ADSE vs NRGV vs BLNK Stock Comparison

Ads-Tec Energy Public, Energy Vault Holdings and Blink Charging Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.41 -26.8% 1M -75.7% 1Y
Market cap
$58.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Energy Vault Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Energy Vault Holdings 6, Ads-Tec Energy Public 2, Blink Charging 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionADSENRGVBLNKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $588.65M $590.20M $58.95M NRGV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -5.3x -1.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +336.8% -5.9% NRGV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -48.6% -52.5% NRGV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -32.8% -100.0% NRGV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.2x 0.8x NRGV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.2% +0.6% -75.7% NRGV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.5%/yr -20.0%/yr -58.1%/yr ADSE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.3% 103.3% 82.6% ADSE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 34/100 56/100 BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

ADSENRGVBLNK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisADSENRGVBLNK
Valuation – 28 #45 of 62 39 #38 of 62
Growth – 53 #28 of 59 91 #6 of 59
Profitability – 37 #35 of 55 41 #33 of 55
Financial Health 7 #67 of 72 18 #59 of 72 54 #34 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 36 #19 of 29 –
Overall – 34 56
  • ADSE ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • NRGV ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BLNK ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodADSENRGVBLNKSPY
1 month -11.5%-17.4%-26.8% +0.7%
3 months -22.1%+15.9%-16.3% +3.7%
6 months -18.2%-28.9%-43.8% +7.1%
Year to date -23.2%-28.9%-38.8% +12.8%
1 year -7.2%+0.6%-75.7% +11.9%
3 years +49.8%+75.4%-82.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +14.4%+20.6%-43.6% +22.8%
5 years -2.6%-67.2%-98.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -0.5%-20.0%-58.1% +10.9%
10 years ——-97.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-31.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureADSENRGVBLNKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.3%103.3%82.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.9%108.0%81.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.143.293.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.160.01-0.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.6%-97.1%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.4%-49.5%-75.9% -1.2%
52-week high $12.88$6.49$1.70 $779.14
52-week low $9.28$2.51$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleADSENRGVBLNK
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.6x -5.3xmedian 26.6x -1.2xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 2.6xmedian 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.9x -11.0xmedian 18.9x -0.6xmedian 18.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 30.1x -4.1xmedian 30.1x -4.6xmedian 30.1x
P/B now vs peer median 66.4xmedian 1.9x 86.1xmedian 1.9x 1.2xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 -0.75median 0.97 -0.03median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsADSENRGVBLNK
Revenue – $225.87M $96.55M
Gross profit – $50.76M $28.68M
Operating income – -$74.19M -$51.16M
Net income – -$109.74M -$48.32M
Free cash flow – -$144.74M -$12.82M
R&D – $11.87M –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.62 $-0.35
Cash & equivalents $5.24M $93.04M $34.00M
Total debt $49.29M $243.01M $265.00K
Shares (diluted) 56.39M 178.39M 144.26M
Enterprise value $506.34M $376.76M -$75.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricADSENRGVBLNK
P/E – -5.3x -1.2x
P/FCF – -4.1x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -5.8x -10.3x
P/S – 2.6x 0.6x
P/B 66.4x 86.1x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 66.4x -1,746x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – -11.0x -0.6x
EV/EBIT – -10.0x -0.5x
EV/Revenue – 3.3x 0.3x
EV/FCF – -5.1x -2.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -7.2x -4.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.75 -0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricADSENRGVBLNK
Revenue growth (1Y) – 336.8% -5.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 13.8% 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 385.2% 12.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 31.4% 0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 41.4% 76.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.6% 25.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 24.1% 77.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -0.1% 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – 33.2% 83.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.1% 44.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -227.0% 88.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.1% 63.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -71.5% 76.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.9% 53.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricADSENRGVBLNK
Gross margin – 22.5% 29.7%
EBITDA margin – -29.8% -43.6%
Operating margin – -32.8% -53.0%
Pretax margin – -45.9% -49.8%
Net margin – -48.6% -52.5%
FCF margin – -64.1% -13.3%
Operating cash flow margin – -45.4% -5.9%
Return on equity – -588.1% -99.5%
Return on assets – -32.8% -39.7%
Return on invested capital – -32.8% -100.0%
Return on capital employed – -40.7% -76.4%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.9x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 13.2% 3.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricADSENRGVBLNK
Debt / assets 52.9% 65.6% 0.2%
Debt / equity 5.6x 35.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.2x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – -1.7x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 90.5% 98.1% 60.9%
Equity / assets 9.5% 1.9% 39.1%
Interest coverage – -5.5x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.8x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – -1.06 -9.63

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricADSENRGVBLNK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -1.9% –
Shareholder yield – -1.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusADSENRGVBLNK
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.58FY2026 $-0.37FY2026 $-0.21FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $206.66MFY2026 $309.42MFY2026 $90.27MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +553.0%FY2026 +51.9%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +54.4% +20.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersADSENRGVBLNK
Held by institutions 60.4% 58.6% 12.1%
Institutions holding 16 174 114
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +31.6% -26.4%
Institutions buying 5 120 38
Institutions selling 2 30 27
Buyers to sellers 2.50 4.00 1.41

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ADSENRGVBLNK
ADSE 1.00 0.10 0.03
NRGV 0.10 1.00 0.35
BLNK 0.03 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ADSE, NRGV and BLNK?

Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) $588.65M, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) $590.20M, Blink Charging (BLNK) $58.95M.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) +336.8%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) has the highest net margin (Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -48.6%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%). On return on invested capital, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) leads (Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -32.8%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -100.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) returned the most: Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) -7.2%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) +0.6%, Blink Charging (BLNK) -75.7%. Over five years, Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) compounded fastest (Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) -0.5%/yr, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) -20.0%/yr, Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) has been the steadiest (Ads-Tec Energy Public (ADSE) 46.3%, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) 103.3%, Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ADSE, NRGV and BLNK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Vault Holdings (NRGV) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.