ACMR vs LRCX vs AMAT Stock Comparison

ACM Research, Lam Research and Applied Materials Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACMR ACM Research, Inc.
$49.29 -34.8% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.19B
P/E
22.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.04B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$254.39 -21.5% 1M +58.3% 1Y
Market cap
$317.77B
P/E
37.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
0.44%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$421.66 -17.6% 1M +78.9% 1Y
Market cap
$334.63B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
0.47%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 5, Applied Materials 4, ACM Research 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionACMRLRCXAMATLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.19B $317.77B $334.63B AMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.3x 37.7x 36.1x ACMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 25.1x 31.2x ACMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.3% +33.4% +7.8% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.5% 32.3% 30.1% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.7% 49.6% 25.3% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.6x -0.4x -0.3x ACMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.44% 0.47% AMAT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% +58.3% +78.9% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.9%/yr +35.2%/yr +25.3%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.9% 65.7% 60.6% AMAT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 66/100 56/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

ACMRLRCXAMAT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisACMRLRCXAMAT
Valuation 71 #28 of 94 47 #50 of 94 50 #48 of 94
Growth 58 #39 of 92 82 #17 of 92 45 #51 of 92
Profitability 37 #56 of 88 94 #6 of 88 89 #11 of 88
Financial Health 59 #40 of 96 45 #53 of 96 48 #50 of 96
Shareholder Returns 3 #70 of 72 62 #28 of 72 49 #37 of 72
Overall 46 66 56
  • ACMR ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • AMAT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodACMRLRCXAMATSPY
1 month -34.8%-21.5%-17.6% +0.7%
3 months -37.3%-14.6%-16.0% +3.7%
6 months -4.6%-1.3%+6.9% +7.1%
Year to date +24.9%+48.6%+64.1% +12.8%
1 year +16.9%+58.3%+78.9% +11.9%
3 years +284.8%+336.0%+221.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +56.7%+63.4%+47.7% +22.8%
5 years +39.3%+351.4%+208.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +6.9%+35.2%+25.3% +10.9%
10 years —+2,544.4%+1,371.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+38.8%+30.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureACMRLRCXAMATSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.9%65.7%60.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.5%65.3%62.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.623.262.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.190.891.30 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.9%-56.8%-55.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.2%-41.3%-41.7% -1.2%
52-week high $126.89$433.33$723.00 $779.14
52-week low $29.67$139.59$220.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleACMRLRCXAMAT
P/E now vs peer median 22.3xmedian 46.4x 37.7xmedian 46.4x 36.1xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 7.8x 12.2xmedian 7.8x 10.9xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 27.5x 31.0xmedian 27.5x 34.3xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -26.8xmedian 40.1x 48.6xmedian 40.1x 59.5xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 4.7x 22.8xmedian 4.7x 13.1xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.82median 2.10 1.21median 2.10 2.43median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsACMRLRCXAMAT
Revenue $1.04B $26.13B $30.84B
Gross profit $454.91M $13.34B $15.23B
Operating income $137.88M $9.65B $9.14B
Net income $209.10M $8.45B $9.27B
Free cash flow -$118.74M $6.54B $5.62B
R&D $162.47M $2.47B $3.97B
EPS (diluted) $2.09 $6.73 $11.58
Cash & equivalents $969.23M $7.44B $7.04B
Total debt $340.91M $16.44B $26.11B
Shares (diluted) 71.84M 1.26B 800.00M
Enterprise value -$141.10M $293.82B $300.07B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricACMRLRCXAMAT
P/E 22.3x 37.7x 36.1x
P/FCF -26.8x 48.6x 59.5x
P/Operating cash flow -482.7x 41.9x 39.9x
P/S 3.1x 12.2x 10.9x
P/B 1.3x 22.8x 13.1x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 22.8x 13.2x
EV/EBITDA 15.4x 31.0x 34.3x
EV/EBIT 17.8x 32.5x 36.3x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 12.0x 10.8x
EV/FCF -20.7x 48.0x 59.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -371.6x 41.5x 39.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.82 1.21 2.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricACMRLRCXAMAT
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.3% 33.4% 7.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 18.2% 5.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.0% 38.1% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.8% 23.4% 7.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.3% 49.3% 6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.3% 29.0% 6.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 50.4% 45.4% 35.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.6% 28.6% 12.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.8% 47.0% 36.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.1% 31.1% 14.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -110.8% 18.7% 9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.9% 15.3% 1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -717.8% 17.8% -3.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 13.2% -7.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricACMRLRCXAMAT
Gross margin 43.8% 51.1% 49.4%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 38.7% 31.4%
Operating margin 13.3% 37.0% 29.6%
Pretax margin 22.7% 37.2% 34.8%
Net margin 14.5% 32.3% 30.1%
FCF margin -11.4% 25.0% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin -0.6% 29.0% 27.2%
Return on equity 9.3% 64.1% 37.4%
Return on assets 6.5% 33.9% 22.1%
Return on invested capital 4.7% 49.6% 25.3%
Return on capital employed 5.6% 54.8% 29.0%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.9x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.5% 1.5% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricACMRLRCXAMAT
Debt / assets 10.0% 14.2% 15.0%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.6x -0.4x -0.3x
Debt / FCF -2.9x 0.6x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 29.2% 47.2% 41.1%
Equity / assets 70.8% 52.8% 58.9%
Interest coverage 18.1x – 33.0x
Current ratio 3.7x 2.5x 2.4x
Quick ratio 2.1x 1.8x 1.6x
Cash ratio 1.4x 1.0x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 3.29 19.99 15.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricACMRLRCXAMAT
Dividend yield – 0.4% 0.5%
Net buyback yield -25.5% 1.2% 0.6%
Shareholder yield -25.5% 1.6% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusACMRLRCXAMAT
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2026 25.1xFY2027 31.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.28FY2026 $10.12FY2027 $13.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.6%FY2026 +73.9%FY2027 +43.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.3% +12.6% +32.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.15BFY2026 $32.96BFY2027 $32.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.1%FY2026 +41.9%FY2027 +15.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.4% +25.0% +38.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersACMRLRCXAMAT
Held by institutions 75.0% 85.6% 83.6%
Institutions holding 376 3,133 3,507
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.2% +6.2% +6.0%
Institutions buying 246 1,697 1,790
Institutions selling 90 1,163 1,350
Buyers to sellers 2.73 1.46 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ACMRLRCXAMAT
ACMR 1.00 0.71 0.69
LRCX 0.71 1.00 0.91
AMAT 0.69 0.91 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ACMR, LRCX and AMAT?

Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: ACM Research (ACMR) $3.19B, Lam Research (LRCX) $317.77B, Applied Materials (AMAT) $334.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, ACMR, LRCX and AMAT?

ACM Research (ACMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ACM Research (ACMR) 22.3x, Lam Research (LRCX) 37.7x, Applied Materials (AMAT) 36.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, ACM Research (ACMR) is cheapest (ACM Research (ACMR) 21.6x, Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x, Applied Materials (AMAT) 31.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ACM Research (ACMR) +27.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (ACM Research (ACMR) 14.5%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (ACM Research (ACMR) 4.7%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: ACM Research (ACMR) +16.9%, Lam Research (LRCX) +58.3%, Applied Materials (AMAT) +78.9%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (ACM Research (ACMR) +6.9%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +35.2%/yr, Applied Materials (AMAT) +25.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Applied Materials (AMAT) has the highest dividend yield: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.44%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 0.47%. ACM Research (ACMR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Applied Materials (AMAT) has been the steadiest (ACM Research (ACMR) 87.9%, Lam Research (LRCX) 65.7%, Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ACMR, LRCX and AMAT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.