AEC vs EMAT vs UUUU Stock Comparison

Anfield Energy, Evolution Metals & Technologies and Energy Fuels Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AEC Anfield Energy Inc.
$2.78 -23.6% 1M -63.7% 1Y
Market cap
$44.48M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.19M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
3 wins
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc
$7.55 -33.6% 1M -64.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.98B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$105.76M
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Energy Fuels leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Energy Fuels 4, Anfield Energy 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAECEMATUUUULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $44.48M $920.21M $1.98B UUUU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.1x -17.2x -24.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +62.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,743.6% — -77.3% UUUU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -6.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — 2.9x AEC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -63.7% -90.5% -64.7% AEC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -21.0%/yr — -1.5%/yr UUUU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.6% 189.9% 84.2% AEC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 5/100 20/100 41/100 UUUU

Percentile Scorecard

AECEMATUUUU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAECEMATUUUU
Valuation 0 #23 of 23 17 #135 of 162 14 #20 of 23
Growth 15 #18 of 21 31 #102 of 147 75 #6 of 21
Profitability 0 #18 of 18 – 47 #10 of 18
Financial Health 5 #21 of 22 12 #145 of 165 48 #12 of 22
Shareholder Returns – – 22 #8 of 10
Overall 5 20 41
  • AEC ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • EMAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • UUUU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAECEMATUUUUSPY
1 month -23.6%-55.9%-33.6% -0.8%
3 months -38.4%-71.9%-35.6% +3.5%
6 months -48.5%-84.6%-64.6% +7.0%
Year to date -45.8%-87.2%-48.1% +12.2%
1 year -63.7%-90.5%-64.7% +13.0%
3 years -38.2%-86.9%+0.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -14.8%-49.2%+0.1% +23.1%
5 years -69.1%—-7.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -21.0%—-1.5% +11.0%
10 years -96.3%—+435.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year -28.1%—+18.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAECEMATUUUUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.6%189.9%84.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.5%158.3%83.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.470.453.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.48-0.77 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.0%-93.7%-72.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.9%-93.4%-72.8% -1.8%
52-week high $9.56$21.29$27.72 $779.14
52-week low $2.78$1.35$7.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAECEMATUUUU
P/E now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 26.7x -16.4xmedian 12.8x -23.0xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 36.1xmedian 6.7x 535.9xmedian 3.1x 17.8xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 28.0x —median 7.0x -18.0xmedian 28.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.6xmedian 10.1x —median 15.2x -22.9xmedian 10.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x -46.5xmedian 2.1x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 45.36 -0.47median 0.29 0.61median 45.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAECEMATUUUU
Revenue $1.19M – $105.76M
Gross profit – – $43.20M
Operating income -$17.90M -$15.92M -$96.29M
Net income -$20.72M -$53.55M -$82.51M
Free cash flow -$12.00M – -$82.50M
R&D $8.34M – $39.87M
EPS (diluted) $-1.34 $-0.09 $-0.33
Cash & equivalents $1.27M $5.25M $58.42M
Total debt $35.69M $6.18M $2.03B
Shares (diluted) 15.45M 621.76M 249.32M
Enterprise value $29.28M $901.65M -$962.43M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAECEMATUUUU
P/E -2.1x -16.4x -23.0x
P/FCF -3.6x – -22.9x
P/Operating cash flow -3.4x – -30.2x
P/S 36.1x 535.9x 17.8x
P/B 1.2x -46.5x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.3x -34.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA -2.9x – -18.0x
EV/EBIT -2.9x -55.1x -16.9x
EV/Revenue 43.2x – 15.4x
EV/FCF -4.3x – -19.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -4.1x – -26.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.47 0.61

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAECEMATUUUU
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 62.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 52.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 1,943%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 41.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -112.8% -258.6% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -35.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -111.1% 10.2% 11.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -208.9% -44.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -85.8% 34.3% 22.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 34.5% -38.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 29.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -24.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 17.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -10.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAECEMATUUUU
Gross margin – – 40.9%
EBITDA margin -1,497% – -85.5%
Operating margin -1,507% – -91.0%
Pretax margin -1,640% – -77.8%
Net margin -1,744% – -77.3%
FCF margin -1,010% – -78.0%
Operating cash flow margin -1,066% – -59.1%
Return on equity -56.1% – -10.8%
Return on assets -30.7% -91.1% -5.5%
Return on invested capital – – -6.7%
Return on capital employed -27.8% – -6.6%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 13.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAECEMATUUUU
Debt / assets 14.4% 6.5% 44.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x -0.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – 2.9x
Debt / FCF -0.8x – -8.2x
Liabilities / assets 48.3% 119.8% 48.0%
Equity / assets 51.7% -19.8% 52.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.2x 27.9x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.2x 25.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 25.3x
Altman Z-score -1.83 – 1.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAECEMATUUUU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -14.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – -14.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAECEMATUUUU
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.43FY2026 $-0.27FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $15.71MFY2026 $140.58MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +124.4%FY2026 +113.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +2,427.0% +89.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAECEMATUUUU
Held by institutions 10.6% – 72.3%
Institutions holding 25 – 349
Change in shares held, QoQ -18.7% – +8.7%
Institutions buying 9 – 203
Institutions selling 7 – 93
Buyers to sellers 1.29 – 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AECEMATUUUU
AEC 1.00 0.07 0.65
EMAT 0.07 1.00 0.07
UUUU 0.65 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AEC, EMAT and UUUU?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) is the largest by market capitalisation: Anfield Energy (AEC) $44.48M, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $920.21M, Energy Fuels (UUUU) $1.98B.

Which company is more profitable?

Energy Fuels (UUUU) has the highest net margin (Anfield Energy (AEC) -1,743.6%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -77.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Anfield Energy (AEC) returned the most: Anfield Energy (AEC) -63.7%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -90.5%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -64.7%. Over five years, Energy Fuels (UUUU) compounded fastest (Anfield Energy (AEC) -21.0%/yr, Energy Fuels (UUUU) -1.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Anfield Energy (AEC) has been the steadiest (Anfield Energy (AEC) 80.6%, Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 189.9%, Energy Fuels (UUUU) 84.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AEC, EMAT and UUUU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Fuels (UUUU) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.