Vishay Intertechnology Inc (VSH) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Vishay Intertechnology

NYSE: VSH

$41.83 ▼ -0.11 (-0.27%)

At close: Jul 14, 2026 · 2:28 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap6.97 Bn

P/E-32.18

P/S2.18

Div. Yield0.01

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)983.09 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)17.34

Add ratio to table…

About

Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. manufactures one of the world’s largest portfolios of discrete semiconductors and passive electronic components that support innovative designs in the automotive, industrial, computing, consumer, telecommunications, military, aerospace, and healthcare markets. The company’s products include MOSFETs, diodes, optoelectronic components, resistors, inductors, and capacitors. Vishay serves customers worldwide under the brand promise of The DNA of tech.®

Vishay generates revenue by selling its semiconductor and passive component products to original equipment manufacturers, electronic manufacturing services providers, and independent distributors. The company’s product mix consists of commodity, certified, and custom items, with commodity products representing approximately 26% of total revenue, certified products about 48%, and custom products around 26% for 2025. Sales are driven by demand for power control, signal processing, energy storage, and connectivity solutions across multiple end markets.

The company operates through the following segments.

• MOSFETs: This segment provides metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors used for power control, power conversion, and power management in applications such as mobile phones, computers, televisions, solar inverters, and automotive and industrial systems. Vishay is a leader in low voltage TrenchFET and high voltage MOSFETs, offering products that serve both commodity and non commodity markets.

• Diodes: This segment offers diodes that route, regulate, and block radio frequency, analog, and power signals; protect systems from surges or electrostatic discharge damage; and provide electromagnetic interference filtering. Vishay holds a leading position in rectifiers, TVS diodes, and protection diodes, serving automotive, industrial, computing, and consumer markets with products that span commodity, certified, and custom categories.

• Optoelectronic Components: This segment supplies infrared emitters and detectors, optocouplers, solid state relays, optical sensors, light emitting diodes, seven segment displays, and infrared data transceiver modules. Vishay is a leading manufacturer of infrared remote control receivers and optocouplers, with products used in telecommunications, consumer electronics, solar inverters, and industrial systems, and all offerings are classified as either certified or custom.

• Resistors: This segment provides a broad range of resistor products that impede electric current and adjust voltage and current levels in electronic circuitry. Vishay maintains a leadership position in wire wound power shunts, leaded and thin film SMD resistors, power inductors, wet and polymer tantalum capacitors, and offers products ranging from commodity to custom with a strong focus on precision and specialty applications.

• Inductors: This segment manufactures inductors that impede electric current by using an internal magnetic field to change alternating current phase and resist alternating current. Vishay is a market leader with its patented IHLP low profile high current inductor technology, serving automotive, industrial, military, and healthcare markets with products that are predominantly certified or custom.

• Capacitors: This segment produces capacitors that store and discharge energy for filtering, timing, and conditioning applications across electronic circuits. Vishay holds a strong position in wet tantalum and MicroTan technologies, offering a product range from tiny surface mount devices to large power correction capacitors used in renewable energy, heavy industry, and electrical power grids, with most products classified as certified or custom.

Vishay holds a global technology leadership position in several product categories, including wire wound power shunts, leaded and thin film SMD resistors, power inductors, wet and polymer tantalum capacitors, power rectifiers, low voltage power MOSFETs, and infrared components. The company faces competition from firms such as Infineon, Nexperia, ON Semiconductor, Renesas, STMicroelectronics, and Toshiba in MOSFETs; Diodes Inc., Nexperia, ON Semiconductor, Rohm, and STMicroelectronics in diodes; Broadcom, ON Semiconductor, Renesas, and Toshiba in optoelectronics; Bourns, KOA, Murata, Panasonic, Rohm, TDK EPCOS, and Yageo in resistors; Bourns, Cyntec, Murata, Panasonic, Taiyo Yuden, TDK EPCOS, and Yageo in inductors; and Kyocera, Murata, Nichicon, Panasonic, Taiyo Yuden, TDK EPCOS, and Yageo in capacitors. Vishay’s competitive advantages stem from its broad product portfolio, strong research and development capabilities, extensive global manufacturing footprint, and long standing customer relationships that enable it to act as a reliable second source supplier.

Vishay sells its products to original equipment manufacturers, electronic manufacturing services companies, and independent distributors that maintain large inventories of electronic components for resale. The company’s top 30 customers account for approximately 74% of total net revenue, with no single customer exceeding 10% of sales in 2025. This diversified base spans the automotive, industrial, computing, consumer, telecommunications, military, aerospace, and healthcare sectors.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Vishay Intertechnology is positioned to capitalize on strong secular tailwinds in AI, automotive electrification, and industrial automation, with management explicitly stating that AI data center exposure will be "well above" last year's sub-$100 million level and expecting over 20% AI segment growth in 2026, a figure that significantly exceeds the high single-digit overall industry growth rate they cited and suggests a disproportionate contribution to revenue acceleration. The company’s book-to-bill ratio of 1.34 overall and 1.47 for semiconductors reflects not just cyclical recovery but structural demand strength, as customers are placing proactive orders with 1-year forecasts and building safety stock for AI and automotive applications—behavior indicative of sustained confidence in Vishay’s supply reliability rather than temporary panic buying. This is further validated by distribution point-of-sale growing 10.7% sequentially and 24.9% year-over-year, confirming that end-customer demand is genuinely expanding beyond channel inventory adjustments. The strategic emphasis on "moving closer to customers" through increased FAE engagement and reference designs is already yielding tangible wins, including new grid projects in Europe and top-supplier status for resistors in multiple EV platforms, which creates switching costs and deepens relationships that insulate Vishay from pure-play commodity pressures. The completion of four tier-one automotive site audits at Newport with two more planned for Q2, coupled with the targeted mid-2027 production ramp at the German 12-inch fab, signals that capacity investments are aligning precisely with qualification timelines for high-margin automotive power semiconductors, setting the stage for margin expansion as utilization improves. Despite near-term free cash flow negativity from front-loaded capex, the company’s reaffirmed long-term target of $5.5 billion in revenue and 31% gross margin remains credible given the breadth of end-market strength—particularly in aerospace and defense (up 16.8% sequentially) and industrial power (sixth consecutive quarter of sequential gains)—and the diversification provided by its hybrid semi-passive model, which allows it to capture value across the entire electronic component value chain rather than being exposed to single-segment volatility. The deliberate reduction of distribution inventory to 20 weeks from 22 weeks, after previously building to a 26-week target, demonstrates disciplined channel management that is now providing sales leverage as conditions strengthen, with management noting this inventory optimization was done "deliberately" to avoid overhang and improve responsiveness—a subtle but critical signal that the company is not misreading demand strength. Finally, the confirmation that pricing initiatives announced in Q4 2025 are becoming effective in Q2 and Q3, with ASP improvements of 1%-1.5% in Q2 and more in Q3, reveals an underappreciated lever for margin expansion that management did not heavily promote but which directly addresses historical pricing weakness in passive components and could meaningfully lift gross margins toward the 22% Q2 guidance range and beyond as volume growth continues.

Vishay Intertechnology is positioned to capitalize on strong secular tailwinds in AI, automotive electrification, and industrial automation, with management explicitly stating that AI data center exposure will be "well above" last year's sub-$100 million level and expecting over 20% AI segment growth in 2026, a figure that significantly exceeds the high single-digit overall industry growth rate they cited and suggests a disproportionate contribution to revenue acceleration. The company’s book-to-bill ratio of 1.34 overall and 1.47 for semiconductors reflects not just cyclical recovery but structural demand strength, as customers are placing proactive orders with 1-year forecasts and building safety stock for AI and automotive applications—behavior indicative of sustained confidence in Vishay’s supply reliability rather than temporary panic buying. This is further validated by distribution point-of-sale growing 10.7% sequentially and 24.9% year-over-year, confirming that end-customer demand is genuinely expanding beyond channel inventory adjustments. The strategic emphasis on "moving closer to customers" through increased FAE engagement and reference designs is already yielding tangible wins, including new grid projects in Europe and top-supplier status for resistors in multiple EV platforms, which creates switching costs and deepens relationships that insulate Vishay from pure-play commodity pressures. The completion of four tier-one automotive site audits at Newport with two more planned for Q2, coupled with the targeted mid-2027 production ramp at the German 12-inch fab, signals that capacity investments are aligning precisely with qualification timelines for high-margin automotive power semiconductors, setting the stage for margin expansion as utilization improves. Despite near-term free cash flow negativity from front-loaded capex, the company’s reaffirmed long-term target of $5.5 billion in revenue and 31% gross margin remains credible given the breadth of end-market strength—particularly in aerospace and defense (up 16.8% sequentially) and industrial power (sixth consecutive quarter of sequential gains)—and the diversification provided by its hybrid semi-passive model, which allows it to capture value across the entire electronic component value chain rather than being exposed to single-segment volatility. The deliberate reduction of distribution inventory to 20 weeks from 22 weeks, after previously building to a 26-week target, demonstrates disciplined channel management that is now providing sales leverage as conditions strengthen, with management noting this inventory optimization was done "deliberately" to avoid overhang and improve responsiveness—a subtle but critical signal that the company is not misreading demand strength. Finally, the confirmation that pricing initiatives announced in Q4 2025 are becoming effective in Q2 and Q3, with ASP improvements of 1%-1.5% in Q2 and more in Q3, reveals an underappreciated lever for margin expansion that management did not heavily promote but which directly addresses historical pricing weakness in passive components and could meaningfully lift gross margins toward the 22% Q2 guidance range and beyond as volume growth continues.

▼ Bear case

Vishay Intertechnology faces significant near-term headwinds that the market may be underestimating, beginning with the persistent drag from its capital-intensive expansion cycle, where free cash flow turned negative $47 million in Q1 due to $111 million in capex—nearly 78% of which was allocated to the German 12-inch fab—despite operating cash flow of only $64 million, a dynamic that will likely persist through 2026 given the full-year capex guidance of $400–$440 million and the company’s own admission that it expects negative free cash flow for the year, forcing continued reliance on its revolver ($250 million outstanding) and limiting flexibility for shareholder returns despite the stated 70% free cash flow payout policy. The Newport fab, while cited as reaching gross profit neutrality by quarter end, remains a margin drag in absolute terms, with management explicitly stating they will no longer provide specific guidance on its impact because costs are now "commingled" with the rest of the business, suggesting that any meaningful contribution to consolidated profitability is still distant and contingent on full automotive qualification—a process requiring two additional Q2 site audits and subsequent customer program approvals, which introduces execution risk and delays the anticipated margin accretive ramp. Furthermore, the company’s pricing strategy, though acknowledged as contributing 1%-1.5% ASP improvement in Q2 and more in Q3, remains modest and reactive, with Joel Smejkal describing Q1’s benefit as "small" and acknowledging that price increases are implemented product-by-product based on metal impact, indicating a fragmented, cost-plus approach rather than strategic value-based pricing that limits upside in a competitive passive components market where rivals are also raising prices. The reliance on accounts receivable securitization to fund capex—contributing $63 million to operating cash flow—masks underlying cash conversion weakness, as the core business generated only $1 million in operating cash before this financing tactic, and while DSO improved to 41 days, inventory days outstanding remain elevated at 106 days despite geopolitical buffer stocking, implying that working capital efficiency gains are partly artificial and vulnerable to reversals if demand softens. Geographically, Asia’s 4.9% sequential revenue decline, only partially offset by AI product demand, underscores ongoing vulnerability to regional disruptions like Lunar New Year and highlights the company’s continued dependence on volatile end markets, particularly when contrasted with Europe’s 15.3% sequential growth driven by smart grid and telecom—areas that, while promising, are subject to long procurement cycles and government funding uncertainty, as evidenced by the nascent stage of defense orders which Joel Smejkal acknowledged are in the "very early innings" of a multiyear ramp. Finally, the effective tax rate guidance of 40%-50% for Q2, while attributed to low pretax income, remains structurally high due to US taxation of foreign earnings and repatriation taxes, a drag that will persist until earnings scale meaningfully—a threshold that may be delayed by the very capex burden the company is undertaking, creating a self-reinforcing cycle where investment suppresses near-term profitability and keeps tax inefficiencies elevated.

Vishay Intertechnology faces significant near-term headwinds that the market may be underestimating, beginning with the persistent drag from its capital-intensive expansion cycle, where free cash flow turned negative $47 million in Q1 due to $111 million in capex—nearly 78% of which was allocated to the German 12-inch fab—despite operating cash flow of only $64 million, a dynamic that will likely persist through 2026 given the full-year capex guidance of $400–$440 million and the company’s own admission that it expects negative free cash flow for the year, forcing continued reliance on its revolver ($250 million outstanding) and limiting flexibility for shareholder returns despite the stated 70% free cash flow payout policy. The Newport fab, while cited as reaching gross profit neutrality by quarter end, remains a margin drag in absolute terms, with management explicitly stating they will no longer provide specific guidance on its impact because costs are now "commingled" with the rest of the business, suggesting that any meaningful contribution to consolidated profitability is still distant and contingent on full automotive qualification—a process requiring two additional Q2 site audits and subsequent customer program approvals, which introduces execution risk and delays the anticipated margin accretive ramp. Furthermore, the company’s pricing strategy, though acknowledged as contributing 1%-1.5% ASP improvement in Q2 and more in Q3, remains modest and reactive, with Joel Smejkal describing Q1’s benefit as "small" and acknowledging that price increases are implemented product-by-product based on metal impact, indicating a fragmented, cost-plus approach rather than strategic value-based pricing that limits upside in a competitive passive components market where rivals are also raising prices. The reliance on accounts receivable securitization to fund capex—contributing $63 million to operating cash flow—masks underlying cash conversion weakness, as the core business generated only $1 million in operating cash before this financing tactic, and while DSO improved to 41 days, inventory days outstanding remain elevated at 106 days despite geopolitical buffer stocking, implying that working capital efficiency gains are partly artificial and vulnerable to reversals if demand softens. Geographically, Asia’s 4.9% sequential revenue decline, only partially offset by AI product demand, underscores ongoing vulnerability to regional disruptions like Lunar New Year and highlights the company’s continued dependence on volatile end markets, particularly when contrasted with Europe’s 15.3% sequential growth driven by smart grid and telecom—areas that, while promising, are subject to long procurement cycles and government funding uncertainty, as evidenced by the nascent stage of defense orders which Joel Smejkal acknowledged are in the "very early innings" of a multiyear ramp. Finally, the effective tax rate guidance of 40%-50% for Q2, while attributed to low pretax income, remains structurally high due to US taxation of foreign earnings and repatriation taxes, a drag that will persist until earnings scale meaningfully—a threshold that may be delayed by the very capex burden the company is undertaking, creating a self-reinforcing cycle where investment suppresses near-term profitability and keeps tax inefficiencies elevated.

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Semiconductors

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	NVDA	Nvidia Corp	4,798.43 Bn	0.00 Bn	18.93	8.47 Bn
2	MU	Micron Technology Inc	1,164.41 Bn	0.00 Bn	12.90	5.72 Bn
3	AMD	Advanced Micro Devices Inc	882.18 Bn	0.00 Bn	23.55	3.22 Bn
4	INTC	Intel Corp	645.64 Bn	0.00 Bn	12.01	45.03 Bn
5	ALMU	Aeluma, Inc.	370.26 Bn	0.00 Bn	71,258.42	-
6	ARM	Arm Holdings Plc /Uk	358.73 Bn	427.06 Bn	72.91	-
7	TXN	Texas Instruments Inc	271.25 Bn	0.00 Bn	14.71	14.05 Bn
8	MRVL	Marvell Technology, Inc.	239.95 Bn	0.00 Bn	27.53	4.96 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Statement, Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Statement, Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password