Hess Midstream
NYSE: HESM
$39.28 ▼ -1.25  (-3.08%)
At close: Aug 17, 2026 · 12:54 PM UTC
Financial Ratios
Market Cap5.05 Bn
P/E8.13
P/S3.13
Div. Yield0.05
ROIC (Qtr)0.06
Total Debt (Qtr)3.72 Bn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-3.67
Add ratio to table…

About

Hess Midstream LP is a growth oriented limited partnership that owns operates develops and acquires a diverse set of midstream assets and provides fee based services to its sponsor and third party customers. The company's asset base consists of natural gas gathering pipelines crude oil gathering systems water gathering and disposal facilities gas processing plants fractionation units storage terminals and export infrastructure. These assets are primarily located in the…

Read more ↓
Sector: Energy Industry: Oil & Gas Midstream CIK: 0001789832

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case
  • Hess Midstream's strategic positioning within Chevron's optimized Bakken development plan creates a durable competitive advantage that the market is underestimating, as the shift to longer laterals not only reduces well connectivity capital expenditures but also enhances the economic life of existing infrastructure, allowing the company to generate significantly higher free cash flow per unit of throughput than historical averages suggest; this operational efficiency gain is structural and permanent, directly supporting the raised 2026 adjusted free cash flow guidance of $910 million to $960 million, which represents a 20% year-over-year increase at the midpoint, and enables approximately $280 million of excess adjusted free cash flow after distributions for incremental shareholder returns and debt repayment, a figure that implies a free cash flow yield exceeding 10% based on current enterprise value and is sustainable through 2028 due to contractual volume protections. The company's contract structure provides exceptional downside protection and predictable cash conversion that is not fully appreciated by investors, with 85% of revenues derived from fixed-fee arrangements and cost-of-service contracts for terminaling and water gathering extending through 2033, ensuring stable returns regardless of commodity price volatility; additionally, the terminaling segment's tariff mechanism, which resets annually to target a mid-teen return based on projected CapEx, OpEx, and throughput, creates a self-correcting earnings floor that has already demonstrated resilience through weather-related disruptions, as evidenced by the maintenance of an 83% gross adjusted EBITDA margin—well above the 75% target—even during the sequential decline in Q1 FY26 results, indicating that the underlying earnings power of the business is stronger than reported quarterly fluctuations suggest. The deferral of material cash taxes until after 2028, resulting from recent IRS guidance on the corporate alternative minimum tax, represents a significant and underrecognized catalyst that effectively increases the company's after-tax cash flow by approximately $15 million annually starting in 2026, which directly contributes to the excess free cash flow available for shareholder returns and debt reduction; this tax timing benefit, combined with the leverage trajectory projecting a decline to near 2.5x by 2028 through EBITDA growth and debt repayment, enhances financial flexibility and reduces risk, yet the market appears to be pricing HESM as if it faces near-term tax liabilities or limited capital allocation options, when in reality the combination of MVC-backed volume visibility, inflation-linked fee escalators, and disciplined capital expenditure guidance of approximately $105 million for 2026 supports a durable model of growing distributions and incremental returns that is unlikely to be disrupted by upstream production plateaus at 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.
▼ Bear case
  • Hess Midstream's full-year 2026 net income and adjusted EBITDA guidance remains flat at the midpoint versus 2025, signaling limited organic growth potential despite management's emphasis on free cash flow generation, and this stagnation is exacerbated by the company's reliance on Chevron's Bakken production plateau at approximately 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, which caps throughput upside and makes incremental volume gains dependent on third-party utilization—a segment that remains small and unpredictable, as evidenced by the first-quarter third-party gas throughput increase being described as merely "normal optionality" with no indication of scalable growth, thereby undermining the thesis that operational efficiencies alone can sustain meaningful long-term expansion beyond cost-cutting. The company's heavy dependence on fixed-fee and cost-of-service contracts, while providing stability, also creates significant upside limitation, as tariff resets through 2033 are designed to return a targeted mid-teen return based on projected costs and volumes, meaning that any efficiency gains from longer laterals or reduced well connectivity are likely to be offset by downward tariff adjustments in the terminaling and water gathering segments, effectively transferring the benefits of operational improvements to Chevron rather than allowing Hess Midstream to retain incremental margin expansion, a dynamic that was hinted at in the Q&A when management acknowledged that tariffs "flex down" with lower CapEx but did not address how this impacts their ability to grow EBITDA independent of volume or inflation. Although leverage is projected to decline to near 2.5x by 2028, this assumes consistent EBITDA growth and disciplined debt repayment, yet the company's capital expenditure guidance of approximately $105 million for 2026 leaves little room for error if upstream activity declines faster than anticipated or if weather-related disruptions become more frequent, and with net interest expense guidance of $210 million for the full year representing a significant fixed cost, any shortfall in adjusted EBITDA—currently guided between $1.225 billion and $1.275 billion—could quickly erode the cushion for distributions and debt repayment, particularly since the $280 million of excess adjusted free cash flow after distributions is highly sensitive to even minor deviations in performance, leaving minimal margin for error in a business model that offers little strategic flexibility for reinvestment or diversification beyond its current asset base.

Related and Nonrelated Parties Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Oil & Gas Midstream
S.No. Ticker Company Market CapP/EP/STotal Debt (Qtr)
1 EP-PC Kinder Morgan, Inc. 112.69 Bn31.566.2732.25 Bn
2 ENB Enbridge Inc 111.15 Bn26.961.8479.93 Bn
3 EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 82.76 Bn13.001.4233.23 Bn
4 ET Energy Transfer LP 72.45 Bn14.350.8568.42 Bn
5 TRP Tc Energy Corp 65.93 Bn26.8012.9235.14 Bn
6 MPLX Mplx Lp 60.29 Bn12.704.5625.64 Bn
7 OKE Oneok Inc /New/ 59.71 Bn16.321.5233.00 Bn
8 TRGP Targa Resources Corp. 58.99 Bn26.013.5219.58 Bn