ABEV vs CWGL vs STZ Stock Comparison

Ambev, Crimson Wine and Constellation Brands Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ABEV Ambev S.A.
$2.84 -2.4% 1M +29.7% 1Y
Market cap
$45.06B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.68B
Div. yield
–
Brewers Consumer Staples
7 wins
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.15 -6.1% 1M -21.0% 1Y
Market cap
$83.79M
P/E
119.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ambev leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ambev 7, Constellation Brands 3, Crimson Wine 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABEVCWGLSTZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.06B $83.79M $22.26B ABEV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x 119.0x 11.6x STZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x — 11.0x STZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% +1.5% -4.3% ABEV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.8% 1.0% 19.8% STZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% -0.7% 11.8% ABEV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.6x 3.2x ABEV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.7% -21.0% -2.9% ABEV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr -13.9%/yr -8.8%/yr ABEV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 30.6% 31.4% CWGL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 46/100 62/100 ABEV

Percentile Scorecard

ABEVCWGLSTZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABEVCWGLSTZ
Valuation 87 #6 of 38 65 #14 of 38 89 #5 of 38
Growth 31 #23 of 33 25 #25 of 33 22 #26 of 33
Profitability 100 #1 of 31 50 #16 of 31 83 #6 of 31
Financial Health 81 #8 of 38 76 #10 of 38 24 #29 of 38
Shareholder Returns 46 #13 of 23 14 #20 of 23 91 #3 of 23
Overall 69 46 62
  • ABEV ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • STZ ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABEVCWGLSTZSPY
1 month -2.4%-6.1%+19.3% -0.8%
3 months -7.8%+3.8%+4.5% +3.5%
6 months -1.7%-3.9%-12.6% +7.0%
Year to date +15.0%-15.3%-1.7% +12.2%
1 year +29.7%-21.0%-2.9% +13.0%
3 years +16.4%-24.5%-40.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +5.2%-9.0%-16.1% +23.1%
5 years +6.0%-52.6%-36.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.2%-13.9%-8.8% +11.0%
10 years -54.3%-55.5%-18.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year -7.5%-7.8%-2.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureABEVCWGLSTZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%30.6%31.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%34.8%30.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.460.11-0.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.82-0.69-0.09 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.2%-56.9%-58.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.2%-21.0%-18.6% -1.8%
52-week high $3.43$5.25$166.68 $779.14
52-week low $2.18$3.90$112.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABEVCWGLSTZ
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 26.6x 121.4xmedian 26.6x 12.0xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 14.2x 20.3xmedian 14.2x 10.4xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 18.3x -2.7xmedian 18.3x 12.5xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.6x 0.5xmedian 2.6x 2.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 4.09median 2.09 -25.03median 2.09 1.08median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABEVCWGLSTZ
Revenue $16.68B $72.36M $9.70B
Gross profit $8.66B $32.85M $4.85B
Operating income $4.53B -$2.29M $2.78B
Net income $3.16B $704.00K $1.92B
Free cash flow $6.02B -$31.77M $1.84B
EPS (diluted) $0.20 $0.03 $11.28
Cash & equivalents $3.21B $11.84M $98.50M
Total debt $2.67B $36.85M $10.32B
Shares (diluted) 15.68B 20.59M 170.60M
Enterprise value $30.35B $13.45M $21.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABEVCWGLSTZ
P/E 14.1x 121.4x 12.0x
P/FCF 7.4x -2.7x 12.5x
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 9.1x 8.6x
P/S 2.7x 1.2x 2.4x
P/B 2.6x 0.5x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 0.5x 3.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.3x 20.3x 10.4x
EV/EBIT 9.4x -48.3x 11.9x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 1.5x 3.4x
EV/FCF 7.0x -3.5x 18.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.0x 11.7x 12.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.09 -25.03 1.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABEVCWGLSTZ
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% 1.5% -4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.4% 0.9% -2.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.9% -0.3% -2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 0.0% -0.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.0% -199.9% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.5% -59.1% -2.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.2% 143.6% 57.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.6% -6.1% 8.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -14.2% 143.6% 62.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.5% -4.8% 11.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.3% 292.2% -4.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 45.4% -0.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% -1,125% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.9% -71.7% 6.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABEVCWGLSTZ
Gross margin 51.9% 45.4% 50.0%
EBITDA margin 34.6% 7.5% 32.9%
Operating margin 27.1% -3.2% 28.7%
Pretax margin 23.1% 1.5% 25.5%
Net margin 18.8% 1.0% 19.8%
FCF margin 36.1% -43.9% 19.0%
Operating cash flow margin 31.5% 13.0% 27.4%
Return on equity 18.4% 0.4% 23.0%
Return on assets 11.7% 0.3% 9.1%
Return on invested capital 25.3% -0.7% 11.8%
Return on capital employed 23.5% -1.0% 14.6%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 13.4x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.1% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABEVCWGLSTZ
Debt / assets 4.1% 15.6% 46.8%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 4.6x 3.2x
Debt / FCF 0.2x -1.2x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 35.7% 21.2% 59.8%
Equity / assets 64.3% 78.8% 40.2%
Interest coverage 5.7x -1.6x –
Current ratio 1.0x 10.5x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 2.1x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.09 1.31 2.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABEVCWGLSTZ
Dividend yield 1.1% – 3.0%
Net buyback yield 1.2% 0.0% 3.4%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 0.0% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 36.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 38.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABEVCWGLSTZ
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 – 11.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 – $12.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.6%FY2026 – +4.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% – -4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.71BFY2026 – $8.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 – -5.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.1% – +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABEVCWGLSTZ
Held by institutions 6.7% 17.4% 84.4%
Institutions holding 403 5 1,032
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +1.4% +1.3%
Institutions buying 199 2 408
Institutions selling 131 2 449
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.00 0.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABEVCWGLSTZ
ABEV 1.00 -0.02 0.17
CWGL -0.02 1.00 -0.14
STZ 0.17 -0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABEV, CWGL and STZ?

Ambev (ABEV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ambev (ABEV) $45.06B, Crimson Wine (CWGL) $83.79M, Constellation Brands (STZ) $22.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, ABEV, CWGL and STZ?

Constellation Brands (STZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ambev (ABEV) 14.3x, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 119.0x, Constellation Brands (STZ) 11.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Constellation Brands (STZ) is cheapest (Ambev (ABEV) 14.9x, Constellation Brands (STZ) 11.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ambev (ABEV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ambev (ABEV) +4.1%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%, Constellation Brands (STZ) -4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Constellation Brands (STZ) has the highest net margin (Ambev (ABEV) 18.8%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 19.8%). On return on invested capital, Ambev (ABEV) leads (Ambev (ABEV) 25.3%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 11.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ambev (ABEV) returned the most: Ambev (ABEV) +29.7%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -21.0%, Constellation Brands (STZ) -2.9%. Over five years, Ambev (ABEV) compounded fastest (Ambev (ABEV) +1.2%/yr, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -13.9%/yr, Constellation Brands (STZ) -8.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ambev (ABEV) 0.00%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 0.00%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 0.03%. Ambev (ABEV) and Crimson Wine (CWGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crimson Wine (CWGL) has been the steadiest (Ambev (ABEV) 36.0%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.6%, Constellation Brands (STZ) 31.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABEV, CWGL and STZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ambev (ABEV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.