ACN vs BWMN vs LOPE Stock Comparison

Accenture, Bowman Consulting and Grand Canyon Education Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACN Accenture plc
$235.11 +33.5% 1M -6.2% 1Y
Market cap
$149.30B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Consulting Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Accenture leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Accenture 4, Grand Canyon Education 4, Bowman Consulting 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionACNBWMNLOPELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $149.30B $704.42M $4.04B ACN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.2x 102.3x 18.0x LOPE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.3x 20.7x 16.5x ACN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.7% +14.2% +7.0% BWMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.7% 1.3% 19.6% LOPE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.9% 3.8% — ACN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.4x — ACN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.2% -1.1% -28.0% BWMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.0%/yr +23.5%/yr +12.3%/yr BWMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.2% 63.1% 32.2% LOPE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 43/100 74/100 LOPE

Percentile Scorecard

ACNBWMNLOPE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisACNBWMNLOPE
Valuation 53 #53 of 112 26 #83 of 112 49 #58 of 112
Growth 48 #50 of 96 81 #19 of 96 42 #56 of 96
Profitability 87 #13 of 91 39 #56 of 91 99 #2 of 91
Financial Health 80 #26 of 125 23 #97 of 125 90 #13 of 125
Shareholder Returns 56 #30 of 67 44 #38 of 67 91 #7 of 67
Overall 65 43 74
  • ACN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BWMN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • LOPE ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodACNBWMNLOPESPY
1 month +33.5%+0.7%+6.8% -0.2%
3 months +42.8%+62.1%+4.6% +3.9%
6 months +32.3%+37.9%-6.3% +8.2%
Year to date -12.4%+29.8%-5.4% +12.9%
1 year -6.2%-1.1%-28.0% +12.3%
3 years -18.9%+62.8%+34.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -6.8%+17.7%+10.3% +23.3%
5 years -34.0%+186.6%+78.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -8.0%+23.5%+12.3% +10.9%
10 years +103.6%—+266.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.4%—+13.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureACNBWMNLOPESPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.2%63.1%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.7%53.5%36.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.071.50-0.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.12-0.02-0.87 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.0%-56.2%-38.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-3.5%-28.0% -1.2%
52-week high $288.54$44.43$218.48 $779.14
52-week low $124.44$25.31$136.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleACNBWMNLOPE
P/E now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 21.2x 102.4xmedian 21.2x 18.4xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 0.9x 3.6xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 11.9x 19.3xmedian 11.9x 12.0xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 13.7x 58.8xmedian 13.7x 17.0xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 6.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 4.50median 1.00 5.89median 1.00 1.68median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsACNBWMNLOPE
Revenue $73.10B $527.60M $1.14B
Gross profit $23.40B $281.51M –
Operating income $10.59B $17.72M $279.71M
Net income $7.79B $7.38M $224.21M
Free cash flow $12.58B $12.56M $242.56M
EPS (diluted) $12.65 $0.41 $8.55
Cash & equivalents $10.17B $10.49M $171.06M
Total debt $5.14B $759.87M –
Shares (diluted) 615.59M 16.60M 26.22M
Enterprise value $108.58B $654.60M $2.93B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricACNBWMNLOPE
P/E 18.5x 102.4x 18.4x
P/FCF 12.5x 58.8x 17.0x
P/Operating cash flow 11.9x 31.8x 14.8x
P/S 2.1x 1.4x 3.6x
P/B 4.8x 2.9x 6.2x
P/Tangible book 5.1x 4.3x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.6x 19.3x 12.0x
EV/EBIT 14.3x 53.8x 13.8x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 1.8x 3.4x
EV/FCF 12.1x 76.0x 15.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.5x 41.0x 13.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.50 5.89 1.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricACNBWMNLOPE
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.7% 14.2% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 19.9% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.6% 15.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 21.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.6% 47.3% -2.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 76.6% 5.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.0% -32.6% -5.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 25.1% 5.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.4% -33.6% 1.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 17.4% 11.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.4% -33.6% -6.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 49.4% 6.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.8% -62.9% -7.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 29.4% 7.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricACNBWMNLOPE
Gross margin 32.0% 53.4% –
EBITDA margin 17.9% 9.3% 28.1%
Operating margin 14.5% 3.4% 24.5%
Pretax margin 14.6% 0.7% 25.6%
Net margin 10.7% 1.3% 19.6%
FCF margin 17.2% 2.4% 21.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% 4.4% 24.4%
Return on equity 24.3% 2.9% 32.8%
Return on assets 11.7% 1.2% 23.8%
Return on invested capital 20.9% 3.8% –
Return on capital employed 22.9% 5.2% 33.9%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.9x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 3.2x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% 3.5% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricACNBWMNLOPE
Debt / assets 7.5% 36.4% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.4x –
Debt / FCF 0.4x 18.0x –
Liabilities / assets 52.0% 58.6% 27.2%
Equity / assets 48.0% 41.4% 72.8%
Interest coverage 39.8x – –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.9x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.8x 2.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x 2.3x
Altman Z-score 4.82 2.09 16.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricACNBWMNLOPE
Dividend yield 2.8% – –
Net buyback yield 2.7% 3.2% 8.3%
Shareholder yield 5.5% 3.2% 8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.5% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 31.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 9.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 12.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusACNBWMNLOPE
Forward P/E 15.3xFY2027 20.7xFY2026 16.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $15.40FY2027 $2.07FY2026 $9.55FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.2%FY2027 +23.2%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -2.2% +16.4% +25.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $72.38BFY2027 $555.17MFY2026 $1.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.4%FY2027 +27.7%FY2026 -0.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.1% +10.4% +14.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersACNBWMNLOPE
Held by institutions 72.9% 63.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,898 136 447
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% +3.1% +1.8%
Institutions buying 957 78 208
Institutions selling 776 36 182
Buyers to sellers 1.23 2.17 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ACNBWMNLOPE
ACN 1.00 0.07 0.42
BWMN 0.07 1.00 0.03
LOPE 0.42 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ACN, BWMN and LOPE?

Accenture (ACN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Accenture (ACN) $149.30B, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) $704.42M, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) $4.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, ACN, BWMN and LOPE?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Accenture (ACN) 19.2x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 102.3x, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 18.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Accenture (ACN) is cheapest (Accenture (ACN) 15.3x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 20.7x, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 16.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Accenture (ACN) +6.7%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +14.2%, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has the highest net margin (Accenture (ACN) 10.7%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 1.3%, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 19.6%). On return on invested capital, Accenture (ACN) leads (Accenture (ACN) 20.9%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bowman Consulting (BWMN) returned the most: Accenture (ACN) -6.2%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) -1.1%, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) -28.0%. Over five years, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) compounded fastest (Accenture (ACN) -8.0%/yr, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +23.5%/yr, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) +12.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Accenture (ACN) 0.03%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 0.00%, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 0.00%. Bowman Consulting (BWMN) and Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) has been the steadiest (Accenture (ACN) 50.2%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 63.1%, Grand Canyon Education (LOPE) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ACN, BWMN and LOPE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Accenture (ACN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.