AACG vs EDU vs LRN Stock Comparison

ATA Creativity Global, New Oriental Education & Technology and Stride Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AACG ATA Creativity Global
$0.73 -16.1% 1M -44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$37.51M
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
LRN Stride, Inc.
$78.52 -0.1% 1M -48.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.38B
P/E
10.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.54B
Div. yield
–
Education Services Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

New Oriental Education & Technology leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (New Oriental Education & Technology 7, Stride 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAACGEDULRNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.96M $9.14B $3.38B EDU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.3x 19.2x 10.1x LRN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.5x 9.3x LRN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.2% +15.5% +2.5% EDU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -17.9% 8.4% — EDU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -76.1% 13.8% — EDU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -44.7% -2.8% -48.4% EDU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.4%/yr +22.3%/yr +18.3%/yr EDU
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.4% 35.2% 89.7% EDU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 68/100 77/100 LRN

Percentile Scorecard

AACGEDULRN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAACGEDULRN
Valuation 25 #25 of 33 72 #10 of 33 78 #8 of 33
Growth 24 #23 of 30 76 #8 of 30 55 #14 of 30
Profitability 18 #24 of 29 71 #9 of 29 82 #6 of 29
Financial Health 13 #34 of 39 68 #13 of 39 92 #4 of 39
Shareholder Returns – 54 #7 of 14 –
Overall 20 68 77
  • AACG ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • EDU ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • LRN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAACGEDULRNSPY
1 month -16.1%+3.4%-0.1% -0.8%
3 months -20.7%+16.9%-12.8% +3.5%
6 months -39.2%+11.7%-19.7% +7.0%
Year to date -7.6%+6.1%+20.9% +12.2%
1 year -44.7%-2.8%-48.4% +13.0%
3 years -24.0%-9.4%+44.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -8.7%-3.3%+13.0% +23.1%
5 years -68.0%+172.9%+132.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -20.4%+22.3%+18.3% +11.0%
10 years -79.6%+11.4%+575.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year -14.7%+1.1%+21.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAACGEDULRNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.4%35.2%89.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.8%33.4%121.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.270.14-0.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.51-0.08-0.54 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.1%-62.9%-64.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.9%-8.0%-48.9% -1.8%
52-week high $1.40$63.51$153.53 $779.14
52-week low $0.64$44.44$61.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAACGEDULRN
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 15.5x 19.4xmedian 15.5x 10.0xmedian 15.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x 1.3xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 10.1x —median 10.1x —median 10.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.7xmedian 14.7x 8.8xmedian 14.7x 7.2xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 2.0x 2.1xmedian 2.0x 1.9xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -1.31median 0.35 0.46median 0.35 0.40median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAACGEDULRN
Revenue $37.51M $5.66B $2.54B
Gross profit $11.16B $634.59M $949.60M
Operating income -$8.96M $643.25M $466.05M
Net income $325.78M $516.66M $334.31M
Free cash flow – $1.03B –
R&D $328.76M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.21 $3.01 $7.06
Cash & equivalents $12.18M $1.82B $547.75M
Total debt $6.52M $1.08B –
Shares (diluted) 31.70M 157.85M 47.33M
Enterprise value -$14.04M -$2.01B $3.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAACGEDULRN
P/E -3.5x 19.4x 10.0x
P/FCF 32.7x 8.8x 7.2x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.8x 6.5x
P/S 0.6x 1.6x 1.3x
P/B 5.1x 2.1x 1.9x
P/Tangible book -374.9x 2.1x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -1.5x 10.2x –
EV/Revenue 0.4x 1.2x 1.3x
EV/FCF – 6.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 6.4x 6.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.31 0.46 0.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAACGEDULRN
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.2% 15.5% 2.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 23.6% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.8% 1,976,824% -2.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 28.1% 11.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -49.3% 50.2% 22.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.3% 50.1% 33.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 6,569% 37.5% 5.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 259.8% 30.0% 29.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -32.3% 32.1% 10.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.6% 42.0% 25.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.6% 33.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% 33.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAACGEDULRN
Gross margin 29,757% 11.2% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -23.9% 11.4% –
Pretax margin -19.2% 11.4% –
Net margin -17.9% 8.4% –
FCF margin – 18.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 18.1% 19.9%
Return on equity 5,070% 11.8% 20.3%
Return on assets 528.3% 6.1% 13.5%
Return on invested capital -76.1% 13.8% –
Return on capital employed -72.2% 13.9% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.0x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAACGEDULRN
Debt / assets 3.9% 3.2% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 92.2% 50.8% 33.9%
Equity / assets 7.8% 49.2% 66.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.3x 1.5x 2.6x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score -1.92 2.69 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAACGEDULRN
Dividend yield – 2.1% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAACGEDULRN
Forward P/E – 12.5xFY2026 9.3xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.68FY2026 $8.42FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +31.1%FY2026 +17.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – +11.8% -6.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $6.34BFY2026 $2.42BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.1%FY2026 -3.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – +10.6% +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAACGEDULRN
Held by institutions 0.5% 31.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 8 170 410
Change in shares held, QoQ -13.5% -5.3% +1.2%
Institutions buying 2 80 212
Institutions selling 3 65 135
Buyers to sellers 0.67 1.23 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AACGEDULRN
AACG 1.00 -0.09 -0.01
EDU -0.09 1.00 0.13
LRN -0.01 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AACG, EDU and LRN?

New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) is the largest by market capitalisation: ATA Creativity Global (AACG) $21.96M, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) $9.14B, Stride (LRN) $3.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, AACG, EDU and LRN?

Stride (LRN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ATA Creativity Global (AACG) -3.3x, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) 19.2x, Stride (LRN) 10.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Stride (LRN) is cheapest (New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) 12.5x, Stride (LRN) 9.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ATA Creativity Global (AACG) +0.2%, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) +15.5%, Stride (LRN) +2.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) has the highest net margin (ATA Creativity Global (AACG) -17.9%, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) 8.4%). On return on invested capital, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) leads (ATA Creativity Global (AACG) -76.1%, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) 13.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) returned the most: ATA Creativity Global (AACG) -44.7%, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) -2.8%, Stride (LRN) -48.4%. Over five years, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) compounded fastest (ATA Creativity Global (AACG) -20.4%/yr, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) +22.3%/yr, Stride (LRN) +18.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) has been the steadiest (ATA Creativity Global (AACG) 87.4%, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) 35.2%, Stride (LRN) 89.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AACG, EDU and LRN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, New Oriental Education & Technology (EDU) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.