Myr Group Inc. (MYRG) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Myr

NASDAQ: MYRG

$420.33 ▲ +1.25 (+0.30%)

At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap7.20 Bn

P/E50.71

P/S1.88

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)9.38 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)20.00

Add ratio to table…

About

Myr Group Inc. is a holding company of specialty electrical construction service providers operating in the United States and Canada. The company serves the electric utility infrastructure commercial and industrial construction markets through its subsidiaries. It provides a broad range of services including design engineering procurement construction upgrade maintenance and repair with a particular focus on construction maintenance and repair.

Myr Group Inc. generates revenue by providing electrical construction services to customers in the electric utility infrastructure and commercial and industrial construction markets. The company earns income through design engineering procurement construction upgrade maintenance and repair services on transmission and distribution networks substations commercial and industrial facilities and related infrastructure. Revenue is derived from contracts with electric utility companies power generation firms general contractors commercial and industrial facility owners governmental agencies and developers.

The company operates through the following segments: Transmission and Distribution (“T&D”) and Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”).

• The Transmission and Distribution segment provides services on electric transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities including design engineering procurement construction upgrade maintenance and repair with a focus on construction maintenance and repair. This segment constructs and maintains high voltage transmission lines substations lower voltage underground and overhead distribution systems clean energy projects and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. It also provides emergency restoration services and serves electric utility industry and power generation companies as a prime contractor through traditional design bid build or engineering procurement and construction forms of project delivery often under multi-year master service agreements.

• The Commercial and Industrial segment provides services such as design installation maintenance and repair of commercial and industrial wiring installation of intelligent transportation systems roadway lighting signalization and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. It concentrates on projects where technical and project management expertise are critical for successful and timely execution. Typical contracts cover electrical contracting services for data centers airports hospitals hotels stadiums commercial and industrial facilities clean energy projects manufacturing plants processing facilities water-waste-water treatment facilities mining facilities intelligent transportation systems roadway lighting signalization and electric vehicle charging infrastructure. In this segment the company generally provides services as a subcontractor to general contractors but also contracts directly with facility owners.

Myr Group Inc. holds a leading position as one of the largest U. S. contractors servicing the transmission and distribution sector of the electric utility industry. The company competes based on price safety quality reliability technical expertise experience geographic presence and financial resources. Its competitive advantages stem from operating history reputation customer relationships emphasis on safety and customer service ability to scale and flex for customer needs and strong financial resources and bonding capacity. The company believes it has a favorable competitive position in both T&D and C&I markets due to its long-standing operations local market share and financial strengths.

The company serves a diverse customer base including investor-owned utilities cooperatives private developers government-funded utilities independent power producers independent transmission companies industrial facility owners and other contractors in the T&D segment. In the C&I segment the customer base includes general contractors commercial and industrial facility owners governmental agencies and developers. Myr Group Inc. maintains long-standing relationships with many customers cultivated through a partnering approach involving project evaluation consulting quality performance performance measurement and direct customer contact.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

The company's strategic focus on expanding Master Service Agreements (MSAs) with major utilities positions it to capture predictable, long-duration revenue streams that are underappreciated by the market, as evidenced by the new 5-year Xcel Energy distribution MSA with over $500 million in anticipated revenue and two additional MSAs in the Northeast and Midwest. These agreements, which represented approximately 60% of T&D revenues in Q2 FY25, reduce bid-cycle volatility and enhance customer stickiness, creating a durable competitive advantage in a market where grid modernization investments are projected to exceed $1.4 trillion in the U.S. power sector from 2025 to 2030 per Deloitte Research. The market has not fully priced in the margin expansion potential from these MSAs, as better-than-anticipated productivity and favorable job closeouts on long-term contracts drove gross margin to 11.5% in Q2 FY25—more than double the prior year’s 4.9%—despite only modest revenue growth of 8.6%, indicating operating leverage is beginning to materialize as project execution improves and inefficiencies from prior clean energy projects subside. Furthermore, the company’s self-perform model for 100% of electrical work, combined with disciplined labor investment in training and recruitment, provides insulation from subcontractor margin compression risks that peers face, allowing MYRG to maintain pricing power and quality control in high-demand segments like data centers and transmission rebuilds, where backlog grew 4% year-over-year to $2.64 billion as of June 30, 2025, with strong conversion from recently awarded projects like the $90 million Colorado data center award.
The Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment is benefiting from structural tailwinds in nonresidential construction that are broader and more sustainable than the market acknowledges, particularly in manufacturing, educational, and institutional building, which saw 4.8%, 3.9%, and 10.5% growth respectively in recent Dodge Momentum Index and Census Bureau data, with data center spending alone up 24% year-over-year as of May 2025. MYRG’s C&I backlog of $1.72 billion as of June 30, 2025, reflects deep penetration into these high-growth niches, and the company’s ability to win work in aerospace, healthcare, battery storage, and transportation—without relying on a single dominant vertical—demonstrates resilience against sector-specific downturns. Management’s commentary on clients issuing limited notices to proceed for long-lead equipment indicates that project timelines are being actively managed to prevent delays, countering fears of tariff or supply chain disruptions, while the segment’s operating income margin expanded to 5.6% in Q2 FY25 from just 0.4% in the prior year period, driven by the non-recurrence of contingent compensation expenses and a shift toward higher-margin fixed-price contracts. The market is underestimating the scalability of this model, as C&I revenues grew 6% year-over-year despite broader economic uncertainty, and the segment’s diversified end-market exposure provides a buffer against cyclical weakness in any single industry, a fact reinforced by the absence of meaningful project rebids or schedule extensions cited during the Q&A.
Capital allocation discipline is creating an underappreciated shareholder yield opportunity, as the company’s new $75 million share repurchase program—authorized to replace the prior initiative and expiring in February 2026—combined with a strong balance sheet featuring $383 million in borrowing availability, $251 million in working capital, and a funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio of just 0.46x as of June 30, 2025, provides ample flexibility to return capital without compromising growth investments. Despite peers pursuing aggressive M&A in the C&I space at elevated multiples, MYRG’s deliberate approach—waiting for the right strategic fit at a fair price—avoids value-destructive deals while preserving financial flexibility, and the board’s authorization of the repurchase program signals confidence in intrinsic value. The market has not fully credited the compounding effect of buybacks on earnings per share, especially given that net income per diluted share rose to $1.70 in Q2 FY25 from a loss of $0.91 in the prior year period, and free cash flow increased to $12 million from $3 million year-over-year, with operating cash flow rising to $33 million from $23 million, indicating sustainable internal capital generation that supports both repurchases and selective acquisitions without increasing leverage. This balanced approach—prioritizing organic growth, prudent M&A, and shareholder returns—is a structural advantage in an industry where peers are over-leveraging to chase growth, and it positions MYRG to compound value through cycles.

The company's strategic focus on expanding Master Service Agreements (MSAs) with major utilities positions it to capture predictable, long-duration revenue streams that are underappreciated by the market, as evidenced by the new 5-year Xcel Energy distribution MSA with over $500 million in anticipated revenue and two additional MSAs in the Northeast and Midwest. These agreements, which represented approximately 60% of T&D revenues in Q2 FY25, reduce bid-cycle volatility and enhance customer stickiness, creating a durable competitive advantage in a market where grid modernization investments are projected to exceed $1.4 trillion in the U.S. power sector from 2025 to 2030 per Deloitte Research. The market has not fully priced in the margin expansion potential from these MSAs, as better-than-anticipated productivity and favorable job closeouts on long-term contracts drove gross margin to 11.5% in Q2 FY25—more than double the prior year’s 4.9%—despite only modest revenue growth of 8.6%, indicating operating leverage is beginning to materialize as project execution improves and inefficiencies from prior clean energy projects subside. Furthermore, the company’s self-perform model for 100% of electrical work, combined with disciplined labor investment in training and recruitment, provides insulation from subcontractor margin compression risks that peers face, allowing MYRG to maintain pricing power and quality control in high-demand segments like data centers and transmission rebuilds, where backlog grew 4% year-over-year to $2.64 billion as of June 30, 2025, with strong conversion from recently awarded projects like the $90 million Colorado data center award.
The Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment is benefiting from structural tailwinds in nonresidential construction that are broader and more sustainable than the market acknowledges, particularly in manufacturing, educational, and institutional building, which saw 4.8%, 3.9%, and 10.5% growth respectively in recent Dodge Momentum Index and Census Bureau data, with data center spending alone up 24% year-over-year as of May 2025. MYRG’s C&I backlog of $1.72 billion as of June 30, 2025, reflects deep penetration into these high-growth niches, and the company’s ability to win work in aerospace, healthcare, battery storage, and transportation—without relying on a single dominant vertical—demonstrates resilience against sector-specific downturns. Management’s commentary on clients issuing limited notices to proceed for long-lead equipment indicates that project timelines are being actively managed to prevent delays, countering fears of tariff or supply chain disruptions, while the segment’s operating income margin expanded to 5.6% in Q2 FY25 from just 0.4% in the prior year period, driven by the non-recurrence of contingent compensation expenses and a shift toward higher-margin fixed-price contracts. The market is underestimating the scalability of this model, as C&I revenues grew 6% year-over-year despite broader economic uncertainty, and the segment’s diversified end-market exposure provides a buffer against cyclical weakness in any single industry, a fact reinforced by the absence of meaningful project rebids or schedule extensions cited during the Q&A.
Capital allocation discipline is creating an underappreciated shareholder yield opportunity, as the company’s new $75 million share repurchase program—authorized to replace the prior initiative and expiring in February 2026—combined with a strong balance sheet featuring $383 million in borrowing availability, $251 million in working capital, and a funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio of just 0.46x as of June 30, 2025, provides ample flexibility to return capital without compromising growth investments. Despite peers pursuing aggressive M&A in the C&I space at elevated multiples, MYRG’s deliberate approach—waiting for the right strategic fit at a fair price—avoids value-destructive deals while preserving financial flexibility, and the board’s authorization of the repurchase program signals confidence in intrinsic value. The market has not fully credited the compounding effect of buybacks on earnings per share, especially given that net income per diluted share rose to $1.70 in Q2 FY25 from a loss of $0.91 in the prior year period, and free cash flow increased to $12 million from $3 million year-over-year, with operating cash flow rising to $33 million from $23 million, indicating sustainable internal capital generation that supports both repurchases and selective acquisitions without increasing leverage. This balanced approach—prioritizing organic growth, prudent M&A, and shareholder returns—is a structural advantage in an industry where peers are over-leveraging to chase growth, and it positions MYRG to compound value through cycles.

▼ Bear case

The company’s transmission and distribution (T&D) segment remains overly dependent on volatile clean energy and solar-related projects, which despite management’s claims of selectivity, continue to pose hidden margin risks that are not being adequately addressed, as evidenced by the explicit acknowledgment that Q2 FY24’s gross margin of 4.9% was negatively impacted by certain T&D clean energy projects and a C&I project, with similar project types still in the portfolio and contributing to the 10% T&D revenue contribution from solar work noted by Kelly Huntington as declining but still material. The market is ignoring the potential for recurring project inefficiencies and unfavorable change orders on these complex, innovation-driven installations—particularly as grid modernization efforts accelerate and utilities push for faster deployment of intermittent resources—which could again erode margins if productivity gains seen in Q2 FY25 (cited as a key driver of the 11.5% gross margin) prove temporary or project-specific, especially given that labor costs and project inefficiencies were explicitly called out as partial offsets to margin improvement, signaling ongoing operational fragility in high-complexity work. Furthermore, the reliance on master service agreements, while providing revenue predictability, may conceal deteriorating underlying project economics if cost overruns on long-term contracts are absorbed through change orders or scope creep, a risk amplified by the company’s self-perform model which leaves it fully exposed to labor productivity fluctuations and wage inflation in tight skilled trades markets, with no clear hedging strategy disclosed for labor or material cost volatility beyond general statements about training and recruitment.
The Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment’s backlog growth and margin expansion are being driven by non-recurring and transient factors that create a misleading impression of sustainable strength, most notably the $90 million data center award in Colorado, which while significant, represents a single large project that may not be indicative of broad-based demand, and the C&I operating income margin expansion to 5.6% in Q2 FY25 from 0.4% in the prior year period was heavily influenced by the non-recurrence of contingent compensation expenses tied to a prior acquisition—a one-time benefit that will not repeat—and a favorable job closeout on unspecified projects, which management admitted was a partial driver of gross margin improvement, suggesting that core operational profitability in C&I remains weak and highly sensitive to project-specific outcomes rather than structural improvements in pricing power or execution efficiency. The market is failing to scrutinize the segment’s dependence on winning large, lumpy projects like data centers and aerospace work, which are inherently cyclical and subject to sudden shifts in client capital allocation, as highlighted by Don Egan’s acknowledgment that bidding activity remains healthy only “even as wider economic questions linger,” implying vulnerability to macroeconomic downturns that could rapidly evaporate the pipeline, especially given that the C&I backlog of $1.72 billion as of June 30, 2025, while up year-over-year, showed sequential decline that management dismissed as “normal progression” but which could instead reflect weakening new award momentum masked by the timing of large project completions.
Capital allocation strategy is overly conservative and potentially value-destructive, as the company’s refusal to pursue aggressive M&A despite a strong balance sheet—with $86 million in funded debt, $383 million in borrowing availability, and a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of just 0.46x—represents a missed opportunity to consolidate fragmentation in the C&I space where peers are acquiring scale at premium multiples, and the authorization of a $75 million share repurchase program while organic growth remains modest (high single-digit T&D and C&I growth excluding solar) suggests management may be prioritizing short-term EPS boosts over long-term competitive positioning, particularly when the market values scale and integrated service capabilities in electrical contracting, as evidenced by the continued strength of firms that have rolled up regional players to serve national accounts in data centers, transportation, and manufacturing. The market is ignoring the risk that MYRG’s disciplined approach—waiting for the “right” acquisition at a “fair” multiple—may result in prolonged inaction while competitors secure strategic assets, leaving the company unable to bid on the largest, most complex projects that require broad geographic footprints and diversified service lines, a limitation that could become critical as infrastructure spending accelerates and utilities and corporate clients demand single-source providers capable of handling end-to-end execution, a gap that organic growth alone is unlikely to bridge quickly enough to prevent market share erosion in key verticals. Furthermore, the reliance on share buybacks to drive shareholder returns assumes the stock is undervalued, but with the company trading at elevated multiples relative to peers on a forward EV/EBITDA basis (implied by the strong recovery in earnings from a low base), this capital return may be suboptimal compared to reinvesting in capabilities that could capture higher-margin, scalable work in emerging sectors like grid-edge technologies or renewable integration, where the company has explicitly retreated from solar T&D work and shown only selective interest in C&I renewables.

The company’s transmission and distribution (T&D) segment remains overly dependent on volatile clean energy and solar-related projects, which despite management’s claims of selectivity, continue to pose hidden margin risks that are not being adequately addressed, as evidenced by the explicit acknowledgment that Q2 FY24’s gross margin of 4.9% was negatively impacted by certain T&D clean energy projects and a C&I project, with similar project types still in the portfolio and contributing to the 10% T&D revenue contribution from solar work noted by Kelly Huntington as declining but still material. The market is ignoring the potential for recurring project inefficiencies and unfavorable change orders on these complex, innovation-driven installations—particularly as grid modernization efforts accelerate and utilities push for faster deployment of intermittent resources—which could again erode margins if productivity gains seen in Q2 FY25 (cited as a key driver of the 11.5% gross margin) prove temporary or project-specific, especially given that labor costs and project inefficiencies were explicitly called out as partial offsets to margin improvement, signaling ongoing operational fragility in high-complexity work. Furthermore, the reliance on master service agreements, while providing revenue predictability, may conceal deteriorating underlying project economics if cost overruns on long-term contracts are absorbed through change orders or scope creep, a risk amplified by the company’s self-perform model which leaves it fully exposed to labor productivity fluctuations and wage inflation in tight skilled trades markets, with no clear hedging strategy disclosed for labor or material cost volatility beyond general statements about training and recruitment.
The Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment’s backlog growth and margin expansion are being driven by non-recurring and transient factors that create a misleading impression of sustainable strength, most notably the $90 million data center award in Colorado, which while significant, represents a single large project that may not be indicative of broad-based demand, and the C&I operating income margin expansion to 5.6% in Q2 FY25 from 0.4% in the prior year period was heavily influenced by the non-recurrence of contingent compensation expenses tied to a prior acquisition—a one-time benefit that will not repeat—and a favorable job closeout on unspecified projects, which management admitted was a partial driver of gross margin improvement, suggesting that core operational profitability in C&I remains weak and highly sensitive to project-specific outcomes rather than structural improvements in pricing power or execution efficiency. The market is failing to scrutinize the segment’s dependence on winning large, lumpy projects like data centers and aerospace work, which are inherently cyclical and subject to sudden shifts in client capital allocation, as highlighted by Don Egan’s acknowledgment that bidding activity remains healthy only “even as wider economic questions linger,” implying vulnerability to macroeconomic downturns that could rapidly evaporate the pipeline, especially given that the C&I backlog of $1.72 billion as of June 30, 2025, while up year-over-year, showed sequential decline that management dismissed as “normal progression” but which could instead reflect weakening new award momentum masked by the timing of large project completions.
Capital allocation strategy is overly conservative and potentially value-destructive, as the company’s refusal to pursue aggressive M&A despite a strong balance sheet—with $86 million in funded debt, $383 million in borrowing availability, and a debt-to-EBITDA ratio of just 0.46x—represents a missed opportunity to consolidate fragmentation in the C&I space where peers are acquiring scale at premium multiples, and the authorization of a $75 million share repurchase program while organic growth remains modest (high single-digit T&D and C&I growth excluding solar) suggests management may be prioritizing short-term EPS boosts over long-term competitive positioning, particularly when the market values scale and integrated service capabilities in electrical contracting, as evidenced by the continued strength of firms that have rolled up regional players to serve national accounts in data centers, transportation, and manufacturing. The market is ignoring the risk that MYRG’s disciplined approach—waiting for the “right” acquisition at a “fair” multiple—may result in prolonged inaction while competitors secure strategic assets, leaving the company unable to bid on the largest, most complex projects that require broad geographic footprints and diversified service lines, a limitation that could become critical as infrastructure spending accelerates and utilities and corporate clients demand single-source providers capable of handling end-to-end execution, a gap that organic growth alone is unlikely to bridge quickly enough to prevent market share erosion in key verticals. Furthermore, the reliance on share buybacks to drive shareholder returns assumes the stock is undervalued, but with the company trading at elevated multiples relative to peers on a forward EV/EBITDA basis (implied by the strong recovery in earnings from a low base), this capital return may be suboptimal compared to reinvesting in capabilities that could capture higher-margin, scalable work in emerging sectors like grid-edge technologies or renewable integration, where the company has explicitly retreated from solar T&D work and shown only selective interest in C&I renewables.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Engineering & Construction

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	STN	Stantec Inc	7,704.08 Bn	7,675.69	591.81	1.34 Bn
2	PWR	Quanta Services, Inc.	103.60 Bn	92.14	3.44	5.89 Bn
3	MTZ	Mastec Inc	30.47 Bn	63.56	1.99	2.53 Bn
4	STRL	Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.	23.80 Bn	63.82	8.25	0.29 Bn
5	APG	APi Group Corp	18.02 Bn	-67.25	2.20	2.76 Bn
6	J	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	14.73 Bn	-745.61	1.12	4.08 Bn
7	IESC	IES Holdings, Inc.	13.95 Bn	38.52	3.84	0.04 Bn
8	ACM	Aecom	8.61 Bn	-69.12	0.54	2.71 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password