ABAT vs LAR vs LAC Stock Comparison

American Battery Technology, Lithium Argentina AG and Lithium Americas Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LAR Lithium Argentina AG
$4.24 -26.5% 1M +3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$676.05M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$225.80M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
5 wins
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.
$2.08 -28.3% 1M -67.9% 1Y
Market cap
$749.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Lithium Argentina AG leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lithium Argentina AG 5, Lithium Americas 2, American Battery Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionABATLARLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $163.94M $676.05M $749.16M LAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.2x -12.5x -25.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 17.7x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +406.8% +371.3% — ABAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -337.5% -23.9% — LAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -3.4x — LAR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.0% +3.4% -67.9% LAR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -40.9%/yr -15.9%/yr — LAR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.1% 74.6% 67.1% LAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 66/100 — LAR

Percentile Scorecard

ABATLARLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisABATLARLAC
Valuation 13 #141 of 162 71 #48 of 162 92 #14 of 162
Growth 37 #93 of 147 74 #39 of 147 –
Profitability 10 #110 of 122 41 #73 of 122 –
Financial Health 78 #37 of 166 75 #43 of 166 46 #90 of 166
Shareholder Returns 8 #99 of 107 72 #31 of 107 –
Overall 29 66 –
  • ABAT ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LAR ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodABATLARLACSPY
1 month -41.6%-26.5%-28.3% -1.0%
3 months -38.9%-27.4%-26.2% +2.9%
6 months -58.8%-54.5%-55.2% +6.4%
Year to date -59.6%-24.0%-52.3% +11.4%
1 year -76.0%+3.4%-67.9% +13.1%
3 years -75.8%-33.6%-69.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year -37.7%-12.8%-32.4% +21.5%
5 years -92.8%-57.9%— +67.7%
5 years, per year -40.9%-15.9%— +10.9%
10 years -77.5%+244.7%— +255.2%
10 years, per year -13.9%+13.2%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureABATLARLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.1%74.6%67.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 92.1%72.8%66.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.462.622.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.810.05-1.01 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.0%-89.5%-82.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.4%-64.0%-69.0% -2.5%
52-week high $5.98$11.79$6.72 $779.14
52-week low $1.35$3.72$2.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleABATLARLAC
P/E now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 12.7x -12.8xmedian 12.7x -25.9xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 3.1x 3.0xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 6.9x 3.7xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.1xmedian 15.1x -34.5xmedian 15.1x —median 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.1x 0.8xmedian 2.1x 0.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.55median 0.27 0.22median 0.27 —median 0.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsABATLARLAC
Revenue $21.74M $225.80M –
Gross profit -$3.09M $110.90M –
Operating income -$74.71M $256.12M –
Net income -$73.38M -$18.74M -$73.07M
Free cash flow -$37.81M -$19.96M –
R&D $17.87M $4.53M -$1.00K
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $-0.33 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $49.52M $99.72M $822.78M
Total debt $32.00M -$925.15M $1.34B
Shares (diluted) 127.58M 162.17M 401.74M
Enterprise value -$3.68M $235.63M -$1.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricABATLARLAC
P/E -2.3x -12.8x -25.9x
P/FCF -5.1x -34.5x –
P/Operating cash flow -7.9x -34.5x –
P/S 8.8x 3.0x –
P/B 1.5x 0.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 0.8x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA -2.1x 3.7x –
EV/EBIT -2.0x 3.7x –
EV/Revenue 6.9x 1.6x –
EV/FCF -4.0x -17.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -6.2x -17.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.55 0.22 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricABATLARLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 406.8% 371.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 70.8% 32,338% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -77.8% 213.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -49.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -56.9% 48.1% -33.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.0% -17.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 1.2% 95.8% 63.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.3% -57.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.2% 39.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.9% 31.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% 43.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 31.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricABATLARLAC
Gross margin -14.2% 49.1% –
EBITDA margin -320.6% 43.1% –
Operating margin -343.6% 113.4% –
Pretax margin -339.1% -12.2% –
Net margin -337.5% -23.9% –
FCF margin -173.9% -8.8% –
Operating cash flow margin -111.4% -8.8% –
Return on equity -61.7% 1.6% –
Return on assets -58.5% 1.2% –
Return on invested capital – 0.0% –
Return on capital employed -62.4% 6.9% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 213.9% 6.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricABATLARLAC
Debt / assets 6.0% -14.7% 27.9%
Debt / equity 0.1x -0.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x -3.4x –
Debt / FCF -0.2x 8.5x –
Liabilities / assets 4.9% 27.2% 44.9%
Equity / assets 95.1% 72.8% 55.1%
Interest coverage -76.2x 161.6x –
Current ratio 9.5x -2.0x 5.5x
Quick ratio 8.9x -0.7x 3.5x
Cash ratio 7.7x -0.7x 3.5x
Altman Z-score 13.05 1.66 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricABATLARLAC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -40.0% -0.2% –
Shareholder yield -40.0% -0.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusABATLARLAC
Forward P/E – 17.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.24FY2026 $-0.07FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +33.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $0.00FY2026 $0.00FY2026

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersABATLARLAC
Held by institutions 36.6% 33.9% 30.8%
Institutions holding 176 164 274
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.9% +0.6% -0.6%
Institutions buying 102 75 149
Institutions selling 33 48 57
Buyers to sellers 3.09 1.56 2.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ABATLARLAC
ABAT 1.00 0.48 0.67
LAR 0.48 1.00 0.73
LAC 0.67 0.73 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ABAT, LAR and LAC?

Lithium Americas (LAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: American Battery Technology (ABAT) $163.94M, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) $676.05M, Lithium Americas (LAC) $749.16M.

Which company is growing faster?

American Battery Technology (ABAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: American Battery Technology (ABAT) +406.8%, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +371.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) has the highest net margin (American Battery Technology (ABAT) -337.5%, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) returned the most: American Battery Technology (ABAT) -76.0%, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) +3.4%, Lithium Americas (LAC) -67.9%. Over five years, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) compounded fastest (American Battery Technology (ABAT) -40.9%/yr, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) -15.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lithium Americas (LAC) has been the steadiest (American Battery Technology (ABAT) 94.1%, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) 74.6%, Lithium Americas (LAC) 67.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ABAT, LAR and LAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.