.8% 5.9%
Return on invested capital -2.7% -10.4% 9.7%
Return on capital employed – – 9.8%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 0.5x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFLBRK-BNSC
Debt / assets 7.5% 10.2% 36.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.4x 2.7x
Debt / FCF 3.3x 5.3x 10.1x
Liabilities / assets 73.9% 40.6% 63.6%
Equity / assets 26.1% 59.4% 36.4%
Interest coverage -5.1x -21.4x 5.2x
Current ratio – – 0.9x
Quick ratio – – 0.8x
Cash ratio – – 0.4x
Altman Z-score – – 2.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFLBRK-BNSC
Dividend yield 2.0% – 1.6%
Net buyback yield 6.1% 0.4% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 0.4% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 45.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 73.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -0.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFLBRK-BNSC
Forward P/E 17.0xFY2026 – 28.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.27FY2026 – $12.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.9%FY2026 – -2.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.3% – +24.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.70BFY2026 – $14.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 – +15.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.7% – +2.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFLBRK-BNSC
Held by institutions 68.2% 65.8% 75.9%
Institutions holding 1,700 4,925 1,865
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +1.8% +1.5%
Institutions buying 741 2,237 752
Institutions selling 581 1,989 632
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.12 1.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFLBRK-BNSC
AFL 1.00 0.44 0.29
BRK-B 0.44 1.00 0.22
NSC 0.29 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFL, BRK-B and NSC?

Norfolk Southern (NSC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aflac (AFL) $62.80B, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) $783.54M, Norfolk Southern (NSC) $76.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, AFL, BRK-B and NSC?

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aflac (AFL) 12.9x, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) 0.0x, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 28.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Aflac (AFL) is cheapest (Aflac (AFL) 17.0x, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 28.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Aflac (AFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aflac (AFL) +10.9%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) +3.9%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) +6.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Aflac (AFL) has the highest net margin (Aflac (AFL) 26.9%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) 22.3%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 20.7%). On return on invested capital, Norfolk Southern (NSC) leads (Aflac (AFL) -2.7%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) -10.4%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 9.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Norfolk Southern (NSC) returned the most: Aflac (AFL) +16.9%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) +13.9%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) +22.4%. Over five years, Aflac (AFL) compounded fastest (Aflac (AFL) +18.2%/yr, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) +13.6%/yr, Norfolk Southern (NSC) +3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Aflac (AFL) 0.00%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) 0.00%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 0.02%. Aflac (AFL) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) has been the steadiest (Aflac (AFL) 17.6%, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) 14.6%, Norfolk Southern (NSC) 21.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFL, BRK-B and NSC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Aflac (AFL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.