NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Sector: Energy Industry: Oil & Gas Midstream CIK: 0001504461

Market Cap 2.24 Bn

P/E 437.50

P/S 0.71

Div. Yield 0.05

ROIC (Qtr) 0.00

Total Debt (Qtr) 2.93 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) -7.39

Add ratio to table...

About

NGL Energy Partners LP is a diversified midstream energy partnership that transports treats recycles and disposes of produced and flowback water generated from crude oil and natural gas production The company also transports stores markets and provides logistics services for crude oil and liquid hydrocarbons It operates primarily in the United States and Canada serving upstream midstream and downstream customers in the energy sector NGL Energy Partners LP generates revenue through fee-based services and product sales across its three operating...

NGL Energy Partners LP is a diversified midstream energy partnership that transports treats recycles and disposes of produced and flowback water generated from crude oil and natural gas production The company also transports stores markets and provides logistics services for crude oil and liquid hydrocarbons It operates primarily in the United States and Canada serving upstream midstream and downstream customers in the energy sector

NGL Energy Partners LP generates revenue through fee-based services and product sales across its three operating segments The Water Solutions segment earns revenue from water transportation treatment recycling disposal and the sale of recovered skim oil and non-potable water The Crude Oil Logistics segment generates income from purchasing transporting storing and terminaling crude oil The Liquids Logistics segment derives revenue from supplying natural gas liquids to commercial retail and industrial customers through storage terminaling transportation and marine export services

The company operates through the following segments: Water Solutions Crude Oil Logistics and Liquids Logistics

• The Water Solutions segment transports treats recycles and disposes of produced and flowback water from oil and gas production It sells produced water for reuse and brackish non-potable water to producer customers As part of water processing it aggregates and sells recovered crude oil known as skim oil The segment also disposes of solids such as tank bottoms drilling fluids and drilling muds and provides ancillary services like truck and frac tank washouts Activities are supported by long-term fixed fee contracts and acreage dedications with minimum volume commitments from leading oil and gas companies.

• The Crude Oil Logistics segment purchases crude oil from producers and marketers and transports it to refineries or for resale at pipeline injection stations storage terminals barge loading facilities rail facilities and other trade hubs It provides storage terminaling and transportation services through owned assets Operations are supported by long-term fixed rate contracts with acreage dedications and minimum volume commitments on storage tanks and owned and leased pipelines.

• The Liquids Logistics segment conducts supply operations for natural gas liquids to commercial retail and industrial customers across the United States and Canada These operations are conducted through five owned terminals third-party storage and terminal facilities nine common carrier pipelines and a fleet of leased railcars The segment provides marine export services for butane from its Chesapeake Virginia facility and owns a propane pipeline in Michigan It uses back-to-back physical contracts pre-sale agreements and financially settled derivatives to manage price exposure.

NGL Energy Partners LP holds a strong position in the midstream energy industry particularly as one of the largest independent produced water transportation and disposal companies in the United States The company benefits from strategic asset locations in prolific basins such as the Delaware DJ and Eagle Ford Basins Competitive advantages include long-term contracts with acreage dedications minimum volume commitments and integrated infrastructure networks that are difficult for competitors to replicate The company faces competition from independent water handling firms and in-house operations of oil and gas producers but differentiates through service reliability scale and contractual stability

The company serves large publicly traded oil and gas companies with diversified acreage positions across multiple producing regions In the Water Solutions segment 73% of revenue came from the ten largest customers during the year ended March 31 2025 In the Crude Oil Logistics segment 79% of revenue was generated from the ten largest customers In the Liquids Logistics segment 36% of revenue came from the ten largest customers Key customers include major energy producers refiners and marketers though specific names are not disclosed in the filing

Investment thesis

Bull case

NGL’s Water Solutions segment has demonstrated a robust trajectory, with a 16.5% jump in adjusted EBITDA and a 17.1% rise in physical disposal volumes within the quarter, surpassing 3 million barrels per day for the first time. The partnership’s strategic shift to focus on water handling, coupled with the completion of the 27‑mile Western Express pipeline expansion, has expanded delivery capacity and reduced operating costs to $0.18 per barrel, underscoring operational efficiencies that can translate into higher margins. Management’s confirmation of a full‑year EBITDA guide of $650‑$660 million and a projected 2027 target exceeding $700 million, driven by newly signed Delaware Basin contracts, suggests a sustained upside that market participants have yet to fully price. Moreover, the aggressive divestiture of non‑core assets—such as the wholesale propane business and 17 NGL terminals—has streamlined the balance sheet, reducing leverage to a low 4.0× and freeing capital for growth initiatives or shareholder returns. The combination of a high volume pipeline footprint, disciplined capital allocation, and a clear water‑centric strategy positions NGL to capture long‑term revenue growth in a sector that is increasingly under regulatory pressure for water disposal and reuse.
Capital expenditures in 2026 were heavily allocated to growth projects that have already reached service, and the partnership reported a $100+ million increase in growth cap‑ex over the second and third quarters. This disciplined investment in asset expansion, particularly in the Delaware Basin, has resulted in on‑time, under‑budget execution, as highlighted by Doug White’s commentary. The resulting contractual volume commitments, totaling over 1.5 million barrels per day under MVC or CBC, provide revenue certainty even in the event of physical volume shortfalls, effectively flattening seasonal cash flow volatility. Such forward‑locked volumes shield the partnership from commodity price swings that typically affect the crude logistics and liquids segments, thereby reinforcing a resilient revenue base. Investors who have not yet recognized the strategic advantage of these long‑term contracts may be overlooking a core driver of NGL’s valuation.
NGL’s AI initiative, now in its second year, leverages SCADA data to identify operational improvements that could reduce energy consumption and optimize pipeline throughput. While the CEO and COO remained reticent to quantify the current impact, the underlying premise is that predictive analytics will unlock incremental EBITDA by a margin of 1‑2% across the water solutions portfolio. In the broader industry, AI adoption is still nascent, and companies that successfully embed data‑driven decision making can achieve a competitive moat. Given NGL’s extensive data set—encompassing millions of data points across its pipeline network—the partnership is positioned to realize measurable cost savings and revenue enhancements before its peers. Early adopters of AI in midstream operations are likely to see a measurable lift in return on invested capital, providing an incremental upside that is not yet fully reflected in the market price.
The proposed nuclear‑powered thermal desalination partnership with Natura Resources presents a transformational long‑term catalyst. Though the capital commitment on the nuclear side is negligible for NGL, the partnership will gain access to a unique, low‑cost heat source that can scale up to 800,000 barrels of treated water daily. This technology would enable NGL to supply high‑quality treated water to municipal and industrial customers, creating a new revenue stream and positioning the company as a pioneer in sustainable water treatment. The anticipated TPDES permit issuance this year will unlock this capability, potentially generating significant operating cash flows beyond the current water disposal model. Investors who have not yet accounted for this future diversification are likely undervaluing NGL’s growth prospects, especially given the rising demand for treated water in water‑constrained regions.
The partnership’s liquidity profile remains strong, with cash and available capacity on its ABL facility totaling $331.1 million and no upcoming debt maturities. The board’s proactive redemption of Class D preferred units has reduced dividend obligations and improved net income per unit. By targeting remaining preferred equity in the near term, NGL can further improve leverage and enhance shareholder value through increased distributions or share repurchases. This disciplined capital management, combined with a high free‑cash‑flow generation, equips the partnership to absorb short‑term shocks while sustaining long‑term investment momentum. Market participants who have overlooked the company’s robust liquidity cushion and efficient capital deployment may underestimate the upside potential in a volatile market environment.

NGL’s Water Solutions segment has demonstrated a robust trajectory, with a 16.5% jump in adjusted EBITDA and a 17.1% rise in physical disposal volumes within the quarter, surpassing 3 million barrels per day for the first time. The partnership’s strategic shift to focus on water handling, coupled with the completion of the 27‑mile Western Express pipeline expansion, has expanded delivery capacity and reduced operating costs to $0.18 per barrel, underscoring operational efficiencies that can translate into higher margins. Management’s confirmation of a full‑year EBITDA guide of $650‑$660 million and a projected 2027 target exceeding $700 million, driven by newly signed Delaware Basin contracts, suggests a sustained upside that market participants have yet to fully price. Moreover, the aggressive divestiture of non‑core assets—such as the wholesale propane business and 17 NGL terminals—has streamlined the balance sheet, reducing leverage to a low 4.0× and freeing capital for growth initiatives or shareholder returns. The combination of a high volume pipeline footprint, disciplined capital allocation, and a clear water‑centric strategy positions NGL to capture long‑term revenue growth in a sector that is increasingly under regulatory pressure for water disposal and reuse.
Capital expenditures in 2026 were heavily allocated to growth projects that have already reached service, and the partnership reported a $100+ million increase in growth cap‑ex over the second and third quarters. This disciplined investment in asset expansion, particularly in the Delaware Basin, has resulted in on‑time, under‑budget execution, as highlighted by Doug White’s commentary. The resulting contractual volume commitments, totaling over 1.5 million barrels per day under MVC or CBC, provide revenue certainty even in the event of physical volume shortfalls, effectively flattening seasonal cash flow volatility. Such forward‑locked volumes shield the partnership from commodity price swings that typically affect the crude logistics and liquids segments, thereby reinforcing a resilient revenue base. Investors who have not yet recognized the strategic advantage of these long‑term contracts may be overlooking a core driver of NGL’s valuation.
NGL’s AI initiative, now in its second year, leverages SCADA data to identify operational improvements that could reduce energy consumption and optimize pipeline throughput. While the CEO and COO remained reticent to quantify the current impact, the underlying premise is that predictive analytics will unlock incremental EBITDA by a margin of 1‑2% across the water solutions portfolio. In the broader industry, AI adoption is still nascent, and companies that successfully embed data‑driven decision making can achieve a competitive moat. Given NGL’s extensive data set—encompassing millions of data points across its pipeline network—the partnership is positioned to realize measurable cost savings and revenue enhancements before its peers. Early adopters of AI in midstream operations are likely to see a measurable lift in return on invested capital, providing an incremental upside that is not yet fully reflected in the market price.
The proposed nuclear‑powered thermal desalination partnership with Natura Resources presents a transformational long‑term catalyst. Though the capital commitment on the nuclear side is negligible for NGL, the partnership will gain access to a unique, low‑cost heat source that can scale up to 800,000 barrels of treated water daily. This technology would enable NGL to supply high‑quality treated water to municipal and industrial customers, creating a new revenue stream and positioning the company as a pioneer in sustainable water treatment. The anticipated TPDES permit issuance this year will unlock this capability, potentially generating significant operating cash flows beyond the current water disposal model. Investors who have not yet accounted for this future diversification are likely undervaluing NGL’s growth prospects, especially given the rising demand for treated water in water‑constrained regions.
The partnership’s liquidity profile remains strong, with cash and available capacity on its ABL facility totaling $331.1 million and no upcoming debt maturities. The board’s proactive redemption of Class D preferred units has reduced dividend obligations and improved net income per unit. By targeting remaining preferred equity in the near term, NGL can further improve leverage and enhance shareholder value through increased distributions or share repurchases. This disciplined capital management, combined with a high free‑cash‑flow generation, equips the partnership to absorb short‑term shocks while sustaining long‑term investment momentum. Market participants who have overlooked the company’s robust liquidity cushion and efficient capital deployment may underestimate the upside potential in a volatile market environment.

Bear case

Despite impressive water volumes, NGL’s Water Solutions segment remains vulnerable to the cyclicality of the oil and gas sector, as produced water volumes are directly linked to drilling activity and fracture spacing. A prolonged downturn in oil prices or a slowdown in development, especially in the Delaware Basin, could materially reduce the inflow of produced water, leading to under‑utilized infrastructure and erosion of margin. Management’s emphasis on “no material impact” from the recent cold‑weather volume dip is potentially overstated; similar seasonal events could become more frequent with climate volatility, exposing the partnership to unpredictable revenue streams. The company’s current volume commitments under MVC and CBC provide contractual revenue but do not guarantee physical disposal volumes, creating a mismatch between revenue recognition and operational cash flows. Investors may be underestimating the risk that a sharp decline in drilling could cascade into lower volumes and profitability.
The decline in adjusted EBITDA for the Crude Oil Logistics and Liquids Logistics segments—down from $17.3 million and $18.6 million to $15.4 million and $15.2 million, respectively—illustrates the erosive effect of lower oil prices and tighter market margins. Grand Mesa pipeline margins have weakened due to both reduced volumes and price compression, and the partnership’s exit from the refined products and biodiesel businesses signals a retreat from potentially higher‑margin operations. These segment losses highlight the inherent risk of NGL’s diversification strategy; over‑reliance on the water solutions core could expose the company to a single‑industry downturn if the broader midstream market weakens. The board’s heavy focus on water may leave the partnership ill‑equipped to pivot back to more profitable logistics services if market conditions demand it.
NGL’s AI and machine‑learning initiative, while promising, lacks concrete performance metrics and has not yet translated into quantifiable cost savings or revenue enhancement, as evidenced by the management’s reluctance to disclose dollar impacts. The project is still in its second year, implying that significant time, data refinement, and integration are required before meaningful returns materialize. Relying on an unproven technology introduces execution risk, especially if the partnership fails to integrate AI insights into operational decision‑making or if data quality issues arise. Investors may be overestimating the immediate value of this initiative, overlooking the substantial investment in talent, data infrastructure, and change management required to unlock its potential.
The nuclear‑desalination partnership, while innovative, carries significant regulatory, technical, and environmental risks that could delay or derail the project. The MOU with Natura Resources does not guarantee a finalized technology or capital structure, and the partnership’s claim that the nuclear side will impose “no CapEx demand” may be overly optimistic. The TPDES permit process is inherently uncertain; permitting delays or stricter discharge requirements could substantially increase operating costs or postpone revenue generation. Moreover, the partnership’s current capital expenditure forecast has not changed, suggesting that the desalination initiative may remain a long‑term, high‑risk endeavor with limited near‑term financial impact. Investors may be underappreciating the potential for regulatory setbacks and cost overruns that could erode the anticipated upside.
NGL’s liquidity cushion, while currently solid, is strained by recent capital outlays and a growing common unit repurchase program that has already exhausted a significant portion of its ABL facility. The $100+ million growth cap‑ex over the last two quarters, coupled with a high level of repurchases, could limit the partnership’s flexibility to fund new projects or weather unforeseen downturns. Management’s focus on redeeming Class D preferred units and repurchasing common units may divert cash that could otherwise be used to absorb operational shocks or invest in higher‑return projects. The partnership’s reliance on a limited pool of large producers for volume commitments exposes it to counterparty concentration risk; any significant loss of a key customer could materially affect cash flows. Investors who have not factored in these liquidity and concentration risks may overestimate NGL’s resilience.

Despite impressive water volumes, NGL’s Water Solutions segment remains vulnerable to the cyclicality of the oil and gas sector, as produced water volumes are directly linked to drilling activity and fracture spacing. A prolonged downturn in oil prices or a slowdown in development, especially in the Delaware Basin, could materially reduce the inflow of produced water, leading to under‑utilized infrastructure and erosion of margin. Management’s emphasis on “no material impact” from the recent cold‑weather volume dip is potentially overstated; similar seasonal events could become more frequent with climate volatility, exposing the partnership to unpredictable revenue streams. The company’s current volume commitments under MVC and CBC provide contractual revenue but do not guarantee physical disposal volumes, creating a mismatch between revenue recognition and operational cash flows. Investors may be underestimating the risk that a sharp decline in drilling could cascade into lower volumes and profitability.
The decline in adjusted EBITDA for the Crude Oil Logistics and Liquids Logistics segments—down from $17.3 million and $18.6 million to $15.4 million and $15.2 million, respectively—illustrates the erosive effect of lower oil prices and tighter market margins. Grand Mesa pipeline margins have weakened due to both reduced volumes and price compression, and the partnership’s exit from the refined products and biodiesel businesses signals a retreat from potentially higher‑margin operations. These segment losses highlight the inherent risk of NGL’s diversification strategy; over‑reliance on the water solutions core could expose the company to a single‑industry downturn if the broader midstream market weakens. The board’s heavy focus on water may leave the partnership ill‑equipped to pivot back to more profitable logistics services if market conditions demand it.
NGL’s AI and machine‑learning initiative, while promising, lacks concrete performance metrics and has not yet translated into quantifiable cost savings or revenue enhancement, as evidenced by the management’s reluctance to disclose dollar impacts. The project is still in its second year, implying that significant time, data refinement, and integration are required before meaningful returns materialize. Relying on an unproven technology introduces execution risk, especially if the partnership fails to integrate AI insights into operational decision‑making or if data quality issues arise. Investors may be overestimating the immediate value of this initiative, overlooking the substantial investment in talent, data infrastructure, and change management required to unlock its potential.
The nuclear‑desalination partnership, while innovative, carries significant regulatory, technical, and environmental risks that could delay or derail the project. The MOU with Natura Resources does not guarantee a finalized technology or capital structure, and the partnership’s claim that the nuclear side will impose “no CapEx demand” may be overly optimistic. The TPDES permit process is inherently uncertain; permitting delays or stricter discharge requirements could substantially increase operating costs or postpone revenue generation. Moreover, the partnership’s current capital expenditure forecast has not changed, suggesting that the desalination initiative may remain a long‑term, high‑risk endeavor with limited near‑term financial impact. Investors may be underappreciating the potential for regulatory setbacks and cost overruns that could erode the anticipated upside.
NGL’s liquidity cushion, while currently solid, is strained by recent capital outlays and a growing common unit repurchase program that has already exhausted a significant portion of its ABL facility. The $100+ million growth cap‑ex over the last two quarters, coupled with a high level of repurchases, could limit the partnership’s flexibility to fund new projects or weather unforeseen downturns. Management’s focus on redeeming Class D preferred units and repurchasing common units may divert cash that could otherwise be used to absorb operational shocks or invest in higher‑return projects. The partnership’s reliance on a limited pool of large producers for volume commitments exposes it to counterparty concentration risk; any significant loss of a key customer could materially affect cash flows. Investors who have not factored in these liquidity and concentration risks may overestimate NGL’s resilience.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2023)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Oil & Gas Midstream

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	ENB	Enbridge Inc	89.39 Bn	26.26	1.79	78.78 Bn
2	EPD	Enterprise Products Partners L.P.	84.79 Bn	14.51	1.64	33.91 Bn
3	KMI	Kinder Morgan, Inc.	74.38 Bn	22.44	4.24	32.06 Bn
4	ET	Energy Transfer LP	69.95 Bn	16.80	1.00	69.34 Bn
5	TRGP	Targa Resources Corp.	57.41 Bn	27.19	3.47	19.13 Bn
6	OKE	Oneok Inc /New/	57.35 Bn	16.21	1.63	32.01 Bn
7	MPLX	Mplx Lp	56.29 Bn	12.00	6.26	25.63 Bn
8	TRP	Tc Energy Corp	50.82 Bn	22.35	4.66	33.55 Bn

Research Tools

NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2023)

Peer comparison

Research Tools

NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2023)

Peer comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password