AAQL vs DJT vs SNAP Stock Comparison

Antiaging Quantum Living, Trump Media & Technology and Snap Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SNAP Snap Inc
$5.08 -12.0% 1M -30.4% 1Y
Market cap
$8.27B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.35B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Snap leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Snap 6, Antiaging Quantum Living 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAQLDJTSNAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.62M $1.11B $8.27B SNAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -33.8x -0.8x -26.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +62.4% +21.6% +12.6% AAQL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.4% -28,860.4% -4.9% SNAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -45.0% -5.8% SNAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -0.3x -5.9x SNAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.0% -71.6% -30.4% AAQL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.2%/yr -41.1%/yr -37.5%/yr AAQL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 179.6% 75.8% 61.2% SNAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 25/100 56/100 SNAP

Percentile Scorecard

AAQLDJTSNAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAQLDJTSNAP
Valuation 14 #143 of 166 13 #145 of 166 47 #89 of 166
Growth 37 #98 of 154 24 #117 of 154 85 #24 of 154
Profitability 11 #137 of 154 13 #134 of 154 33 #104 of 154
Financial Health 17 #149 of 179 19 #146 of 179 41 #106 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 57 #42 of 97 75 #25 of 97
Overall 20 25 56
  • AAQL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DJT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • SNAP ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAQLDJTSNAPSPY
1 month +98.0%-53.5%-12.0% -5.9%
3 months +65.6%-59.4%-2.5% -4.6%
6 months +62.9%-55.4%-15.1% +0.2%
Year to date +68.3%-69.6%-37.1% +7.5%
1 year +1.0%-71.6%-30.4% +8.2%
3 years -7.3%-73.3%-52.7% +68.3%
3 years, per year -2.5%-35.6%-22.1% +19.0%
5 years +140.5%-92.9%-90.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year +19.2%-41.1%-37.5% +9.4%

Risk

MeasureAAQLDJTSNAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 179.6%75.8%61.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 580.3%78.1%63.1% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.051.932.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.95-0.50 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.5%-95.9%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-75.0%-44.1% -5.9%
52-week high $1.01$16.09$9.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.45$4.02$3.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAQLDJTSNAP
P/E now vs peer median -33.8xmedian 18.0x -0.9xmedian 18.0x -27.2xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 1.3x 247.2xmedian 1.3x 1.4xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -38.4xmedian 15.5x -1.5xmedian 15.5x -65.0xmedian 15.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -55.9xmedian 11.4x 131.6xmedian 11.4x 12.4xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median -34.8xmedian 1.7x 1.1xmedian 1.7x 4.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 0.38 0.01median 0.38 -0.69median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAQLDJTSNAP
Revenue $1.47M $4.52M $6.35B
Gross profit $780.28K $1.52M $3.64B
Operating income -$1.02M -$946.99M -$323.82M
Net income -$1.02M -$1.30B -$311.24M
Free cash flow -$619.31K $8.49M $705.55M
R&D – $33.78M $1.95B
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $-4.70 $-0.19
Cash & equivalents $608.10K $215.46M $958.85M
Total debt $987.46K $970.32M $3.53B
Shares (diluted) 34.28M 277.28M 1.66B
Enterprise value $32.11M -$1.62B -$3.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAQLDJTSNAP
P/E -33.8x -0.9x -27.2x
P/FCF -55.9x 131.6x 12.4x
P/Operating cash flow -75.6x 131.2x 9.5x
P/S 23.5x 247.2x 1.4x
P/B -34.8x 1.1x 4.5x
P/Tangible book -34.8x 1.1x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA -38.4x -1.5x -65.0x
EV/EBIT -34.3x -1.5x -29.8x
EV/Revenue 23.8x 308.0x 1.5x
EV/FCF -56.5x 164.0x 13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -76.4x 163.4x 10.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 0.01 -0.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAQLDJTSNAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 62.4% 21.6% 12.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 391.6% – 12.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 69.1% -40.2% 20.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 297.7% – 11.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -42.8% -522.7% 50.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -182.5% -193.3% 39.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -59.8% -1,101% 43.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -182.7% -247.3% 38.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -39.9% -941.6% 42.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -170.4% -77.8% 39.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.4% 122.6% 56.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -107.1% 31.6% 54.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.6% 120.6% 79.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -129.0% 31.6% 105.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAQLDJTSNAP
Gross margin 53.0% 33.7% 57.3%
EBITDA margin -61.8% -20,789% -2.3%
Operating margin -69.3% -20,956% -5.1%
Pretax margin -68.7% -28,859% -4.9%
Net margin -69.4% -28,860% -4.9%
FCF margin -42.0% 187.8% 11.1%
Operating cash flow margin -31.1% 188.4% 14.5%
Return on equity – -114.7% -15.5%
Return on assets -41.1% -61.3% -4.2%
Return on invested capital – -45.0% -5.8%
Return on capital employed – -83.5% -5.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.0x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 0.0x -3.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 962.7% 16.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAQLDJTSNAP
Debt / assets 30.3% 48.1% 47.3%
Debt / equity -1.0x 0.9x 1.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x -0.3x -5.9x
Debt / FCF -1.6x 114.3x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 130.5% 49.3% 74.2%
Equity / assets -30.5% 50.7% 25.8%
Interest coverage – -20.5x -2.2x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.0x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x 2.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.7x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 3.02 -3.88 -0.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAQLDJTSNAP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 4.0% 9.7%
Shareholder yield – 4.0% 9.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAQLDJTSNAP
EPS, next fiscal year – – $-0.05FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $7.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +19.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -0.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAQLDJTSNAP
Held by institutions – 23.0% 37.8%
Institutions holding – 325 536
Change in shares held, QoQ – +11.5% -2.3%
Institutions buying – 143 254
Institutions selling – 72 177
Buyers to sellers – 1.99 1.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAQLDJTSNAP
AAQL 1.00 -0.18 -0.01
DJT -0.18 1.00 0.33
SNAP -0.01 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAQL, DJT and SNAP?

Snap (SNAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) $34.62M, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) $1.11B, Snap (SNAP) $8.27B.

Which company is growing faster?

Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +62.4%, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) +21.6%, Snap (SNAP) +12.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Snap (SNAP) has the highest net margin (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -69.4%, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) -28,860.4%, Snap (SNAP) -4.9%). On return on invested capital, Snap (SNAP) leads (Trump Media & Technology (DJT) -45.0%, Snap (SNAP) -5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) returned the most: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +1.0%, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) -71.6%, Snap (SNAP) -30.4%. Over five years, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) compounded fastest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +19.2%/yr, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) -41.1%/yr, Snap (SNAP) -37.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Snap (SNAP) has been the steadiest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) 179.6%, Trump Media & Technology (DJT) 75.8%, Snap (SNAP) 61.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAQL, DJT and SNAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Snap (SNAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.