AETN vs BLNK vs TSLA Stock Comparison

Aeternum Health, Blink Charging and Tesla Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AETN Aeternum Health, Inc.
$1.79 +1,391.7% 1M +4,375.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.54M
P/E
72.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
3 wins
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.41 -26.8% 1M -76.2% 1Y
Market cap
$60.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
TSLA Tesla, Inc.
$404.22 +13.1% 1M -12.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.31T
P/E
343.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$103.62B
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tesla leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tesla 6, Aeternum Health 3, Blink Charging 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAETNBLNKTSLALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.54M $60.08M $1.31T TSLA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 72.7x -1.2x 343.9x AETN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 251.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -5.9% +11.8% TSLA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -52.5% 3.7% TSLA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -100.0% 3.4% TSLA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.8x -3.2x TSLA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4,375.0% -76.2% -12.2% AETN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.4%/yr -58.1%/yr +1.7%/yr AETN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 338.4% 82.6% 45.7% TSLA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 55/100 51/100 BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

AETNBLNKTSLA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAETNBLNKTSLA
Valuation 85 #10 of 61 38 #38 of 61 14 #43 of 50
Growth 35 #38 of 58 90 #7 of 58 44 #28 of 49
Profitability – 41 #33 of 55 78 #11 of 47
Financial Health 3 #69 of 71 51 #35 of 71 96 #3 of 53
Shareholder Returns 43 #17 of 29 – 20 #25 of 31
Overall 41 55 51
  • AETN ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BLNK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • TSLA ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAETNBLNKTSLASPY
1 month +1,391.7%-26.8%+13.1% +0.9%
3 months +1,690.0%-12.8%+35.5% +5.9%
6 months +1,178.6%-42.3%+8.4% +8.5%
Year to date +5,866.7%-38.8%-10.1% +13.3%
1 year +4,375.0%-76.2%-12.2% +12.4%
3 years +1,690.0%-82.5%+95.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +161.8%-44.1%+25.0% +23.5%
5 years +79.0%-98.7%+8.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year +12.4%-58.1%+1.7% +11.0%
10 years +258.0%-97.7%+2,932.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +13.6%-31.5%+40.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureAETNBLNKTSLASPY
Volatility, 1Y 338.4%82.6%45.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 301.4%81.5%47.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.733.122.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 12.93-0.92-0.27 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.0%-99.2%-73.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.3%-76.2%-17.5% -0.9%
52-week high $3.00$1.72$489.88 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$0.38$298.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAETNBLNKTSLA
P/E now vs peer median 72.7xmedian 29.4x -1.2xmedian 29.4x 344.0xmedian 20.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x 12.6xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.4x -0.6xmedian 18.4x 117.5xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -59.0xmedian 24.4x -4.6xmedian 24.4x 227.1xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -277.1xmedian 1.8x 1.2xmedian 1.8x 15.0xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 -0.03median 1.07 -10.56median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAETNBLNKTSLA
Revenue – $96.55M $103.62B
Gross profit – $28.68M $19.53B
Operating income -$593.72K -$51.16M $4.37B
Net income $1.35M -$48.32M $3.86B
Free cash flow -$1.60M -$12.82M $5.76B
R&D – – $7.73B
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $-0.35 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $702.81K $34.00M $15.22B
Total debt $5.74M $265.00K $9.34B
Shares (diluted) 54.67M 144.26M 3.54B
Enterprise value $93.75M -$74.59M $1.13T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAETNBLNKTSLA
P/E 72.7x -1.2x 344.0x
P/FCF -59.0x -4.6x 227.1x
P/Operating cash flow -59.0x -10.3x 70.0x
P/S – 0.6x 12.6x
P/B -277.1x 1.2x 15.0x
P/Tangible book -265.4x 1.4x 15.1x
EV/EBITDA – -0.6x 117.5x
EV/EBIT -161.9x -0.5x 291.5x
EV/Revenue – 0.3x 12.3x
EV/FCF -60.0x -2.0x 221.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -60.0x -4.4x 68.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.03 -10.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAETNBLNKTSLA
Revenue growth (1Y) – -5.9% 11.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 0.8% 3.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 12.9% 20.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -98.9% 76.3% -22.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.7% -29.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 525.2% 77.5% -35.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 27.2% -32.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 482.6% 83.3% -35.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 44.2% -32.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -17,504% 88.8% 18.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 63.4% 10.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17,504% 76.6% 3.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 53.2% -2.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAETNBLNKTSLA
Gross margin – 29.7% 18.9%
EBITDA margin – -43.6% 10.5%
Operating margin – -53.0% 4.2%
Pretax margin – -49.8% 5.0%
Net margin – -52.5% 3.7%
FCF margin – -13.3% 5.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -5.9% 18.0%
Return on equity – -99.5% 4.5%
Return on assets 134.3% -39.7% 2.6%
Return on invested capital – -100.0% 3.4%
Return on capital employed – -76.4% 3.9%
Asset turnover – 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.2x 0.1x 4.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.1% 3.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAETNBLNKTSLA
Debt / assets 117.7% 0.2% 6.3%
Debt / equity -6.7x 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.8x -3.2x
Debt / FCF -1.4x 0.0x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 117.7% 60.9% 41.1%
Equity / assets -17.7% 39.1% 58.9%
Interest coverage – – 13.1x
Current ratio – 1.2x 1.9x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 1.3x
Cash ratio – 0.6x 1.2x
Altman Z-score – -9.63 14.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAETNBLNKTSLA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.5% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield -0.5% – -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAETNBLNKTSLA
Forward P/E – – 251.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.21FY2026 $1.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -3.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +32.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $90.27MFY2026 $112.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -12.8%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +20.4% +15.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAETNBLNKTSLA
Held by institutions – 12.1% 42.6%
Institutions holding – 113 4,263
Change in shares held, QoQ – -26.4% +7.4%
Institutions buying – 37 2,374
Institutions selling – 27 1,357
Buyers to sellers – 1.37 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AETNBLNKTSLA
AETN 1.00 0.07 0.05
BLNK 0.07 1.00 0.35
TSLA 0.05 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AETN, BLNK and TSLA?

Tesla (TSLA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aeternum Health (AETN) $94.54M, Blink Charging (BLNK) $60.08M, Tesla (TSLA) $1.31T.

Which stock is cheaper, AETN, BLNK and TSLA?

Aeternum Health (AETN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aeternum Health (AETN) 72.7x, Blink Charging (BLNK) -1.2x, Tesla (TSLA) 343.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tesla (TSLA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%, Tesla (TSLA) +11.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tesla (TSLA) has the highest net margin (Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%, Tesla (TSLA) 3.7%). On return on invested capital, Tesla (TSLA) leads (Blink Charging (BLNK) -100.0%, Tesla (TSLA) 3.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aeternum Health (AETN) returned the most: Aeternum Health (AETN) +4,375.0%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -76.2%, Tesla (TSLA) -12.2%. Over five years, Aeternum Health (AETN) compounded fastest (Aeternum Health (AETN) +12.4%/yr, Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.1%/yr, Tesla (TSLA) +1.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tesla (TSLA) has been the steadiest (Aeternum Health (AETN) 338.4%, Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.6%, Tesla (TSLA) 45.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AETN, BLNK and TSLA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tesla (TSLA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.