ADMT vs ABT vs ISRG Stock Comparison

Adm Tronics Unlimited, Abbott Laboratories and Intuitive Surgical Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABT Abbott Laboratories
$103.13 +1.8% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$178.45B
P/E
38.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$48.23B
Div. yield
2.44%
Medical Devices Healthcare
5 wins
ISRG Intuitive Surgical Inc
$445.88 +10.0% 1M -19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$154.54B
P/E
52.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.58B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Abbott Laboratories leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Abbott Laboratories 5, Intuitive Surgical 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionADMTABTISRGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.38M $178.45B $154.54B ABT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.5x 38.2x 52.6x ABT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.1x 38.9x ABT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.2% +10.0% +20.5% ISRG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.2% — 25.5% ISRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -27.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.44% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -44.4% -18.9% -19.1% ABT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.1%/yr -4.2%/yr +4.6%/yr ISRG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 180.8% 27.4% 34.6% ABT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 60/100 80/100 ISRG

Percentile Scorecard

ADMTABTISRG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisADMTABTISRG
Valuation 52 #109 of 227 74 #60 of 227 54 #106 of 227
Growth 2 #214 of 219 17 #181 of 219 80 #45 of 219
Profitability 46 #111 of 206 – 98 #6 of 206
Financial Health 16 #200 of 238 – 78 #53 of 238
Shareholder Returns – 90 #15 of 134 92 #12 of 134
Overall 29 60 80
  • ADMT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ABT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ISRG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodADMTABTISRGSPY
1 month 0.0%+1.8%+10.0% -0.2%
3 months +25.0%-3.9%+23.2% +3.9%
6 months -37.5%+9.9%-4.4% +8.2%
Year to date -50.0%-17.7%-21.3% +12.9%
1 year -44.4%-18.9%-19.1% +12.3%
3 years -54.5%+11.1%+72.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -23.1%+3.6%+19.9% +23.3%
5 years -58.3%-19.2%+25.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.1%-4.2%+4.6% +10.9%
10 years -68.8%+156.0%+505.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year -11.0%+9.9%+19.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureADMTABTISRGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 180.8%27.4%34.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 350.0%27.5%37.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.19-0.010.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.25-0.69-0.55 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -80.0%-41.6%-49.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.3%-21.0%-24.8% -1.2%
52-week high $0.12$130.59$592.85 $779.14
52-week low $0.03$82.56$332.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleADMTABTISRG
P/E now vs peer median -8.5xmedian 29.6x 38.2xmedian 29.6x 52.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.9x 3.7xmedian 2.9x 13.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -13.9xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x 36.8xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -21.5xmedian 22.3x 22.3xmedian 22.3x 43.0xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x 9.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.31median 1.04 -12.85median 1.04 2.05median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsADMTABTISRG
Revenue $3.24M $48.23B $11.58B
Gross profit $1.27M – $7.78B
Operating income -$288.99K $6.65B $3.28B
Net income -$395.64K – $2.97B
Free cash flow -$157.02K – $3.60B
R&D $522.65K $3.31B $1.49B
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $2.70 $8.41
Cash & equivalents $222.62K – $2.98B
Total debt $1.93M – –
Shares (diluted) 67.59M 1.74B 351.60M
Enterprise value $2.28M $178.45B $134.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricADMTABTISRG
P/E -8.5x 38.2x 52.6x
P/FCF -21.5x 22.3x 43.0x
P/Operating cash flow -21.5x – 37.8x
P/S 1.0x 3.7x 13.3x
P/B 5.6x – 9.6x
P/Tangible book 5.7x – 10.4x
EV/EBITDA -13.9x – 36.8x
EV/EBIT -12.5x – 45.8x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 3.7x 13.0x
EV/FCF -23.0x – 41.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -23.0x – 36.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.31 -12.85 2.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricADMTABTISRG
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.2% 10.0% 20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.7% 6.5% 19.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -6.4% – 21.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.4% – 19.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -93.9% -13.8% 16.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -58.3% 3.5% 24.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -485.4% – 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.7% – 24.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -485.4% -66.2% 10.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.7% -3.0% 25.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -389.0% – 38.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -84.7% – 26.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -389.0% – 58.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -84.7% – 42.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricADMTABTISRG
Gross margin 39.2% – 67.2%
EBITDA margin -8.0% – 35.3%
Operating margin -8.9% – 28.4%
Pretax margin -12.2% – 31.3%
Net margin -12.2% – 25.5%
FCF margin -4.8% – 31.1%
Operating cash flow margin -4.8% – 35.3%
Return on equity -67.4% – 17.3%
Return on assets -20.6% – 14.8%
Return on invested capital -27.1% – –
Return on capital employed -41.9% – 18.7%
Asset turnover 1.7x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 7.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricADMTABTISRG
Debt / assets 22.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.7x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x – –
Debt / FCF -2.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 70.2% – 16.7%
Equity / assets 29.8% – 83.3%
Interest coverage -8.0x – –
Current ratio 1.0x – 3.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 1.6x
Altman Z-score -20.34 – 30.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricADMTABTISRG
Dividend yield – 2.4% –
Net buyback yield – – 2.8%
Shareholder yield – 2.4% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusADMTABTISRG
Forward P/E – 18.1xFY2026 38.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.69FY2026 $11.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.5%FY2026 +28.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.4% +4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $53.00BFY2026 $11.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +19.5%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.2% +11.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersADMTABTISRG
Held by institutions – 79.2% 86.2%
Institutions holding – 2,979 2,235
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.3% +4.6%
Institutions buying – 1,259 1,070
Institutions selling – 1,377 877
Buyers to sellers – 0.91 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ADMTABTISRG
ADMT 1.00 -0.08 0.00
ABT -0.08 1.00 0.32
ISRG 0.00 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ADMT, ABT and ISRG?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) $3.38M, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) $178.45B, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) $154.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, ADMT, ABT and ISRG?

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) -8.5x, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 38.2x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 52.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is cheapest (Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 18.1x, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 38.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) -2.2%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) +10.0%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) has the highest net margin (Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) -12.2%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 25.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Abbott Laboratories (ABT) returned the most: Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) -44.4%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -18.9%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) -19.1%. Over five years, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) compounded fastest (Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) -16.1%/yr, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) -4.2%/yr, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) +4.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 2.44%. Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has been the steadiest (Adm Tronics Unlimited (ADMT) 180.8%, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) 27.4%, Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) 34.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ADMT, ABT and ISRG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.