Tutor Perini Corp (TPC) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Tutor Perini

NYSE: TPC

$75.43 ▲ +0.56 (+0.75%)

At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap4.20 Bn

P/E30.01

P/S0.74

Div. Yield0.01

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)398.90 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)11.46

Add ratio to table…

About

Tutor Perini Corporation is a leading construction company offering diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies worldwide. The firm performed work on approximately 1,600 construction projects during 2025 and maintains a broad portfolio that includes heavy civil infrastructure, building construction and specialty trade services. It leverages vertical integration to self-perform a substantial share of work, ranging from earthwork and concrete placement to electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection installations. This integrated approach enables the company to manage large, complex projects while adhering to strict safety and quality standards.

The company generates revenue through contracts for construction services, including general contracting, pre-construction planning, comprehensive project management, design-bid-build, design-build, construction management and public-private partnership arrangements. It frequently self-performs tasks such as excavation, concrete forming and placement, steel erection, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, and fire protection. Revenue is sourced from both private sector clients and government agencies, with government contracts representing about 75% of total revenue in 2025. A significant portion of its backlog consists of fixed price contracts, which help lock in pricing and reduce exposure to material and labor cost inflation.

The company operates through the following segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors.

• Civil: This segment concentrates on public works construction, including the building and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass transit systems, military and government facilities, and water management and wastewater treatment plants. It serves customers awarded through competitive bidding or best value proposals, where technical qualifications, project team, schedule, past performance and price are evaluated. The segment’s backlog is heavily weighted toward mass transit and detention facilities, reflecting strong demand for transportation infrastructure and correctional projects.

• Building: This segment delivers services to specialized building markets such as hospitality and gaming, transportation, healthcare, commercial offices, government facilities, sports and entertainment, education, correctional and detention facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and technology sectors. It excels at managing large, complex projects with aggressive fast track schedules, elaborate designs and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems. Notable projects include hotel and casino developments, hospital replacements, office towers, educational facilities and judicial complexes.

• Specialty Contractors: This segment supplies electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection systems for civil and building projects across industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass transit end markets. It also performs direct work for state and local municipal agencies, real estate developers, school districts and other commercial and industrial customers. The segment’s expertise supports the company’s vertical integration model by allowing in house completion of critical trade work that enhances bid competitiveness and project cost control.

Tutor Perini is recognized as a leader in the construction industry, competing with major civil contractors such as Kiewit Corporation, Flatiron Dragados USA, Lane Construction Corporation, OHL USA, Skanska USA and The Walsh Group. In the building market it faces competition from AECOM, Balfour Beatty Construction, Clark Construction Group, DPR Construction, Gilbane Inc., Hensel Phelps Construction Co., McCarthy Building Companies Inc., M. A. Mortenson Company, PCL Constructors Inc., Skanska USA, Suffolk Construction, Swinerton Inc. and Turner Construction Company. Its competitive advantages stem from extensive experience, a strong reputation for on time completion, vertical integration capabilities that enable self performance of a high proportion of work, and a proven safety and quality record. These strengths allow the company to win large fixed price contracts and to provide cross selling opportunities across its Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors lines.

The company serves a diverse customer base that includes state and local agencies, private owners and federal agencies, with state and local entities accounting for about 78% of backlog, private owners 14% and federal agencies 8%. Notable customers encompass transportation authorities such as Newark Liberty International Airport, the East Side Access project, the Minneapolis Southwest Light Rail, the California High Speed Rail system, the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement, the Los Angeles Metro subway and the San Francisco Central Subway extension. In the building sector it has worked for developers and owners of the Hudson Yards complex, the Brooklyn and Manhattan jail projects, the CityCenter complex, the Cosmopolitan Resort and Casino, the Wynn Encore Hotel, Cedars Sinai Replacement Hospital, UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital, Kaiser Permanente facilities, the Choctaw Casino and Resort, the Pechanga Resort and Casino, and various courthouses in San Bernardino, San Diego and Miami. Additionally, the firm provides services to technology companies in northern California, to correctional departments across multiple states, and to federal agencies including the Department of Defense and the Veterans Administration.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Tutor Perini Corporation is positioned to capture significant upside from its $19.8 billion backlog, which includes nine mega projects with long durations and higher-margin profiles that are currently in early ramp-up phases. The Civil segment delivered its highest-ever first-quarter operating income with a 12.6% margin, while the Building segment saw operating income surge 56% year-over-year to $16 million with a 3.5% margin, both driven by execution on newer, higher-margin projects with substantial scope remaining. Management anticipates Civil margins in the 12% to 15% range and Building margins in the 3% to 6% range for the year, with further upside as projects like the Midtown Bus Terminal replacement in New York—which could add approximately $1 billion of backlog in the second half of 2026—progress into higher-production phases. This ramp-up of existing backlog, rather than reliance on new wins alone, provides a durable foundation for double-digit revenue growth and earnings expansion in 2026 and beyond, particularly as the Specialty Contractors segment transitions from marginal profitability to targeted 1% to 3% margins in 2026 and a long-term 5% to 8% range, supported by two-thirds of its backlog being internal company work that enhances cross-segment synergies. The company’s net cash position of $4 million (cash exceeding debt) and strong operating cash flow generation of $147 million in Q1—up 542% year-over-year—provides flexibility to pursue large projects independently, avoid joint-venture margin dilution, and fund opportunistic share buybacks under its $200 million program, having already repurchased 278,000 shares at ~$72. This financial strength, combined with refinancing plans targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings, reduces financial leverage risk and enhances free cash flow available for shareholder returns or reinvestment in high-margin work. Furthermore, the Indo-Pacific region represents a underappreciated catalyst, with over $4 billion in opportunities including military infrastructure at Naval Base Guam, airport and harbor projects in Yap, and wharf improvements in Palau—markets where Tutor Perini has established local execution capabilities through PMSI and Black, yet these were not heavily promoted in the guidance discussion despite their scale and alignment with the company’s public-sector expertise. The recent $81.8 million and $61.6 million U.S. Coast Guard contracts in Alaska for family housing and child development centers further validate the company’s ability to win complex, long-duration federal projects in niche geographies, with work commencing immediately and substantial completion not expected until 2028–2029, ensuring multi-year revenue visibility. Finally, the affirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 appears conservative given that adjusted EPS already reached $1.03 in Q1—implying a run rate above $4.12 annualized—despite transient headwinds from share-based compensation expense and the W Element Hotel legal reserve, suggesting the market may be underestimating the earnings power of the backlog as project execution accelerates through 2026 and into 2027, when many mega projects reach peak construction activity.

Tutor Perini Corporation is positioned to capture significant upside from its $19.8 billion backlog, which includes nine mega projects with long durations and higher-margin profiles that are currently in early ramp-up phases. The Civil segment delivered its highest-ever first-quarter operating income with a 12.6% margin, while the Building segment saw operating income surge 56% year-over-year to $16 million with a 3.5% margin, both driven by execution on newer, higher-margin projects with substantial scope remaining. Management anticipates Civil margins in the 12% to 15% range and Building margins in the 3% to 6% range for the year, with further upside as projects like the Midtown Bus Terminal replacement in New York—which could add approximately $1 billion of backlog in the second half of 2026—progress into higher-production phases. This ramp-up of existing backlog, rather than reliance on new wins alone, provides a durable foundation for double-digit revenue growth and earnings expansion in 2026 and beyond, particularly as the Specialty Contractors segment transitions from marginal profitability to targeted 1% to 3% margins in 2026 and a long-term 5% to 8% range, supported by two-thirds of its backlog being internal company work that enhances cross-segment synergies. The company’s net cash position of $4 million (cash exceeding debt) and strong operating cash flow generation of $147 million in Q1—up 542% year-over-year—provides flexibility to pursue large projects independently, avoid joint-venture margin dilution, and fund opportunistic share buybacks under its $200 million program, having already repurchased 278,000 shares at ~$72. This financial strength, combined with refinancing plans targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings, reduces financial leverage risk and enhances free cash flow available for shareholder returns or reinvestment in high-margin work. Furthermore, the Indo-Pacific region represents a underappreciated catalyst, with over $4 billion in opportunities including military infrastructure at Naval Base Guam, airport and harbor projects in Yap, and wharf improvements in Palau—markets where Tutor Perini has established local execution capabilities through PMSI and Black, yet these were not heavily promoted in the guidance discussion despite their scale and alignment with the company’s public-sector expertise. The recent $81.8 million and $61.6 million U.S. Coast Guard contracts in Alaska for family housing and child development centers further validate the company’s ability to win complex, long-duration federal projects in niche geographies, with work commencing immediately and substantial completion not expected until 2028–2029, ensuring multi-year revenue visibility. Finally, the affirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 appears conservative given that adjusted EPS already reached $1.03 in Q1—implying a run rate above $4.12 annualized—despite transient headwinds from share-based compensation expense and the W Element Hotel legal reserve, suggesting the market may be underestimating the earnings power of the backlog as project execution accelerates through 2026 and into 2027, when many mega projects reach peak construction activity.

▼ Bear case

Tutor Perini Corporation faces material risks from unresolved legacy disputes that could undermine earnings and cash flow despite strong operational performance, most notably the unfavorable $175 million legal ruling in the W Element Hotel case in Philadelphia, which management acknowledged as an ongoing litigation with an appeal process likely taking two years or longer. Although the company characterized the first-quarter charge as immaterial, the ruling represents a significant contingent liability that could grow if appeals fail, and the refusal to comment on perceived legal flaws suggests a lack of confidence in overturning the decision, creating uncertainty around future cash outflows and potential settlements that are not fully reflected in current guidance. Additionally, the Specialty Contractors segment, while showing improvement from a $7 million loss to breakeven profitability, remains burdened by legacy dispute-related adjustments and is guided to only 1% to 3% margins in 2026—well below the Civil and Building segments—due to lingering overhang from past projects, indicating that segment-wide profitability improvement may be slower than anticipated and could drag on consolidated margins if internal synergies fail to materialize as expected. The company’s reliance on share-based compensation expense adjustments to present strong adjusted earnings performance raises concerns about GAAP earnings quality, as the $23.5 million increase in this expense year-over-year—driven by a substantially higher stock price—directly reduced GAAP net income to $25.7 million from $28.0 million, and with liability-classified awards still vesting through 2026, this volatility could persist, making GAAP EPS less predictable and potentially disappointing to investors focused on bottom-line results under standard accounting. Furthermore, while management highlighted a strong bidding pipeline, it offered little detail on win rates or margins for upcoming mega projects like the Penn Station transformation, I-535 Blatnik Bridge, or California High-Speed Rail segments, and acknowledged that competitive dynamics, though currently favorable due to data centers pulling rivals away, could shift if new entrants emerge or if public funding delays—particularly for Indo-Pacific projects tied to U.S. government appropriations—extend award timelines beyond the 2026–2027 window. The company also noted that some California-based work is winding down, requiring resource reallocation, which implies potential underutilization or transition costs as it shifts focus to Northeast and Midwest opportunities, and the expectation of a modest sequential backlog decline in the near term before renewed growth introduces near-term revenue volatility that could disappoint if new award pacing lags. Finally, the refinance plan targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings is contingent on market stability, yet geopolitical volatility remains a cited risk, and any delay or less favorable outcome in debt restructuring could keep interest expense elevated, eroding the net cash position’s benefit and reducing the financial flexibility management touts as a competitive advantage.

Tutor Perini Corporation faces material risks from unresolved legacy disputes that could undermine earnings and cash flow despite strong operational performance, most notably the unfavorable $175 million legal ruling in the W Element Hotel case in Philadelphia, which management acknowledged as an ongoing litigation with an appeal process likely taking two years or longer. Although the company characterized the first-quarter charge as immaterial, the ruling represents a significant contingent liability that could grow if appeals fail, and the refusal to comment on perceived legal flaws suggests a lack of confidence in overturning the decision, creating uncertainty around future cash outflows and potential settlements that are not fully reflected in current guidance. Additionally, the Specialty Contractors segment, while showing improvement from a $7 million loss to breakeven profitability, remains burdened by legacy dispute-related adjustments and is guided to only 1% to 3% margins in 2026—well below the Civil and Building segments—due to lingering overhang from past projects, indicating that segment-wide profitability improvement may be slower than anticipated and could drag on consolidated margins if internal synergies fail to materialize as expected. The company’s reliance on share-based compensation expense adjustments to present strong adjusted earnings performance raises concerns about GAAP earnings quality, as the $23.5 million increase in this expense year-over-year—driven by a substantially higher stock price—directly reduced GAAP net income to $25.7 million from $28.0 million, and with liability-classified awards still vesting through 2026, this volatility could persist, making GAAP EPS less predictable and potentially disappointing to investors focused on bottom-line results under standard accounting. Furthermore, while management highlighted a strong bidding pipeline, it offered little detail on win rates or margins for upcoming mega projects like the Penn Station transformation, I-535 Blatnik Bridge, or California High-Speed Rail segments, and acknowledged that competitive dynamics, though currently favorable due to data centers pulling rivals away, could shift if new entrants emerge or if public funding delays—particularly for Indo-Pacific projects tied to U.S. government appropriations—extend award timelines beyond the 2026–2027 window. The company also noted that some California-based work is winding down, requiring resource reallocation, which implies potential underutilization or transition costs as it shifts focus to Northeast and Midwest opportunities, and the expectation of a modest sequential backlog decline in the near term before renewed growth introduces near-term revenue volatility that could disappoint if new award pacing lags. Finally, the refinance plan targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings is contingent on market stability, yet geopolitical volatility remains a cited risk, and any delay or less favorable outcome in debt restructuring could keep interest expense elevated, eroding the net cash position’s benefit and reducing the financial flexibility management touts as a competitive advantage.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Engineering & Construction

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	STN	Stantec Inc	7,704.08 Bn	7,675.69	591.81	1.34 Bn
2	PWR	Quanta Services, Inc.	103.60 Bn	92.14	3.44	5.89 Bn
3	MTZ	Mastec Inc	30.47 Bn	63.56	1.99	2.53 Bn
4	STRL	Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.	23.80 Bn	63.82	8.25	0.29 Bn
5	APG	APi Group Corp	18.02 Bn	-67.25	2.20	2.76 Bn
6	J	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	14.73 Bn	-745.61	1.12	4.08 Bn
7	IESC	IES Holdings, Inc.	13.95 Bn	38.52	3.84	0.04 Bn
8	ACM	Aecom	8.61 Bn	-69.12	0.54	2.71 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password