ACM vs FLR vs PHOE Stock Comparison

Aecom, Fluor and Phoenix Asia Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACM Aecom
$60.73 -0.3% 1M -54.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.91B
P/E
27.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.39B
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
8 wins
FLR Fluor Corp
$44.88 -10.8% 1M -8.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.43B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$15.54B
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Aecom leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Aecom 8, Fluor 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionACMFLRPHOELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.91B $6.43B $330.37M ACM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.5x -3.2x -268.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 17.8x — ACM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.2% -4.8% — ACM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% -12.8% — ACM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.9% 0.0% — ACM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 13.1x — ACM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.3% -8.3% -14.3% FLR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.9%/yr +19.9%/yr — FLR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.4% 48.4% 378.1% ACM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 46/100 — ACM

Percentile Scorecard

ACMFLRPHOE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisACMFLRPHOE
Valuation 63 #20 of 52 31 #36 of 52 6 #49 of 52
Growth 11 #33 of 37 3 #36 of 37 –
Profitability 44 #21 of 37 22 #29 of 37 –
Financial Health 25 #43 of 57 71 #17 of 57 100 #1 of 57
Shareholder Returns 92 #3 of 27 100 #1 of 27 –
Overall 47 46 –
  • ACM ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FLR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • PHOE ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodACMFLRPHOESPY
1 month -0.3%-10.8%-24.1% -0.8%
3 months -14.4%-13.2%-25.2% +3.5%
6 months -25.9%-13.2%-2.6% +7.0%
Year to date -36.3%+13.2%-6.3% +12.2%
1 year -54.3%-8.3%-14.3% +13.0%
3 years -18.8%+34.8%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -6.7%+10.5%— +23.1%
5 years -9.3%+147.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.9%+19.9%— +11.0%
10 years +120.8%-11.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.2%-1.2%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureACMFLRPHOESPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.4%48.4%378.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.1%49.3%338.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.861.85-1.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.42-0.17-0.04 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-47.6%-92.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.8%-21.9%-88.7% -1.8%
52-week high $134.35$57.49$133.12 $779.14
52-week low $58.00$39.63$10.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleACMFLRPHOE
P/E now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 25.7x -3.1xmedian 25.7x -268.5xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 0.8x 0.4xmedian 0.8x 45.0xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 12.9x -27.2xmedian 12.9x —median 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.4xmedian 22.5x -18.4xmedian 22.5x -56.6xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.3x 2.2xmedian 2.3x 52.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.85median 0.56 0.01median 0.56 —median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsACMFLRPHOE
Revenue $15.39B $15.54B –
Gross profit $874.05M -$124.00M –
Operating income $631.20M -$216.00M –
Net income $334.79M -$2.00B –
Free cash flow $203.45M -$330.00M –
EPS (diluted) $2.24 $-14.16 –
Cash & equivalents $1.01B $2.92B $892.53K
Total debt $2.75B $1.07B –
Shares (diluted) 128.60M 141.00M 21.49M
Enterprise value $3.03B -$6.78B $324.69M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricACMFLRPHOE
P/E 27.1x -3.1x -268.5x
P/FCF 38.4x -18.4x -56.6x
P/Operating cash flow 21.4x -21.2x –
P/S 0.5x 0.4x 45.0x
P/B 3.3x 2.2x 52.6x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 2.2x 52.6x
EV/EBITDA 13.4x -27.2x –
EV/EBIT 15.1x -19.0x –
EV/Revenue 0.6x 0.3x –
EV/FCF 46.9x -12.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.1x -14.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.85 0.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricACMFLRPHOE
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.2% -4.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 1.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -25.9% -125.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.4% -34.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -38.5% -172.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.8% -76.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) -50.9% -148.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.6% -196.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) -51.4% -156.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.9% -253.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -60.5% -182.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.5% -85.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.3% -235.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.3% -124.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricACMFLRPHOE
Gross margin 5.7% -0.8% –
EBITDA margin 4.6% -1.0% –
Operating margin 4.1% -1.4% –
Pretax margin 3.4% -1.0% –
Net margin 1.9% -12.8% –
FCF margin 1.3% -2.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 2.4% -1.8% –
Return on equity 13.9% -69.0% –
Return on assets 2.8% -25.6% –
Return on invested capital 9.9% 0.0% –
Return on capital employed 10.5% -4.7% –
Asset turnover 1.3x 2.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricACMFLRPHOE
Debt / assets 22.8% 14.2% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 13.1x –
Debt / FCF 13.5x -3.2x –
Liabilities / assets 80.0% 63.0% 15.9%
Equity / assets 20.0% 37.0% 84.1%
Interest coverage 3.1x -5.0x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.8x 5.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.7x 5.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 1.79 3.69 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricACMFLRPHOE
Dividend yield 2.0% – –
Net buyback yield 8.2% 21.0% –
Shareholder yield 10.3% 21.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusACMFLRPHOE
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 17.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.19FY2026 $2.52FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -20.3%FY2026 +15.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +54.7% +24.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.04BFY2026 $15.93BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -7.0%FY2026 +2.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% +22.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersACMFLRPHOE
Held by institutions 92.6% 93.4% –
Institutions holding 572 549 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.5% +1.1% –
Institutions buying 270 249 –
Institutions selling 232 222 –
Buyers to sellers 1.16 1.12 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ACMFLRPHOE
ACM 1.00 0.26 -0.02
FLR 0.26 1.00 -0.05
PHOE -0.02 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ACM, FLR and PHOE?

Aecom (ACM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aecom (ACM) $7.91B, Fluor (FLR) $6.43B, Phoenix Asia Holdings (PHOE) $330.37M.

Which company is growing faster?

Aecom (ACM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aecom (ACM) -4.2%, Fluor (FLR) -4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Aecom (ACM) has the highest net margin (Aecom (ACM) 1.9%, Fluor (FLR) -12.8%). On return on invested capital, Aecom (ACM) leads (Aecom (ACM) 9.9%, Fluor (FLR) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fluor (FLR) returned the most: Aecom (ACM) -54.3%, Fluor (FLR) -8.3%, Phoenix Asia Holdings (PHOE) -14.3%. Over five years, Fluor (FLR) compounded fastest (Aecom (ACM) -1.9%/yr, Fluor (FLR) +19.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aecom (ACM) has been the steadiest (Aecom (ACM) 38.4%, Fluor (FLR) 48.4%, Phoenix Asia Holdings (PHOE) 378.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ACM, FLR and PHOE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Aecom (ACM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.