A vs TMO vs DHR Stock Comparison

Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Danaher Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
A Agilent Technologies, Inc.
$175.96 +1.8% 1M +18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$50.15B
P/E
34.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.37B
Div. yield
0.01%
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
7 wins
DHR Danaher Corp /De/
$232.95 +3.7% 1M +4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$163.62B
P/E
40.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.11B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Agilent Technologies leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Agilent Technologies 7, Thermo Fisher Scientific 3, Danaher 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATMODHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $50.15B $257.69B $163.62B TMO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.8x 36.4x 40.9x A
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.9x 26.4x 25.6x DHR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.6% +8.3% +4.6% A
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.5% — 15.9% A
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.1% — 5.7% A
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x — 2.9x A
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.9% +19.6% +4.5% TMO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.5%/yr +2.3%/yr -5.3%/yr A
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.4% 29.9% 30.7% TMO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 51/100 59/100 A

Percentile Scorecard

ATMODHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATMODHR
Valuation 58 #97 of 228 49 #116 of 228 67 #75 of 228
Growth 36 #141 of 221 40 #133 of 221 21 #176 of 221
Profitability 91 #20 of 208 70 #63 of 208 88 #26 of 208
Financial Health 55 #108 of 239 – 46 #130 of 239
Shareholder Returns 71 #40 of 137 44 #77 of 137 76 #34 of 137
Overall 62 51 59
  • A ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • TMO ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DHR ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATMODHRSPY
1 month +1.8%+1.7%+3.7% -0.8%
3 months +27.6%+22.4%+18.5% +3.5%
6 months +52.2%+46.3%+29.0% +7.0%
Year to date +29.3%+18.2%+1.8% +12.2%
1 year +18.9%+19.6%+4.5% +13.0%
3 years +71.2%+58.7%+24.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +19.6%+16.7%+7.4% +23.1%
5 years +13.3%+11.8%-23.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.5%+2.3%-5.3% +11.0%
10 years +305.7%+362.6%+199.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year +15.0%+16.6%+11.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureATMODHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.4%29.9%30.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.5%28.3%31.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.880.620.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.580.660.15 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.6%-41.5%-50.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.0%-1.7%-3.8% -1.8%
52-week high $177.72$696.55$242.05 $779.14
52-week low $110.24$438.34$161.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATMODHR
P/E now vs peer median 34.5xmedian 30.6x 35.9xmedian 30.6x 41.0xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 3.0x 5.3xmedian 3.0x 6.5xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x 24.3xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 39.2xmedian 23.3x 34.0xmedian 23.3x 30.0xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 2.4x 4.6xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 3.51median 0.87 4.74median 0.87 -3.28median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATMODHR
Revenue $7.37B $47.35B $25.11B
Gross profit $3.97B – $14.69B
Operating income $1.64B $8.47B $5.13B
Net income $1.44B $7.09B $4.00B
Free cash flow $1.27B – $5.47B
R&D $485.00M $1.40B $1.62B
EPS (diluted) $5.09 $19.06 $5.66
Cash & equivalents $1.76B $5.46B $4.35B
Total debt $3.95B – $26.56B
Shares (diluted) 283.00M 371.00M 707.60M
Enterprise value $43.03B $257.69B $147.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATMODHR
P/E 34.5x 35.9x 41.0x
P/FCF 39.2x 34.0x 30.0x
P/Operating cash flow 30.8x 27.2x 24.7x
P/S 6.7x 5.3x 6.5x
P/B 6.7x 4.6x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 7.7x 6.9x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 27.1x – 24.3x
EV/EBIT 31.6x – 36.3x
EV/Revenue 7.0x 5.3x 7.4x
EV/FCF 40.9x – 34.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.2x 27.2x 28.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.51 4.74 -3.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATMODHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.6% 8.3% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 2.9% -0.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.2% – 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.7% – -0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.5% 12.8% 16.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 7.2% -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 18.0% 7.9% 17.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 6.2% -14.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.9% 9.7% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 7.6% -12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.6% 21.9% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.9% 4.5% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.5% – 12.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.7% – -9.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATMODHR
Gross margin 53.8% – 58.5%
EBITDA margin 25.9% – 30.5%
Operating margin 22.2% – 20.4%
Pretax margin 22.5% – 19.0%
Net margin 19.5% – 15.9%
FCF margin 17.2% – 21.8%
Operating cash flow margin 21.8% 19.7% 26.4%
Return on equity 19.9% 13.2% 7.6%
Return on assets 10.7% 6.2% 4.5%
Return on invested capital 13.1% – 5.7%
Return on capital employed 14.6% – 6.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.3x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATMODHR
Debt / assets 28.3% – 28.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x – 2.9x
Debt / FCF 3.1x – 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 47.3% – 43.1%
Equity / assets 52.7% 47.9% 56.9%
Interest coverage 15.5x – 17.6x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.8x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.4x – 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.8x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score 5.82 – 3.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATMODHR
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.3% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.6% – 1.8%
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.3% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 22.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATMODHR
Forward P/E 26.9xFY2026 26.4xFY2026 25.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.54FY2026 $25.91FY2026 $9.11FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +17.0%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.3% +2.0% +8.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.87BFY2026 $50.12BFY2026 $27.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +9.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.6% -2.8% -1.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATMODHR
Held by institutions 92.6% 90.2% 81.9%
Institutions holding 1,122 2,621 2,115
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% +0.8% +1.1%
Institutions buying 599 1,141 837
Institutions selling 350 1,144 1,015
Buyers to sellers 1.71 1.00 0.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATMODHR
A 1.00 0.73 0.60
TMO 0.73 1.00 0.72
DHR 0.60 0.72 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, A, TMO and DHR?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Agilent Technologies (A) $50.15B, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) $257.69B, Danaher (DHR) $163.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, A, TMO and DHR?

Agilent Technologies (A) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Agilent Technologies (A) 34.8x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 36.4x, Danaher (DHR) 40.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Danaher (DHR) is cheapest (Agilent Technologies (A) 26.9x, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 26.4x, Danaher (DHR) 25.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Agilent Technologies (A) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Agilent Technologies (A) +8.6%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +8.3%, Danaher (DHR) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Agilent Technologies (A) has the highest net margin (Agilent Technologies (A) 19.5%, Danaher (DHR) 15.9%). On return on invested capital, Agilent Technologies (A) leads (Agilent Technologies (A) 13.1%, Danaher (DHR) 5.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) returned the most: Agilent Technologies (A) +18.9%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +19.6%, Danaher (DHR) +4.5%. Over five years, Agilent Technologies (A) compounded fastest (Agilent Technologies (A) +2.5%/yr, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) +2.3%/yr, Danaher (DHR) -5.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Agilent Technologies (A) 0.01%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 0.00%, Danaher (DHR) 0.00%. Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) and Danaher (DHR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) has been the steadiest (Agilent Technologies (A) 32.4%, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) 29.9%, Danaher (DHR) 30.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, A, TMO and DHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Agilent Technologies (A) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.