Graham Corp (GHM) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Graham

NYSE: GHM

$103.55 ▼ -1.95 (-1.85%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap1.14 Bn

P/E91.07

P/S4.64

Div. Yield0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)13.00 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)13.03

Add ratio to table…

About

Graham Corporation is a global leader in the design and manufacture of mission critical fluid, power, heat transfer, and vacuum technologies for the Defense, Energy & Process, and Space industries. The company designs and produces custom-engineered vacuum systems, heat transfer equipment, cryogenic pumps, and turbomachinery solutions. These products are used in critical applications such as propulsion systems, thermal management, power generation, and life support across high-reliability sectors.

Graham Corporation generates revenue through the sale of highly engineered, custom-built equipment tailored to specific customer requirements in defense, energy, and space markets. Primary revenue streams come from ejectors, surface condensers, turbines, compressors, pumps, blowers, and specialized turbomachinery. The company serves a diverse customer base including government contractors, original equipment manufacturers, engineering firms, and industrial operators in refining, chemical processing, power generation, and aerospace sectors.

The company operates through the following segments: Graham Corporation core operations and Barber-Nichols, LLC.

• Graham Corporation core operations: This segment focuses on the design and manufacture of vacuum, heat transfer, and fluid transfer technologies for the Defense and Energy & Process markets. It produces surface condensers, ejectors, process condensers, liquid ring pumps, and heat exchangers used in naval propulsion, power plants, refineries, and chemical facilities. The segment includes trademarked innovations such as the NextGen™ steam ejector nozzle, which reduces steam consumption and increases system capacity in refining applications.

• Barber-Nichols, LLC: This wholly-owned subsidiary specializes in specialty turbomachinery products for the Defense, Space, Aerospace, Cryogenic, and New Energy markets. Barber-Nichols designs, develops, manufactures, and sells custom turbines, pumps, compressors, and blowers for applications including rocket propulsion, cryogenic fluid handling, and nuclear systems. The segment integrates technologies from the P3 acquisition, including the patented multi-channel diffuser (MCD) and self-contained actuating magnetic pump (SCAMP), which enhance pump efficiency and enable low-flow, high-pressure cryogenic pumping for hydrogen, oxygen, methane, and nitrogen.

Graham Corporation holds a strong position in niche engineered equipment markets where customization, reliability, and technical expertise are critical differentiators. The company competes with firms such as Curtiss-Wright, Honeywell, Xylem, GEA, and Koch Fertilizer in defense and energy sectors, and with specialized turbomachinery providers like Concepts NREC and Triumph Aerospace in space applications. Its competitive advantages stem from deep customer engagement, engineering expertise, tight-tolerance manufacturing capabilities, and a long-tenured skilled workforce capable of managing complex, high-mix, low-volume production.

Graham Corporation serves a diverse customer base including tier one and tier two suppliers to the defense and aerospace industries, major engineering and procurement contractors, original equipment manufacturers, and operators of industrial facilities. Specific customers named in the filing include NASA, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Dow Chemical, DuPont, Air Liquide, Bechtel, Fluor Corporation, Jacobs Engineering, Koch Fertilizer, L3Harris, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon Technologies, Rolls-Royce North America, Siemens Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and United Launch Alliance. The company also supplies the U. S. Navy for submarine and aircraft carrier programs, and supports commercial space ventures such as Blue Origin, Sierra Space, and Axiom Space.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Graham Corporation is positioned to capitalize on structural tailwinds in its core Defense, Energy & Process, and Space markets, which are supported by record backlog growth and strong demand fundamentals not fully reflected in current market pricing. The company reported a record backlog of $515.6 million as of December 31, 2025, representing a 34% year-over-year increase, with approximately 85% of this backlog tied to Defense industry contracts. This high concentration in defense provides exceptional revenue visibility and stability, as defense spending is less susceptible to economic cyclicality and benefits from long-term geopolitical priorities and multi-year funding commitments. The company’s book-to-bill ratio of 1.3x for Q3 FY26 further confirms that new orders are outpacing sales, signaling sustained demand momentum. Despite management noting lumpiness in Defense orders due to large capital projects, the consistent growth in backlog and orders—particularly in Defense and Space—indicates that the underlying demand environment remains robust and is likely to support revenue conversion over the next 12 to 24 months, with 35% to 40% of backlog expected to convert to sales in the coming year. This creates a durable foundation for top-line growth that may be underestimated by investors focused solely on quarterly volatility.
The strategic acquisition of FlackTek in January 2026 represents a transformative catalyst that is underappreciated in current valuations, offering both revenue diversification and margin expansion potential beyond what is reflected in near-term guidance. FlackTek brings advanced mixing and materials processing as a third core technology platform, complementing Graham’s existing vacuum, heat transfer, and turbomachinery capabilities, and aligns directly with its Defense, Energy & Process, and Space end markets. With approximately $30 million in annualized revenue and a growing installed base generating recurring demand for consumables and services, FlackTek enhances revenue predictability and durability. The acquisition was structured with a base price of $35 million (12x projected 2026 adjusted EBITDA) and includes a potential $25 million earnout over four years beginning in FY27, tied to progressively increasing adjusted EBITDA targets—this creates strong incentive for post-acquisition performance and aligns management interests with long-term value creation. Furthermore, FlackTek’s technology enables cross-selling opportunities across Graham’s existing customer base, particularly in high-value applications such as defense energetics, aerospace materials processing, and battery manufacturing, where precision and consistency are critical. The integration of FlackTek into Graham’s operational and financial infrastructure, supported by the expanded $80 million revolving credit facility, positions the company to unlock synergies that could drive margin accretion sooner than anticipated.
Graham’s disciplined capital allocation strategy, strengthened balance sheet, and improving profitability metrics suggest the company is well-positioned to generate sustainable free cash flow and return capital to shareholders, a factor not yet priced into the stock. Despite increased SG&A from acquisition integration and performance-based compensation, the company reported a 200 basis point decrease in SG&A as a percentage of sales in Q3 FY26, reflecting operating leverage and financial discipline. Cash provided by operating activities reached $4.8 million in the quarter, with $22.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and zero debt outstanding as of December 31, 2025. Following the FlackTek acquisition and associated financing, Graham’s pro forma leverage ratio is approximately 1.2x, well within its target range and leaving ample capacity under its $80 million revolving credit facility for future investments. The company also announced a $50 million private placement to T. Rowe Price in April 2026 at $83.36 per share, signaling strong institutional confidence and providing additional financial flexibility for debt repayment or growth initiatives. With updated FY26 guidance calling for Adjusted EBITDA of $24 million to $28 million (up from the prior range of $22 million to $28 million) and an effective tax rate guidance of 16% to 18% (down from 20% to 22%), Graham is demonstrating improving profitability and capital efficiency. These trends, combined with low leverage and strong cash conversion, support the potential for future dividend initiation or share repurchases—actions that could meaningfully enhance shareholder returns if the market begins to recognize the company’s financial maturity.

Graham Corporation is positioned to capitalize on structural tailwinds in its core Defense, Energy & Process, and Space markets, which are supported by record backlog growth and strong demand fundamentals not fully reflected in current market pricing. The company reported a record backlog of $515.6 million as of December 31, 2025, representing a 34% year-over-year increase, with approximately 85% of this backlog tied to Defense industry contracts. This high concentration in defense provides exceptional revenue visibility and stability, as defense spending is less susceptible to economic cyclicality and benefits from long-term geopolitical priorities and multi-year funding commitments. The company’s book-to-bill ratio of 1.3x for Q3 FY26 further confirms that new orders are outpacing sales, signaling sustained demand momentum. Despite management noting lumpiness in Defense orders due to large capital projects, the consistent growth in backlog and orders—particularly in Defense and Space—indicates that the underlying demand environment remains robust and is likely to support revenue conversion over the next 12 to 24 months, with 35% to 40% of backlog expected to convert to sales in the coming year. This creates a durable foundation for top-line growth that may be underestimated by investors focused solely on quarterly volatility.
The strategic acquisition of FlackTek in January 2026 represents a transformative catalyst that is underappreciated in current valuations, offering both revenue diversification and margin expansion potential beyond what is reflected in near-term guidance. FlackTek brings advanced mixing and materials processing as a third core technology platform, complementing Graham’s existing vacuum, heat transfer, and turbomachinery capabilities, and aligns directly with its Defense, Energy & Process, and Space end markets. With approximately $30 million in annualized revenue and a growing installed base generating recurring demand for consumables and services, FlackTek enhances revenue predictability and durability. The acquisition was structured with a base price of $35 million (12x projected 2026 adjusted EBITDA) and includes a potential $25 million earnout over four years beginning in FY27, tied to progressively increasing adjusted EBITDA targets—this creates strong incentive for post-acquisition performance and aligns management interests with long-term value creation. Furthermore, FlackTek’s technology enables cross-selling opportunities across Graham’s existing customer base, particularly in high-value applications such as defense energetics, aerospace materials processing, and battery manufacturing, where precision and consistency are critical. The integration of FlackTek into Graham’s operational and financial infrastructure, supported by the expanded $80 million revolving credit facility, positions the company to unlock synergies that could drive margin accretion sooner than anticipated.
Graham’s disciplined capital allocation strategy, strengthened balance sheet, and improving profitability metrics suggest the company is well-positioned to generate sustainable free cash flow and return capital to shareholders, a factor not yet priced into the stock. Despite increased SG&A from acquisition integration and performance-based compensation, the company reported a 200 basis point decrease in SG&A as a percentage of sales in Q3 FY26, reflecting operating leverage and financial discipline. Cash provided by operating activities reached $4.8 million in the quarter, with $22.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and zero debt outstanding as of December 31, 2025. Following the FlackTek acquisition and associated financing, Graham’s pro forma leverage ratio is approximately 1.2x, well within its target range and leaving ample capacity under its $80 million revolving credit facility for future investments. The company also announced a $50 million private placement to T. Rowe Price in April 2026 at $83.36 per share, signaling strong institutional confidence and providing additional financial flexibility for debt repayment or growth initiatives. With updated FY26 guidance calling for Adjusted EBITDA of $24 million to $28 million (up from the prior range of $22 million to $28 million) and an effective tax rate guidance of 16% to 18% (down from 20% to 22%), Graham is demonstrating improving profitability and capital efficiency. These trends, combined with low leverage and strong cash conversion, support the potential for future dividend initiation or share repurchases—actions that could meaningfully enhance shareholder returns if the market begins to recognize the company’s financial maturity.

▼ Bear case

Graham Corporation faces significant margin pressure from shifting sales mix, non-recurring benefit roll-offs, and external cost pressures that management may be understating, posing a risk to profitability that is not fully captured in current guidance or investor expectations. In Q3 FY26, gross profit margin declined 100 basis points year-over-year to 23.8%, primarily due to an unfavorable sales mix and higher levels of lower-margin material receipts. More critically, the company disclosed that gross profit in the prior year benefited from a $0.3 million grant in Q3 FY25 and $1.5 million for the first nine months of FY25 from the BlueForge Alliance for defense welder training programs—this non-recurring income stream did not repeat in FY26, creating a meaningful headwind to year-over-year comparisons that is not being adequately highlighted in forward-looking discussions. Additionally, Graham now expects the full-year impact of tariffs to be between $1.0 million and $1.5 million incrementally versus the prior year, a drag that, while called immaterial for Q3, could accumulate to pressure margins across the full fiscal year. These factors—combined with potential pricing pressure in competitive defense contracts and rising input costs—suggest that the company’s ability to maintain or expand margins may be more challenged than management’s optimistic commentary on operational efficiency and discipline would imply.
Despite strong backlog growth, Graham’s revenue base remains vulnerable to execution risk and order lumpiness, particularly in its Defense-dominated portfolio, which could lead to volatile quarterly performance and undermine investor confidence in the sustainability of its growth trajectory. While management highlighted record backlog and strong book-to-bill ratios, they also acknowledged that orders tend to be lumpy due to the nature of large capital projects, especially in Defense, where contracts can span multiple years and vary significantly in size. This lumpiness creates inherent unpredictability in revenue recognition timing, meaning that even with a strong backlog, sales could fall short of expectations if key projects experience delays due to technical challenges, supply chain disruptions, or customer-funding timing—risks that are amplified by the fact that approximately 85% of backlog is Defense-related. Furthermore, while backlog conversion expectations are disclosed (35% to 40% in the next 12 months), there is no guarantee that these conversion rates will be met, especially if customer priorities shift or if integration challenges from recent acquisitions like FlackTek and Xdot divert focus from core execution. The company’s reliance on a concentrated end market, combined with limited visibility into the exact timing of revenue recognition from backlog, introduces a level of revenue volatility that may not be appropriate for investors seeking steady, predictable growth.
The FlackTek acquisition, while strategically sound, introduces integration and execution risks that could erode expected synergies and strain financial resources, particularly if performance-based earnout targets are not met or if cultural and operational alignment proves more difficult than anticipated. Although Graham structured the deal with a significant earnout component ($25 million over four years) to incentivize performance, this also means that the full value of the acquisition is contingent on achieving progressively increasing adjusted EBITDA targets beginning in FY27—targets that may become harder to hit if integration costs exceed estimates, if FlackTek’s standalone performance fails to scale, or if broader market demand in its served sectors (e.g., industrials, battery, aerospace) softens. The company increased its revolving credit facility to $80 million to finance the deal and support operations, but following the acquisition, Graham took on approximately $20 million in debt, and while its pro forma leverage ratio is 1.2x, any deterioration in operating performance could quickly strain this balance sheet strength. Furthermore, the success of the acquisition hinges on retaining key talent, including FlackTek’s CEO Matt Gross, who is set to join Graham’s leadership team—if key personnel depart post-acquisition or if cultural integration falters, the expected cross-platform innovation and cross-selling opportunities may not materialize. These risks are compounded by the fact that Graham is simultaneously managing ERP implementation costs, acquisition-related expenses, and performance-based compensation increases, all of which could divert management attention and resources from ensuring a smooth integration.

Graham Corporation faces significant margin pressure from shifting sales mix, non-recurring benefit roll-offs, and external cost pressures that management may be understating, posing a risk to profitability that is not fully captured in current guidance or investor expectations. In Q3 FY26, gross profit margin declined 100 basis points year-over-year to 23.8%, primarily due to an unfavorable sales mix and higher levels of lower-margin material receipts. More critically, the company disclosed that gross profit in the prior year benefited from a $0.3 million grant in Q3 FY25 and $1.5 million for the first nine months of FY25 from the BlueForge Alliance for defense welder training programs—this non-recurring income stream did not repeat in FY26, creating a meaningful headwind to year-over-year comparisons that is not being adequately highlighted in forward-looking discussions. Additionally, Graham now expects the full-year impact of tariffs to be between $1.0 million and $1.5 million incrementally versus the prior year, a drag that, while called immaterial for Q3, could accumulate to pressure margins across the full fiscal year. These factors—combined with potential pricing pressure in competitive defense contracts and rising input costs—suggest that the company’s ability to maintain or expand margins may be more challenged than management’s optimistic commentary on operational efficiency and discipline would imply.
Despite strong backlog growth, Graham’s revenue base remains vulnerable to execution risk and order lumpiness, particularly in its Defense-dominated portfolio, which could lead to volatile quarterly performance and undermine investor confidence in the sustainability of its growth trajectory. While management highlighted record backlog and strong book-to-bill ratios, they also acknowledged that orders tend to be lumpy due to the nature of large capital projects, especially in Defense, where contracts can span multiple years and vary significantly in size. This lumpiness creates inherent unpredictability in revenue recognition timing, meaning that even with a strong backlog, sales could fall short of expectations if key projects experience delays due to technical challenges, supply chain disruptions, or customer-funding timing—risks that are amplified by the fact that approximately 85% of backlog is Defense-related. Furthermore, while backlog conversion expectations are disclosed (35% to 40% in the next 12 months), there is no guarantee that these conversion rates will be met, especially if customer priorities shift or if integration challenges from recent acquisitions like FlackTek and Xdot divert focus from core execution. The company’s reliance on a concentrated end market, combined with limited visibility into the exact timing of revenue recognition from backlog, introduces a level of revenue volatility that may not be appropriate for investors seeking steady, predictable growth.
The FlackTek acquisition, while strategically sound, introduces integration and execution risks that could erode expected synergies and strain financial resources, particularly if performance-based earnout targets are not met or if cultural and operational alignment proves more difficult than anticipated. Although Graham structured the deal with a significant earnout component ($25 million over four years) to incentivize performance, this also means that the full value of the acquisition is contingent on achieving progressively increasing adjusted EBITDA targets beginning in FY27—targets that may become harder to hit if integration costs exceed estimates, if FlackTek’s standalone performance fails to scale, or if broader market demand in its served sectors (e.g., industrials, battery, aerospace) softens. The company increased its revolving credit facility to $80 million to finance the deal and support operations, but following the acquisition, Graham took on approximately $20 million in debt, and while its pro forma leverage ratio is 1.2x, any deterioration in operating performance could quickly strain this balance sheet strength. Furthermore, the success of the acquisition hinges on retaining key talent, including FlackTek’s CEO Matt Gross, who is set to join Graham’s leadership team—if key personnel depart post-acquisition or if cultural integration falters, the expected cross-platform innovation and cross-selling opportunities may not materialize. These risks are compounded by the fact that Graham is simultaneously managing ERP implementation costs, acquisition-related expenses, and performance-based compensation increases, all of which could divert management attention and resources from ensuring a smooth integration.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Specialty Industrial Machinery

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	GEV	GE Vernova Inc.	270.93 Bn	28.46	6.55	2.79 Bn
2	ETN	Eaton Corp plc	156.55 Bn	39.19	5.50	21.05 Bn
3	PH	Parker-Hannifin Corp	124.04 Bn	35.64	5.91	9.58 Bn
4	CMI	Cummins Inc	91.66 Bn	34.29	2.70	6.89 Bn
5	EMR	Emerson Electric Co	82.90 Bn	67.34	4.53	13.36 Bn
6	ITW	Illinois Tool Works Inc	81.54 Bn	26.02	5.03	9.15 Bn
7	AME	Ametek Inc/	55.40 Bn	36.26	7.29	2.18 Bn
8	ROK	Rockwell Automation, Inc	51.78 Bn	53.05	5.88	3.69 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2026)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password