AASP vs CNTM vs JFU Stock Comparison

Agassi Sports Entertainment, ConnectM Technology Solutions and 9F Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
JFU 9F Inc.
$2.52 -5.6% 1M -51.7% 1Y
Market cap
$59.34M
P/E
2.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Agassi Sports Entertainment leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Agassi Sports Entertainment 4, 9F 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAASPCNTMJFULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $66.63M $24.87M $59.34M AASP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.8x 10.9x 2.3x JFU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +23.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.3% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.0% -47.1% -51.7% AASP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +49.4%/yr — -38.9%/yr AASP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.6% 132.4% 111.6% AASP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 56/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

AASPCNTMJFU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAASPCNTMJFU
Valuation 4 #119 of 124 85 #20 of 124 99 #2 of 124
Growth 3 #110 of 113 71 #33 of 113 –
Profitability – 55 #50 of 110 –
Financial Health – 12 #114 of 129 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 56 –
  • AASP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • JFU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAASPCNTMJFUSPY
1 month -5.5%-20.0%-5.6% -0.8%
3 months -20.0%-25.7%+26.0% +3.5%
6 months +15.6%-47.2%-18.7% +7.0%
Year to date -12.6%-68.0%-60.6% +12.2%
1 year +4.0%-47.1%-51.7% +13.0%
3 years +2,500.0%-98.8%-16.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +196.5%-77.0%-5.6% +23.1%
5 years +642.9%—-91.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year +49.4%—-38.9% +11.0%
10 years +1,385.7%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +31.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAASPCNTMJFUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.6%132.4%111.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 108.2%132.1%110.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.84-0.101.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.05-0.36-0.46 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.7%-100.0%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.7%-73.8%-70.1% -1.8%
52-week high $7.00$16.00$8.44 $779.14
52-week low $4.00$3.90$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAASPCNTMJFU
P/E now vs peer median -4.8xmedian 38.1x 10.2xmedian 38.1x 2.3xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.3x 0.7xmedian 4.3x 3.1xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.6xmedian 35.4x —median 35.4x —median 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -26.0xmedian 27.1x —median 27.1x 2.0xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 25.8xmedian 3.4x 1.5xmedian 3.4x 0.1xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.27 0.38median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAASPCNTMJFU
Revenue – $36.02M –
Gross profit – $11.16M –
Operating income – -$12.45M –
Net income -$10.28M $2.42M –
Free cash flow -$2.61M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.08 $0.03 –
Cash & equivalents $74.20K $2.39M $62.11M
Total debt – $56.72M –
Shares (diluted) 12.81M 72.32M 11.80M
Enterprise value $65.62M $14.87M -$325.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAASPCNTMJFU
P/E -4.8x 10.2x 2.3x
P/FCF -26.0x – 2.0x
P/Operating cash flow -26.2x – –
P/S – 0.7x 3.1x
P/B 25.8x 1.5x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 191.1x 1.7x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA -6.6x – –
EV/EBIT -6.6x -3.0x –
EV/Revenue – 1.1x –
EV/FCF -26.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -26.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.38 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAASPCNTMJFU
Revenue growth (1Y) – 23.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 35.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 19.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -62.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -272.4% 108.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -465.6% 31.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -282.5% 106.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -375.4% 26.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -262.6% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -224.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -265.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -225.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAASPCNTMJFU
Gross margin – 31.0% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – -34.6% –
Pretax margin – -41.0% –
Net margin – 6.3% –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity -997.3% 27.8% –
Return on assets -388.6% 5.4% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -149.0% –
Asset turnover – 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAASPCNTMJFU
Debt / assets – 31.1% –
Debt / equity – 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 43.7% 70.1% 12.3%
Equity / assets 56.3% 29.9% 87.7%
Interest coverage – -7.6x –
Current ratio – 0.2x –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – -1.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAASPCNTMJFU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAASPCNTMJFU
EPS, next fiscal year – $-3.87FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $76.76MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +114.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.7% –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AASPCNTMJFU
AASP 1.00 -0.04 0.07
CNTM -0.04 1.00 -0.11
JFU 0.07 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AASP, CNTM and JFU?

Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) $66.63M, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $24.87M, 9F (JFU) $59.34M.

Which stock is cheaper, AASP, CNTM and JFU?

9F (JFU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) -4.8x, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 10.9x, 9F (JFU) 2.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) returned the most: Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) +4.0%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -47.1%, 9F (JFU) -51.7%. Over five years, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) compounded fastest (Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) +49.4%/yr, 9F (JFU) -38.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) has been the steadiest (Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) 81.6%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, 9F (JFU) 111.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AASP, CNTM and JFU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Agassi Sports Entertainment (AASP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.