Kbr, Inc. (KBR) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Kbr

NYSE: KBR

$36.28 ▼ -0.39 (-1.06%)

At close: Jul 8, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap4.40 Bn

P/E-86.36

P/S0.57

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)2.58 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-4.71

Add ratio to table…

About

KBR Inc. delivers science technology engineering and logistics support solutions to the U. S. federal government allied nations and commercial clients around the world.

KBR generates revenue by providing professional services and technology solutions including leading national security and defense systems engineering rapid prototyping test and evaluation aerospace acquisition support data analytics and systems integration sustainment engineering operational expertise in space domain awareness C5ISR human spaceflight and satellite operations integrated supply chain and logistics and military aviation support advanced digital artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions in cyber analytics cybersecurity space and air dominance connected battlespace national security intelligence data analytics mission planning systems virtual and augmented reality technical training and artificial intelligence and machine learning scientific research such as quantum science and computing health and human performance materials science life science research and earth sciences engineering and project management solutions to advance energy security sustainable decarbonization energy transition and asset optimization proprietary sustainability-focused process licensing energy transition and security advisory services and digitally-enabled asset optimization solutions and professional advisory services across the defense renewable energy and critical infrastructure sectors.

The company operates through the following segments: Mission Technology Solutions and Sustainable Technology Solutions.

• Mission Technology Solutions provides full life-cycle support solutions to defense intelligence space aviation and other programs and missions for military and other government agencies primarily in the U. S. U. K. and Australia. KBR's full-spectrum solutions span research and development advanced prototyping acquisition support systems engineering C5ISR cyber analytics space domain awareness test and evaluation data analytics and integration systems integration and program management global supply chain management operations readiness and support and professional advisory services across the defense energy security and transition and critical infrastructure sectors.

• Sustainable Technology Solutions is anchored by a portfolio of over 85 innovative proprietary sustainability-focused process technologies that reduce emissions increase efficiency and/or accelerate and enable energy transition across the industrial base in four primary verticals: ammonia/syngas chemical/petrochemicals clean refining and circular process/circular economy solutions. STS also provides highly synergistic services including advisory and consulting focused on energy security broad-based energy transition and net-zero carbon emission solutions high-end engineering design and program management centered around decarbonization energy efficiency environmental impact and asset optimization as well as digitally-enabled operating and monitoring solutions.

KBR operates in global markets with customers who demand innovation technical and domain expertise and digitally enabled technology-led sustainable solutions. The company differentiates itself through its people sustainability leadership technical excellence and digital solutions customer relationships and financial strength. KBR's competitive advantages include a distinctive mission-focused and inclusive team ethos internationally recognized subject matter experts with deep domain knowledge an employee base with high-level security clearance a Zero Harm philosophy with ten key areas of sustainability focus carbon neutrality since 2019 and net-zero carbon ambition a leading hydrogen energy enabler status with proprietary green ammonia solution K-GreeN TM exclusive licensor of Hydro-PRT TM technology for plastic recycling over 85 innovative sustainable proprietary process technologies advanced digital capabilities including artificial intelligence and machine learning virtual and augmented reality visualizations decades of enduring relationships with government and commercial clients and a diverse portfolio of multi-year mission-critical programs creating stability and resilience with low capital intensity and strong liquidity.

KBR serves a diverse customer base including domestic and foreign governments and commercial and industrial companies. Key customers include U. S. Department of War agencies such as the U. S. Army Navy Air Force Space Force Missile Defense Agency National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency National Reconnaissance Office and other intelligence agencies U. S. civilian agencies such as NASA U. S. Geological Survey and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration the U. K. Ministry of Defence other U. K. Crown Services the Royal Australian Air Force Navy and Army and other national governments.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

The sustainable technology business ended the quarter with backlog of approximately 4.7 billion dollars up 9% year over year driven by strong bookings in energy security downstream reliability and long duration asset services. The non LNG book to bill ratio was 1.2 times for the quarter and the trailing twelve month ratio also stood at 1.2 times indicating consistent demand generation. Repeat customers contributed roughly 80% of the pipeline exceeding 5 billion dollars excluding LNG which highlights the durability of relationships and reduces reliance on single large awards. The company’s engineering led capital light model allows it to layer recurring operations and maintenance services onto project work deepening customer ties and improving visibility into future revenue. Digital capabilities added through the partnership with Applied Computing are expected to connect project execution to maintenance and operations while preserving the capital light approach. This combination of diversified pipeline repeat business and digital enablement positions STS for steady growth even amid geopolitical volatility.
Margin expansion in STS is underpinned by a structural shift toward higher margin technology licensing and joint venture operations services which are less cyclical than pure construction work. The base business margin excluding the LNG project was 16.1% in the quarter and management indicated a long term target of 15% trending upward as the mix shifts toward licensing and JV OpEx. The LNG project contributed an incremental 500 basis points to STS margin but its contribution is portfolio based meaning that as it rolls off the backfill will come from multiple higher margin streams rather than a single replacement. Growth in technology licenses and proprietary equipment sales is expected to drive the weighted margin toward the 20% plus range over time. Joint venture OpEx work under the Bris platform is anticipated to increase volume in the second half of the year providing additional EBITDA contribution. This deliberate portfolio shaping creates a more durable margin profile that is less dependent on any single large contract.
Mission Tech is seeing durable demand in space and national security areas where the U.S. Space Force and allied defense customers prioritize digital engineering analytics and AI driven insights to accelerate capability development. The company recently won work supporting the Space Force applying digital engineering and analytics to help accelerate development and deployment of next generation space capabilities. It also secured a role providing direct data and analytical support to senior defense leaders focused on translating complex data into actionable insight for critical decisions. In the intelligence side KBR has demonstrated strong performance in space intelligence which aligns with the administration’s emphasis on decision advantage and connected battlefield concepts. These programs value speed integration and measurable mission outcomes which are core strengths of KBR’s mission critical execution model. The underlying mission priorities are enduring and funding durability is expected to improve as award protests resolve and funding restrictions ease.
Critical minerals and circularity represent a growing structural theme where governments and producers are focused on maintaining and expanding supply of essential inputs such as ammonia and other processed materials. KBR secured a long term catalyst supply agreement supporting Indorama’s ammonia operations alongside optimization work across chemicals and materials assets during the quarter. The business is seeing early engineering led scopes for licensed ammonia technology and proprietary solutions which support durable near term booking opportunities. Demand is being driven by resource security considerations in the Middle East Africa and parts of the Americas where customers prioritize reliability redundancy and throughput expansion. The company’s established local footprint and relationships enable it to capture these opportunities while maintaining a capital light approach through selective program and project management work. Over the medium term this theme is likely to generate recurring revenue streams that are less sensitive to cyclical capital spending swings.
The planned spin of the Mission Government Services business into a separate pure play entity is designed to unlock shareholder value by allowing each company to pursue a clear strategic focus aligned with its end markets. Management has reiterated that the strategic rationale for the separation remains unchanged and that a fourth quarter timeline provides additional runway to address IT systems legal entity and leadership transition complexities. Investor Days scheduled for the second week of November will outline the stand alone strategy operating models and long term priorities for both the Sustainable Technology and Mission Tech businesses ahead of the transaction close. By separating the businesses KBR expects to eliminate conglomerate discounts and enable investors to value each pure play on its own merits potentially leading to a re rating of the stock. The spin also allows each entity to allocate capital more efficiently without the constraints of a mixed portfolio supporting targeted investments in growth areas such as digital capabilities and critical minerals. Overall the separation is viewed as a catalyst that could sharpen focus improve operational execution and create long term value for shareholders.

The sustainable technology business ended the quarter with backlog of approximately 4.7 billion dollars up 9% year over year driven by strong bookings in energy security downstream reliability and long duration asset services. The non LNG book to bill ratio was 1.2 times for the quarter and the trailing twelve month ratio also stood at 1.2 times indicating consistent demand generation. Repeat customers contributed roughly 80% of the pipeline exceeding 5 billion dollars excluding LNG which highlights the durability of relationships and reduces reliance on single large awards. The company’s engineering led capital light model allows it to layer recurring operations and maintenance services onto project work deepening customer ties and improving visibility into future revenue. Digital capabilities added through the partnership with Applied Computing are expected to connect project execution to maintenance and operations while preserving the capital light approach. This combination of diversified pipeline repeat business and digital enablement positions STS for steady growth even amid geopolitical volatility.
Margin expansion in STS is underpinned by a structural shift toward higher margin technology licensing and joint venture operations services which are less cyclical than pure construction work. The base business margin excluding the LNG project was 16.1% in the quarter and management indicated a long term target of 15% trending upward as the mix shifts toward licensing and JV OpEx. The LNG project contributed an incremental 500 basis points to STS margin but its contribution is portfolio based meaning that as it rolls off the backfill will come from multiple higher margin streams rather than a single replacement. Growth in technology licenses and proprietary equipment sales is expected to drive the weighted margin toward the 20% plus range over time. Joint venture OpEx work under the Bris platform is anticipated to increase volume in the second half of the year providing additional EBITDA contribution. This deliberate portfolio shaping creates a more durable margin profile that is less dependent on any single large contract.
Mission Tech is seeing durable demand in space and national security areas where the U.S. Space Force and allied defense customers prioritize digital engineering analytics and AI driven insights to accelerate capability development. The company recently won work supporting the Space Force applying digital engineering and analytics to help accelerate development and deployment of next generation space capabilities. It also secured a role providing direct data and analytical support to senior defense leaders focused on translating complex data into actionable insight for critical decisions. In the intelligence side KBR has demonstrated strong performance in space intelligence which aligns with the administration’s emphasis on decision advantage and connected battlefield concepts. These programs value speed integration and measurable mission outcomes which are core strengths of KBR’s mission critical execution model. The underlying mission priorities are enduring and funding durability is expected to improve as award protests resolve and funding restrictions ease.
Critical minerals and circularity represent a growing structural theme where governments and producers are focused on maintaining and expanding supply of essential inputs such as ammonia and other processed materials. KBR secured a long term catalyst supply agreement supporting Indorama’s ammonia operations alongside optimization work across chemicals and materials assets during the quarter. The business is seeing early engineering led scopes for licensed ammonia technology and proprietary solutions which support durable near term booking opportunities. Demand is being driven by resource security considerations in the Middle East Africa and parts of the Americas where customers prioritize reliability redundancy and throughput expansion. The company’s established local footprint and relationships enable it to capture these opportunities while maintaining a capital light approach through selective program and project management work. Over the medium term this theme is likely to generate recurring revenue streams that are less sensitive to cyclical capital spending swings.
The planned spin of the Mission Government Services business into a separate pure play entity is designed to unlock shareholder value by allowing each company to pursue a clear strategic focus aligned with its end markets. Management has reiterated that the strategic rationale for the separation remains unchanged and that a fourth quarter timeline provides additional runway to address IT systems legal entity and leadership transition complexities. Investor Days scheduled for the second week of November will outline the stand alone strategy operating models and long term priorities for both the Sustainable Technology and Mission Tech businesses ahead of the transaction close. By separating the businesses KBR expects to eliminate conglomerate discounts and enable investors to value each pure play on its own merits potentially leading to a re rating of the stock. The spin also allows each entity to allocate capital more efficiently without the constraints of a mixed portfolio supporting targeted investments in growth areas such as digital capabilities and critical minerals. Overall the separation is viewed as a catalyst that could sharpen focus improve operational execution and create long term value for shareholders.

▼ Bear case

The potential in sourcing of core workforce competencies at NASA poses a tangible revenue risk for KBR as the agency evaluates moving contractor staff onto government payroll. Management indicated that the impact could be in the range of 50 million to 60 million dollars over the course of the year representing a notable portion of the Mission Tech revenue base. This shift would primarily affect the mix of work on programs where independent technical expertise and operational continuity are currently provided by KBR. While the change is expected to be gradual the ultimate scale and timing remain uncertain creating visibility challenges for forecasting Mission Tech revenue. A reduction in KBR’s role on NASA programs could also affect the company’s reputation as a long term partner in human space flight and related missions. Investors should monitor any formal announcements from NASA regarding workforce changes as they could lead to a downward revision of earnings expectations.
Mission Tech results continue to be affected by the planned reduction in EUCOM contingency work which was a significant headwind driving the 85 million dollar year over year revenue decline in the quarter. Excluding EUCOM the segment’s revenues were flat year over year with growth in U.S. and Australian defense programs offset by award delays protest activity and funding restrictions at NASA. The persistence of award delays and protests creates uncertainty around the timing of anticipated ramp activity particularly for the MIS contract which management described as timing driven. Funding restrictions stemming from congressional appropriations or shifting defense priorities could further constrain the ability to convert bid volume into awarded contracts. Until these headwinds subside Mission Tech may struggle to achieve meaningful top line growth despite underlying demand in enduring mission areas. Investors should watch for developments in protest resolutions and funding bills as they could materially influence the segment’s revenue trajectory.
STS margin performance remains heavily reliant on the contribution from the LNG project which added an estimated 500 basis points to profitability in the quarter. Once that project rolls off the base business margin of approximately 16.1% may not be sufficient to sustain the long term target of 20% plus without acceleration in higher margin streams. Growth in technology licensing and joint venture OpEx work is expected to backfill the LNG contribution but the pace and scale of that backfill are not yet fully visible to investors. If the shift toward licensing and recurring services lags the overall STS margin could compress putting pressure on adjusted EBITDA and EPS. The company’s disclosure that the backfill is portfolio based rather than a one for one replacement introduces execution risk as multiple initiatives must succeed simultaneously. Consequently the durability of STS margins is contingent on successful implementation of these strategic initiatives over the next twelve to eighteen months.
Geopolitical volatility in the Middle East could undermine the current resilience demonstrated by KBR’s operations despite management’s positive assessment of customer commitment and activity levels. Any escalation in conflict could disrupt supply chains increase security costs and impede staffing efforts on project sites potentially leading to delays or cost overruns. While the company has not observed a material change in capital spending priorities as customers continue to fund essential programs already underway a sudden shift in regional stability could alter those priorities quickly. KBR’s reliance on repeat customer relationships and local footprint may not fully insulate it from broader macroeconomic shocks that affect hydrocarbon revenues and government budgets. Investors should consider the possibility that the current strong pipeline in the region may be vulnerable to abrupt changes in the security environment. Consequently the medium term outlook for STS in the Middle East contains both upside from resilience work and downside from potential destabilization.
Execution of the spin transaction carries inherent risks including the complexity of separating IT systems rationalizing legal entities and aligning leadership teams across the two new organizations. Management noted that they are targeting an effective spin date of January 4 2027 which provides additional runway but also raises the possibility of delays if unforeseen challenges arise in data migration or regulatory approvals. A delayed spin could prolong period of duplicated costs distract management focus and create uncertainty among employees and customers. The transaction also involves tax considerations with the IRS private letter ruling process still underway and any adverse outcome could affect the tax free status of the separation. Furthermore the planned Investor Days in November are contingent on the spin timeline and any shift in timing could affect the relevance of the information presented to investors. Overall while the spin is intended to create value the execution risk should not be underestimated particularly given the scale of the undertaking.

The potential in sourcing of core workforce competencies at NASA poses a tangible revenue risk for KBR as the agency evaluates moving contractor staff onto government payroll. Management indicated that the impact could be in the range of 50 million to 60 million dollars over the course of the year representing a notable portion of the Mission Tech revenue base. This shift would primarily affect the mix of work on programs where independent technical expertise and operational continuity are currently provided by KBR. While the change is expected to be gradual the ultimate scale and timing remain uncertain creating visibility challenges for forecasting Mission Tech revenue. A reduction in KBR’s role on NASA programs could also affect the company’s reputation as a long term partner in human space flight and related missions. Investors should monitor any formal announcements from NASA regarding workforce changes as they could lead to a downward revision of earnings expectations.
Mission Tech results continue to be affected by the planned reduction in EUCOM contingency work which was a significant headwind driving the 85 million dollar year over year revenue decline in the quarter. Excluding EUCOM the segment’s revenues were flat year over year with growth in U.S. and Australian defense programs offset by award delays protest activity and funding restrictions at NASA. The persistence of award delays and protests creates uncertainty around the timing of anticipated ramp activity particularly for the MIS contract which management described as timing driven. Funding restrictions stemming from congressional appropriations or shifting defense priorities could further constrain the ability to convert bid volume into awarded contracts. Until these headwinds subside Mission Tech may struggle to achieve meaningful top line growth despite underlying demand in enduring mission areas. Investors should watch for developments in protest resolutions and funding bills as they could materially influence the segment’s revenue trajectory.
STS margin performance remains heavily reliant on the contribution from the LNG project which added an estimated 500 basis points to profitability in the quarter. Once that project rolls off the base business margin of approximately 16.1% may not be sufficient to sustain the long term target of 20% plus without acceleration in higher margin streams. Growth in technology licensing and joint venture OpEx work is expected to backfill the LNG contribution but the pace and scale of that backfill are not yet fully visible to investors. If the shift toward licensing and recurring services lags the overall STS margin could compress putting pressure on adjusted EBITDA and EPS. The company’s disclosure that the backfill is portfolio based rather than a one for one replacement introduces execution risk as multiple initiatives must succeed simultaneously. Consequently the durability of STS margins is contingent on successful implementation of these strategic initiatives over the next twelve to eighteen months.
Geopolitical volatility in the Middle East could undermine the current resilience demonstrated by KBR’s operations despite management’s positive assessment of customer commitment and activity levels. Any escalation in conflict could disrupt supply chains increase security costs and impede staffing efforts on project sites potentially leading to delays or cost overruns. While the company has not observed a material change in capital spending priorities as customers continue to fund essential programs already underway a sudden shift in regional stability could alter those priorities quickly. KBR’s reliance on repeat customer relationships and local footprint may not fully insulate it from broader macroeconomic shocks that affect hydrocarbon revenues and government budgets. Investors should consider the possibility that the current strong pipeline in the region may be vulnerable to abrupt changes in the security environment. Consequently the medium term outlook for STS in the Middle East contains both upside from resilience work and downside from potential destabilization.
Execution of the spin transaction carries inherent risks including the complexity of separating IT systems rationalizing legal entities and aligning leadership teams across the two new organizations. Management noted that they are targeting an effective spin date of January 4 2027 which provides additional runway but also raises the possibility of delays if unforeseen challenges arise in data migration or regulatory approvals. A delayed spin could prolong period of duplicated costs distract management focus and create uncertainty among employees and customers. The transaction also involves tax considerations with the IRS private letter ruling process still underway and any adverse outcome could affect the tax free status of the separation. Furthermore the planned Investor Days in November are contingent on the spin timeline and any shift in timing could affect the relevance of the information presented to investors. Overall while the spin is intended to create value the execution risk should not be underestimated particularly given the scale of the undertaking.

Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Engineering & Construction

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	STN	Stantec Inc	7,704.08 Bn	7,675.69	591.81	1.34 Bn
2	PWR	Quanta Services, Inc.	103.60 Bn	92.14	3.44	5.89 Bn
3	MTZ	Mastec Inc	30.47 Bn	63.56	1.99	2.53 Bn
4	STRL	Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.	23.80 Bn	63.82	8.25	0.29 Bn
5	APG	APi Group Corp	18.02 Bn	-67.25	2.20	2.76 Bn
6	J	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	14.73 Bn	-745.61	1.12	4.08 Bn
7	IESC	IES Holdings, Inc.	13.95 Bn	38.52	3.84	0.04 Bn
8	ACM	Aecom	8.61 Bn	-69.12	0.54	2.71 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Business Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password