ACCL vs BAH vs BWMN Stock Comparison

Acco Group Holdings, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding and Bowman Consulting Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding 8, Bowman Consulting 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionACCLBAHBWMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $69.03M $9.93B $738.25M BAH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 123.1x 12.7x 102.3x BAH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.8x 20.7x BAH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -6.2% +14.2% BWMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.1% 1.3% BAH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.1% 3.8% BAH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 4.4x BAH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.78% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% -8.8% -2.7% BWMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +0.9%/yr +23.5%/yr BWMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 88.2% 42.2% 63.2% BAH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 67/100 54/100 BAH

Percentile Scorecard

ACCLBAHBWMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisACCLBAHBWMN
Valuation 21 #39 of 49 88 #7 of 49 50 #25 of 49
Growth – 65 #13 of 35 82 #7 of 35
Profitability – 84 #6 of 32 52 #16 of 32
Financial Health 90 #7 of 61 28 #44 of 61 27 #45 of 61
Shareholder Returns – 70 #7 of 21 60 #9 of 21
Overall – 67 54
  • ACCL ranked among 64 companies in Business Services
  • BAH ranked among 64 companies in Business Services
  • BWMN ranked among 64 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodACCLBAHBWMNSPY
1 month +4.4%+14.3%+0.6% -0.8%
3 months +24.3%+16.4%+63.3% +3.5%
6 months +86.4%+9.4%+37.8% +7.0%
Year to date -3.7%-1.2%+29.7% +12.2%
1 year -4.7%-8.8%-2.7% +13.0%
3 years —-29.0%+62.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-10.8%+17.6% +23.1%
5 years —+4.6%+186.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+0.9%+23.5% +11.0%
10 years —+169.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+10.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureACCLBAHBWMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 88.2%42.2%63.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.2%42.0%53.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.520.201.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.05-0.21-0.04 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.2%-67.9%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -42.1%-18.5%-3.6% -1.8%
52-week high $4.51$102.23$44.43 $779.14
52-week low $1.30$59.71$25.31 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleACCLBAHBWMN
P/E now vs peer median 123.1xmedian 20.2x 12.7xmedian 20.2x 102.3xmedian 20.2x
P/S now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 1.0x 0.9xmedian 1.0x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.3x 11.7xmedian 12.3x 19.3xmedian 12.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 126.3xmedian 22.6x 10.1xmedian 22.6x 58.8xmedian 22.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 1.7x 8.0xmedian 1.7x 2.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.83 0.30median 1.83 5.88median 1.83

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsACCLBAHBWMN
Revenue – $10.98B $527.60M
Gross profit – $5.77B $281.51M
Operating income – $1.02B $17.72M
Net income – $784.00M $7.38M
Free cash flow – $984.00M $12.56M
EPS (diluted) – $6.56 $0.41
Cash & equivalents $5.63M $334.00M $10.49M
Total debt – $4.41B $759.87M
Shares (diluted) 13.52M 119.59M 16.60M
Enterprise value $53.50M $7.44B $688.43M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricACCLBAHBWMN
P/E 123.1x 12.7x 102.3x
P/FCF 126.3x 10.1x 58.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.2x 31.8x
P/S 13.4x 0.9x 1.4x
P/B 11.6x 8.0x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 11.6x 25.5x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA – 11.7x 19.3x
EV/EBIT – 13.8x 53.8x
EV/Revenue – 1.3x 1.8x
EV/FCF – 14.2x 75.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.0x 41.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.30 5.88

Growth

14 metrics
MetricACCLBAHBWMN
Revenue growth (1Y) – -6.2% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% 19.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -7.8% 15.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.4% 21.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -8.0% 47.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 25.3% 76.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – -5.1% -32.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 38.5% 25.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -2.5% -33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 42.9% 17.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 18.2% -33.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 61.2% 49.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 20.1% -62.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 75.1% 29.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricACCLBAHBWMN
Gross margin – 52.5% 53.4%
EBITDA margin – 10.9% 9.3%
Operating margin – 9.3% 3.4%
Pretax margin – 7.9% 0.7%
Net margin – 7.1% 1.3%
FCF margin – 9.0% 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin – 9.8% 4.4%
Return on equity – 64.1% 2.9%
Return on assets – 9.9% 1.2%
Return on invested capital – 17.1% 3.8%
Return on capital employed – 17.1% 5.2%
Asset turnover – 1.4x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricACCLBAHBWMN
Debt / assets – 53.1% 36.4%
Debt / equity – 3.5x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 4.4x
Debt / FCF – 4.5x 18.0x
Liabilities / assets 23.6% 85.0% 58.6%
Equity / assets 76.4% 15.0% 41.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 4.2x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 3.3x 2.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 3.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 3.35 2.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricACCLBAHBWMN
Dividend yield – 2.8% –
Net buyback yield – 3.4% 3.2%
Shareholder yield – 6.2% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusACCLBAHBWMN
Forward P/E – 12.8xFY2026 20.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.50FY2026 $2.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -0.2%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -0.5% +16.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $11.75BFY2026 $555.17MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.8%FY2026 +27.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +4.1% +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersACCLBAHBWMN
Held by institutions – 96.5% 63.8%
Institutions holding – 557 136
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.0% +3.1%
Institutions buying – 283 78
Institutions selling – 202 36
Buyers to sellers – 1.40 2.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ACCLBAHBWMN
ACCL 1.00 0.08 0.01
BAH 0.08 1.00 0.14
BWMN 0.01 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ACCL, BAH and BWMN?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Acco Group Holdings (ACCL) $69.03M, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) $9.93B, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) $738.25M.

Which stock is cheaper, ACCL, BAH and BWMN?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Acco Group Holdings (ACCL) 123.1x, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.7x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 102.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) is cheapest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.8x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 20.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -6.2%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) has the highest net margin (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 7.1%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) leads (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 17.1%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bowman Consulting (BWMN) returned the most: Acco Group Holdings (ACCL) -4.7%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -8.8%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) -2.7%. Over five years, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) compounded fastest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) +0.9%/yr, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +23.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 2.78%. Acco Group Holdings (ACCL) and Bowman Consulting (BWMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) has been the steadiest (Acco Group Holdings (ACCL) 88.2%, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 42.2%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 63.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ACCL, BAH and BWMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.