Array Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARRY)

$8.48 ▲ +0.29 (+3.54%)
As of May 22, 2026 04:00 PM
Sector: Technology Industry: Solar CIK: 0001820721
Market Cap 1.25 Bn
P/E -9.87
P/S 1.04
Div. Yield 0.00
ROIC (Qtr) -0.01
Total Debt (Qtr) 667.21 Mn
Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) -26.11
Add ratio to table...

About

Array Technologies, Inc. is a leading global provider of solar tracking technology and fixed tilt systems for utility scale and distributed generation solar photovoltaic projects. The company designs manufactures and sells a range of products that include single axis tracker systems, software platforms, foundation solutions, racking systems and field services. Its tracker offerings move solar panels throughout the day to maintain optimal orientation to the sun thereby increasing energy production and lowering the levelized cost of energy for project...

Read more

Investment thesis

Bull case

  • Array Technologies has leveraged a disciplined product rollout strategy that is now reflected in a near‑40% share of the order book for its new OmniTrak, Skylink, and Hail XP platforms. The consistent ASP gains across both ATI and STI segments in the quarter, the first increase in six quarters, demonstrate that commodity cost pass‑through is translating into higher revenue per megawatt delivered. This pricing resilience is a direct result of the company’s domestic sourcing initiatives, which have driven tariff exposure to below 14% of bill‑of‑materials costs, allowing the firm to maintain margin stability even as steel prices remain elevated. By coupling improved ASPs with a product mix that has higher LCOE advantages for customers, Array is capturing a premium in a market that increasingly prioritizes long‑term asset performance over initial capital outlay.
  • The APA acquisition, completed mid‑quarter, has added $17 million in revenue and is already generating significant pipeline momentum, with the company reporting a near‑$50 million contribution to 2025 revenue guidance once full integration is achieved. APA’s engineered foundation and fixed‑tilt expertise provide a differentiated competitive edge, particularly for utility‑scale projects where the cost of traditional piling can be a barrier. Array’s integrated sales strategy has accelerated the cross‑selling of APA products to existing Array customers, creating a synergetic effect that expands the company’s share of wallet without proportionate increases in capital expenditure. The acquisition is also creating a new product development pipeline, with co‑developed integrated tracker‑foundation solutions slated for 2026 that will further deepen market penetration and elevate unit economics.
  • The company’s order book quality has improved markedly, with more than 50% of the $1.9 billion backlog comprised of non‑EPC and tier‑one customers, a metric that historically correlates with higher order retention and lower debooking risk. This shift is a testament to Array’s enhanced customer engagement, which includes a newly established technical sales force that bridges the gap between engineering requirements and product capabilities. The resulting relationships have secured multi‑year, multi‑gigawatt agreements that provide revenue predictability and buffer the firm against short‑term market volatility. As the backlog transitions to a higher‑quality mix, the firm is positioned to convert more of its pipeline into realized revenue without a commensurate increase in sales or marketing spend.
  • Domestic manufacturing capacity expansion, anchored by the new Albuquerque facility and the planned expansion of APA’s Ohio plant, provides Array with significant supply‑chain flexibility that mitigates the impact of fluctuating tariff regimes and steel price swings. By leveraging a large domestic supplier base, the company can lock in material costs ahead of project contracts, thereby protecting margin and avoiding the need for aggressive price concessions. The domestic focus also opens eligibility for Section 45X IRA credits, which can be leveraged to lower overall project costs and increase competitiveness for U.S. utility developers. This supply‑chain advantage is a structural shift in the industry that has positioned Array to capture a larger share of the domestic market, which is projected to grow as policy incentives for clean energy expand.
  • The company’s free‑cash‑flow guidance for 2025 has been modestly reduced to approximately $100 million, but this adjustment is largely attributed to predictable acquisition‑related capital expenditures and timing of 45X collections shifting to 2026. The guidance still reflects a healthy liquidity position, with $222 million in cash and total liquidity exceeding $365 million, providing a cushion for opportunistic acquisitions or organic growth initiatives. The firm’s leverage ratio of 2.1 times adjusted EBITDA is comfortably within industry norms for a high‑growth solar equipment company, allowing it to fund continued expansion of its product portfolio and global reach without excessive debt burden.
Read more

Bear case

  • Array’s adjusted gross margin in Q3 fell 35 basis points relative to the prior year quarter, largely due to the erosion of a 45X amortization benefit, commodity inflation that outpaced ASP growth, and tariff drag. This indicates that margin compression is still a real threat, especially if steel prices continue to rise or if new tariff regimes are introduced, which could erode the company’s ability to maintain its current ASP levels and lead to a further decline in gross profitability. The fact that the company has already adjusted its free‑cash‑flow guidance downward to $100 million reflects the real cost of integrating the APA acquisition and timing of 45X collections shifting to 2026, suggesting that future periods may see additional working‑capital or capital‑expenditure outflows that are not fully captured in the current guidance.
  • While the order book is strong, the company has admitted that it has had to exclude many international projects, particularly in Brazil, due to regulatory uncertainty and potential debooking risks. This exclusion means that a potentially significant portion of the pipeline is not reflected in the $1.9 billion order book figure, raising questions about the true quality and conversion probability of the current backlog. The company’s reliance on a domestic‑centric strategy may also limit its ability to capture revenue from fast‑growing international markets where policy incentives and demand for solar infrastructure are rapidly increasing.
  • The integration of APA presents both a synergy opportunity and a risk. The acquisition has a dilutive effect on gross margin of approximately 20 basis points in the quarter, and the company has acknowledged that the 45X benefits are still unrealized and dependent on timing. If the projected synergies from unified procurement and sales are delayed or do not materialize as expected, Array could experience prolonged margin pressure, impacting the company's profitability trajectory. Moreover, the integration requires significant capital outlays, with a new Albuquerque facility and expansion of APA’s Ohio plant, which could strain cash flows if the expected revenue uplift is slower than anticipated.
  • The company’s emphasis on product innovation has led to increased R&D and SG&A spend, as evidenced by an adjusted SG&A of $39 million, up from $36 million in 2024. While new products such as OmniTrak, Skylink, and Hail XP have gained traction, the firm still faces intense competition from peers that may offer similar or superior technology at lower cost, especially in the mid‑tier tracker market. If Array cannot maintain its perceived LCOE advantage, it risks losing market share to faster‑moving competitors, which could erode its high‑margin business and force price reductions.
  • The company’s domestic supply‑chain strategy, while reducing tariff exposure, also limits flexibility to source cost‑effective components from lower‑cost international suppliers. In the event of a sudden spike in domestic steel prices or supply constraints, Array may find it difficult to maintain competitive pricing, especially if global competitors can still leverage cheaper foreign components. This could lead to margin compression or even loss of bids for price‑sensitive customers.
Read more

Geographical Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Solar
S.No. Ticker Company Market Cap P/E P/S Total Debt (Qtr)
1 FSLR First Solar, Inc. 26.65 Bn 15.99 4.92 0.43 Bn
2 NXT Nextpower Inc. 17.99 Bn 30.78 5.05 -
3 CSIQ Canadian Solar Inc. 15.11 Bn 0.00 2.70 5.34 Bn
4 ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.19 Bn 61.16 5.85 0.57 Bn
5 SEDG Solaredge Technologies, Inc. 3.80 Bn -16.02 3.28 -
6 RUN Sunrun Inc. 3.38 Bn 5.88 1.06 0.44 Bn
7 SHLS Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 1.60 Bn 47.82 2.99 0.18 Bn
8 ARRY Array Technologies, Inc. 1.25 Bn -9.87 1.04 0.67 Bn