Tutor Perini TPC

NYSE TPC
$91.27 +0.91 (+1.01%)
At close: Aug 21, 2026 · 4:00 PM EDT
Financial Ratios
Market Cap4.80 Bn
P/E27.16
P/S0.81
Div. Yield0.01
ROIC (Qtr)0.03
Total Debt (Qtr)401.35 Mn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)19.17
Add ratio to table…

About

Tutor Perini Corporation is a leading construction company offering diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies worldwide. The firm performed work on approximately 1,600 construction projects during 2025 and maintains a broad portfolio that includes heavy civil infrastructure, building construction and specialty trade services. It leverages vertical integration to self-perform a substantial share…

Read more ↓
Sector: Industrials Sector rationale Tutor Perini is a construction company providing general contracting, construction management, and design-build services for heavy civil infrastructure and buildings. Its revenue is derived from contracts for public works (highways, bridges, tunnels) and specialized building projects for private and government clients, which falls squarely within the Engineering and Construction industry of the Industrials sector. Industries: Engineering and Construction Industrials Primary Tutor Perini is a leading construction company providing general contracting, construction management, and design-build services for non-residential projects. Its portfolio includes heavy civil infrastructure (highways, bridges, tunnels), commercial offices, and government facilities like the Hudson Yards complex and various judicial complexes. HVAC Industrials Secondary The company operates a Specialty Contractors segment that provides HVAC and mechanical systems installation for industrial, commercial, and mass transit end markets. It self-performs heating, ventilation, and air conditioning work as part of its vertical integration model. Utility Construction Industrials Secondary The Civil segment focuses on public works construction, specifically building and rehabilitating highways, bridges, tunnels, and mass transit systems. It serves government agencies on large-scale transportation infrastructure projects such as the California High Speed Rail and Los Angeles Metro subway. Classified using BQ-MICS CIK: 0000077543

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • Tutor Perini Corporation is positioned to capture significant upside from its $19.8 billion backlog, which includes nine mega projects with long durations and higher-margin profiles that are currently in early ramp-up phases. The Civil segment delivered its highest-ever first-quarter operating income with a 12.6% margin, while the Building segment saw operating income surge 56% year-over-year to $16 million with a 3.5% margin, both driven by execution on newer, higher-margin projects with substantial scope remaining. Management anticipates Civil margins in the 12% to 15% range and Building margins in the 3% to 6% range for the year, with further upside as projects like the Midtown Bus Terminal replacement in New York—which could add approximately $1 billion of backlog in the second half of 2026—progress into higher-production phases. This ramp-up of existing backlog, rather than reliance on new wins alone, provides a durable foundation for double-digit revenue growth and earnings expansion in 2026 and beyond, particularly as the Specialty Contractors segment transitions from marginal profitability to targeted 1% to 3% margins in 2026 and a long-term 5% to 8% range, supported by two-thirds of its backlog being internal company work that enhances cross-segment synergies. The company’s net cash position of $4 million (cash exceeding debt) and strong operating cash flow generation of $147 million in Q1—up 542% year-over-year—provides flexibility to pursue large projects independently, avoid joint-venture margin dilution, and fund opportunistic share buybacks under its $200 million program, having already repurchased 278,000 shares at ~$72. This financial strength, combined with refinancing plans targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings, reduces financial leverage risk and enhances free cash flow available for shareholder returns or reinvestment in high-margin work. Furthermore, the Indo-Pacific region represents a underappreciated catalyst, with over $4 billion in opportunities including military infrastructure at Naval Base Guam, airport and harbor projects in Yap, and wharf improvements in Palau—markets where Tutor Perini has established local execution capabilities through PMSI and Black, yet these were not heavily promoted in the guidance discussion despite their scale and alignment with the company’s public-sector expertise. The recent $81.8 million and $61.6 million U.S. Coast Guard contracts in Alaska for family housing and child development centers further validate the company’s ability to win complex, long-duration federal projects in niche geographies, with work commencing immediately and substantial completion not expected until 2028–2029, ensuring multi-year revenue visibility. Finally, the affirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 appears conservative given that adjusted EPS already reached $1.03 in Q1—implying a run rate above $4.12 annualized—despite transient headwinds from share-based compensation expense and the W Element Hotel legal reserve, suggesting the market may be underestimating the earnings power of the backlog as project execution accelerates through 2026 and into 2027, when many mega projects reach peak construction activity.
▼ Bear case
  • Tutor Perini Corporation faces material risks from unresolved legacy disputes that could undermine earnings and cash flow despite strong operational performance, most notably the unfavorable $175 million legal ruling in the W Element Hotel case in Philadelphia, which management acknowledged as an ongoing litigation with an appeal process likely taking two years or longer. Although the company characterized the first-quarter charge as immaterial, the ruling represents a significant contingent liability that could grow if appeals fail, and the refusal to comment on perceived legal flaws suggests a lack of confidence in overturning the decision, creating uncertainty around future cash outflows and potential settlements that are not fully reflected in current guidance. Additionally, the Specialty Contractors segment, while showing improvement from a $7 million loss to breakeven profitability, remains burdened by legacy dispute-related adjustments and is guided to only 1% to 3% margins in 2026—well below the Civil and Building segments—due to lingering overhang from past projects, indicating that segment-wide profitability improvement may be slower than anticipated and could drag on consolidated margins if internal synergies fail to materialize as expected. The company’s reliance on share-based compensation expense adjustments to present strong adjusted earnings performance raises concerns about GAAP earnings quality, as the $23.5 million increase in this expense year-over-year—driven by a substantially higher stock price—directly reduced GAAP net income to $25.7 million from $28.0 million, and with liability-classified awards still vesting through 2026, this volatility could persist, making GAAP EPS less predictable and potentially disappointing to investors focused on bottom-line results under standard accounting. Furthermore, while management highlighted a strong bidding pipeline, it offered little detail on win rates or margins for upcoming mega projects like the Penn Station transformation, I-535 Blatnik Bridge, or California High-Speed Rail segments, and acknowledged that competitive dynamics, though currently favorable due to data centers pulling rivals away, could shift if new entrants emerge or if public funding delays—particularly for Indo-Pacific projects tied to U.S. government appropriations—extend award timelines beyond the 2026–2027 window. The company also noted that some California-based work is winding down, requiring resource reallocation, which implies potential underutilization or transition costs as it shifts focus to Northeast and Midwest opportunities, and the expectation of a modest sequential backlog decline in the near term before renewed growth introduces near-term revenue volatility that could disappoint if new award pacing lags. Finally, the refinance plan targeting 400 to 500 basis points of interest savings is contingent on market stability, yet geopolitical volatility remains a cited risk, and any delay or less favorable outcome in debt restructuring could keep interest expense elevated, eroding the net cash position’s benefit and reducing the financial flexibility management touts as a competitive advantage.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Engineering & Construction
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 PWR Quanta Services, Inc. 96.39 Bn71.382.936.10 Bn
2 FIX Comfort Systems Usa Inc 58.32 Bn169.6814.740.05 Bn
3 FER Ferrovial N.V. 45.15 Bn35.324.161.25 Bn
4 EME EMCOR Group, Inc. 34.54 Bn24.001.86-
5 IESC IES Holdings, Inc. 27.27 Bn61.726.84-
6 MTZ Mastec Inc 20.83 Bn38.931.292.74 Bn
7 APG APi Group Corp 17.90 Bn-72.162.123.83 Bn
8 J Jacobs Solutions Inc. 17.64 Bn58.681.243.58 Bn