Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings BAERW

NASDAQ BAERW

$0.18 +0.01 (+5.82%)

At close: Sep 8, 2026 · 4:00 PM EDT

Key Stats

Market Cap10.57 Mn

P/E-0.25

P/S0.09

Div. Yield0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)235.89 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)-0.84

Add ratio to table…

About

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. provides aerial wildfire surveillance, relief and suppression, and aerial firefighting services using next-generation technology and environmentally friendly methods primarily throughout the United States. The company also offers airframe modification and integration solutions for governmental and commercial customers. Its mission is to deploy advanced aviation technologies to protect lives, property, critical infrastructure, and the…

The company generates revenue by delivering aerial firefighting and surveillance services under government contracts, providing maintenance and repair services for specialized aircraft, and offering airframe modification and integration solutions. It serves federal, state, and local governmental entities through short, medium, and long-term contracts. Revenue is derived from task orders placed by agencies such as the U. S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior under established agreements.

Fire Suppression: This segment involves deploying CL-415EAF (Super Scooper) aircraft to drop large volumes of water for initial and direct attack on wildfires. The Super Scooper aircraft are amphibious and can skim water from nearby sources to reload quickly, enabling sustained fire suppression efforts. Bridger operates the largest commercial Super Scooper fleet worldwide, enhancing its rapid-response capabilities.
Aerial Surveillance: This segment provides manned aircraft for fire monitoring, tactical coordination, and real-time data transmission to incident commanders. The service utilizes Daher Kodiak 100s, Pilatus PC-12s, Beechcraft King Air 350s, and Twin Commander aircraft equipped with advanced sensors and communication systems. These platforms support persistent aerial intelligence, command and control, and situational awareness during wildfire operations.
Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO): This segment delivers maintenance and repair services for Canadair CL-215 Amphibious aircraft, known as Spanish Scoopers, to return them to service. It also provides turnkey aerospace engineering services, including aircraft modification, operations support, and airworthiness certification for manned and unmanned platforms. These solutions serve both Bridger’s own fleet and external governmental and commercial customers.

Bridger holds a strong position in the aerial firefighting industry due to its specialized capabilities and extensive government contracts. The company is one of the largest providers of air tactical group platforms in the U. S. and has contracts covering 100% of the nation for certain services. Its competitive advantages include operating the largest commercial Super Scooper fleet, maintaining a highly skilled workforce, and offering integrated solutions through its proprietary Ignis software for real-time data delivery.

The company serves federal agencies including the U. S. Forest Service, the Department of the Interior (now operating as the U. S. Wildland Fire Service), the Bureau of Land Management, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. It also holds contracts with state agencies such as the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire), the Colorado Department of Public Safety, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the Oregon Department of Forestry, and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Additionally, Bridger works with the Alaska Division of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Alberta Forestry Division Wildfire Management Branch.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

Bridger Aerospace’s recent 160-day task orders from the US Forest Service for its CL-415EAF Super Scooper aircraft represent a structural shift in wildfire management strategy, moving beyond reactive firefighting to proactive, year-round deployment. This extension from last year’s 120 guaranteed flying days to 160 days per aircraft—adding 40 days across four Super Scoopers—signals a long-term commitment by the federal government to invest in advanced aerial firefighting assets as climate-driven fire seasons intensify and lengthen. The early award date in May and coverage extending into Q4 2026 reflect not just seasonal readiness but a strategic pivot toward sustained operational presence, which directly supports Bridger’s stated goal of driving year-round revenue. This reduces the historical volatility tied to peak fire seasons and transforms the business model from one dependent on episodic, high-intensity bursts to one with predictable, contracted cash flow streams. The Super Scooper’s unique water-scooping capability—allowing rapid refill from lakes without returning to base—gives Bridger a technological edge over slower, less agile competitors, reinforcing its position as a mission-critical provider in an era of increasing wildfire frequency and severity. Management’s emphasis on year-round readiness is not aspirational but operational, as evidenced by the February mobilization in Oklahoma and the pre-season investments in winter maintenance and flight training, which position the company to capture revenue earlier and more efficiently as fire risk escalates.
Despite a 46% year-over-year decline in Q1 2026 revenue to $8.5 million, Bridger Aerospace is maintaining its full-year 2026 guidance of $135–$145 million in revenue and $55–$60 million in Adjusted EBITDA, implying a strong second-half rebound driven by the new task orders and elevated wildfire risk conditions. The Q1 dip is entirely consistent with the seasonal nature of the business—historically low fire activity in Q1 due to snowpack and moisture—yet the company used this period strategically to prepare its fleet, conduct training, and position assets ahead of what management describes as a “very active fire season” fueled by historically low snowpack, widespread drought, and the warmest March on record in 132 years. These environmental conditions are not transient; they reflect a structural shift in climate patterns that increase the likelihood of prolonged, intense fire seasons across the western and southern U.S., directly increasing demand for Bridger’s services. The exclusion of return-to-service work from the Spanish Scoopers in 2025—which artificially inflated prior-year revenue—means the underlying growth trajectory is even stronger than headline figures suggest, with the company citing 29% growth when excluding that one-time item. Furthermore, the increase in SG&A expenses, while concerning on the surface, is largely driven by non-cash stock-based compensation and fair value adjustments to warrants—accounting items that do not reflect operational cash burn—and investments in workforce readiness that are essential for scaling operations safely and efficiently as demand rises. The company’s cash position of $9.0 million as of March 31, 2026, though down from year-end, is sufficient to fund pre-season preparations and is being replenished through the timing of government contract receipts, which typically peak in Q2 and Q3 as fire seasons intensify.
Bridger Aerospace’s competitive moat is deepening through its specialization in the CL-415EAF Super Scooper, a platform uniquely suited for initial attack and sustained suppression in remote, water-rich environments—capabilities that fixed-wing airtankers and helicopters cannot match in speed or efficiency. The Forest Service’s decision to award longer, earlier task orders to Bridger validates the superiority of this technology and suggests a growing preference for scooper-based fleets in federal firefighting strategy, potentially disadvantaging competitors reliant on slower-retardant aircraft. As wildfire seasons become more persistent and geographically expansive—now threatening regions beyond the traditional West, including the Southeast and Midwest—Bridger’s national operational footprint and ability to rapidly deploy aircraft across multiple jurisdictions become critical advantages. The company’s international experience further enhances its resilience, providing diversification beyond U.S. federal contracts and offering potential avenues for growth in fire-prone regions like Australia, Canada, and the Mediterranean. Importantly, the task orders are not merely extensions but represent a vote of confidence in Bridger’s reliability, safety record, and operational excellence—factors that are paramount in government contracting and difficult for new entrants to replicate quickly. This trust, combined with the high barriers to entry in acquiring and maintaining specialized amphibious aircraft, creates a durable advantage that shields Bridger from commoditization and supports pricing power in an increasingly constrained supply environment for elite firefighting assets.

Bridger Aerospace’s recent 160-day task orders from the US Forest Service for its CL-415EAF Super Scooper aircraft represent a structural shift in wildfire management strategy, moving beyond reactive firefighting to proactive, year-round deployment. This extension from last year’s 120 guaranteed flying days to 160 days per aircraft—adding 40 days across four Super Scoopers—signals a long-term commitment by the federal government to invest in advanced aerial firefighting assets as climate-driven fire seasons intensify and lengthen. The early award date in May and coverage extending into Q4 2026 reflect not just seasonal readiness but a strategic pivot toward sustained operational presence, which directly supports Bridger’s stated goal of driving year-round revenue. This reduces the historical volatility tied to peak fire seasons and transforms the business model from one dependent on episodic, high-intensity bursts to one with predictable, contracted cash flow streams. The Super Scooper’s unique water-scooping capability—allowing rapid refill from lakes without returning to base—gives Bridger a technological edge over slower, less agile competitors, reinforcing its position as a mission-critical provider in an era of increasing wildfire frequency and severity. Management’s emphasis on year-round readiness is not aspirational but operational, as evidenced by the February mobilization in Oklahoma and the pre-season investments in winter maintenance and flight training, which position the company to capture revenue earlier and more efficiently as fire risk escalates.
Despite a 46% year-over-year decline in Q1 2026 revenue to $8.5 million, Bridger Aerospace is maintaining its full-year 2026 guidance of $135–$145 million in revenue and $55–$60 million in Adjusted EBITDA, implying a strong second-half rebound driven by the new task orders and elevated wildfire risk conditions. The Q1 dip is entirely consistent with the seasonal nature of the business—historically low fire activity in Q1 due to snowpack and moisture—yet the company used this period strategically to prepare its fleet, conduct training, and position assets ahead of what management describes as a “very active fire season” fueled by historically low snowpack, widespread drought, and the warmest March on record in 132 years. These environmental conditions are not transient; they reflect a structural shift in climate patterns that increase the likelihood of prolonged, intense fire seasons across the western and southern U.S., directly increasing demand for Bridger’s services. The exclusion of return-to-service work from the Spanish Scoopers in 2025—which artificially inflated prior-year revenue—means the underlying growth trajectory is even stronger than headline figures suggest, with the company citing 29% growth when excluding that one-time item. Furthermore, the increase in SG&A expenses, while concerning on the surface, is largely driven by non-cash stock-based compensation and fair value adjustments to warrants—accounting items that do not reflect operational cash burn—and investments in workforce readiness that are essential for scaling operations safely and efficiently as demand rises. The company’s cash position of $9.0 million as of March 31, 2026, though down from year-end, is sufficient to fund pre-season preparations and is being replenished through the timing of government contract receipts, which typically peak in Q2 and Q3 as fire seasons intensify.
Bridger Aerospace’s competitive moat is deepening through its specialization in the CL-415EAF Super Scooper, a platform uniquely suited for initial attack and sustained suppression in remote, water-rich environments—capabilities that fixed-wing airtankers and helicopters cannot match in speed or efficiency. The Forest Service’s decision to award longer, earlier task orders to Bridger validates the superiority of this technology and suggests a growing preference for scooper-based fleets in federal firefighting strategy, potentially disadvantaging competitors reliant on slower-retardant aircraft. As wildfire seasons become more persistent and geographically expansive—now threatening regions beyond the traditional West, including the Southeast and Midwest—Bridger’s national operational footprint and ability to rapidly deploy aircraft across multiple jurisdictions become critical advantages. The company’s international experience further enhances its resilience, providing diversification beyond U.S. federal contracts and offering potential avenues for growth in fire-prone regions like Australia, Canada, and the Mediterranean. Importantly, the task orders are not merely extensions but represent a vote of confidence in Bridger’s reliability, safety record, and operational excellence—factors that are paramount in government contracting and difficult for new entrants to replicate quickly. This trust, combined with the high barriers to entry in acquiring and maintaining specialized amphibious aircraft, creates a durable advantage that shields Bridger from commoditization and supports pricing power in an increasingly constrained supply environment for elite firefighting assets.

▼ Bear case

Bridger Aerospace’s Q1 2026 financials reveal a troubling divergence between rising operational costs and stagnant or declining revenue, with SG&A expenses nearly doubling year-over-year to $16.7 million from $8.6 million, driven by non-cash stock-based compensation, warrant fair value adjustments, and workforce expansion—costs that are not directly tied to revenue generation and may indicate overinvestment ahead of uncertain demand. While management attributes the Q1 revenue drop to seasonal patterns, the 46% decline to $8.5 million raises concerns about the company’s ability to monetize its readiness investments efficiently, especially given that cost of revenues remained flat at $17.0 million despite lower activity, suggesting inefficiencies in fleet utilization or fixed cost absorption during off-peak periods. The widening net loss—from $15.5 million to $31.3 million—and the deterioration in Adjusted EBITDA from $(5.1) million to $(14.5) million point to a business model that is burning cash at an accelerating rate during its preparatory phase, with no clear path to profitability until peak season revenue materializes, which remains contingent on unpredictable wildfire severity and timing. The company’s reliance on government task orders, while recently strengthened, still leaves it exposed to budgetary delays, appropriation risks, or shifts in federal priorities—particularly if Congress redirects funds toward ground-based suppression or forest management initiatives amid growing fiscal scrutiny.
Despite the optimistic outlook, Bridger’s full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $135–$145 million implies a mere 14% midpoint growth over 2025 levels, a modest increase that fails to justify the significant cash burn and operational expansion underway, especially when considering that the 2025 baseline was inflated by return-to-service work on the Spanish Scoopers—a non-recurring revenue stream that, when excluded, still only yields 29% growth, which may be overly optimistic given the volatility of wildfire seasons. The assumption that elevated wildfire risk will translate directly into higher contract value or volume overlooks the possibility that federal agencies may respond to increased fire activity not by purchasing more flight hours but by imposing stricter performance penalties, reducing per-hour rates, or shifting to alternative suppression methods like prescribed burns or drone surveillance to control costs. Furthermore, the extension of task orders to 160 days, while positive, does not guarantee full utilization—weather, maintenance delays, or pilot availability could result in underperformance relative to contracted days, leaving Bridger to absorb fixed costs without corresponding revenue, a risk exacerbated by the company’s high fixed-cost structure tied to aircraft maintenance, hangar leases, and specialized personnel. The $6.2 million in Q1 interest expense—up from $5.7 million—reflects a growing debt burden that becomes increasingly difficult to service if fire seasons underperform or if payment receipts from government contracts are delayed due to bureaucratic processing times, a common issue in federal contracting.
Bridger Aerospace’s growth strategy hinges on the continued dominance of the CL-415EAF Super Scooper in federal firefighting fleets, but this creates a dangerous concentration risk: the company’s fortunes are tied to a single aircraft type and a single primary customer (the US Forest Service), making it vulnerable to technological disruption, shifts in procurement policy, or the emergence of cheaper, more versatile alternatives such as next-generation drones, AI-guided retardant drops, or hybrid electric amphibious platforms currently in development by competitors. While the Super Scooper remains effective today, its design is decades old, and reliance on aging airframes increases maintenance complexity, downtime risk, and long-term capital expenditure needs—factors not fully reflected in current guidance but likely to pressure margins as the fleet ages. Additionally, the company’s international operations, while cited as a diversification benefit, remain minimal and unproven at scale, offering little near-term buffer against U.S. federal budget volatility. The forward-looking statements in the press release acknowledge significant risks—including integration challenges from acquisitions, cybersecurity threats, loss of key personnel, and inability to protect intellectual property—but management’s emphasis on growth prospects appears to downplay the likelihood of these risks materializing in tandem, particularly as the company scales operations rapidly. Finally, the widening gap between GAAP net loss and Adjusted EBITDA—driven by escalating non-cash adjustments—suggests that the company’s profitability metrics may be increasingly detached from economic reality, potentially misleading investors about the true cash-generating capacity of the core business.

Bridger Aerospace’s Q1 2026 financials reveal a troubling divergence between rising operational costs and stagnant or declining revenue, with SG&A expenses nearly doubling year-over-year to $16.7 million from $8.6 million, driven by non-cash stock-based compensation, warrant fair value adjustments, and workforce expansion—costs that are not directly tied to revenue generation and may indicate overinvestment ahead of uncertain demand. While management attributes the Q1 revenue drop to seasonal patterns, the 46% decline to $8.5 million raises concerns about the company’s ability to monetize its readiness investments efficiently, especially given that cost of revenues remained flat at $17.0 million despite lower activity, suggesting inefficiencies in fleet utilization or fixed cost absorption during off-peak periods. The widening net loss—from $15.5 million to $31.3 million—and the deterioration in Adjusted EBITDA from $(5.1) million to $(14.5) million point to a business model that is burning cash at an accelerating rate during its preparatory phase, with no clear path to profitability until peak season revenue materializes, which remains contingent on unpredictable wildfire severity and timing. The company’s reliance on government task orders, while recently strengthened, still leaves it exposed to budgetary delays, appropriation risks, or shifts in federal priorities—particularly if Congress redirects funds toward ground-based suppression or forest management initiatives amid growing fiscal scrutiny.
Despite the optimistic outlook, Bridger’s full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $135–$145 million implies a mere 14% midpoint growth over 2025 levels, a modest increase that fails to justify the significant cash burn and operational expansion underway, especially when considering that the 2025 baseline was inflated by return-to-service work on the Spanish Scoopers—a non-recurring revenue stream that, when excluded, still only yields 29% growth, which may be overly optimistic given the volatility of wildfire seasons. The assumption that elevated wildfire risk will translate directly into higher contract value or volume overlooks the possibility that federal agencies may respond to increased fire activity not by purchasing more flight hours but by imposing stricter performance penalties, reducing per-hour rates, or shifting to alternative suppression methods like prescribed burns or drone surveillance to control costs. Furthermore, the extension of task orders to 160 days, while positive, does not guarantee full utilization—weather, maintenance delays, or pilot availability could result in underperformance relative to contracted days, leaving Bridger to absorb fixed costs without corresponding revenue, a risk exacerbated by the company’s high fixed-cost structure tied to aircraft maintenance, hangar leases, and specialized personnel. The $6.2 million in Q1 interest expense—up from $5.7 million—reflects a growing debt burden that becomes increasingly difficult to service if fire seasons underperform or if payment receipts from government contracts are delayed due to bureaucratic processing times, a common issue in federal contracting.
Bridger Aerospace’s growth strategy hinges on the continued dominance of the CL-415EAF Super Scooper in federal firefighting fleets, but this creates a dangerous concentration risk: the company’s fortunes are tied to a single aircraft type and a single primary customer (the US Forest Service), making it vulnerable to technological disruption, shifts in procurement policy, or the emergence of cheaper, more versatile alternatives such as next-generation drones, AI-guided retardant drops, or hybrid electric amphibious platforms currently in development by competitors. While the Super Scooper remains effective today, its design is decades old, and reliance on aging airframes increases maintenance complexity, downtime risk, and long-term capital expenditure needs—factors not fully reflected in current guidance but likely to pressure margins as the fleet ages. Additionally, the company’s international operations, while cited as a diversification benefit, remain minimal and unproven at scale, offering little near-term buffer against U.S. federal budget volatility. The forward-looking statements in the press release acknowledge significant risks—including integration challenges from acquisitions, cybersecurity threats, loss of key personnel, and inability to protect intellectual property—but management’s emphasis on growth prospects appears to downplay the likelihood of these risks materializing in tandem, particularly as the company scales operations rapidly. Finally, the widening gap between GAAP net loss and Adjusted EBITDA—driven by escalating non-cash adjustments—suggests that the company’s profitability metrics may be increasingly detached from economic reality, potentially misleading investors about the true cash-generating capacity of the core business.

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer group

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Commercial Aerospace

S.No.	Ticker	Company	match	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	RTX	RTX Corp	primary	267.07 Bn	32.87	2.86	37.38 Bn
2	BA	Boeing Co	primary	166.24 Bn	79.54	1.77	50.16 Bn
3	HWM	Howmet Aerospace Inc.	primary	93.56 Bn	50.03	10.26	4.95 Bn
4	TDG	TransDigm Group INC	primary	65.39 Bn	34.22	6.53	33.62 Bn
5	HON	Honeywell International Inc	primary	65.28 Bn	8.03	1.72	39.29 Bn
6	HEI	Heico Corp	primary	43.97 Bn	48.19	8.49	2.54 Bn
7	AER	AerCap Holdings N.V.	primary	24.40 Bn	5.78	2.72	42.77 Bn
8	WWD	Woodward, Inc.	primary	19.99 Bn	36.22	4.77	1.80 Bn

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings BAERW

About

Investment Thesis

Type of service. Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password