Fluor Corp (FLR) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Sector: Industrials Industry: Engineering & Construction CIK: 0001124198

Market Cap 6.63 Bn

P/E 20.56

P/S 0.44

Div. Yield 0.00

ROIC (Qtr) 0.00

Total Debt (Qtr) 1.07 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) -8.01

Add ratio to table...

About

Fluor Corporation provides professional and technical services focused on engineering, procurement, construction and project management. The company serves clients in life sciences, advanced technologies and manufacturing, data centers, mining and metals, gas and nuclear derived power, infrastructure, chemicals, LNG, oil and gas production and fuels. It also serves the U. S. federal government and governments abroad. The company generates revenue primarily through fees earned on engineering, procurement, construction and project management services...

Fluor Corporation provides professional and technical services focused on engineering, procurement, construction and project management. The company serves clients in life sciences, advanced technologies and manufacturing, data centers, mining and metals, gas and nuclear derived power, infrastructure, chemicals, LNG, oil and gas production and fuels. It also serves the U. S. federal government and governments abroad.

The company generates revenue primarily through fees earned on engineering, procurement, construction and project management services delivered under reimbursable and lump sum contracts. These services include front end engineering, program management, detailed design, procurement, construction, commissioning and operations and maintenance. Revenue is derived from fees, markups on labor costs and incentive fees tied to performance milestones.

The company operates through the following segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, Mission Solutions, and Other.

• Urban Solutions provides front end engineering, program management and EPC services for advanced technologies and manufacturing, life sciences, mining and metals and infrastructure markets. The segment includes technical staffing services through TRS Staffing Solutions and plant facility services for power generation and industrial manufacturing.

• Energy Solutions delivers EPC services for upstream and downstream oil and gas, chemicals, LNG, power, nuclear, low carbon energy, asset decarbonization, carbon capture, renewable fuels, green chemicals and hydrogen projects. The segment also offers consulting, feasibility studies and project finance structuring.

• Mission Solutions supplies advanced technical services to the U. S. federal government and foreign governments, covering nuclear security, fuels enrichment, nuclear waste management, laboratory management, environmental remediation and decommissioning. The segment also provides operations and maintenance, global logistics, EPC, life support and mission critical facility services for defense and intelligence clients, supported by security cleared personnel.

• Other includes residual activities such as the former NuScale stake prior to its deconsolidation in October 2024 and the divested Stork business, with results deemed immaterial for 2025. The company has been monetizing its remaining NuScale shares through structured forward sale agreements.

Fluor is recognized as one of the world's leading professional services firms, competing with AECOM, Amentum Services, Bechtel, Black & Veatch, Burns & McDonnell, BWXT, EMCOR, Jacobs, KBR, Kiewit, Parsons, Turner, V2X, Zachry, ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios, Balfour Beatty, Chiyoda, Exyte, Hatch, JGC, Petrofac, AtkinsRéalis, Technip Energies, Wood Group and WorleyParsons. Its competitive advantages stem from a strong safety culture, a global execution platform, excellence in execution, market diversity, long standing client relationships, disciplined risk management and a commitment to sustainability.

Fluor serves a diverse customer base that includes industrial corporations in life sciences, advanced technologies and manufacturing, data centers, mining and metals, infrastructure, chemicals, LNG and oil and gas, as well as agencies of the U. S. federal government and various foreign governments. In 2025, a single Urban Solutions customer contributed about 15 percent of total revenue while U. S. government agencies collectively accounted for approximately 17 percent of revenue.

Investment thesis

Bull case

Fluor’s 2025 results demonstrate a backlog that exceeds $25 billion and new award bookings of $12 billion, with 87 % of contracts reimbursable and 50 % or more expected to convert to revenue in 2026. The company’s disciplined shift to “smart lump sum” contracts and a high proportion of reimbursable work markedly reduce exposure to cost overruns, thereby tightening margin control and improving earnings sustainability. Management’s consistent guidance that the book‑to‑burn ratio will remain above one signals confidence that the pipeline will continue to feed the backlog at a healthy pace, ensuring ongoing revenue growth that the market has not yet fully priced in.
NuScale’s monetization provides a clean, cash‑positive catalyst that is unlikely to be fully reflected in current valuations. The company has already captured $1.35 billion in Q1 2026 and is set to close the program by Q2, delivering an MOIC of over 3.5× and an IRR exceeding 13 %. These proceeds, combined with a $1.4 billion share‑repurchase program, will both lift free cash flow and enhance earnings per share, creating a tangible upside for shareholders that is only beginning to materialise.
Urban Solutions has sustained a three‑year streak of new award bookings in the $9 billion range while its backlog has risen to $18.7 billion. Despite a $108 million cost spike on three legacy projects, the company is aggressively pursuing recoveries and change orders, and is on track to hand over three of those projects in 2026 and a fourth in 2027. Once those assets are closed, Urban Solutions is expected to realise its full margin potential of 3‑4 % in 2026, a significant upside over the current $2.2 % adjusted EBITDA margin reported for 2025.
Energy Solutions is repositioning its portfolio toward higher‑margin engineering services that are designed to unlock larger EPC awards in the next two years. Although the segment reported a $414 million loss in 2025 due largely to the Santos ruling, its new awards of $1.4 billion reflect a 20 % revenue share in 2026 and an expected margin of 4‑5 %. Coupled with the company’s focus on “smart lump sum” risk allocation, this shift signals a structural improvement in the segment’s profitability profile that the market has not yet fully appreciated.
Mission Solutions is poised to benefit from the U.S. government’s accelerated nuclear fuel supply chain initiatives, with a projected 6 % margin in 2026. The company secured a six‑year contract to extend its presence at the Portsmouth site and is actively pursuing new missions in the intelligence and defense sectors. Given that Mission’s backlog has only declined modestly from $2.7 billion to $2.2 billion, and that it has a higher-margin EPC profile than the other segments, the upside potential for earnings growth remains substantial.

Fluor’s 2025 results demonstrate a backlog that exceeds $25 billion and new award bookings of $12 billion, with 87 % of contracts reimbursable and 50 % or more expected to convert to revenue in 2026. The company’s disciplined shift to “smart lump sum” contracts and a high proportion of reimbursable work markedly reduce exposure to cost overruns, thereby tightening margin control and improving earnings sustainability. Management’s consistent guidance that the book‑to‑burn ratio will remain above one signals confidence that the pipeline will continue to feed the backlog at a healthy pace, ensuring ongoing revenue growth that the market has not yet fully priced in.
NuScale’s monetization provides a clean, cash‑positive catalyst that is unlikely to be fully reflected in current valuations. The company has already captured $1.35 billion in Q1 2026 and is set to close the program by Q2, delivering an MOIC of over 3.5× and an IRR exceeding 13 %. These proceeds, combined with a $1.4 billion share‑repurchase program, will both lift free cash flow and enhance earnings per share, creating a tangible upside for shareholders that is only beginning to materialise.
Urban Solutions has sustained a three‑year streak of new award bookings in the $9 billion range while its backlog has risen to $18.7 billion. Despite a $108 million cost spike on three legacy projects, the company is aggressively pursuing recoveries and change orders, and is on track to hand over three of those projects in 2026 and a fourth in 2027. Once those assets are closed, Urban Solutions is expected to realise its full margin potential of 3‑4 % in 2026, a significant upside over the current $2.2 % adjusted EBITDA margin reported for 2025.
Energy Solutions is repositioning its portfolio toward higher‑margin engineering services that are designed to unlock larger EPC awards in the next two years. Although the segment reported a $414 million loss in 2025 due largely to the Santos ruling, its new awards of $1.4 billion reflect a 20 % revenue share in 2026 and an expected margin of 4‑5 %. Coupled with the company’s focus on “smart lump sum” risk allocation, this shift signals a structural improvement in the segment’s profitability profile that the market has not yet fully appreciated.
Mission Solutions is poised to benefit from the U.S. government’s accelerated nuclear fuel supply chain initiatives, with a projected 6 % margin in 2026. The company secured a six‑year contract to extend its presence at the Portsmouth site and is actively pursuing new missions in the intelligence and defense sectors. Given that Mission’s backlog has only declined modestly from $2.7 billion to $2.2 billion, and that it has a higher-margin EPC profile than the other segments, the upside potential for earnings growth remains substantial.

Bear case

The company’s legacy infrastructure projects have continued to erode profitability, with a $108 million cost growth on three projects and four projects remaining in loss positions through 2026 and early 2027. These overruns not only reduce current margin but also expose Fluor to future change‑order liabilities, potentially compressing margins further as the company attempts to recover costs. The backlog conversion estimate of 50 % or more may prove optimistic given the high proportion of legacy work still in hand, raising the risk of revenue shortfalls.
The Santos ruling remains a material risk, having already generated a $643 million charge and a $642 million cash outflow in 2025. The pending appeal could produce additional liabilities or force further cost‑cutting measures, while the company’s cash position has already contracted from $3.0 billion to $2.2 billion. Negative operating cash flow of $387 million in 2025 and the projected $400 million tax burden from NuScale monetization in 2026 suggest that liquidity could become strained if the company’s core projects underperform or if unforeseen liabilities surface.
Energy Solutions remains a weak link, having moved from a $256 million profit in 2024 to a $414 million loss in 2025, and its revenue has fallen to $3.6 billion from $6.0 billion. The segment’s new awards of $1.4 billion are substantially lower than the $3.2 billion booked in 2024, indicating a slowdown in high‑margin opportunities. Even with a projected 4‑5 % margin, Energy Solutions still faces significant execution risk and limited upside if the company cannot secure larger EPC contracts.
Mission Solutions’ margin has slipped from 5.9 % to 3.5 % in 2025, and its backlog has shrunk from $2.7 billion to $2.2 billion. The segment is still burdened by $60 million in reserves and prior rulings, and its revenue growth is largely dependent on government contracts that can be volatile with fiscal cycles. A slowdown in defense spending or additional regulatory scrutiny could further erode Mission’s profitability and the company’s overall margin profile.
The company’s reliance on reimbursable contracts, while protective against fixed‑price overruns, also exposes it to prolonged cash‑flow pressures if clients shift to more fixed‑price or “smart lump sum” contracts that carry higher risk. A change in market sentiment toward more aggressive price competition could force Fluor to reduce its profit margins or to lose bids, thereby undermining the high booking volumes that the company relies on to sustain its growth trajectory.

The company’s legacy infrastructure projects have continued to erode profitability, with a $108 million cost growth on three projects and four projects remaining in loss positions through 2026 and early 2027. These overruns not only reduce current margin but also expose Fluor to future change‑order liabilities, potentially compressing margins further as the company attempts to recover costs. The backlog conversion estimate of 50 % or more may prove optimistic given the high proportion of legacy work still in hand, raising the risk of revenue shortfalls.
The Santos ruling remains a material risk, having already generated a $643 million charge and a $642 million cash outflow in 2025. The pending appeal could produce additional liabilities or force further cost‑cutting measures, while the company’s cash position has already contracted from $3.0 billion to $2.2 billion. Negative operating cash flow of $387 million in 2025 and the projected $400 million tax burden from NuScale monetization in 2026 suggest that liquidity could become strained if the company’s core projects underperform or if unforeseen liabilities surface.
Energy Solutions remains a weak link, having moved from a $256 million profit in 2024 to a $414 million loss in 2025, and its revenue has fallen to $3.6 billion from $6.0 billion. The segment’s new awards of $1.4 billion are substantially lower than the $3.2 billion booked in 2024, indicating a slowdown in high‑margin opportunities. Even with a projected 4‑5 % margin, Energy Solutions still faces significant execution risk and limited upside if the company cannot secure larger EPC contracts.
Mission Solutions’ margin has slipped from 5.9 % to 3.5 % in 2025, and its backlog has shrunk from $2.7 billion to $2.2 billion. The segment is still burdened by $60 million in reserves and prior rulings, and its revenue growth is largely dependent on government contracts that can be volatile with fiscal cycles. A slowdown in defense spending or additional regulatory scrutiny could further erode Mission’s profitability and the company’s overall margin profile.
The company’s reliance on reimbursable contracts, while protective against fixed‑price overruns, also exposes it to prolonged cash‑flow pressures if clients shift to more fixed‑price or “smart lump sum” contracts that carry higher risk. A change in market sentiment toward more aggressive price competition could force Fluor to reduce its profit margins or to lose bids, thereby undermining the high booking volumes that the company relies on to sustain its growth trajectory.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Engineering & Construction

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	PWR	Quanta Services, Inc.	116.80 Bn	105.38	3.88	5.89 Bn
2	FIX	Comfort Systems Usa Inc	71.83 Bn	58.80	25.07	0.04 Bn
3	EME	EMCOR Group, Inc.	41.41 Bn	31.08	22.37	-
4	MTZ	Mastec Inc	33.79 Bn	75.00	2.21	2.53 Bn
5	STRL	Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.	27.10 Bn	77.95	9.39	0.29 Bn
6	APG	APi Group Corp	19.02 Bn	-68.89	2.33	2.76 Bn
7	IESC	IES Holdings, Inc.	13.82 Bn	36.49	3.80	0.04 Bn
8	J	Jacobs Solutions Inc.	13.29 Bn	32.67	1.01	4.08 Bn

Research Tools

Fluor Corp (NYSE: FLR)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Research Tools

Fluor Corp (NYSE: FLR)

About

Investment thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password