ABX vs KKR vs FNV Stock Comparison

Abacus Global Management, Kkr and Franco Nevada Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABX Abacus Global Management, Inc.
$8.62 +6.9% 1M +61.7% 1Y
Market cap
$842.97M
P/E
29.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$267.28M
Div. yield
2.32%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
5 wins
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.
$95.82 +2.8% 1M -19.2% 1Y
Market cap
$86.02B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.31B
Div. yield
0.80%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$231.54 -6.6% 1M +24.2% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.73%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Abacus Global Management leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Abacus Global Management 5, Franco Nevada 4, Kkr 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABXKKRFNVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $842.97M $86.02B $44.64B KKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.1x 28.7x 30.7x KKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.9x 11.2x 29.6x ABX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +65.3% +31.1% +73.6% FNV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.5% 14.0% 62.8% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.0% 6.0% — ABX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 3.5x — ABX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.32% 0.80% 0.73% ABX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +61.7% -19.2% +24.2% ABX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.6%/yr +3.8%/yr +10.2%/yr FNV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.7% 38.2% 39.0% KKR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 59/100 80/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

ABXKKRFNV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABXKKRFNV
Valuation 86 #26 of 181 81 #36 of 181 59 #75 of 181
Growth 95 #7 of 110 79 #24 of 110 91 #11 of 110
Profitability 75 #32 of 127 55 #58 of 127 99 #2 of 127
Financial Health 40 #97 of 162 33 #109 of 162 98 #5 of 162
Shareholder Returns 59 #32 of 76 48 #40 of 76 56 #34 of 76
Overall 71 59 80
  • ABX ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • KKR ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • FNV ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABXKKRFNVSPY
1 month +6.9%+2.8%-6.6% +0.7%
3 months -17.8%-5.2%+4.6% +3.7%
6 months -9.3%-8.2%+0.5% +7.1%
Year to date +0.8%-24.8%+11.7% +12.8%
1 year +61.7%-19.2%+24.2% +11.9%
3 years +41.3%+74.0%+83.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +12.2%+20.3%+22.4% +22.8%
5 years -12.5%+20.3%+62.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year -2.6%+3.8%+10.2% +10.9%
10 years —+560.4%+260.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+20.8%+13.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureABXKKRFNVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.7%38.2%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.1%40.8%42.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.151.451.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.11-0.500.62 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.8%-49.8%-38.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.2%-32.9%-17.5% -1.2%
52-week high $12.00$142.77$280.82 $779.14
52-week low $5.02$83.88$184.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABXKKRFNV
P/E now vs peer median 29.1xmedian 33.5x 28.7xmedian 33.5x 30.7xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 4.9x 4.0xmedian 4.9x 19.3xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 12.0x 12.8xmedian 12.0x 20.2xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 14.3x 36.8xmedian 14.3x 25.2xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.8x 5.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -1.14median 0.97 0.97median 0.97 1.03median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABXKKRFNV
Revenue $267.28M $21.31B $2.32B
Gross profit $236.22M – $1.79B
Operating income $85.02M – $1.82B
Net income $28.20M $5.64B $1.48B
Free cash flow $89.47M $2.34B $1.77B
EPS (diluted) $0.29 $3.16 $7.54
Cash & equivalents $23.39M $21.08B $1.01B
Total debt $330.61M $53.48B –
Shares (diluted) 98.46M 945.58M 193.00M
Enterprise value $657.84M $52.51B $42.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABXKKRFNV
P/E 29.1x 28.7x 30.7x
P/FCF 9.4x 36.8x 25.2x
P/Operating cash flow 9.3x 34.6x 25.1x
P/S 3.2x 4.0x 19.3x
P/B 1.9x 1.1x 5.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 1.2x 5.4x
EV/EBITDA 11.0x 12.8x 20.2x
EV/EBIT 13.5x 12.6x 24.0x
EV/Revenue 4.3x 5.6x 18.8x
EV/FCF 12.9x 50.6x 24.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 47.6x 24.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.14 0.97 1.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABXKKRFNV
Revenue growth (1Y) 65.3% 31.1% 73.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 77.1% 24.2% 23.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 65.6% – 88.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 76.7% – 32.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 152.8% – 89.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.8% – 34.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 2,295% 16.1% 88.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.8% 48.3% 30.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 2,506% 50.9% 87.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.5% 29.7% 29.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 169.9% -47.6% 53.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 81.3% 33.3% 20.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 168.4% -48.8% 83.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 80.8% 32.8% 19.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABXKKRFNV
Gross margin 88.4% – 77.3%
EBITDA margin 39.0% 43.3% 93.0%
Operating margin 31.8% – 78.5%
Pretax margin 17.0% 31.1% 85.0%
Net margin 10.5% 14.0% 62.8%
FCF margin 33.5% 11.0% 76.4%
Operating cash flow margin 34.0% 11.7% 76.7%
Return on equity 6.6% 7.1% 18.1%
Return on assets 3.3% 1.3% 16.7%
Return on invested capital 7.0% 6.0% –
Return on capital employed 11.2% – 20.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.2x 0.4x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 8.6% 3.6% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABXKKRFNV
Debt / assets 38.1% 12.9% –
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 3.5x –
Debt / FCF 3.7x 22.9x –
Liabilities / assets 49.9% 81.3% 7.6%
Equity / assets 50.1% 18.7% 92.4%
Interest coverage 2.2x 3.4x 1,070x
Current ratio 0.7x – 9.4x
Quick ratio 0.6x – 8.5x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 6.9x
Altman Z-score 1.72 – 40.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABXKKRFNV
Dividend yield 2.3% 0.8% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 3.9% 0.3% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 6.2% 1.1% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 11.9% 18.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.6% 15.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.1% 12.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.3% 11.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABXKKRFNV
Forward P/E 8.9xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 29.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.97FY2026 $8.52FY2026 $7.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.8%FY2026 +74.9%FY2026 +40.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.8% -18.9% +8.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $269.54MFY2026 $11.55BFY2026 $2.66BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 +50.8%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.0% +1.9% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABXKKRFNV
Held by institutions 28.7% 60.4% 71.6%
Institutions holding 149 1,267 662
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% +3.8% +0.4%
Institutions buying 79 634 336
Institutions selling 48 458 207
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.38 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABXKKRFNV
ABX 1.00 0.32 0.25
KKR 0.32 1.00 0.12
FNV 0.25 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABX, KKR and FNV?

Kkr (KKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Abacus Global Management (ABX) $842.97M, Kkr (KKR) $86.02B, Franco Nevada (FNV) $44.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, ABX, KKR and FNV?

Kkr (KKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Abacus Global Management (ABX) 29.1x, Kkr (KKR) 28.7x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 30.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Abacus Global Management (ABX) is cheapest (Abacus Global Management (ABX) 8.9x, Kkr (KKR) 11.2x, Franco Nevada (FNV) 29.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Franco Nevada (FNV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Abacus Global Management (ABX) +65.3%, Kkr (KKR) +31.1%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Abacus Global Management (ABX) 10.5%, Kkr (KKR) 14.0%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%). On return on invested capital, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads (Abacus Global Management (ABX) 7.0%, Kkr (KKR) 6.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Abacus Global Management (ABX) returned the most: Abacus Global Management (ABX) +61.7%, Kkr (KKR) -19.2%, Franco Nevada (FNV) +24.2%. Over five years, Franco Nevada (FNV) compounded fastest (Abacus Global Management (ABX) -2.6%/yr, Kkr (KKR) +3.8%/yr, Franco Nevada (FNV) +10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Abacus Global Management (ABX) has the highest dividend yield: Abacus Global Management (ABX) 2.32%, Kkr (KKR) 0.80%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.73%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kkr (KKR) has been the steadiest (Abacus Global Management (ABX) 55.7%, Kkr (KKR) 38.2%, Franco Nevada (FNV) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABX, KKR and FNV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Abacus Global Management (ABX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.