Toast
NYSE: TOST
$28.65 ▼ -0.97  (-3.26%)
At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 2:52 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap16.87 Bn
P/E40.95
P/S2.62
Div. Yield0.00
ROIC (Qtr)0.00
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)21.91
Add ratio to table…

About

Toast, Inc. provides a cloud-based, all-in-one digital technology platform designed specifically for the restaurant and food and beverage retail industries. The company delivers a comprehensive suite of software-as-a-service products, integrated payment processing, restaurant-grade hardware, and a broad ecosystem of third-party partners. Toast operates as the central operating system for restaurants, connecting front-of-house and back-of-house operations across dine-in,…

Read more ↓
Sector: Technology Industry: Software - Infrastructure CIK: 0001650164

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • Toast, Inc. is building a structural moat through its vertically integrated agent platform that transforms from a system of record to an active operator for customers, with Toast IQ Grow’s marketing agent already delivering an 8% increase in GPV for pilot customers by leveraging 14 years of proprietary data on guest behavior, labor costs, and inventory patterns—a dataset that grows more valuable with each new location and transaction, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel that competitors cannot replicate without similar historical depth and scale. This advantage is particularly potent because it solves the core pain point of time-constrained restaurateurs who outsource critical functions like marketing and bookkeeping; by embedding AI agents that work directly within the Toast ecosystem using internal data, the company is shifting from selling software to selling outcomes, which justifies premium pricing and drives higher customer lifetime value as seen in Toast Local’s 2x weekly app downloads and Sahara Bistro Shawarma’s 30% sales increase from marketing tool adoption, signaling early but scalable monetization of the agent layer beyond initial use cases. The company’s expansion into enterprise and retail verticals is demonstrating stronger unit economics than its core restaurant business did at a comparable stage, with enterprise wins like Hungry Howie’s (500 locations) and Papa Murphy’s, combined with retail traction in grocery (over 100 locations generating $5M in sales), proving the vertical playbook’s replicability in high-complexity environments where Toast’s existing capabilities in supplier connectivity, invoice workflows, and SKU-level management translate directly—this is further validated by international growth in tier-one cities like London and Sydney, where higher-GPV restaurants align with Toast’s value proposition, enabling faster ARPU growth and location scaling in markets where the platform’s operational depth (e.g., Toast Go 3 handhelds, KDS) addresses critical pain points for busy operators, creating a runway for sustained share gains beyond the U.S. core. Toast, Inc. is executing a capital-efficient growth strategy fueled by AI-driven productivity gains, with engineering coding velocity up over 60% year-over-year enabling three-month acceleration of the marketing agent launch and 40% of support interactions now resolved by AI, which is freeing up resources to reinvest in high-ROI initiatives like enterprise Drive-Through (opening 140k locations) and Toast Local’s reservation expansion to 20k restaurants via Resy and Toast Tables—this operational leverage is allowing the company to maintain discipline in capital allocation while pursuing long-term 40%+ EBITDA margin targets, as evidenced by stock-based compensation as a % of recurring gross profit falling to 11% (nearly half of two years ago) and opportunistic share repurchases of 14M shares for ~$400M, signaling confidence in intrinsic value and providing a buffer against near-term margin pressure from hardware investments.
▼ Bear case
  • Toast, Inc. faces significant execution risk in monetizing its AI agent platform beyond early pilot results, as the 8% GPV lift from Toast IQ Grow’s marketing agent remains unproven at scale and may not generalize across diverse restaurant types or geographies, with management acknowledging that customers are “stretched thin” and may lack the bandwidth to fully leverage agent capabilities even if the technology works—this is compounded by the lack of clarity on pricing strategy for agents, as the company is still exploring usage-based models without committing to a timeline, leaving uncertainty about whether the value created will be captured adequately through pricing or if customers will resist paying premiums for outcomes they currently obtain via fragmented, lower-cost solutions. The company’s hardware investments are creating a growing drag on profitability that may persist longer than anticipated, with Elena Gomez explicitly stating the impact to the 2027 P&L will be larger than in 2026 due to increased inventory levels secured for supply chain resilience, and while she claims no structural long-term impact, the near-term cost pressure from building inventory to secure supply into 2027—coupled with the 150bps EBITDA margin impact already guided for 2026—suggests that hardware-related expenses could outweigh AI-driven efficiency gains in the medium term, especially if supply chain volatility persists or if demand for new hardware like Toast Go 3 fails to meet expectations, undermining the thesis that AI productivity will fully offset these costs. Toast, Inc.’s expansion into new verticals and international markets is encountering diminishing returns as the company shifts focus to tier-one cities abroad (e.g., London, Sydney) rather than pursuing deep penetration across entire countries, which limits the scalability of its international TAM and increases customer acquisition costs in saturated urban markets where local competitors may already have entrenched relationships—this is exacerbated by the enterprise pipeline, while strong in location volume (Q1 2026 bookings exceeded total 2023 customers), lacking clarity on conversion rates, deal size, and time-to-revenue, raising concerns that the perceived enterprise momentum may not translate to proportional ARR growth or margin expansion if these deals require heavy customization or yield lower ARPU than the core SMB business.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Software - Infrastructure
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 MSFT Microsoft Corp 2,853.66 Bn22.798.9740.26 Bn
2 ORCL Oracle Corp 408.21 Bn23.926.06122.34 Bn
3 PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. 300.98 Bn131.2457.61-
4 PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc 247.84 Bn193.3425.05-
5 CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 193.63 Bn-1,201.4140.240.75 Bn
6 FTNT Fortinet, Inc. 117.45 Bn60.0816.520.50 Bn
7 NET Cloudflare, Inc. 86.88 Bn-1,001.4737.311.29 Bn
8 SNPS Synopsys Inc 86.18 Bn1,416.9910.7610.04 Bn