ACM vs J vs NOA Stock Comparison

Aecom, Jacobs Solutions and North American Construction Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACM Aecom
$61.52 +1.0% 1M -53.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.92B
P/E
27.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.39B
Div. yield
2.02%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins
J Jacobs Solutions Inc.
$148.28 +7.2% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$17.37B
P/E
51.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.22B
Div. yield
0.94%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Jacobs Solutions leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Jacobs Solutions 6, North American Construction 4, Aecom 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionACMJNOALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.92B $17.37B $354.50M J
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.5x 51.6x 15.0x NOA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.7x 21.9x 10.3x NOA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.2% +20.1% +7.5% J
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% 2.4% 2.2% J
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.9% 5.8% 6.8% ACM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 2.7x 2.6x ACM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.02% 0.94% 3.90% NOA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.6% -7.9% -19.5% J
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.3%/yr +5.2%/yr -7.0%/yr J
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.3% 33.0% 48.1% J
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 45/100 55/100 NOA

Percentile Scorecard

ACMJNOA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisACMJNOA
Valuation 67 #18 of 52 37 #33 of 52 88 #7 of 52
Growth 11 #33 of 37 31 #26 of 37 14 #32 of 37
Profitability 44 #21 of 37 53 #18 of 37 61 #15 of 37
Financial Health 29 #41 of 57 45 #32 of 57 16 #48 of 57
Shareholder Returns 92 #3 of 27 62 #11 of 27 96 #2 of 27
Overall 49 45 55
  • ACM ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • J ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • NOA ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodACMJNOASPY
1 month +1.0%+7.2%-0.1% -0.2%
3 months -17.4%+5.4%-10.3% +3.9%
6 months -24.1%+17.3%-15.3% +8.2%
Year to date -35.5%+11.9%-14.4% +12.9%
1 year -53.6%-7.9%-19.5% +12.3%
3 years -17.8%+36.7%-40.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -6.3%+11.0%-16.1% +23.3%
5 years -10.8%+28.7%-30.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.3%+5.2%-7.0% +10.9%
10 years +124.8%+253.7%+310.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.4%+13.5%+15.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureACMJNOASPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.3%33.0%48.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.1%36.0%56.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.870.771.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.40-0.24-0.41 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-34.8%-55.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.2%-7.9%-27.1% -1.2%
52-week high $134.35$161.00$16.88 $779.14
52-week low $58.00$107.27$11.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleACMJNOA
P/E now vs peer median 27.5xmedian 26.7x 51.6xmedian 26.7x 15.0xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.8x 1.2xmedian 0.8x 0.3xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 13.1x 22.4xmedian 13.1x 4.1xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.9xmedian 23.0x 26.9xmedian 23.0x -1.6xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.4x 5.3xmedian 2.4x 1.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.86median 0.57 -2.43median 0.57 -0.59median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsACMJNOA
Revenue $15.39B $14.22B $1.06B
Gross profit $874.05M $3.14B $137.57M
Operating income $631.20M $649.64M $76.84M
Net income $334.79M $301.35M $23.49M
Free cash flow $203.45M $644.54M -$218.42M
EPS (diluted) $2.24 $2.85 $0.73
Cash & equivalents $1.01B $1.17B $118.01M
Total debt $2.75B $3.58B $727.57M
Shares (diluted) 128.60M 118.90M 32.27M
Enterprise value $3.24B $12.02B $3.38M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricACMJNOA
P/E 27.5x 51.6x 15.0x
P/FCF 38.9x 26.9x -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow 21.7x 23.6x –
P/S 0.5x 1.2x 0.3x
P/B 3.3x 5.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 6.5x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 13.5x 22.4x 4.1x
EV/EBIT 15.3x 30.4x 12.5x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 1.4x 0.9x
EV/FCF 47.4x 30.7x -4.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.4x 26.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.86 -2.43 -0.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricACMJNOA
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.2% 20.1% 7.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 28.1% 18.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -25.9% 6.3% -2.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.4% 5.8% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -38.5% -23.4% -22.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 14.0% 6.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -50.9% -40.0% -7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.6% -26.5% -26.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -51.4% -30.4% -6.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.9% -21.3% -25.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -60.5% 47.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.5% -10.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.3% 56.4% -9.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.3% -10.1% -50.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricACMJNOA
Gross margin 5.7% 22.1% 13.0%
EBITDA margin 4.6% 6.2% 22.4%
Operating margin 4.1% 4.6% 7.3%
Pretax margin 3.4% 3.6% 19.2%
Net margin 1.9% 2.4% 2.2%
FCF margin 1.3% 4.5% -20.6%
Operating cash flow margin 2.4% 5.2% –
Return on equity 13.9% 9.2% 16.7%
Return on assets 2.8% 2.5% 3.9%
Return on invested capital 9.9% 5.8% 6.8%
Return on capital employed 10.5% 8.2% –
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 2.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.5% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricACMJNOA
Debt / assets 22.8% 30.5% 46.0%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.1x 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 2.7x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 13.5x 5.6x -3.3x
Liabilities / assets 80.0% 72.2% 78.6%
Equity / assets 20.0% 27.8% 21.4%
Interest coverage 3.1x 3.9x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.6x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score 1.79 2.85 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricACMJNOA
Dividend yield 2.0% 0.9% 3.9%
Net buyback yield 8.1% 3.9% 7.8%
Shareholder yield 10.1% 4.9% 11.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 53.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusACMJNOA
Forward P/E 14.7xFY2026 21.9xFY2026 10.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.19FY2026 $6.78FY2026 $1.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -20.3%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026 +43.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +54.7% +27.6% +22.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.04BFY2026 $9.78BFY2026 $1.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.0%FY2026 -18.7%FY2026 +23.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% -0.5% +9.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersACMJNOA
Held by institutions 92.6% 92.2% 57.1%
Institutions holding 572 871 72
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.5% +3.0% -3.6%
Institutions buying 270 375 45
Institutions selling 232 360 18
Buyers to sellers 1.16 1.04 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ACMJNOA
ACM 1.00 0.59 0.06
J 0.59 1.00 0.19
NOA 0.06 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ACM, J and NOA?

Jacobs Solutions (J) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aecom (ACM) $7.92B, Jacobs Solutions (J) $17.37B, North American Construction (NOA) $354.50M.

Which stock is cheaper, ACM, J and NOA?

North American Construction (NOA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aecom (ACM) 27.5x, Jacobs Solutions (J) 51.6x, North American Construction (NOA) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, North American Construction (NOA) is cheapest (Aecom (ACM) 14.7x, Jacobs Solutions (J) 21.9x, North American Construction (NOA) 10.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Jacobs Solutions (J) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aecom (ACM) -4.2%, Jacobs Solutions (J) +20.1%, North American Construction (NOA) +7.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Jacobs Solutions (J) has the highest net margin (Aecom (ACM) 1.9%, Jacobs Solutions (J) 2.4%, North American Construction (NOA) 2.2%). On return on invested capital, Aecom (ACM) leads (Aecom (ACM) 9.9%, Jacobs Solutions (J) 5.8%, North American Construction (NOA) 6.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Jacobs Solutions (J) returned the most: Aecom (ACM) -53.6%, Jacobs Solutions (J) -7.9%, North American Construction (NOA) -19.5%. Over five years, Jacobs Solutions (J) compounded fastest (Aecom (ACM) -2.3%/yr, Jacobs Solutions (J) +5.2%/yr, North American Construction (NOA) -7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

North American Construction (NOA) has the highest dividend yield: Aecom (ACM) 2.02%, Jacobs Solutions (J) 0.94%, North American Construction (NOA) 3.90%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jacobs Solutions (J) has been the steadiest (Aecom (ACM) 38.3%, Jacobs Solutions (J) 33.0%, North American Construction (NOA) 48.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ACM, J and NOA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jacobs Solutions (J) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.