Mgic Investment Corp (MTG) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Mgic Investment

NYSE: MTG

$29.66 ▲ +0.70 (+2.40%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap6.42 Bn

P/E8.95

P/S6.30

Div. Yield0.02

Total Debt (Qtr)646.51 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)21.89

Add ratio to table…

About

MGIC Investment Corporation is a holding company that through its wholly owned subsidiaries provides private mortgage insurance other mortgage credit risk management solutions and ancillary services. The company operates primarily in the United States mortgage insurance industry where it insures residential mortgage loans against borrower default. The company generates revenue chiefly from premiums collected on private mortgage insurance policies it writes. Additional…

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

MGIC reported a robust increase in new insurance written NIW of 41% year over year reaching fourteen billion dollars in the first quarter driven by higher refinance activity and a modestly larger purchase market. This surge indicates that the company is successfully capturing demand in a rate environment where borrowers are seeking to lower monthly payments through refinancing. Management highlighted that if mortgage rates were to decline further than currently predicted the size of the MI market would benefit from additional refinance activity. Even though persistency may dip slightly the underlying premium revenue from new policies would likely offset any persistency drag. The ability to grow NIW while maintaining disciplined underwriting suggests that MGIC can expand its earnings base without compromising credit quality. This positions the company to benefit from any future rate‑driven uptick in housing activity.
The quarterly re‑estimation of ultimate losses on prior delinquencies produced thirty one million dollars of favorable loss reserve development primarily because cure rates on delinquency notices received in 2025 exceeded expectations. This favorable development signals that the underlying credit performance of the portfolio is stronger than historical averages and that the company is releasing capital that can be redeployed to growth initiatives or shareholder returns. Management noted that long‑term cure rates remain attractive and have not shown signs of slowing down which supports continued reserve releases in future quarters. The improving cure trend reduces expected loss ratios and enhances profitability on existing in force business. This hidden strength in credit quality provides a cushion against potential macroeconomic headwinds and adds to the earnings upside that the market may be overlooking.
MGIC’s capital structure remains robust with six billion dollars of balance sheet capital and a well established reinsurance program that reduced PMIERs required assets by three point one billion dollars or approximately fifty two%. The reinsurance panel consists of highly rated reinsurers which lowers loss volatility in stress scenarios while providing capital diversification at attractive costs. Management emphasized that they prioritize prudent insurance in force growth over capital return yet they have consistently returned capital through share repurchases and dividends. The recent authorization of an additional seven hundred fifty million dollar share repurchase program and the four hundred million dollar dividend to the holding company demonstrate confidence in intrinsic value. This balanced approach allows MGIC to sustain high payout ratios while preserving financial strength across a range of macroeconomic environments. The market may be underestimating the flexibility this capital framework provides for future growth or defensive positioning.
FHFA’s announcement of advances in credit score modernization including the adoption of VantageScore 4.0 and FICO Score 10T aims to lower costs for borrowers and expand eligibility for mortgage credit. MGIC expressed full support for these initiatives and is actively working with the GSEs lenders and technology partners to operationalize the changes. By embracing newer scoring models the company could access a broader pool of low down payment borrowers who previously might have been excluded due to legacy scoring limitations. This expansion could drive additional NIW growth without requiring a relaxation of underwriting standards because the new scores are designed to maintain risk predictability. The potential uplift in addressable market represents a structural shift that could sustain long term volume growth independent of short term rate cycles. The market may not yet be pricing in the incremental revenue stream from this credit score evolution.
Expense discipline remains a core tenet of MGIC’s operating model with underwriting and other expenses down to forty eight million dollars in the quarter from fifty three million dollars a year earlier. Management continues to expect full year operating expenses in the range of one hundred ninety million to two hundred million dollars reflecting a controlled cost base. Investment income totaled sixty two million dollars flat sequentially and year over year as the book yield on the fixed income portfolio has been around four% for the past year. Reinvestment rates on the portfolio continue to exceed the book yield yet capital return activities have limited investment portfolio growth. This combination of stable investment earnings and tight expense control creates a predictable earnings floor that can absorb volatility in underwriting results. The market may be overlooking the stability that this cost structure provides especially during periods of uncertain housing demand.

MGIC reported a robust increase in new insurance written NIW of 41% year over year reaching fourteen billion dollars in the first quarter driven by higher refinance activity and a modestly larger purchase market. This surge indicates that the company is successfully capturing demand in a rate environment where borrowers are seeking to lower monthly payments through refinancing. Management highlighted that if mortgage rates were to decline further than currently predicted the size of the MI market would benefit from additional refinance activity. Even though persistency may dip slightly the underlying premium revenue from new policies would likely offset any persistency drag. The ability to grow NIW while maintaining disciplined underwriting suggests that MGIC can expand its earnings base without compromising credit quality. This positions the company to benefit from any future rate‑driven uptick in housing activity.
The quarterly re‑estimation of ultimate losses on prior delinquencies produced thirty one million dollars of favorable loss reserve development primarily because cure rates on delinquency notices received in 2025 exceeded expectations. This favorable development signals that the underlying credit performance of the portfolio is stronger than historical averages and that the company is releasing capital that can be redeployed to growth initiatives or shareholder returns. Management noted that long‑term cure rates remain attractive and have not shown signs of slowing down which supports continued reserve releases in future quarters. The improving cure trend reduces expected loss ratios and enhances profitability on existing in force business. This hidden strength in credit quality provides a cushion against potential macroeconomic headwinds and adds to the earnings upside that the market may be overlooking.
MGIC’s capital structure remains robust with six billion dollars of balance sheet capital and a well established reinsurance program that reduced PMIERs required assets by three point one billion dollars or approximately fifty two%. The reinsurance panel consists of highly rated reinsurers which lowers loss volatility in stress scenarios while providing capital diversification at attractive costs. Management emphasized that they prioritize prudent insurance in force growth over capital return yet they have consistently returned capital through share repurchases and dividends. The recent authorization of an additional seven hundred fifty million dollar share repurchase program and the four hundred million dollar dividend to the holding company demonstrate confidence in intrinsic value. This balanced approach allows MGIC to sustain high payout ratios while preserving financial strength across a range of macroeconomic environments. The market may be underestimating the flexibility this capital framework provides for future growth or defensive positioning.
FHFA’s announcement of advances in credit score modernization including the adoption of VantageScore 4.0 and FICO Score 10T aims to lower costs for borrowers and expand eligibility for mortgage credit. MGIC expressed full support for these initiatives and is actively working with the GSEs lenders and technology partners to operationalize the changes. By embracing newer scoring models the company could access a broader pool of low down payment borrowers who previously might have been excluded due to legacy scoring limitations. This expansion could drive additional NIW growth without requiring a relaxation of underwriting standards because the new scores are designed to maintain risk predictability. The potential uplift in addressable market represents a structural shift that could sustain long term volume growth independent of short term rate cycles. The market may not yet be pricing in the incremental revenue stream from this credit score evolution.
Expense discipline remains a core tenet of MGIC’s operating model with underwriting and other expenses down to forty eight million dollars in the quarter from fifty three million dollars a year earlier. Management continues to expect full year operating expenses in the range of one hundred ninety million to two hundred million dollars reflecting a controlled cost base. Investment income totaled sixty two million dollars flat sequentially and year over year as the book yield on the fixed income portfolio has been around four% for the past year. Reinvestment rates on the portfolio continue to exceed the book yield yet capital return activities have limited investment portfolio growth. This combination of stable investment earnings and tight expense control creates a predictable earnings floor that can absorb volatility in underwriting results. The market may be overlooking the stability that this cost structure provides especially during periods of uncertain housing demand.

▼ Bear case

Although NIW grew sharply in the first quarter the increase was largely driven by refinance activity which is highly sensitive to mortgage rate movements. Management acknowledged that if rates were to decline further than currently predicted the MI market would benefit from additional refinance activity but also warned that growth in insurance in force would be offset by lower persistency. Persistency already slipped to eighty four% from eighty five% last quarter and the annual measure showed a slight decline during the quarter. A sustained low rate environment could therefore lead to higher NIW but lower persistency reducing the durability of the in force book and potentially pressuring future premium revenue. The market may be overestimating the sustainability of NIW growth without considering the persistency trade off that accompanies a refinance‑led boom.
The company’s delinquency rate increased one basis point quarter over quarter and fourteen basis points year over year despite historically favorable seasonal trends in the first quarter. Management attributed part of the rise to timing differences in servicer reporting of delinquencies but acknowledged that longer term cure rates, while still attractive, have normalized from pre‑COVID levels. The account‑based delinquency rate is creeping upward and the roll rates between buckets are also a little worse on a year over year basis. If the upward trend in delinquencies continues it could erode the favorable loss reserve development seen this quarter and lead to higher expected losses. The market might be ignoring the nascent signs of credit deterioration that could eventually require higher reserves and impact earnings.
MGIC’s capital return activity has been aggressive with share repurchases totaling seven hundred fifty million dollars over the prior four quarters and dividends of one hundred thirty eight million dollars representing a one hundred twenty three% payout of net income earned over that period. While the board views this as a reflection of strong credit performance and financial results the company also noted that capital return decisions are contingent on macroeconomic conditions remaining consistent with historical patterns. Should the economic environment deteriorate— for example if unemployment rises or GDP growth slows—the capacity to sustain such high payout ratios could be challenged. The reliance on capital return to drive shareholder value may leave less buffer for absorbing unexpected losses or investing in growth initiatives. The market may be assuming that the current payout level is sustainable without stress testing it against adverse scenarios.
The discussion around AOCI indicated that management treats unrealized gains and losses on the investment portfolio as temporary and views them as noise for capital return decisions. However AOCI fluctuations can affect book value per share and investor perception of financial strength. In the first quarter AOCI did not help keep capital flat as it had in the prior year which contributed to a more noticeable impact on leverage metrics. If market volatility causes significant swings in the fixed income portfolio the resulting AOCI moves could lead to periods where statutory capital appears strained even if the underlying economic capital remains sound. Investors might be overlooking the potential for AOCI‑driven volatility to influence perceptions of solvency and thereby affect the company’s access to capital or cost of reinsurance.
Management highlighted that the power of interest rates drives activity and behavior in the mortgage insurance space more than higher prices for certain goods. Yet they also noted that wage growth has remained strong and nominal GDP continues to run very high which are offsetting factors. The reliance on interest rate sensitivity means that any persistent macroeconomic shock that disrupts rate expectations— such as a sudden inflation spike prompting tighter monetary policy—could suppress refinance activity and consequently NIW. At the same time higher rates could increase borrowing costs for homebuyers reducing purchase market demand. This dual exposure to rate movements creates a scenario where both the refinance and purchase channels could face headwinds simultaneously under certain macroeconomic conditions. The market may be underestimating the extent to which MGIC’s fortunes are tied to the direction and volatility of interest rates.

Although NIW grew sharply in the first quarter the increase was largely driven by refinance activity which is highly sensitive to mortgage rate movements. Management acknowledged that if rates were to decline further than currently predicted the MI market would benefit from additional refinance activity but also warned that growth in insurance in force would be offset by lower persistency. Persistency already slipped to eighty four% from eighty five% last quarter and the annual measure showed a slight decline during the quarter. A sustained low rate environment could therefore lead to higher NIW but lower persistency reducing the durability of the in force book and potentially pressuring future premium revenue. The market may be overestimating the sustainability of NIW growth without considering the persistency trade off that accompanies a refinance‑led boom.
The company’s delinquency rate increased one basis point quarter over quarter and fourteen basis points year over year despite historically favorable seasonal trends in the first quarter. Management attributed part of the rise to timing differences in servicer reporting of delinquencies but acknowledged that longer term cure rates, while still attractive, have normalized from pre‑COVID levels. The account‑based delinquency rate is creeping upward and the roll rates between buckets are also a little worse on a year over year basis. If the upward trend in delinquencies continues it could erode the favorable loss reserve development seen this quarter and lead to higher expected losses. The market might be ignoring the nascent signs of credit deterioration that could eventually require higher reserves and impact earnings.
MGIC’s capital return activity has been aggressive with share repurchases totaling seven hundred fifty million dollars over the prior four quarters and dividends of one hundred thirty eight million dollars representing a one hundred twenty three% payout of net income earned over that period. While the board views this as a reflection of strong credit performance and financial results the company also noted that capital return decisions are contingent on macroeconomic conditions remaining consistent with historical patterns. Should the economic environment deteriorate— for example if unemployment rises or GDP growth slows—the capacity to sustain such high payout ratios could be challenged. The reliance on capital return to drive shareholder value may leave less buffer for absorbing unexpected losses or investing in growth initiatives. The market may be assuming that the current payout level is sustainable without stress testing it against adverse scenarios.
The discussion around AOCI indicated that management treats unrealized gains and losses on the investment portfolio as temporary and views them as noise for capital return decisions. However AOCI fluctuations can affect book value per share and investor perception of financial strength. In the first quarter AOCI did not help keep capital flat as it had in the prior year which contributed to a more noticeable impact on leverage metrics. If market volatility causes significant swings in the fixed income portfolio the resulting AOCI moves could lead to periods where statutory capital appears strained even if the underlying economic capital remains sound. Investors might be overlooking the potential for AOCI‑driven volatility to influence perceptions of solvency and thereby affect the company’s access to capital or cost of reinsurance.
Management highlighted that the power of interest rates drives activity and behavior in the mortgage insurance space more than higher prices for certain goods. Yet they also noted that wage growth has remained strong and nominal GDP continues to run very high which are offsetting factors. The reliance on interest rate sensitivity means that any persistent macroeconomic shock that disrupts rate expectations— such as a sudden inflation spike prompting tighter monetary policy—could suppress refinance activity and consequently NIW. At the same time higher rates could increase borrowing costs for homebuyers reducing purchase market demand. This dual exposure to rate movements creates a scenario where both the refinance and purchase channels could face headwinds simultaneously under certain macroeconomic conditions. The market may be underestimating the extent to which MGIC’s fortunes are tied to the direction and volatility of interest rates.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Insurance - Specialty

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	FNF	Fidelity National Financial, Inc.	13.89 Bn	15.70	0.93	4.40 Bn
2	AXS	Axis Capital Holdings Ltd	8.66 Bn	8.33	1.29	0.07 Bn
3	FAF	First American Financial Corp	7.75 Bn	8.85	1.01	-
4	ACT	Enact Holdings, Inc.	6.62 Bn	9.79	5.12	0.74 Bn
5	MTG	Mgic Investment Corp	6.42 Bn	8.95	6.30	0.65 Bn
6	ESNT	Essent Group Ltd.	6.17 Bn	8.99	4.60	0.50 Bn
7	RDN	Radian Group Inc	5.30 Bn	43.78	4.06	1.27 Bn
8	AGO	Assured Guaranty Ltd	3.84 Bn	8.74	7.09	1.71 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password