ABVX vs MRNA vs NXTS Stock Comparison

Abivax, Moderna and Nexentis Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABVX Abivax S.A.
$86.50 -5.0% 1M -4.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.04B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$76.25M
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
2 wins
MRNA Moderna, Inc.
$198.85 0.0% 1M +643.6% 1Y
Market cap
$73.27B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.23B
Div. yield
–
Biotechnology Healthcare
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Moderna leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Moderna 6, Abivax 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABVXMRNANXTSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.04B $73.27B $424.47K MRNA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -12.9x -23.3x 0.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -463.2% -27.6% — MRNA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -141.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -74.9% -43.3% — MRNA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.5x 1.6x ABVX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.7% +643.6% -97.9% MRNA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -10.2%/yr -86.1%/yr MRNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.2% 131.0% 169.1% ABVX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 57/100 32/100 MRNA

Percentile Scorecard

ABVXMRNANXTS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABVXMRNANXTS
Valuation 73 #168 of 626 69 #194 of 626 –
Growth 8 #556 of 604 18 #495 of 604 13 #526 of 604
Profitability 26 #414 of 555 57 #242 of 555 40 #333 of 555
Financial Health 82 #122 of 658 55 #299 of 658 44 #372 of 658
Shareholder Returns 89 #41 of 368 85 #56 of 368 –
Overall 56 57 32
  • ABVX ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • MRNA ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NXTS ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABVXMRNANXTSSPY
1 month -5.0%0.0%-61.9% -0.8%
3 months -32.4%+257.5%-66.5% +3.5%
6 months -22.7%+308.3%-88.4% +7.0%
Year to date -35.9%+574.3%-95.2% +12.2%
1 year -4.7%+643.6%-97.9% +13.0%
3 years +832.1%+176.5%-99.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +110.6%+40.4%-89.6% +23.1%
5 years —-41.7%-100.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-10.2%-86.1% +11.0%
10 years ——-100.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-66.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureABVXMRNANXTSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.2%131.0%169.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.2%79.5%153.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.952.142.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.054.91-0.58 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.5%-93.9%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.5%-19.1%-97.8% -1.8%
52-week high $145.31$245.81$26.04 $779.14
52-week low $72.50$22.36$0.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABVXMRNANXTS
P/E now vs peer median -12.9xmedian 17.1x -25.1xmedian 17.1x 0.0xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median -89.1xmedian 8.8x 35.6xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -18.6xmedian 17.1x -24.3xmedian 17.1x 1.5xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -29.5xmedian 18.0x -63.8xmedian 18.0x —median 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 2.1x 11.7xmedian 2.1x 0.2xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 0.39median 0.31 0.00median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABVXMRNANXTS
Revenue -$76.25M $2.23B –
Gross profit – $521.00M –
Operating income -$341.36M -$3.32B -$5.28M
Net income -$467.93M -$3.15B -$14.06M
Free cash flow -$230.23M -$1.24B –
R&D $242.27M $2.88B $532.00K
EPS (diluted) $-6.73 $-7.92 $-17.10
Cash & equivalents $443.17M $1.72B $7.62M
Total debt $156.48K $591.00M $3.22M
Shares (diluted) 69.53M 398.00M 816.14K
Enterprise value $3.68B $52.62B -$22.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABVXMRNANXTS
P/E -12.9x -25.1x 0.0x
P/FCF -29.5x -63.8x –
P/Operating cash flow -29.5x -73.9x –
P/S -89.1x 35.6x –
P/B 16.2x 11.7x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 16.5x 11.7x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA -18.6x -24.3x 1.5x
EV/EBIT -18.5x -22.5x 1.5x
EV/Revenue -82.9x 33.6x –
EV/FCF -27.5x -60.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow -27.5x -69.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.39 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABVXMRNANXTS
Revenue growth (1Y) -463.2% -27.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -40.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -67.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -56.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.2% -1.4% -7.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -103.9% 3.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -120.1% -8.5% -48.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -66.4% -35.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -99.6% -5.8% -567.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -65.1% -45.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.0% 60.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -68.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -55.6% 64.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABVXMRNANXTS
Gross margin – 23.4% –
EBITDA margin – -138.2% –
Operating margin – -149.0% –
Pretax margin – -138.6% –
Net margin – -141.4% –
FCF margin – -55.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 301.6% -48.2% –
Return on equity -102.8% -44.5% -157.0%
Return on assets -81.0% -28.1% -71.9%
Return on invested capital -74.9% -43.3% –
Return on capital employed -68.9% -38.2% -31.5%
Asset turnover -0.1x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue -97.6% 20.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABVXMRNANXTS
Debt / assets 0.0% 5.4% 2.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.5x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 0.0x -0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 20.8% 38.3% 89.8%
Equity / assets 79.2% 61.7% 10.2%
Interest coverage -4.1x – –
Current ratio 6.0x 2.3x 3.7x
Quick ratio 5.7x 2.0x 3.2x
Cash ratio 5.7x 2.0x 3.2x
Altman Z-score 33.72 11.55 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABVXMRNANXTS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABVXMRNANXTS
EPS, next fiscal year $-4.42FY2026 $-7.93FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.07MFY2026 $2.04BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -5.0%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1,467.2% +26.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABVXMRNANXTS
Held by institutions 79.0% 80.2% –
Institutions holding 301 784 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.1% +3.4% –
Institutions buying 189 402 –
Institutions selling 99 238 –
Buyers to sellers 1.91 1.69 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABVXMRNANXTS
ABVX 1.00 0.14 -0.02
MRNA 0.14 1.00 -0.05
NXTS -0.02 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABVX, MRNA and NXTS?

Moderna (MRNA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Abivax (ABVX) $6.04B, Moderna (MRNA) $73.27B, Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) $424.47K.

Which company is growing faster?

Moderna (MRNA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Abivax (ABVX) -463.2%, Moderna (MRNA) -27.6%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Moderna (MRNA) returned the most: Abivax (ABVX) -4.7%, Moderna (MRNA) +643.6%, Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -97.9%. Over five years, Moderna (MRNA) compounded fastest (Moderna (MRNA) -10.2%/yr, Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) -86.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Abivax (ABVX) has been the steadiest (Abivax (ABVX) 91.2%, Moderna (MRNA) 131.0%, Nexentis Technologies (NXTS) 169.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABVX, MRNA and NXTS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Moderna (MRNA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.