AAQL vs BILI vs MOMO Stock Comparison

Antiaging Quantum Living, Bilibili and Hello Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BILI Bilibili Inc.
$12.90 -14.8% 1M -59.2% 1Y
Market cap
$10.81B
P/E
49.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
1 win
MOMO Hello Group Inc.
$4.47 -8.8% 1M -34.4% 1Y
Market cap
$729.52M
P/E
4.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.45B
Div. yield
6.26%
Social Media Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hello leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Hello 8, Antiaging Quantum Living 2, Bilibili 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAAQLBILIMOMOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.48M $10.81B $729.52M BILI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -17.1x 49.4x 4.6x MOMO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.0x 5.8x MOMO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +62.4% +10.2% -0.2% AAQL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.4% 4.9% 11.0% MOMO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.9% 10.8% MOMO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x — -5.3x MOMO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 6.26% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -48.5% -59.2% -34.4% MOMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.5%/yr -29.4%/yr -18.5%/yr AAQL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 120.5% 46.4% 28.6% MOMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 17/100 55/100 64/100 MOMO

Percentile Scorecard

AAQLBILIMOMO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAAQLBILIMOMO
Valuation 12 #146 of 166 34 #110 of 166 98 #5 of 166
Growth 36 #97 of 152 87 #20 of 152 27 #112 of 152
Profitability 10 #137 of 152 54 #70 of 152 74 #40 of 152
Financial Health 11 #159 of 179 45 #99 of 179 93 #14 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 27 #69 of 94
Overall 17 55 64
  • AAQL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BILI ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MOMO ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAAQLBILIMOMOSPY
1 month -12.1%-14.8%-8.8% +0.9%
3 months -16.4%-30.4%-23.9% +5.9%
6 months -17.7%-39.9%-26.4% +8.5%
Year to date -15.0%-47.5%-31.8% +13.3%
1 year -48.5%-59.2%-34.4% +12.4%
3 years -53.6%-3.0%-36.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year -22.6%-1.0%-14.0% +23.5%
5 years +24.4%-82.4%-64.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +4.5%-29.4%-18.5% +11.0%
10 years ——-82.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——-16.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureAAQLBILIMOMOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 120.5%46.4%28.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 451.4%47.6%30.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.171.480.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-1.28-1.20 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.5%-90.0%-69.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.0%-64.1%-36.7% -0.9%
52-week high $1.00$35.92$7.06 $779.14
52-week low $0.51$12.90$4.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAAQLBILIMOMO
P/E now vs peer median -17.1xmedian 16.8x 49.4xmedian 16.8x 4.6xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 1.4x 2.4xmedian 1.4x 0.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -19.6xmedian 13.9x —median 13.9x -1.4xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.2xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x 2.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median -17.6xmedian 1.8x 4.6xmedian 1.8x 0.5xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 0.36 1.59median 0.36 -0.59median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAAQLBILIMOMO
Revenue $1.47M $4.49B $1.45B
Gross profit $780.28K $1.66B $541.64M
Operating income -$1.02M $199.33M $172.29M
Net income -$1.02M $232.09M $160.51M
Free cash flow -$619.31K – $283.31M
R&D – $537.35M $109.35M
EPS (diluted) $-0.03 $0.25 $0.95
Cash & equivalents $608.10K $760.10M $966.60M
Total debt $3.49M $2.12B $366.04M
Shares (diluted) 34.28M 888.05M 169.30M
Enterprise value $14.98M $1.27B -$2.44B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAAQLBILIMOMO
P/E -17.1x 49.4x 4.6x
P/FCF -28.2x – 2.6x
P/Operating cash flow -38.2x – 3.4x
P/S 11.9x 2.4x 0.5x
P/B -17.6x 4.6x 0.5x
P/Tangible book -17.6x 5.6x 0.5x
EV/EBITDA -19.6x – -1.4x
EV/EBIT -17.5x 54.1x -1.5x
EV/Revenue 12.1x 2.4x -0.2x
EV/FCF -28.8x – -0.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -39.0x – -1.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 1.59 -0.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAAQLBILIMOMO
Revenue growth (1Y) 62.4% 10.2% -0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 391.6% 11.9% -6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 69.1% 13.6% -1.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 297.7% 35.6% -9.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -42.8% 341.5% -8.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -182.5% 30.1% -15.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -59.8% 733.2% 34.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -182.7% 32.0% -14.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -39.9% 239.4% 47.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -170.4% 31.1% -7.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 47.4% – 24.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -107.1% – -12.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.6% – 50.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -129.0% – -4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAAQLBILIMOMO
Gross margin 53.0% 37.0% 37.3%
EBITDA margin -61.8% – 12.8%
Operating margin -69.3% 4.4% 11.9%
Pretax margin -68.7% 4.9% 14.6%
Net margin -69.4% 4.9% 11.0%
FCF margin -42.0% – 19.5%
Operating cash flow margin -31.1% – 14.9%
Return on equity – 10.1% 15.9%
Return on assets -41.1% 3.8% 12.8%
Return on invested capital – 4.9% 10.8%
Return on capital employed – 6.7% 10.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAAQLBILIMOMO
Debt / assets 30.3% 33.9% 0.0%
Debt / equity -1.0x 0.9x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x – -5.3x
Debt / FCF -1.6x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 130.5% 62.5% 18.5%
Equity / assets -30.5% 37.5% 81.5%
Interest coverage – 8.8x 66.5x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x 5.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.8x 3.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.7x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 0.61 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAAQLBILIMOMO
Dividend yield – – 6.3%
Net buyback yield – – -16.2%
Shareholder yield – – -10.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAAQLBILIMOMO
Forward P/E – 13.0xFY2026 5.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.99FY2026 $0.77FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +17.9%FY2026 +13.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +35.4% +9.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.23BFY2026 $1.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +20.6%FY2026 -6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.8% +15.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAAQLBILIMOMO
Held by institutions – 3.2% 40.1%
Institutions holding – 155 156
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.0% +5.6%
Institutions buying – 92 77
Institutions selling – 44 52
Buyers to sellers – 2.09 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AAQLBILIMOMO
AAQL 1.00 0.00 -0.03
BILI 0.00 1.00 0.37
MOMO -0.03 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AAQL, BILI and MOMO?

Bilibili (BILI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) $17.48M, Bilibili (BILI) $10.81B, Hello (MOMO) $729.52M.

Which stock is cheaper, AAQL, BILI and MOMO?

Hello (MOMO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -17.1x, Bilibili (BILI) 49.4x, Hello (MOMO) 4.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hello (MOMO) is cheapest (Bilibili (BILI) 13.0x, Hello (MOMO) 5.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +62.4%, Bilibili (BILI) +10.2%, Hello (MOMO) -0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hello (MOMO) has the highest net margin (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -69.4%, Bilibili (BILI) 4.9%, Hello (MOMO) 11.0%). On return on invested capital, Hello (MOMO) leads (Bilibili (BILI) 4.9%, Hello (MOMO) 10.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hello (MOMO) returned the most: Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -48.5%, Bilibili (BILI) -59.2%, Hello (MOMO) -34.4%. Over five years, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) compounded fastest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +4.5%/yr, Bilibili (BILI) -29.4%/yr, Hello (MOMO) -18.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Hello (MOMO) 6.26%. Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) and Bilibili (BILI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hello (MOMO) has been the steadiest (Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) 120.5%, Bilibili (BILI) 46.4%, Hello (MOMO) 28.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AAQL, BILI and MOMO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hello (MOMO) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.