AFL vs AIZ vs MKL Stock Comparison

Aflac, Assurant and Markel Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRK-B) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AFL Aflac Inc
$126.17 +11.0% 1M +13.4% 1Y
Market cap
$62.19B
P/E
17.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.63B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
4 wins
AIZ Assurant, Inc.
$306.95 +13.3% 1M +40.6% 1Y
Market cap
$15.07B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.75B
Div. yield
0.01%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
5 wins
MKL Markel Group Inc.
$1,952.07 +12.3% 1M -2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$24.00B
P/E
13.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.74B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Assurant leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Assurant 5, Aflac 4, Markel 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFLAIZMKLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $62.19B $15.07B $24.00B AFL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.6x 14.0x 13.4x MKL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.4x 13.3x 17.9x AIZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.0% +9.4% +3.3% AIZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.2% 7.8% 11.4% AFL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.5% 14.1% 8.4% AIZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.4% +40.6% -2.3% AIZ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.3%/yr +13.6%/yr +8.3%/yr AFL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.4% 22.7% 19.0% AFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 52/100 37/100 AIZ

Percentile Scorecard

AFLAIZMKL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFLAIZMKL
Valuation 15 #101 of 119 45 #66 of 119 53 #56 of 119
Growth 1 #116 of 117 71 #35 of 117 3 #114 of 117
Profitability 47 #63 of 117 53 #56 of 117 34 #78 of 117
Financial Health 49 #61 of 118 36 #76 of 118 57 #51 of 118
Shareholder Returns 88 #14 of 108 54 #50 of 108 36 #69 of 108
Overall 40 52 37
  • AFL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • AIZ ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MKL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFLAIZMKLSPY
1 month +11.0%+13.3%+12.3% -5.9%
3 months -0.4%+3.6%+4.3% -4.6%
6 months +11.1%+31.3%+8.5% +0.2%
Year to date +14.4%+27.4%-9.2% +7.5%
1 year +13.4%+40.6%-2.3% +8.2%
3 years +55.0%+89.9%+46.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year +15.7%+23.9%+13.5% +19.0%
5 years +122.3%+88.8%+48.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year +17.3%+13.6%+8.3% +9.4%
10 years +268.1%+285.0%+136.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year +13.9%+14.4%+9.0% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureAFLAIZMKLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.4%22.7%19.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 17.1%22.9%20.9% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.190.160.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.771.79-0.12 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -20.4%-45.7%-28.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.6%-0.6%-10.9% -5.9%
52-week high $129.53$308.94$2,191.90 $779.14
52-week low $106.20$211.86$1,714.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFLAIZMKL
P/E now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 10.9x 14.1xmedian 10.9x 13.5xmedian 10.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.4x 1.1xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.1x 8.8xmedian 7.1x —median 7.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.1xmedian 8.3x 8.2xmedian 8.3x 13.2xmedian 8.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.5x 2.5xmedian 1.5x 1.3xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -6.09median 0.62 0.47median 0.62 19.43median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFLAIZMKL
Revenue $16.63B $13.75B $15.74B
Gross profit $9.61B $10.74B $10.78B
Operating income $3.07B $1.46B $2.47B
Net income $3.53B $1.07B $1.83B
Free cash flow $2.59B $1.83B $1.80B
EPS (diluted) $7.07 $21.58 $144.02
Cash & equivalents $5.62B $1.78B $3.60B
Total debt $8.90B $2.21B $4.36B
Shares (diluted) 498.68M 49.72M 12.45M
Enterprise value $38.54B $6.82B -$42.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFLAIZMKL
P/E 17.8x 14.1x 13.5x
P/FCF 24.1x 8.2x 13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 24.1x 7.4x 11.6x
P/S 3.8x 1.1x 1.5x
P/B 2.1x 2.5x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 2.7x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 8.8x –
EV/EBIT 21.4x 10.4x 4.7x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 1.1x 0.7x
EV/FCF 25.4x 8.3x 6.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 25.4x 7.4x 5.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.09 0.47 19.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFLAIZMKL
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.0% 9.4% 3.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.1% 8.4% 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.5% 10.8% 6.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.5% 9.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -42.1% 25.6% -17.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -18.7% 22.9% -4.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -15.4% 26.4% -14.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -8.4% 26.7% -3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -9.8% 30.5% -10.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 30.0% 0.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.7% 62.1% -20.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 24.9% -9.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 0.7% 79.5% -24.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 29.1% -11.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFLAIZMKL
Gross margin 57.8% 78.1% 68.5%
EBITDA margin – 12.6% –
Operating margin 18.5% 10.6% 15.7%
Pretax margin 25.8% 9.8% 14.8%
Net margin 21.2% 7.8% 11.4%
FCF margin 15.6% 13.3% 11.5%
Operating cash flow margin 15.6% 14.9% 13.0%
Return on equity 11.8% 17.8% 9.8%
Return on assets 3.1% 3.0% 2.6%
Return on invested capital 6.5% 14.1% 8.4%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.4x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFLAIZMKL
Debt / assets 7.8% 6.1% 6.0%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.1x –
Debt / FCF 3.4x 1.2x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 74.2% 83.6% 74.3%
Equity / assets 25.8% 16.4% 25.7%
Interest coverage 12.0x 12.9x 12.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFLAIZMKL
Dividend yield 1.9% 1.1% –
Net buyback yield 5.7% 2.5% 3.2%
Shareholder yield 7.6% 3.6% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 16.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 9.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFLAIZMKL
Forward P/E 17.4xFY2026 13.3xFY2026 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.27FY2026 $23.08FY2026 $109.22FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.9%FY2026 +16.7%FY2026 -4.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.3% -2.2% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.70BFY2026 $13.27BFY2026 $16.25BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +3.6%FY2026 -2.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.7% +14.0% +0.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFLAIZMKL
Held by institutions 68.2% 98.2% 76.8%
Institutions holding 1,701 613 931
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +3.3% -0.2%
Institutions buying 741 325 427
Institutions selling 582 198 317
Buyers to sellers 1.27 1.64 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFLAIZMKL
AFL 1.00 0.48 0.51
AIZ 0.48 1.00 0.42
MKL 0.51 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFL, AIZ and MKL?

Aflac (AFL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aflac (AFL) $62.19B, Assurant (AIZ) $15.07B, Markel (MKL) $24.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, AFL, AIZ and MKL?

Markel (MKL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aflac (AFL) 17.6x, Assurant (AIZ) 14.0x, Markel (MKL) 13.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Assurant (AIZ) is cheapest (Aflac (AFL) 17.4x, Assurant (AIZ) 13.3x, Markel (MKL) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Assurant (AIZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aflac (AFL) -6.0%, Assurant (AIZ) +9.4%, Markel (MKL) +3.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Aflac (AFL) has the highest net margin (Aflac (AFL) 21.2%, Assurant (AIZ) 7.8%, Markel (MKL) 11.4%). On return on invested capital, Assurant (AIZ) leads (Aflac (AFL) 6.5%, Assurant (AIZ) 14.1%, Markel (MKL) 8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Assurant (AIZ) returned the most: Aflac (AFL) +13.4%, Assurant (AIZ) +40.6%, Markel (MKL) -2.3%. Over five years, Aflac (AFL) compounded fastest (Aflac (AFL) +17.3%/yr, Assurant (AIZ) +13.6%/yr, Markel (MKL) +8.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Aflac (AFL) 0.00%, Assurant (AIZ) 0.01%, Markel (MKL) 0.00%. Aflac (AFL) and Markel (MKL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aflac (AFL) has been the steadiest (Aflac (AFL) 17.4%, Assurant (AIZ) 22.7%, Markel (MKL) 19.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFL, AIZ and MKL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Assurant (AIZ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.