AERG vs NOC vs MSI Stock Comparison

Applied Energetics, Northrop Grumman and Motorola Solutions Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Motorola Solutions leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Motorola Solutions 7, Northrop Grumman 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAERGNOCMSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $209.21M $78.25B $80.30B MSI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.0x 17.3x 37.6x NOC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.4x 26.4x NOC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -82.5% +6.5% +10.3% MSI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -5,128.4% 10.4% 17.4% MSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.2% 20.3% MSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x 2.3x NOC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.01% NOC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -43.0% -6.6% +10.6% MSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.2%/yr +7.8%/yr +14.2%/yr MSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 72.0% 28.6% 26.2% MSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 57/100 55/100 NOC

Percentile Scorecard

AERGNOCMSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAERGNOCMSI
Valuation 5 #95 of 100 74 #27 of 100 48 #53 of 100
Growth 2 #95 of 97 39 #60 of 97 46 #53 of 97
Profitability 5 #91 of 96 77 #23 of 96 99 #2 of 96
Financial Health 53 #50 of 105 39 #65 of 105 20 #84 of 105
Shareholder Returns 24 #49 of 64 59 #27 of 64 60 #26 of 64
Overall 18 57 55
  • AERG ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NOC ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • MSI ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAERGNOCMSISPY
1 month +6.8%+10.8%+6.3% -0.8%
3 months -26.6%+3.3%+14.6% +3.5%
6 months -30.4%-1.7%+12.5% +7.0%
Year to date -48.1%-0.8%+26.7% +12.2%
1 year -43.0%-6.6%+10.6% +13.0%
3 years -59.7%+19.5%+78.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -26.1%+6.1%+21.3% +23.1%
5 years -61.0%+45.7%+94.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year -17.2%+7.8%+14.2% +11.0%
10 years —+147.9%+560.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+20.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAERGNOCMSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 72.0%28.6%26.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 73.3%28.3%27.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.100.000.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.60-0.230.41 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.1%-38.4%-27.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.8%-26.4%-1.2% -1.8%
52-week high $1.95$768.02$491.32 $779.14
52-week low $0.68$473.40$363.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAERGNOCMSI
P/E now vs peer median -13.4xmedian 26.8x 17.8xmedian 26.8x 37.7xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 688.9xmedian 2.9x 1.8xmedian 2.9x 6.6xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -13.8xmedian 15.2x 14.8xmedian 15.2x 24.7xmedian 15.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.8xmedian 25.5x 21.0xmedian 25.5x 30.0xmedian 25.5x
P/B now vs peer median 99.0xmedian 2.5x 4.3xmedian 2.5x 29.9xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.40median 0.94 17.45median 0.94 2.85median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAERGNOCMSI
Revenue $313.97K $43.59B $12.24B
Gross profit $143.70K $8.73B $6.36B
Operating income -$16.17M $4.63B $3.05B
Net income -$16.07M $4.52B $2.14B
Free cash flow -$10.40M $3.83B $2.68B
R&D $2.09M – $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $-0.07 $31.74 $12.76
Cash & equivalents $1.19M $3.74B $710.00M
Total debt – $58.43B $9.03B
Shares (diluted) 229.90M 142.40M 167.20M
Enterprise value $196.18M $65.71B $76.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAERGNOCMSI
P/E -13.4x 17.8x 37.7x
P/FCF -20.8x 21.0x 30.0x
P/Operating cash flow -21.1x 15.3x 27.0x
P/S 688.9x 1.8x 6.6x
P/B 99.0x 4.3x 29.9x
P/Tangible book 99.0x 4.3x -305.6x
EV/EBITDA -13.8x 14.8x 24.7x
EV/EBIT -13.3x 19.7x 29.1x
EV/Revenue 685.1x 2.1x 7.2x
EV/FCF -20.7x 23.8x 33.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -21.0x 17.3x 29.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.40 17.45 2.85

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAERGNOCMSI
Revenue growth (1Y) -82.5% 6.5% 10.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -47.4% 4.1% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -83.3% 9.8% 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -54.8% 3.4% 11.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -41.9% 6.8% 8.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -37.6% 6.4% 15.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -41.0% 12.5% 0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -37.4% -1.1% 12.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -36.1% 13.3% 1.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -33.4% 1.0% 13.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.2% 53.2% 13.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.5% 12.5% 19.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.3% 108.8% 12.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.0% 22.3% 21.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAERGNOCMSI
Gross margin 45.8% 20.0% 52.0%
EBITDA margin -4,975% 14.1% 29.4%
Operating margin -5,150% 10.6% 24.9%
Pretax margin -5,118% 12.0% 22.6%
Net margin -5,128% 10.4% 17.4%
FCF margin -3,312% 8.8% 21.9%
Operating cash flow margin -3,260% 12.1% 24.3%
Return on equity -440.1% 24.7% 81.5%
Return on assets -300.4% 8.8% 11.2%
Return on invested capital – 12.2% 20.3%
Return on capital employed -409.2% 12.2% 22.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.8x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 1.2x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1,759% 0.3% 2.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAERGNOCMSI
Debt / assets – 27.5% 46.9%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x 2.3x
Debt / FCF – 3.8x 3.4x
Liabilities / assets 46.3% 64.4% 86.0%
Equity / assets 53.7% 35.6% 14.0%
Interest coverage – 7.1x 6.9x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 6.92 3.12 4.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAERGNOCMSI
Dividend yield – 1.7% 1.0%
Net buyback yield -5.0% 0.7% 1.3%
Shareholder yield -5.0% 2.3% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.2% 35.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% 28.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.0% 10.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.4% 11.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAERGNOCMSI
Forward P/E – 18.4xFY2026 26.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $30.81FY2026 $18.41FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +17.0%FY2026 +19.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.7% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $42.95BFY2026 $12.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +2.4%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.7% +8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAERGNOCMSI
Held by institutions 0.0% 83.4% 88.3%
Institutions holding 1 1,809 1,466
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.3% +3.4%
Institutions buying 0 840 639
Institutions selling 0 639 596
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AERGNOCMSI
AERG 1.00 -0.04 0.06
NOC -0.04 1.00 0.22
MSI 0.06 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AERG, NOC and MSI?

Motorola Solutions (MSI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Energetics (AERG) $209.21M, Northrop Grumman (NOC) $78.25B, Motorola Solutions (MSI) $80.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, AERG, NOC and MSI?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Energetics (AERG) -13.0x, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 17.3x, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 37.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Northrop Grumman (NOC) is cheapest (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 18.4x, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 26.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Motorola Solutions (MSI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Energetics (AERG) -82.5%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +6.5%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) +10.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Motorola Solutions (MSI) has the highest net margin (Applied Energetics (AERG) -5,128.4%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 10.4%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 17.4%). On return on invested capital, Motorola Solutions (MSI) leads (Northrop Grumman (NOC) 12.2%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 20.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Motorola Solutions (MSI) returned the most: Applied Energetics (AERG) -43.0%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) -6.6%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) +10.6%. Over five years, Motorola Solutions (MSI) compounded fastest (Applied Energetics (AERG) -17.2%/yr, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +7.8%/yr, Motorola Solutions (MSI) +14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) has the highest dividend yield: Applied Energetics (AERG) 0.00%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 0.02%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 0.01%. Applied Energetics (AERG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Motorola Solutions (MSI) has been the steadiest (Applied Energetics (AERG) 72.0%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 28.6%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 26.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AERG, NOC and MSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Motorola Solutions (MSI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.