Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) Stock Analysis and Metrics

Carlyle

NASDAQ: CG

$45.40 ▲ +0.99 (+2.23%)

At close: Jul 24, 2026 · 3:59 PM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap16.34 Bn

P/E25.37

P/S4.02

Div. Yield0.04

Total Debt (Qtr)3.00 Bn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-73.90

Add ratio to table…

About

The Carlyle Group Inc. is one of the world's largest global investment firms that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Carlyle AlpInvest.

The company generates revenue primarily through management fees charged on assets under management, performance allocations (carried interest) from its investment funds and transaction fees from advisory and capital markets activities.

The company operates through the following segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Carlyle AlpInvest.

• Global Private Equity advises buyout, growth, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds. As of December 31 2025 the segment had investments in more than 275 active portfolio companies employing over 700000 people worldwide. Its Corporate Private Equity arm focuses on buyouts, growth and core strategies targeting stable businesses with operational improvement potential. The Real Estate arm invests in residential properties, senior living facilities, industrial and self storage assets while limiting exposure to office hotels and retail. The Infrastructure and Natural Resources arm concentrates on renewables, energy infrastructure, water and waste, transportation, digital infrastructure and power generation, and also engages in upstream, midstream and downstream energy activities across the globe. The segment managed approximately 164 billion dollars of assets under management representing about 34 percent of total firm AUM.

• Global Credit advises products across the credit spectrum including liquid credit, opportunistic credit, direct lending, asset backed finance, aviation finance, infrastructure credit and cross platform credit, together with insurance solutions and global capital markets. Its Insurance Solutions combine insurance expertise with capital sourcing to provide liability funding and reinsurance for reinsurance companies. Liquid Credit invests mainly in senior secured bank loans through collateralized loan obligations and similar vehicles. Opportunistic Credit provides structured and privately negotiated capital solutions such as mezzanine debt and convertible notes for corporate borrowers. Direct Lending focuses on middle market first lien loans for companies lacking access to broadly syndicated loan markets. Asset Backed Finance seeks premium returns by lending against diversified pools of assets with contractual cash flows. Aviation Finance provides financing for commercial aircraft throughout the aviation industry. Infrastructure Credit originates debt for global infrastructure projects in power, energy, transportation, water waste, telecommunications and social infrastructure. Cross Platform initiatives include interval funds and separately managed accounts that invest across the credit platform. Global Capital Markets arranges, underwrites and syndicates loans and securities for third parties and portfolio companies. The segment reported about 211 billion dollars of assets under management representing roughly 44 percent of total firm AUM.

• Carlyle AlpInvest provides investment opportunities through fund of funds, secondary purchases, financings and co investment programs. Its Private Equity Secondary and Portfolio Finance arm acquires limited partnership interests in private funds and offers liquidity and restructuring solutions from debt to equity for third party investors. The Co investment arm invests alongside other private equity and mezzanine funds when opportunities are too large for a single fund sponsor. The Fund of Vehicles arm makes commitments directly to buyout, growth capital, venture and other alternative asset funds advised by other general partners. As of December 31 2025 the segment managed approximately 102 billion dollars of assets under management representing about 21 percent of total firm AUM.

Within the alternative investment industry Carlyle holds a strong position as one of the largest global private equity and credit managers, competing with other large private equity firms, sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and insurance companies. Its competitive advantages stem from a deep industry expertise, a global network of local investment teams, proprietary data analytics and a disciplined investment process that enables consistent deal sourcing and value creation across diversified strategies.

The company serves a broad base of institutional and high net worth investors including pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, endowments and family offices located in 87 countries, with over 3200 active carry fund investors as of December 31 2025.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Carlyle Group's innovative $5 billion capital-efficient solution for its next U.S. buyout fund represents a structural advantage that the market is underestimating. This first-of-its-kind investment vehicle, secured through Carlyle AlpInvest, provides cornerstone investors with both access to the upcoming fund and tailored liquidity options, demonstrating deep client trust and platform differentiation. By leveraging AlpInvest's portfolio finance and secondaries capabilities alongside its core private equity business, Carlyle is creating sticky, long-term relationships that lock in capital at full fees without dilution to existing fund economics. The structure not only accelerates fundraising for Fund IX but also signals to the broader LP base that Carlyle can solve complex portfolio needs in volatile markets, a capability that will drive durable inflows beyond traditional fund cycles. This innovation reflects a shift from pure product sales to solution-oriented partnerships, positioning Carlyle to capture a growing share of LP allocations as reindustrialization and onshoring themes intensify globally. The fact that cornerstone investors increased their U.S. Buyout exposure through this mechanism underscores conviction in Carlyle's core sectors and validates the firm's strategic repositioning of AlpInvest as a solutions provider rather than just a secondaries player.
The company's diversified platform is generating cross-business synergies that are not fully appreciated in current valuations, particularly the ripple effects from strong performance in Carlyle AlpInvest and Global Credit on private equity carry realization timing. AlpInvest's record $107 billion AUM and $6.8 billion quarterly inflows are creating a growing pool of net accrued performance revenues ($643 million, up 13% year-over-year) that will eventually translate into meaningful carry distributions as its European-style waterfalls mature. Simultaneously, Global Credit's strength — evidenced by $209 billion AUM, $25 billion in 12-month inflows, and exceptionally low loss rates (1% nonaccrual in direct lending, 8 basis points annualized inception-to-date) — is providing stable fee-related earnings ($93 million in Q1) and acting as a buffer against private equity market cycles. This diversified engine allows Carlyle to maintain momentum in fundraising and deployment even when private equity exits lag, as seen in the current quarter where NRPR was lower due to composition (CP VII and VIII not yet realizing carry). The market is overlooking how these auxiliary businesses are building latent carry potential that will materialize as funds like Japan IV, Financial Services III, and Europe Tech IV begin to realize cash carry in the coming quarters, creating a delayed but powerful uplift to distributable earnings.
Carlyle's positioning in secular growth themes — national security, energy security, and reindustrialization — is creating a structural tailwind that extends beyond cyclical market movements, yet remains underpriced in the stock. Harvey Schwartz explicitly linked the firm's deep sector expertise in aerospace and defense, industrial, energy, and healthcare to rising government priorities around national security and economic growth competition, noting that every official he meets wants to discuss these two subjects. This is not anecdotal; it reflects a multi-decade shift in capital allocation toward resilient, domestically focused infrastructure and innovation, areas where Carlyle has decades of experience and dedicated teams. The firm's ability to raise $13 billion in inflows to start the year, including record AlpInvest flows and a $12 billion closed-end asset-backed finance strategy (up 30% year-over-year), demonstrates that LPs are actively seeking managers with expertise in these exact domains. Unlike competitors that may be overexposed to cyclical consumer or software buyouts, Carlyle's portfolio is aligned with long-term secular demand for capital in essential industries, giving it a durable advantage in fundraising and deal sourcing that will persist through geopolitical volatility.

Carlyle Group's innovative $5 billion capital-efficient solution for its next U.S. buyout fund represents a structural advantage that the market is underestimating. This first-of-its-kind investment vehicle, secured through Carlyle AlpInvest, provides cornerstone investors with both access to the upcoming fund and tailored liquidity options, demonstrating deep client trust and platform differentiation. By leveraging AlpInvest's portfolio finance and secondaries capabilities alongside its core private equity business, Carlyle is creating sticky, long-term relationships that lock in capital at full fees without dilution to existing fund economics. The structure not only accelerates fundraising for Fund IX but also signals to the broader LP base that Carlyle can solve complex portfolio needs in volatile markets, a capability that will drive durable inflows beyond traditional fund cycles. This innovation reflects a shift from pure product sales to solution-oriented partnerships, positioning Carlyle to capture a growing share of LP allocations as reindustrialization and onshoring themes intensify globally. The fact that cornerstone investors increased their U.S. Buyout exposure through this mechanism underscores conviction in Carlyle's core sectors and validates the firm's strategic repositioning of AlpInvest as a solutions provider rather than just a secondaries player.
The company's diversified platform is generating cross-business synergies that are not fully appreciated in current valuations, particularly the ripple effects from strong performance in Carlyle AlpInvest and Global Credit on private equity carry realization timing. AlpInvest's record $107 billion AUM and $6.8 billion quarterly inflows are creating a growing pool of net accrued performance revenues ($643 million, up 13% year-over-year) that will eventually translate into meaningful carry distributions as its European-style waterfalls mature. Simultaneously, Global Credit's strength — evidenced by $209 billion AUM, $25 billion in 12-month inflows, and exceptionally low loss rates (1% nonaccrual in direct lending, 8 basis points annualized inception-to-date) — is providing stable fee-related earnings ($93 million in Q1) and acting as a buffer against private equity market cycles. This diversified engine allows Carlyle to maintain momentum in fundraising and deployment even when private equity exits lag, as seen in the current quarter where NRPR was lower due to composition (CP VII and VIII not yet realizing carry). The market is overlooking how these auxiliary businesses are building latent carry potential that will materialize as funds like Japan IV, Financial Services III, and Europe Tech IV begin to realize cash carry in the coming quarters, creating a delayed but powerful uplift to distributable earnings.
Carlyle's positioning in secular growth themes — national security, energy security, and reindustrialization — is creating a structural tailwind that extends beyond cyclical market movements, yet remains underpriced in the stock. Harvey Schwartz explicitly linked the firm's deep sector expertise in aerospace and defense, industrial, energy, and healthcare to rising government priorities around national security and economic growth competition, noting that every official he meets wants to discuss these two subjects. This is not anecdotal; it reflects a multi-decade shift in capital allocation toward resilient, domestically focused infrastructure and innovation, areas where Carlyle has decades of experience and dedicated teams. The firm's ability to raise $13 billion in inflows to start the year, including record AlpInvest flows and a $12 billion closed-end asset-backed finance strategy (up 30% year-over-year), demonstrates that LPs are actively seeking managers with expertise in these exact domains. Unlike competitors that may be overexposed to cyclical consumer or software buyouts, Carlyle's portfolio is aligned with long-term secular demand for capital in essential industries, giving it a durable advantage in fundraising and deal sourcing that will persist through geopolitical volatility.

▼ Bear case

Carlyle Group's reliance on legacy private equity funds CP VII and CP VIII for near-term carry realization presents a material risk that the market is ignoring, as these vehicles are approaching the end of their life cycles with diminishing returns potential despite strong historical DPI. While Harvey Schwartz highlighted CP VII's $5 billion in quarterly proceeds and over 70% DPI, he omitted that the fund is now in its later stages, meaning the incremental value creation from remaining assets is likely to be lower-margin and more execution-dependent. The $17 billion in remaining fair value cited for CP VII may be optimistic given the fund's vintage (2018) and the increasing difficulty of finding buyers for large-scale buyout assets in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment. Furthermore, the expectation that carry realization will meaningfully increase from funds like Japan IV, Financial Services III, and Europe Tech IV is speculative, as these funds are either earlier in their lifecycle or exposed to sectors (e.g., European tech, Japan buyout) that face unique headwinds — including currency risk, local market fragmentation, and regulatory scrutiny — that could delay or diminish cash carry generation. The market may be assuming a smooth carry ramp-up, but the timing and quantum remain highly uncertain, especially given Justin Plouffe's reluctance to provide specifics on carry trajectories during Q&A.
The wealth channel's vulnerability to redemption pressures, particularly in products like CTAC, represents an underappreciated operational risk that could undermine inflows and force strategic shifts away from higher-margin retail products. Although Harvey Schwartz dismissed concerns about day 1 markups by emphasizing CTAC's diversification (>900 names) and daily marking practice, he avoided addressing whether the product's structure remains susceptible to panic-driven redemptions during periods of stress, as seen in competitors' retail outflows. The admission that CTAC experienced elevated redemptions last quarter due to being "later in the queue" reveals a structural fragility: even diversified, daily-marked credit funds can face sequential liquidity pressure when underlying asset classes (like direct lending) suffer from negative sentiment. This is especially concerning given the broader wealth channel's reliance on adviser relationships, which can deteriorate quickly if performance perception lags. While Schwartz expressed confidence that the "message is getting through," the lack of concrete data on net flows, adviser retention, or product-specific redemption trends suggests the firm may be underestimating how persistent retail credit fears could erode a key growth avenue for fee-related earnings, particularly as opportunistic credit fundraising remains unlaunched.
Carlyle's stated path to $200 billion in inflows and $6+ per share in distributable earnings by 2028 depends heavily on successful execution of its opportunistic credit fund launch and continued acceleration in AlpInvest and private equity fundraising — goals that may be overly optimistic given rising competition and LP consolidation trends. Justin Plouffe's confidence in mid-to-high single-digit FRE growth hinges on the assumption that fundraising will "really accelerate" in the "super cycle," yet he offered no concrete evidence of pipeline strength beyond general LP feedback. The firm is facing increased competition from specialized asset managers (e.g., direct lending-only shops, infrastructure specialists) and mega-funds that can offer lower fees or more focused expertise, potentially eroding Carlyle's diversification advantage. Furthermore, the reliance on opportunistic credit as a higher-fee growth lever assumes market conditions will favor such strategies, but if credit volatility remains contained or regulators impose new constraints on CLOs or private BDCs, the expected mix shift toward higher-margin products may not materialize. The market may be pricing in perfection — assuming Carlyle can simultaneously grow AUM, improve fee margins, and unlock carry from multiple platforms — without adequately discounting the execution risk inherent in coordinating these parallel initiatives across a complex, global platform.

Carlyle Group's reliance on legacy private equity funds CP VII and CP VIII for near-term carry realization presents a material risk that the market is ignoring, as these vehicles are approaching the end of their life cycles with diminishing returns potential despite strong historical DPI. While Harvey Schwartz highlighted CP VII's $5 billion in quarterly proceeds and over 70% DPI, he omitted that the fund is now in its later stages, meaning the incremental value creation from remaining assets is likely to be lower-margin and more execution-dependent. The $17 billion in remaining fair value cited for CP VII may be optimistic given the fund's vintage (2018) and the increasing difficulty of finding buyers for large-scale buyout assets in a higher-for-longer interest rate environment. Furthermore, the expectation that carry realization will meaningfully increase from funds like Japan IV, Financial Services III, and Europe Tech IV is speculative, as these funds are either earlier in their lifecycle or exposed to sectors (e.g., European tech, Japan buyout) that face unique headwinds — including currency risk, local market fragmentation, and regulatory scrutiny — that could delay or diminish cash carry generation. The market may be assuming a smooth carry ramp-up, but the timing and quantum remain highly uncertain, especially given Justin Plouffe's reluctance to provide specifics on carry trajectories during Q&A.
The wealth channel's vulnerability to redemption pressures, particularly in products like CTAC, represents an underappreciated operational risk that could undermine inflows and force strategic shifts away from higher-margin retail products. Although Harvey Schwartz dismissed concerns about day 1 markups by emphasizing CTAC's diversification (>900 names) and daily marking practice, he avoided addressing whether the product's structure remains susceptible to panic-driven redemptions during periods of stress, as seen in competitors' retail outflows. The admission that CTAC experienced elevated redemptions last quarter due to being "later in the queue" reveals a structural fragility: even diversified, daily-marked credit funds can face sequential liquidity pressure when underlying asset classes (like direct lending) suffer from negative sentiment. This is especially concerning given the broader wealth channel's reliance on adviser relationships, which can deteriorate quickly if performance perception lags. While Schwartz expressed confidence that the "message is getting through," the lack of concrete data on net flows, adviser retention, or product-specific redemption trends suggests the firm may be underestimating how persistent retail credit fears could erode a key growth avenue for fee-related earnings, particularly as opportunistic credit fundraising remains unlaunched.
Carlyle's stated path to $200 billion in inflows and $6+ per share in distributable earnings by 2028 depends heavily on successful execution of its opportunistic credit fund launch and continued acceleration in AlpInvest and private equity fundraising — goals that may be overly optimistic given rising competition and LP consolidation trends. Justin Plouffe's confidence in mid-to-high single-digit FRE growth hinges on the assumption that fundraising will "really accelerate" in the "super cycle," yet he offered no concrete evidence of pipeline strength beyond general LP feedback. The firm is facing increased competition from specialized asset managers (e.g., direct lending-only shops, infrastructure specialists) and mega-funds that can offer lower fees or more focused expertise, potentially eroding Carlyle's diversification advantage. Furthermore, the reliance on opportunistic credit as a higher-fee growth lever assumes market conditions will favor such strategies, but if credit volatility remains contained or regulators impose new constraints on CLOs or private BDCs, the expected mix shift toward higher-margin products may not materialize. The market may be pricing in perfection — assuming Carlyle can simultaneously grow AUM, improve fee margins, and unlock carry from multiple platforms — without adequately discounting the execution risk inherent in coordinating these parallel initiatives across a complex, global platform.

Legal Entity Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Asset Management

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	BN	BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/	1,251.90 Bn	1,035.48	16.53	15.06 Bn
2	BLK	BlackRock, Inc.	163.76 Bn	26.19	6.39	20.18 Bn
3	BX	Blackstone Inc.	101.88 Bn	16.71	6.89	13.28 Bn
4	APO	Apollo Global Management, Inc.	73.13 Bn	69.84	2.74	14.22 Bn
5	STT	State Street Corp	51.60 Bn	18.27	3.57	-
6	AMP	Ameriprise Financial Inc	49.37 Bn	12.67	1.77	0.20 Bn
7	NTRS	Northern Trust Corp	33.59 Bn	18.37	6.53	7.84 Bn
8	RJF	Raymond James Financial Inc	33.19 Bn	15.49	2.41	4.66 Bn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Legal Entity Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Legal Entity Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password