ABLV vs WNW vs ODD Stock Comparison

Able View Global, Meiwu Technology and Oddity Tech Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABLV Able View Global Inc.
$2.48 +90.8% 1M +161.1% 1Y
Market cap
$112.61M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
1 win
ODD Oddity Tech Ltd
$21.59 +15.8% 1M -54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.21B
P/E
93.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$679.09M
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Oddity Tech leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Oddity Tech 2, Able View Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABLVWNWODDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $112.61M $46.86M $1.21B ODD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -2.5x 93.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 49.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — -9.7% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 1.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -0.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 50.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +161.1% -98.8% -54.1% ABLV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -90.3%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.8% 238.7% 106.5% ODD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 26/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

ABLVWNWODD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABLVWNWODD
Valuation – 59 #22 of 52 28 #38 of 52
Growth – – 14 #43 of 50
Profitability – – 32 #31 of 45
Financial Health 46 #31 of 56 100 #1 of 56 49 #29 of 56
Shareholder Returns – – 7 #29 of 31
Overall – – 26
  • ABLV ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • WNW ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • ODD ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABLVWNWODDSPY
1 month +90.8%-17.5%+15.8% -0.2%
3 months +185.1%-15.8%+27.1% +3.9%
6 months +211.0%-34.4%+40.1% +8.2%
Year to date +267.1%-98.5%-46.3% +12.9%
1 year +161.1%-98.8%-54.1% +12.3%
3 years -0.4%-100.0%-15.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -0.1%-93.2%-5.4% +23.3%
5 years —-100.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —-90.3%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureABLVWNWODDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.8%238.7%106.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.2%283.5%130.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.271.100.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.21-0.41-0.51 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.5%-100.0%-87.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.5%-99.0%-54.1% -1.2%
52-week high $2.74$215.00$47.05 $779.14
52-week low $0.58$2.06$9.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABLVWNWODD
P/E now vs peer median —median 18.5x -2.5xmedian 18.5x 94.5xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 6.5xmedian 1.6x 1.8xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x —median 12.9x 229.7xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.6x 5.1xmedian 18.6x -51.0xmedian 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x 5.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 —median 0.97 -2.42median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABLVWNWODD
Revenue – – $679.09M
Gross profit – – $475.42M
Operating income – – -$7.74M
Net income – – $15.16M
Free cash flow – – -$24.08M
EPS (diluted) – – $0.21
Cash & equivalents $4.07M $17.88M $167.27M
Total debt $38.52M – $2.29B
Shares (diluted) 49.39M 22.10M 61.64M
Enterprise value $78.05M -$50.86M -$302.96M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABLVWNWODD
P/E – -2.5x 94.5x
P/FCF – 5.1x -51.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – -62.2x
P/S – 6.5x 1.8x
P/B 14.7x 0.9x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 14.7x 2.2x 6.3x
EV/EBITDA – – 229.7x
EV/EBIT – – -203.3x
EV/Revenue – – 2.3x
EV/FCF – – -65.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -79.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -2.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABLVWNWODD
Revenue growth (1Y) – – -9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -13.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 14.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -106.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -28.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – – -86.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -33.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -88.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -39.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -109.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -30.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -111.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -31.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABLVWNWODD
Gross margin – – 70.0%
EBITDA margin – – 1.0%
Operating margin – – -1.1%
Pretax margin – – 3.8%
Net margin – – 1.9%
FCF margin – – -3.5%
Operating cash flow margin – – -2.9%
Return on equity – – 0.8%
Return on assets – – 0.2%
Return on invested capital – – -0.5%
Return on capital employed – – -0.9%
Asset turnover – – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 5.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABLVWNWODD
Debt / assets 34.8% – 57.5%
Debt / equity 1.4x – 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 50.2x
Debt / FCF – – -22.3x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% – 74.0%
Equity / assets 24.7% 100.0% 26.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 15.8x 3.5x
Quick ratio 1.2x 14.3x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 13.6x 1.7x
Altman Z-score – – 2.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABLVWNWODD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -6.6%
Shareholder yield – – -6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABLVWNWODD
Forward P/E – – 49.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $0.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -80.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +154.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $699.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – -13.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABLVWNWODD
Held by institutions – – 67.0%
Institutions holding – – 136
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +3.0%
Institutions buying – – 80
Institutions selling – – 35
Buyers to sellers – – 2.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABLVWNWODD
ABLV 1.00 0.04 0.01
WNW 0.04 1.00 -0.03
ODD 0.01 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABLV, WNW and ODD?

Oddity Tech (ODD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Able View Global (ABLV) $112.61M, Meiwu Technology (WNW) $46.86M, Oddity Tech (ODD) $1.21B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Able View Global (ABLV) returned the most: Able View Global (ABLV) +161.1%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) -98.8%, Oddity Tech (ODD) -54.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Oddity Tech (ODD) has been the steadiest (Able View Global (ABLV) 132.8%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) 238.7%, Oddity Tech (ODD) 106.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABLV, WNW and ODD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Oddity Tech (ODD) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.