Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Churchill Downs

NASDAQ: CHDN

$89.18 ▲ +1.01 (+1.15%)

At close: Jul 28, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap6.27 Bn

P/E16.01

P/S2.13

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.02

Total Debt (Qtr)3.15 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)3.11

Add ratio to table…

About

Churchill Downs Incorporated is a diversified entertainment and gaming company with roots tracing back over 150 years, anchored by its flagship event, the Kentucky Derby. The company operates at the intersection of live racing, historical racing, online wagering, and regional casino gaming, leveraging a portfolio of iconic venues and digital platforms. Its business spans thoroughbred and harness racing, pari-mutuel wagering, sports betting, and casino operations, positioning it as a leader in regulated gaming and entertainment in the United States.

Churchill Downs Incorporated generates revenue through multiple streams, including commissions from pari-mutuel wagering on live and historical races, simulcast fees, admissions, sponsorships, and event-related services. The company also earns income from food and beverage sales, hotel operations, and gaming activities such as slot machines, table games, and video lottery terminals. Online wagering platforms, sports betting partnerships, and technology services for third-party operators further diversify its revenue base, catering to both on-site and digital customers.

The company operates through the following segments:

• Live and Historical Racing encompasses live and historical pari-mutuel racing at Churchill Downs Racetrack and other properties in Kentucky, Virginia, and New Hampshire. This segment derives revenue from wagering commissions, simulcast fees, admissions, sponsorships, television rights, and food and beverage services. Churchill Downs Racetrack, home of the Kentucky Derby, serves as the centerpiece, offering live racing, upscale amenities, and year-round simulcast wagering.

• Wagering Services and Solutions includes the operations of TwinSpires, United Tote, Exacta Systems, and sports betting activities. TwinSpires operates one of the largest online horse racing wagering platforms in the U. S., providing advance deposit wagering, streaming video, and handicapping data. United Tote manufactures and operates pari-mutuel wagering systems for racetracks and off-track betting facilities, while Exacta Systems supplies central determinant technology for historical racing machines. The segment also manages retail and online sports betting through third-party partnerships.

• Gaming consists of regional casino properties and associated racetracks, generating revenue from slot machines, table games, video poker, and video lottery terminals. This segment includes wholly owned casinos in Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, and Pennsylvania, as well as equity investments in Illinois and Ohio. Ancillary services such as hotels, food and beverage, and retail sportsbooks complement the core gaming operations.

• All Other aggregates miscellaneous businesses and corporate operations, including a captive insurance company and unallocated corporate expenses.

Churchill Downs Incorporated holds a prominent position in the gaming and entertainment industry, distinguished by its ownership of the Kentucky Derby, one of the most recognizable sporting events globally. The company competes with other racetracks, casinos, online wagering platforms, and sports betting operators, but its competitive advantages lie in its iconic brand, diversified revenue streams, and strategic investments in technology and infrastructure. The expansion of historical racing venues and digital wagering platforms has strengthened its market presence, while ongoing capital projects at Churchill Downs Racetrack and new gaming properties enhance its long-term growth prospects. Regulatory challenges and competition for discretionary spending remain key risks, but the company’s scale and operational expertise provide a buffer against industry volatility.

The company serves a broad customer base, including racing enthusiasts, casual bettors, casino patrons, and corporate sponsors. Its live and historical racing venues attract local and international visitors, while online platforms like TwinSpires cater to digital wagering customers across multiple states. Corporate partners, including luxury and marquee brands, engage with the Kentucky Derby and other high-profile events, while regional casinos draw gaming customers from surrounding markets. The company’s properties also serve convention attendees, tourists, and local communities through entertainment, dining, and hospitality offerings.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Churchill Downs Incorporated's acquisition of the intellectual property rights to the Preakness Stakes and Black-Eyed Susan Stakes represents a transformative strategic opportunity that the market is significantly undervaluing. While management framed the deal as consistent with their history of investing in iconic racing assets, they did not fully articulate the scale of the upside potential embedded in this transaction. The Preakness is the second most wagered-on race in the United States, trailing only the Kentucky Derby, and carries immense cultural and commercial weight as the second leg of the Triple Crown. By securing the IP rights—including all trademarks and associated branding—Churchill Downs gains the ability to monetize this asset through enhanced media rights, sponsorship activations, hospitality experiences, and wagering growth across multiple platforms. Crucially, the fee structure involves a modest $3 million base fee (growing at 2.5% annually from 2028) plus 2% of combined handle on Preakness and Black-Eyed Susan Day, which last year totaled approximately $140 million. This implies an annual fee obligation of roughly $2.8 million based on current handle levels, leaving substantial headroom for profitability as handle grows. The company’s expertise in elevating racing events—demonstrated through the continuous enhancement of the Kentucky Derby experience via projects like Victory Run and premium hospitality upgrades—can be directly applied to Pimlico. With Maryland having already allocated $525 million in state funds for facility improvements at Pimlico and Laurel Park, Churchill Downs is positioned not as a passive IP holder but as an active partner capable of driving operational and experiential transformation. This could unlock significant incremental handle, attendance, and sponsorship revenue over time, particularly if the Preakness regains its historical stature as a premier sporting event. The market appears to be treating this as a minor licensing deal rather than recognizing it as a platform for long-term, high-margin growth in the wagering and hospitality ecosystem—similar to how the Derby has evolved under Churchill Downs’ stewardship. Given the company’s proven ability to grow EBITDA through experiential enhancements and strategic reinvestment, the Preakness IP acquisition could become a meaningful contributor to adjusted EBITDA growth well beyond the initial investment, especially as handle and engagement scale in tandem with facility upgrades and marketing initiatives.

Churchill Downs Incorporated's acquisition of the intellectual property rights to the Preakness Stakes and Black-Eyed Susan Stakes represents a transformative strategic opportunity that the market is significantly undervaluing. While management framed the deal as consistent with their history of investing in iconic racing assets, they did not fully articulate the scale of the upside potential embedded in this transaction. The Preakness is the second most wagered-on race in the United States, trailing only the Kentucky Derby, and carries immense cultural and commercial weight as the second leg of the Triple Crown. By securing the IP rights—including all trademarks and associated branding—Churchill Downs gains the ability to monetize this asset through enhanced media rights, sponsorship activations, hospitality experiences, and wagering growth across multiple platforms. Crucially, the fee structure involves a modest $3 million base fee (growing at 2.5% annually from 2028) plus 2% of combined handle on Preakness and Black-Eyed Susan Day, which last year totaled approximately $140 million. This implies an annual fee obligation of roughly $2.8 million based on current handle levels, leaving substantial headroom for profitability as handle grows. The company’s expertise in elevating racing events—demonstrated through the continuous enhancement of the Kentucky Derby experience via projects like Victory Run and premium hospitality upgrades—can be directly applied to Pimlico. With Maryland having already allocated $525 million in state funds for facility improvements at Pimlico and Laurel Park, Churchill Downs is positioned not as a passive IP holder but as an active partner capable of driving operational and experiential transformation. This could unlock significant incremental handle, attendance, and sponsorship revenue over time, particularly if the Preakness regains its historical stature as a premier sporting event. The market appears to be treating this as a minor licensing deal rather than recognizing it as a platform for long-term, high-margin growth in the wagering and hospitality ecosystem—similar to how the Derby has evolved under Churchill Downs’ stewardship. Given the company’s proven ability to grow EBITDA through experiential enhancements and strategic reinvestment, the Preakness IP acquisition could become a meaningful contributor to adjusted EBITDA growth well beyond the initial investment, especially as handle and engagement scale in tandem with facility upgrades and marketing initiatives.

▼ Bear case

Churchill Downs Incorporated faces mounting competitive and regulatory pressures in key growth markets that management downplayed during the earnings call, particularly in Virginia and Louisiana, creating significant headwinds to sustained profitability that the market may be overlooking. While the company highlighted positive developments in Virginia—such as the governor’s veto of skill game legislation and a proposed casino in Fairfax County—it provided limited detail on how intensifying competition from newly licensed operators is impacting performance at its non-Colonial Downs properties. Management acknowledged that performance at other Virginia properties was affected by weather and increased competition, yet offered no concrete strategy beyond vague references to optimizing marketing and operating tactics. This lack of specificity suggests a reactive rather than proactive approach in a market where new entrants are aggressively capturing share, potentially eroding the long-term viability of their legacy HRM venues outside of The Rose at Colonial Downs. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on historical racing machines (HRMs) as a growth engine is increasingly vulnerable to legislative shifts, as evidenced by the cessation of HRM operations in Louisiana in May 2025 due to regulatory changes—a development management noted only in passing while discussing Gaming segment results. The dismissive treatment of this Louisiana exit, coupled with the absence of any discussion about contingency plans or alternative growth pathways in similarly regulated states, reveals a critical blind spot: HRM profitability is highly contingent on favorable state-level gaming policies that can reverse abruptly. In Kentucky, while HRMs remain robust, the company’s expansion plans—including the potential addition of 4,000 more machines—face inherent limits tied to market saturation and demographic constraints, especially as electronic table games (ETGs) like roulette begin to cannibalize traditional slot play without clear evidence of net new customer acquisition. The early encouragement around ETGs was framed as accretive to gross gaming revenue (GGR), but management failed to address whether this represents true incremental spend or merely a shift in player preference within an existing customer base, raising concerns about the scalability of this initiative. Additionally, the company’s aggressive capital allocation—projecting $180–$220 million in project capex and $90–$110 million in maintenance capex for FY26—carries execution risk, particularly given the scale of ongoing investments like the Victory Run project and Rockingham Grand Casino. With free cash flow generation strong but not infinite, any misstep in ROI on these ventures could strain balance sheet flexibility, especially if HRM growth decelerates faster than anticipated due to competitive or regulatory headwinds. The market may be assuming continued momentum in core segments without adequately pricing in the fragility of their growth assumptions in politically sensitive gaming environments.

Churchill Downs Incorporated faces mounting competitive and regulatory pressures in key growth markets that management downplayed during the earnings call, particularly in Virginia and Louisiana, creating significant headwinds to sustained profitability that the market may be overlooking. While the company highlighted positive developments in Virginia—such as the governor’s veto of skill game legislation and a proposed casino in Fairfax County—it provided limited detail on how intensifying competition from newly licensed operators is impacting performance at its non-Colonial Downs properties. Management acknowledged that performance at other Virginia properties was affected by weather and increased competition, yet offered no concrete strategy beyond vague references to optimizing marketing and operating tactics. This lack of specificity suggests a reactive rather than proactive approach in a market where new entrants are aggressively capturing share, potentially eroding the long-term viability of their legacy HRM venues outside of The Rose at Colonial Downs. Furthermore, the company’s reliance on historical racing machines (HRMs) as a growth engine is increasingly vulnerable to legislative shifts, as evidenced by the cessation of HRM operations in Louisiana in May 2025 due to regulatory changes—a development management noted only in passing while discussing Gaming segment results. The dismissive treatment of this Louisiana exit, coupled with the absence of any discussion about contingency plans or alternative growth pathways in similarly regulated states, reveals a critical blind spot: HRM profitability is highly contingent on favorable state-level gaming policies that can reverse abruptly. In Kentucky, while HRMs remain robust, the company’s expansion plans—including the potential addition of 4,000 more machines—face inherent limits tied to market saturation and demographic constraints, especially as electronic table games (ETGs) like roulette begin to cannibalize traditional slot play without clear evidence of net new customer acquisition. The early encouragement around ETGs was framed as accretive to gross gaming revenue (GGR), but management failed to address whether this represents true incremental spend or merely a shift in player preference within an existing customer base, raising concerns about the scalability of this initiative. Additionally, the company’s aggressive capital allocation—projecting $180–$220 million in project capex and $90–$110 million in maintenance capex for FY26—carries execution risk, particularly given the scale of ongoing investments like the Victory Run project and Rockingham Grand Casino. With free cash flow generation strong but not infinite, any misstep in ROI on these ventures could strain balance sheet flexibility, especially if HRM growth decelerates faster than anticipated due to competitive or regulatory headwinds. The market may be assuming continued momentum in core segments without adequately pricing in the fragility of their growth assumptions in politically sensitive gaming environments.

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Gambling

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	CDRO	Codere Online Luxembourg, S.A.	425.84 Bn	295,184.22	1,812.57	0.00 Bn
2	FLUT	Flutter Entertainment plc	19.13 Bn	-51.01	1.12	12.14 Bn
3	DKNG	DraftKings Inc.	12.12 Bn	228.18	1.93	0.58 Bn
4	SGHC	Super Group (SGHC) Ltd	7.57 Bn	33.06	3.25	0.03 Bn
5	CHDN	Churchill Downs Inc	6.27 Bn	16.01	2.13	3.15 Bn
6	RSI	Rush Street Interactive, Inc.	3.15 Bn	35.38	2.53	-
7	BRSL	Brightstar Lottery PLC	1.94 Bn	10.92	0.77	4.01 Bn
8	ACEL	Accel Entertainment, Inc.	1.02 Bn	19.91	0.75	0.58 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Segments Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password