ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (NASDAQ: AOSL)

$41.59 ▲ +3.87 (+10.26%)

As of May 13, 2026 03:59 PM

Sector: Technology Industry: Semiconductors CIK: 0001387467

Market Cap 1.24 Bn

P/E -11.86

P/S 1.81

Div. Yield 0.00

ROIC (Qtr) 0.00

Total Debt (Qtr) 5.09 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr) -6.29

Add ratio to table...

About

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited designs, develops, and supplies a broad portfolio of power semiconductors globally. The company specializes in analog power management solutions, focusing on power discrete devices and power integrated circuits (ICs) that regulate, convert, and manage electrical power in electronic systems. Its products address high-volume applications across computing, consumer electronics, industrial equipment, and communications markets, enabling energy efficiency and performance optimization in devices ranging from smartphones...

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited designs, develops, and supplies a broad portfolio of power semiconductors globally. The company specializes in analog power management solutions, focusing on power discrete devices and power integrated circuits (ICs) that regulate, convert, and manage electrical power in electronic systems. Its products address high-volume applications across computing, consumer electronics, industrial equipment, and communications markets, enabling energy efficiency and performance optimization in devices ranging from smartphones to data centers.

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited generates revenue primarily through the sale of power semiconductors, including metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), power modules, and power ICs. These products are sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), original design manufacturers (ODMs), and distributors, who integrate them into end products such as personal computers, graphic cards, home appliances, power tools, and telecommunications equipment. The company’s revenue streams are supported by a diversified product portfolio, with over 2,800 products targeting applications that demand high efficiency, reliability, and compact form factors.

The company operates through the following segments:

• Power Discretes: This segment includes low, medium, and high-voltage MOSFETs, IGBTs, and silicon carbide (SiC) products. These devices function as switches or converters in power circuits, enabling efficient power delivery in applications such as motor controls, power supplies, and battery management systems. The segment also encompasses proprietary technologies like AlphaSGT and aMOS5, which enhance performance and robustness in demanding environments.

• Power ICs: This segment focuses on integrated devices that combine power delivery and power management functions into single or multi-chip solutions. Products include DC-DC converters, smart power stages, multiphase controllers, and load switches, which are critical for advanced computing, graphics cards, and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The segment leverages proprietary packaging and design techniques to improve power density and reduce time-to-market for customers.

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited competes in the highly fragmented power semiconductor industry, where it faces rivals such as Infineon Technologies, ON Semiconductor, STMicroelectronics, and Monolithic Power Systems. The company differentiates itself through its integrated technology platform, which combines proprietary process technologies, advanced packaging, and a strong intellectual property portfolio of over 1,900 patents. Its in-house wafer fabrication and packaging capabilities provide greater control over product quality, cost, and innovation cycles, while strategic partnerships with third-party foundries ensure flexibility in meeting market demand. The company’s focus on high-growth markets, such as AI and electric vehicles, further strengthens its competitive position.

The company serves a diverse customer base, including leading OEMs such as Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Samsung, and Stanley Black & Decker. It also supplies ODMs like Compal Electronics, Foxconn, Quanta Computer, and Wistron, which manufacture products for global brands. A significant portion of sales is conducted through distributors, with WPG Holdings and Promate Electronic accounting for over 70% of revenue in fiscal 2025. The company’s products are designed into a wide range of electronic systems, from consumer devices to industrial applications, reflecting its broad market reach and customer penetration.

Investment thesis

Bull case

Alpha and Omega’s strategic pivot toward high margin application segments is already reflected in the Q2 mix shift, with computing revenue comprising nearly 50% of total sales even as the overall business remains cyclically sensitive. The company’s narrative emphasizes the transition from generic component supply to application specific total solutions, a change that inherently raises barriers to entry for low margin competitors. Management’s statement that “we are making focused R&D investments in performance driven applications where we already have strong positions” signals a disciplined allocation of resources that is unlikely to be diluted by short term market noise. The use of the 25% R&D increase, coupled with proceeds from the Chongqing joint venture sale, provides the financial leeway to accelerate the launch of differentiated products across AI, data center and premium smartphone platforms. Early evidence of the strategy’s traction is visible in the 5.9% year over year rise in computing revenue and the 1.1% sequential lift in the communication segment, both driven by higher BOM content and expanded OEM relationships. The company’s ability to capture incremental revenue from a tier one U.S. smartphone customer, which has begun integrating higher current charging silicon, demonstrates a clear value add that is difficult to replicate. Over the next 18 to 24 months, as these new platforms reach full scale, the mix shift is expected to translate into sustainable margin expansion and a lower cost structure per unit sold. The structural nature of this transformation mitigates the risk of temporary market downturns that typically affect commodity grade product lines.
The Q2 call highlighted a broader array of AI data‑center applications, with management noting that medium voltage MOSFETs are being deployed in hot‑swap power modules for hyperscale customers. This sector is characterized by high capital intensity, lower price sensitivity, and strong demand for energy‑efficient silicon, aligning with AOS’s high performance capabilities. While the company’s current computing revenue has dipped due to a temporary shift in GPU production toward data‑center models, the underlying trend indicates that future AI workloads will continue to expand, driving a higher proportion of computing sales toward these premium segments. Unlike the consumer PC market, data‑center sales exhibit less seasonality, offering a more predictable revenue base that can stabilize quarterly earnings. The company’s early wins in intermediate‑bus converters and hot‑swap solutions provide a foothold that can be expanded across multiple hyperscale vendors, thereby increasing cross‑sell opportunities. Moreover, AOS’s integrated discrete‑IC platform enables tighter control over performance and power density, which is increasingly demanded by AI workloads that rely on high frequency, low loss power delivery. The management’s projection that the AI/graphics mix within computing could reach 50% or more over the next two years reflects an expectation of rapid penetration into these resilient markets. Should this trajectory materialize, the company would enjoy a higher revenue mix that directly feeds into margin improvement, making AI a core catalyst for long‑term growth.
Smartphone vendors are accelerating the move to higher charging currents, a shift that has already begun to affect AOS’s communication portfolio. The company’s silicon and packaging technology is specifically designed to handle the thermal and electrical stresses associated with fast charging, giving it a competitive edge in the premium handset segment. Management’s commentary that the tier one U.S. customer “has begun integrating higher‑current charging silicon” indicates immediate BOM content expansion, translating into incremental revenue per device. In contrast to legacy power‑management solutions, AOS’s high current silicon can support the next wave of 30W and beyond charging, which is a requirement for premium devices that command higher price points. The global premium smartphone market, though modestly growing, remains sizeable, and the company's partnership with a leading U.S. OEM provides a stable channel for future sales. Over the next few quarters, as new flagship devices launch, AOS expects a steady increase in communications segment revenue, which will be further amplified by the company’s advanced packaging and higher‑current capability. This growth driver is not only cyclical but is also tied to the broader consumer trend of higher battery capacities and faster charging expectations. The resulting revenue boost will offset the seasonal softness seen in other segments and support the company’s long‑term revenue trajectory.
Despite operating losses, Alpha and Omega reported a robust cash balance of $196 million, underscoring the company’s liquidity cushion. The $150 million proceeds from the Chongqing joint‑venture sale are earmarked for targeted R&D, ensuring that capital deployment aligns with strategic priorities rather than opportunistic spending. Management’s guidance of a $15 million CapEx for March, rising to $18 million, is modest relative to revenue, preserving cash for future initiatives and share repurchase plans. The company’s low debt profile—only $2.1 million in long‑term debt—further strengthens its financial flexibility, allowing it to weather short‑term revenue fluctuations without compromising growth investments. Cash‑flow management is reinforced by the fact that the company’s operating cash outflow in Q2 was largely driven by customer deposit repayment and tax payments, rather than a fundamental operational issue. The ongoing ability to return capital to shareholders through a $16 million authorized repurchase program signals confidence in the company’s intrinsic value. This capital strategy positions Alpha and Omega to invest in next‑generation products while maintaining a defensive posture against market volatility. Consequently, the firm’s balance sheet resilience serves as a foundation for the bullish narrative that higher‑margin growth will be sustained over the long haul.
Alpha and Omega’s vertical integration—combining discrete power devices, ICs, and advanced packaging—creates a distinctive competitive moat that is difficult for low‑margin players to replicate. The firm’s proprietary silicon design and packaging expertise allow it to deliver high performance, low loss solutions across multiple application layers, from power modules to system‑level integration. This integration translates into tighter control over yield, lead times, and quality, all of which are critical in the high performance computing and data‑center markets where downtime can be costly. The company's ability to offer complete solution packages also enhances customer lock‑in, as OEMs are increasingly seeking single‑vendor partners to simplify design and reduce board space. Such lock‑in is amplified by the firm’s strong engineering relationships with leading PC, smartphone, and data‑center OEMs, which facilitates co‑development and quicker time‑to‑market for new products. While the company faces short‑term margin pressure, its supply‑chain agility positions it to respond rapidly to evolving customer demands and shifting market dynamics. Moreover, the firm’s capability to integrate wide bandgap devices such as SiC and GaN into its product portfolio provides an additional edge in power‑density and efficiency—attributes that are becoming standard in next‑generation platforms. Together, these supply‑chain strengths support a bullish case that Alpha and Omega can sustain a differentiated, higher‑margin business model over the medium to long term.

Alpha and Omega’s strategic pivot toward high margin application segments is already reflected in the Q2 mix shift, with computing revenue comprising nearly 50% of total sales even as the overall business remains cyclically sensitive. The company’s narrative emphasizes the transition from generic component supply to application specific total solutions, a change that inherently raises barriers to entry for low margin competitors. Management’s statement that “we are making focused R&D investments in performance driven applications where we already have strong positions” signals a disciplined allocation of resources that is unlikely to be diluted by short term market noise. The use of the 25% R&D increase, coupled with proceeds from the Chongqing joint venture sale, provides the financial leeway to accelerate the launch of differentiated products across AI, data center and premium smartphone platforms. Early evidence of the strategy’s traction is visible in the 5.9% year over year rise in computing revenue and the 1.1% sequential lift in the communication segment, both driven by higher BOM content and expanded OEM relationships. The company’s ability to capture incremental revenue from a tier one U.S. smartphone customer, which has begun integrating higher current charging silicon, demonstrates a clear value add that is difficult to replicate. Over the next 18 to 24 months, as these new platforms reach full scale, the mix shift is expected to translate into sustainable margin expansion and a lower cost structure per unit sold. The structural nature of this transformation mitigates the risk of temporary market downturns that typically affect commodity grade product lines.
The Q2 call highlighted a broader array of AI data‑center applications, with management noting that medium voltage MOSFETs are being deployed in hot‑swap power modules for hyperscale customers. This sector is characterized by high capital intensity, lower price sensitivity, and strong demand for energy‑efficient silicon, aligning with AOS’s high performance capabilities. While the company’s current computing revenue has dipped due to a temporary shift in GPU production toward data‑center models, the underlying trend indicates that future AI workloads will continue to expand, driving a higher proportion of computing sales toward these premium segments. Unlike the consumer PC market, data‑center sales exhibit less seasonality, offering a more predictable revenue base that can stabilize quarterly earnings. The company’s early wins in intermediate‑bus converters and hot‑swap solutions provide a foothold that can be expanded across multiple hyperscale vendors, thereby increasing cross‑sell opportunities. Moreover, AOS’s integrated discrete‑IC platform enables tighter control over performance and power density, which is increasingly demanded by AI workloads that rely on high frequency, low loss power delivery. The management’s projection that the AI/graphics mix within computing could reach 50% or more over the next two years reflects an expectation of rapid penetration into these resilient markets. Should this trajectory materialize, the company would enjoy a higher revenue mix that directly feeds into margin improvement, making AI a core catalyst for long‑term growth.
Smartphone vendors are accelerating the move to higher charging currents, a shift that has already begun to affect AOS’s communication portfolio. The company’s silicon and packaging technology is specifically designed to handle the thermal and electrical stresses associated with fast charging, giving it a competitive edge in the premium handset segment. Management’s commentary that the tier one U.S. customer “has begun integrating higher‑current charging silicon” indicates immediate BOM content expansion, translating into incremental revenue per device. In contrast to legacy power‑management solutions, AOS’s high current silicon can support the next wave of 30W and beyond charging, which is a requirement for premium devices that command higher price points. The global premium smartphone market, though modestly growing, remains sizeable, and the company's partnership with a leading U.S. OEM provides a stable channel for future sales. Over the next few quarters, as new flagship devices launch, AOS expects a steady increase in communications segment revenue, which will be further amplified by the company’s advanced packaging and higher‑current capability. This growth driver is not only cyclical but is also tied to the broader consumer trend of higher battery capacities and faster charging expectations. The resulting revenue boost will offset the seasonal softness seen in other segments and support the company’s long‑term revenue trajectory.
Despite operating losses, Alpha and Omega reported a robust cash balance of $196 million, underscoring the company’s liquidity cushion. The $150 million proceeds from the Chongqing joint‑venture sale are earmarked for targeted R&D, ensuring that capital deployment aligns with strategic priorities rather than opportunistic spending. Management’s guidance of a $15 million CapEx for March, rising to $18 million, is modest relative to revenue, preserving cash for future initiatives and share repurchase plans. The company’s low debt profile—only $2.1 million in long‑term debt—further strengthens its financial flexibility, allowing it to weather short‑term revenue fluctuations without compromising growth investments. Cash‑flow management is reinforced by the fact that the company’s operating cash outflow in Q2 was largely driven by customer deposit repayment and tax payments, rather than a fundamental operational issue. The ongoing ability to return capital to shareholders through a $16 million authorized repurchase program signals confidence in the company’s intrinsic value. This capital strategy positions Alpha and Omega to invest in next‑generation products while maintaining a defensive posture against market volatility. Consequently, the firm’s balance sheet resilience serves as a foundation for the bullish narrative that higher‑margin growth will be sustained over the long haul.
Alpha and Omega’s vertical integration—combining discrete power devices, ICs, and advanced packaging—creates a distinctive competitive moat that is difficult for low‑margin players to replicate. The firm’s proprietary silicon design and packaging expertise allow it to deliver high performance, low loss solutions across multiple application layers, from power modules to system‑level integration. This integration translates into tighter control over yield, lead times, and quality, all of which are critical in the high performance computing and data‑center markets where downtime can be costly. The company's ability to offer complete solution packages also enhances customer lock‑in, as OEMs are increasingly seeking single‑vendor partners to simplify design and reduce board space. Such lock‑in is amplified by the firm’s strong engineering relationships with leading PC, smartphone, and data‑center OEMs, which facilitates co‑development and quicker time‑to‑market for new products. While the company faces short‑term margin pressure, its supply‑chain agility positions it to respond rapidly to evolving customer demands and shifting market dynamics. Moreover, the firm’s capability to integrate wide bandgap devices such as SiC and GaN into its product portfolio provides an additional edge in power‑density and efficiency—attributes that are becoming standard in next‑generation platforms. Together, these supply‑chain strengths support a bullish case that Alpha and Omega can sustain a differentiated, higher‑margin business model over the medium to long term.

Bear case

The Q2 call explicitly highlighted a 17% sequential drop in computing revenue, driven by inventory digestion in AI and a shift in GPU allocation toward data‑center workloads. Management’s acknowledgement that visibility into the PC market remains limited underscores the cyclical volatility that can persist if the memory supply chain remains constrained. This temporary softness reveals that the company’s revenue mix is still exposed to the traditional PC cycle, which can erode earnings during downturns. The GPU production rebalancing also suggests that the firm’s high margin GPU‑related revenue streams are subject to upstream capacity constraints, creating uncertainty about when full demand will resume. While data‑center demand is expected to grow, the lag between inventory consumption and new orders can result in continued revenue gaps, especially if customers delay ramp‑ups to manage cash flow. The strategic shift away from PC revenue does not eliminate the need to maintain a robust production footprint for discrete power products, which could lead to capacity underutilization and higher fixed‑cost pressure. Consequently, the company faces a short term revenue drag that could repeat if memory shortages or GPU production bottlenecks persist. These factors represent a tangible risk that the market may underestimate in its valuation of Alpha and Omega’s near‑term performance.
Management’s admission that the PC market’s outlook is limited by memory shortages introduces a significant supply‑chain risk that can dampen demand for the company’s computing products. The uncertainty around memory availability directly affects the launch cadence and volume of new PC platforms, thereby constraining the company’s ability to grow its computing segment. As the memory market remains volatile, OEMs may delay or cancel orders to manage inventory, which would further erode AOS’s revenue mix. The company’s heavy reliance on PC demand for a large portion of its computing revenue exposes it to this external risk, potentially leading to continued revenue contraction if the memory shortage persists into 2027. The risk is compounded by the fact that PC demand is highly price‑sensitive and has historically shown a steep decline during supply shocks, which can trigger a cascading effect on silicon demand. Therefore, the memory shortage presents a persistent threat to Alpha and Omega’s revenue trajectory that investors may underappreciate. The company’s inability to fully offset this exposure through its other segments could result in a slower recovery than management expects.
Alpha and Omega’s non‑GAAP gross margin has slipped to 22.2% from 24.1% in the prior quarter, reflecting the combined impact of higher input costs and lower factory utilization during the Lunar New Year. Management’s guidance of a 21% margin for March suggests that margin compression is expected to continue into the next quarter, potentially undermining earnings recovery. The ongoing pressure on margin stems from both fixed production costs and variable input price volatility, which is difficult to mitigate without significant changes to product mix or pricing power. Even with the planned shift to higher‑margin applications, the company’s current cost base remains large, and it must achieve substantial utilization gains to offset the lower pricing in its legacy product lines. This margin erosion could erode the operating income buffer needed to support the increased R&D spend, thereby exacerbating the cash burn cycle. The management’s confidence in a 30% margin by 2027 may be optimistic if the company cannot secure a sustained mix shift or if input costs rise further due to geopolitical or supply‑chain disruptions. Thus, margin compression is a key risk that could impair Alpha and Omega’s profitability trajectory in the near term.
The announced 25% increase in R&D expense, amounting to roughly $41 million in the quarter, represents a significant rise relative to the company’s $162 million revenue base. Management acknowledges that operating expenses will rise as a result, and the guidance indicates a continuing $4 million increase in operating expenses for the next quarter. With a negative operating margin already recorded, this additional burn could deepen cash flow challenges if revenue growth fails to materialize at the projected pace. The company’s guidance does not provide a clear path to recouping this spend through immediate revenue lift, implying a period of investment without a direct return. This risk is heightened by the fact that the company’s cash balance is already reduced by $27 million from the previous quarter, tightening its liquidity cushion. Investors may misjudge the timing and magnitude of the return on this R&D spend, leading to underperformance relative to expectations. In essence, the aggressive investment in R&D could become a financial burden if the anticipated product rollouts do not accelerate quickly enough, thereby jeopardizing the company’s profitability and growth outlook.
Alpha and Omega’s communications segment is heavily weighted toward a single tier one U.S. smartphone customer, with the company reporting 20% BOM content expansion on that platform. A sudden change in the customer’s product roadmap, design direction, or supplier policy could materially impact the company’s revenue profile, given the concentration risk. Similarly, the power supply and industrial segment, which accounts for 16.7% of revenue, is experiencing a 3% sequential decline and is highly sensitive to consumer demand for quick chargers and e‑mobility products. A downturn in any of these key markets—whether due to competitive displacement, pricing pressure, or broader macroeconomic slowdown—could accelerate revenue erosion. The company’s ability to diversify its customer base appears limited by its current focus on high‑performance, niche applications, which may not provide sufficient buffer against market shocks. This concentration of revenue sources amplifies the business risk, as a single large customer or product line can significantly influence quarterly results. Investors should weigh this dependency when evaluating Alpha and Omega’s risk profile, as a shift in a key customer’s strategy could trigger a cascading effect on the company’s earnings trajectory.

The Q2 call explicitly highlighted a 17% sequential drop in computing revenue, driven by inventory digestion in AI and a shift in GPU allocation toward data‑center workloads. Management’s acknowledgement that visibility into the PC market remains limited underscores the cyclical volatility that can persist if the memory supply chain remains constrained. This temporary softness reveals that the company’s revenue mix is still exposed to the traditional PC cycle, which can erode earnings during downturns. The GPU production rebalancing also suggests that the firm’s high margin GPU‑related revenue streams are subject to upstream capacity constraints, creating uncertainty about when full demand will resume. While data‑center demand is expected to grow, the lag between inventory consumption and new orders can result in continued revenue gaps, especially if customers delay ramp‑ups to manage cash flow. The strategic shift away from PC revenue does not eliminate the need to maintain a robust production footprint for discrete power products, which could lead to capacity underutilization and higher fixed‑cost pressure. Consequently, the company faces a short term revenue drag that could repeat if memory shortages or GPU production bottlenecks persist. These factors represent a tangible risk that the market may underestimate in its valuation of Alpha and Omega’s near‑term performance.
Management’s admission that the PC market’s outlook is limited by memory shortages introduces a significant supply‑chain risk that can dampen demand for the company’s computing products. The uncertainty around memory availability directly affects the launch cadence and volume of new PC platforms, thereby constraining the company’s ability to grow its computing segment. As the memory market remains volatile, OEMs may delay or cancel orders to manage inventory, which would further erode AOS’s revenue mix. The company’s heavy reliance on PC demand for a large portion of its computing revenue exposes it to this external risk, potentially leading to continued revenue contraction if the memory shortage persists into 2027. The risk is compounded by the fact that PC demand is highly price‑sensitive and has historically shown a steep decline during supply shocks, which can trigger a cascading effect on silicon demand. Therefore, the memory shortage presents a persistent threat to Alpha and Omega’s revenue trajectory that investors may underappreciate. The company’s inability to fully offset this exposure through its other segments could result in a slower recovery than management expects.
Alpha and Omega’s non‑GAAP gross margin has slipped to 22.2% from 24.1% in the prior quarter, reflecting the combined impact of higher input costs and lower factory utilization during the Lunar New Year. Management’s guidance of a 21% margin for March suggests that margin compression is expected to continue into the next quarter, potentially undermining earnings recovery. The ongoing pressure on margin stems from both fixed production costs and variable input price volatility, which is difficult to mitigate without significant changes to product mix or pricing power. Even with the planned shift to higher‑margin applications, the company’s current cost base remains large, and it must achieve substantial utilization gains to offset the lower pricing in its legacy product lines. This margin erosion could erode the operating income buffer needed to support the increased R&D spend, thereby exacerbating the cash burn cycle. The management’s confidence in a 30% margin by 2027 may be optimistic if the company cannot secure a sustained mix shift or if input costs rise further due to geopolitical or supply‑chain disruptions. Thus, margin compression is a key risk that could impair Alpha and Omega’s profitability trajectory in the near term.
The announced 25% increase in R&D expense, amounting to roughly $41 million in the quarter, represents a significant rise relative to the company’s $162 million revenue base. Management acknowledges that operating expenses will rise as a result, and the guidance indicates a continuing $4 million increase in operating expenses for the next quarter. With a negative operating margin already recorded, this additional burn could deepen cash flow challenges if revenue growth fails to materialize at the projected pace. The company’s guidance does not provide a clear path to recouping this spend through immediate revenue lift, implying a period of investment without a direct return. This risk is heightened by the fact that the company’s cash balance is already reduced by $27 million from the previous quarter, tightening its liquidity cushion. Investors may misjudge the timing and magnitude of the return on this R&D spend, leading to underperformance relative to expectations. In essence, the aggressive investment in R&D could become a financial burden if the anticipated product rollouts do not accelerate quickly enough, thereby jeopardizing the company’s profitability and growth outlook.
Alpha and Omega’s communications segment is heavily weighted toward a single tier one U.S. smartphone customer, with the company reporting 20% BOM content expansion on that platform. A sudden change in the customer’s product roadmap, design direction, or supplier policy could materially impact the company’s revenue profile, given the concentration risk. Similarly, the power supply and industrial segment, which accounts for 16.7% of revenue, is experiencing a 3% sequential decline and is highly sensitive to consumer demand for quick chargers and e‑mobility products. A downturn in any of these key markets—whether due to competitive displacement, pricing pressure, or broader macroeconomic slowdown—could accelerate revenue erosion. The company’s ability to diversify its customer base appears limited by its current focus on high‑performance, niche applications, which may not provide sufficient buffer against market shocks. This concentration of revenue sources amplifies the business risk, as a single large customer or product line can significantly influence quarterly results. Investors should weigh this dependency when evaluating Alpha and Omega’s risk profile, as a shift in a key customer’s strategy could trigger a cascading effect on the company’s earnings trajectory.

Product and Service Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer comparison

Companies in the Semiconductors

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	NVDA	Nvidia Corp	5,501.97 Bn	45.82	25.48	8.47 Bn
2	AVGO	Broadcom Inc.	1,974.20 Bn	78.72	28.91	66.06 Bn
3	MU	Micron Technology Inc	903.51 Bn	37.39	15.55	10.14 Bn
4	AMD	Advanced Micro Devices Inc	728.95 Bn	168.11	21.04	3.22 Bn
5	INTC	Intel Corp	611.13 Bn	-190.84	11.37	45.03 Bn
6	TSM	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd	335.02 Bn	0.02	2.86	5.70 Bn
7	TXN	Texas Instruments Inc	278.36 Bn	52.17	15.10	14.05 Bn
8	QCOM	Qualcomm Inc/De	227.34 Bn	22.76	6.48	0.50 Bn

Research Tools