Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co /Oh/ (GT) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Goodyear Tire & Rubber

NASDAQ: GT

$6.65 ▼ -0.16 (-2.35%)

At close: Jul 13, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap1.86 Bn

P/E-0.90

P/S0.10

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)6.50 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-8.75

Add ratio to table…

About

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is one of the world's leading manufacturers of tires with operations in most regions of the world. The company operates through three operating segments representing its regional tire businesses: Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and Asia Pacific. Goodyear has a broad global footprint with 51 manufacturing facilities in 19 countries including the United States. The company is known for its recognizable brand name and focuses on the design production marketing and distribution of tires for various applications.

Goodyear generates revenue primarily from the sale of tires to unaffiliated customers across its operating segments. Revenue is derived from net sales of tires including replacement and original equipment tires for consumer commercial and specialty applications. The company also earns revenue from other tire related businesses such as Fleet Solutions in EMEA and aviation sales in Americas. Additionally Goodyear benefits from price and product mix improvements and initiatives under its Goodyear Forward transformation plan which aims to optimize its portfolio deliver segment operating margin expansion and reduce leverage.

The company operates through the following segments: Americas, Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and Asia Pacific.

• The Americas segment includes operations in North and South America and focuses on tire production for consumer commercial and specialty markets in the region. This segment generates revenue from tire sales in the United States Canada Mexico Brazil and other countries in the Americas. It also includes aviation sales and other tire related businesses.

• The Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA) segment covers operations in Europe the Middle East and Africa. This segment produces tires for consumer commercial and specialty applications in these regions. It includes growth in Fleet Solutions which provides tire related services and products to commercial customers. The EMEA segment benefits from price and product mix improvements and foreign exchange rate impacts.

• The Asia Pacific segment encompasses operations in Asia and the Pacific region including China Japan Australia and other countries. This segment focuses on tire production for consumer commercial and specialty markets in the area. Revenue is driven by tire unit sales price and product mix and benefits from the Goodyear Forward plan. The segment has experienced actions to reduce lower margin business and softness in consumer replacement markets.

Goodyear holds a leading position in the global tire industry as one of the world's largest tire manufacturers with a highly recognizable brand. The company competes with other major tire manufacturers such as Michelin Bridgestone Continental and Pirelli. Goodyear's competitive advantages include its global scale brand recognition diversified product portfolio and ongoing transformation initiatives like Goodyear Forward which aim to improve margin expansion and cost structure. The company has pursued portfolio optimization through divestitures of non core assets such as its off the road tire business Dunlop brand rights in certain markets and polymer chemicals business to focus on core tire operations and drive long term shareholder value.

Goodyear serves a diverse customer base including original equipment manufacturers replacement tire consumers commercial fleet operators and specialty tire users. The company sells tires to automotive manufacturers for new vehicle fitment and to distributors retailers and dealers for the replacement market. Specific customer types include consumer replacement buyers commercial trucking companies aviation operators and industrial equipment users. Goodyear also provides tire related services through offerings like Fleet Solutions in EMEA which supports commercial customers with tire management and maintenance solutions.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Goodyear's strategic shift toward premium product lines is creating durable pricing power and margin expansion opportunities that the market is underestimating, particularly as premium over-18-inch tire sales now account for 55% of consumer sales in Asia Pacific—a 4-point year-over-year increase—and 50% in the Americas consumer replacement segment, up from 42% last year. This mix improvement is not merely tactical but structural, driven by deliberate portfolio rationalization of low-margin SKUs and successful launches of higher-margin brands like Eagle and the revitalized Cooper line in EMEA, which exceeded first-quarter volume expectations. The company's ability to grow original equipment (OE) market share by approximately 2 points in both Americas and EMEA despite declining industry volumes reinforces confidence in its brand strength and positions it to capture premium replacement demand over the long term, as OE wins serve as a pipeline for future aftermarket sales. These trends are especially significant given that premium tires command higher price elasticity and are less sensitive to economic downturns, providing a buffer against current volume pressures in lower rim sizes.
Goodyear Forward and related cost transformation initiatives are delivering sustainable structural savings that exceed initial plans and are being accelerated in response to current market conditions, creating a hidden catalyst for margin improvement not fully reflected in current guidance. The program contributed $107 million to segment operating income in Q1, exceeding expectations, and management emphasized that its benefits—derived from operational simplification, productivity gains, and portfolio optimization—are continuing to deliver value beyond the original 2-year timeline. Additionally, the company is implementing new cost actions focused on raw material consolidation, factory efficiencies, indirect spend reduction, and SG&A optimization, with particular attention to flexing cost structures to match demand in high-cost footprints like the Americas. These efforts are designed to deliver near-term payback and are being prioritized in regions where volume pressure is greatest, suggesting that unabsorbed overhead—a cited $90 million headwind in Q2—could be mitigated faster than anticipated through targeted restructuring.
The recent debt refinancing activity, including the pricing of $1.05 billion in senior notes due 2032 at 8.875% and a separate $750 million offering of 6-year senior notes, represents a proactive balance sheet strengthening move that reduces near-term refinancing risk and extends debt maturities, yet the market is overlooking how this positions Goodyear to capitalize on future interest rate declines. By repaying higher-cost 2027 notes (4.875% and 7.625%) and temporarily reducing revolving credit facility balances, the company is lowering its effective interest expense over time while maintaining liquidity for strategic investments. This deleveraging effort, combined with a net debt reduction of nearly $900 million year-over-year, improves financial flexibility and reduces the perceived risk of covenant breaches amid volatile raw material costs. Furthermore, the IEEPA tariff adjustment—already contributing $46 million to gross margin in Q1 and expected to deliver a full-year benefit of approximately $80 million—is a non-recurring cash inflow that enhances free cash flow generation and is not being fully appreciated in current earnings forecasts.

Goodyear's strategic shift toward premium product lines is creating durable pricing power and margin expansion opportunities that the market is underestimating, particularly as premium over-18-inch tire sales now account for 55% of consumer sales in Asia Pacific—a 4-point year-over-year increase—and 50% in the Americas consumer replacement segment, up from 42% last year. This mix improvement is not merely tactical but structural, driven by deliberate portfolio rationalization of low-margin SKUs and successful launches of higher-margin brands like Eagle and the revitalized Cooper line in EMEA, which exceeded first-quarter volume expectations. The company's ability to grow original equipment (OE) market share by approximately 2 points in both Americas and EMEA despite declining industry volumes reinforces confidence in its brand strength and positions it to capture premium replacement demand over the long term, as OE wins serve as a pipeline for future aftermarket sales. These trends are especially significant given that premium tires command higher price elasticity and are less sensitive to economic downturns, providing a buffer against current volume pressures in lower rim sizes.
Goodyear Forward and related cost transformation initiatives are delivering sustainable structural savings that exceed initial plans and are being accelerated in response to current market conditions, creating a hidden catalyst for margin improvement not fully reflected in current guidance. The program contributed $107 million to segment operating income in Q1, exceeding expectations, and management emphasized that its benefits—derived from operational simplification, productivity gains, and portfolio optimization—are continuing to deliver value beyond the original 2-year timeline. Additionally, the company is implementing new cost actions focused on raw material consolidation, factory efficiencies, indirect spend reduction, and SG&A optimization, with particular attention to flexing cost structures to match demand in high-cost footprints like the Americas. These efforts are designed to deliver near-term payback and are being prioritized in regions where volume pressure is greatest, suggesting that unabsorbed overhead—a cited $90 million headwind in Q2—could be mitigated faster than anticipated through targeted restructuring.
The recent debt refinancing activity, including the pricing of $1.05 billion in senior notes due 2032 at 8.875% and a separate $750 million offering of 6-year senior notes, represents a proactive balance sheet strengthening move that reduces near-term refinancing risk and extends debt maturities, yet the market is overlooking how this positions Goodyear to capitalize on future interest rate declines. By repaying higher-cost 2027 notes (4.875% and 7.625%) and temporarily reducing revolving credit facility balances, the company is lowering its effective interest expense over time while maintaining liquidity for strategic investments. This deleveraging effort, combined with a net debt reduction of nearly $900 million year-over-year, improves financial flexibility and reduces the perceived risk of covenant breaches amid volatile raw material costs. Furthermore, the IEEPA tariff adjustment—already contributing $46 million to gross margin in Q1 and expected to deliver a full-year benefit of approximately $80 million—is a non-recurring cash inflow that enhances free cash flow generation and is not being fully appreciated in current earnings forecasts.

▼ Bear case

Goodyear faces significant and persistent raw material cost headwinds tied to geopolitical instability in the Middle East that the market may be underpricing, with management explicitly stating that current spot prices imply a $200 million raw material cost burden in the second half of the year—$300 million worse than prior forecasts—and warning that the conflict's duration and impact on commodity prices remain highly uncertain. This volatility is exacerbated by indexed pricing agreements covering roughly one-third of the business, which reset on a six-month lag, creating a timing mismatch where cost increases are felt immediately but price recovery is delayed, potentially squeezing margins through at least the third quarter. The company's acknowledgment that it cannot reliably predict when or how much it will be able to pass along these costs—especially amid softer demand and higher inventory levels—suggests that pricing power may be insufficient to offset inflation, particularly in price-sensitive segments like sub-18-inch tires where competition remains intense.
Structural demand weaknesses in core markets, particularly in the Americas commercial truck tire business and lower rim size consumer replacement, are proving more durable than cyclical and are being worsened by ongoing market share losses to aggressive competitors, indicating that Goodyear's portfolio rationalization may not be capturing enough value to offset volume declines. Commercial truck volumes in the Americas suffered 'meaningful declines' due to weak freight activity acknowledged as a multiyear downturn, with replacement volume down 22% and OE volume down 5.5%, while consumer replacement volume in the Americas fell 17% due to retailer destocking, market share losses in sub-18-inch rim sizes, and planned exits of low-margin products. Despite premiumization efforts, the company continues to lose share in structurally vulnerable lower-tier segments, and management admitted that accelerating footprint cost reductions is necessary—a sign that current actions may not be sufficient to stabilize earnings in these challenged areas.
Unabsorbed overhead and production cuts tied to demand uncertainty are creating a persistent earnings drag that could extend beyond the near term, with management confirming a $90 million headwind in Q2 and expecting it to remain negative in Q3 due to ongoing efforts to manage cash flow during volatile conditions, signaling that volume recovery may be slower and less robust than hoped. This is compounded by reduced capital expenditure guidance of $725 million—down from prior levels—which, while reflective of lower demand, risks underinvestment in productivity-enhancing automation and capacity optimization if sustained, potentially impairing long-term competitiveness. Furthermore, the company's reliance on working capital management and cash conservation as active priorities, coupled with uncertainty in full-year free cash flow guidance due to unresolved commodity impacts and restructuring outcomes, raises concerns about its ability to generate consistent cash flow without compromising operational flexibility or growth investments.

Goodyear faces significant and persistent raw material cost headwinds tied to geopolitical instability in the Middle East that the market may be underpricing, with management explicitly stating that current spot prices imply a $200 million raw material cost burden in the second half of the year—$300 million worse than prior forecasts—and warning that the conflict's duration and impact on commodity prices remain highly uncertain. This volatility is exacerbated by indexed pricing agreements covering roughly one-third of the business, which reset on a six-month lag, creating a timing mismatch where cost increases are felt immediately but price recovery is delayed, potentially squeezing margins through at least the third quarter. The company's acknowledgment that it cannot reliably predict when or how much it will be able to pass along these costs—especially amid softer demand and higher inventory levels—suggests that pricing power may be insufficient to offset inflation, particularly in price-sensitive segments like sub-18-inch tires where competition remains intense.
Structural demand weaknesses in core markets, particularly in the Americas commercial truck tire business and lower rim size consumer replacement, are proving more durable than cyclical and are being worsened by ongoing market share losses to aggressive competitors, indicating that Goodyear's portfolio rationalization may not be capturing enough value to offset volume declines. Commercial truck volumes in the Americas suffered 'meaningful declines' due to weak freight activity acknowledged as a multiyear downturn, with replacement volume down 22% and OE volume down 5.5%, while consumer replacement volume in the Americas fell 17% due to retailer destocking, market share losses in sub-18-inch rim sizes, and planned exits of low-margin products. Despite premiumization efforts, the company continues to lose share in structurally vulnerable lower-tier segments, and management admitted that accelerating footprint cost reductions is necessary—a sign that current actions may not be sufficient to stabilize earnings in these challenged areas.
Unabsorbed overhead and production cuts tied to demand uncertainty are creating a persistent earnings drag that could extend beyond the near term, with management confirming a $90 million headwind in Q2 and expecting it to remain negative in Q3 due to ongoing efforts to manage cash flow during volatile conditions, signaling that volume recovery may be slower and less robust than hoped. This is compounded by reduced capital expenditure guidance of $725 million—down from prior levels—which, while reflective of lower demand, risks underinvestment in productivity-enhancing automation and capacity optimization if sustained, potentially impairing long-term competitiveness. Furthermore, the company's reliance on working capital management and cash conservation as active priorities, coupled with uncertainty in full-year free cash flow guidance due to unresolved commodity impacts and restructuring outcomes, raises concerns about its ability to generate consistent cash flow without compromising operational flexibility or growth investments.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Auto Parts

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	AAP	Advance Auto Parts Inc	65.13 Bn	-2,713.78	7.57	3.41 Bn
2	AZO	Autozone Inc	53.07 Bn	28.80	2.66	9.02 Bn
3	MGA	Magna International Inc	17.54 Bn	44.62	0.56	4.66 Bn
4	GPC	Genuine Parts Co	16.15 Bn	268.82	0.65	4.64 Bn
5	AUR	Aurora Innovation, Inc.	13.77 Bn	-16.57	3,443.09	-
6	BWA	Borgwarner Inc	13.21 Bn	51.79	0.92	3.88 Bn
7	APTV	Aptiv PLC	12.84 Bn	-40.37	0.62	9.35 Bn
8	ALV	Autoliv Inc	8.73 Bn	-72.12	0.79	2.09 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password