First Majestic Silver Corp (AG) Stock Analysis and Metrics

First Majestic Silver

NYSE: AG

$16.47 ▼ -0.48 (-2.83%)

At close: Jul 13, 2026 · 11:52 AM UTC

Financial Ratios

Market Cap8.16 Bn

P/E49.49

P/S6.49

Div. Yield0.00

ROIC (Qtr)0.00

Total Debt (Qtr)292.22 Mn

Revenue Growth (1y) (Qtr)169.20

Add ratio to table…

About

First Majestic Silver Corp is engaged in the production, development, exploration and acquisition of mineral properties with a focus on silver and gold. The company's primary operations are located in Mexico where it owns and operates four producing mines: the San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine in Durango State, the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine in Sonora State, a seventy percent interest in the Cerro Los Gatos Silver Mine in Chihuahua State held through a joint venture, and the La Encantada Silver Mine in Coahuila State. Additionally First Majestic owns the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine in Elko County Nevada which was temporarily suspended in 2023 to focus on resource exploration and mine optimization. The company also holds several non‑material properties including the San Martín and Del Toro mines under care and maintenance and the La Luz advanced‑stage silver project. In 2024 First Majestic commissioned a wholly owned minting facility named First Mint in Las Vegas Nevada that produces investment‑grade fine silver bullion bars and rounds.

First Majestic generates revenue principally from the sale of silver and gold produced at its operating mines. Revenue includes the sale of metal concentrates and doré to third‑party customers as well as the direct sale of bullion products from its First Mint facility. In 2024 bullion sales from First Mint accounted for approximately six percent of the company’s total silver production providing an additional stream of revenue that leverages vertical integration. The company’s revenue is denominated in United States dollars and fluctuates with prevailing market prices for silver and gold.

First Majestic holds a notable position among silver producers in Mexico with a portfolio of four operating mines that contribute to its status as a significant source of primary silver output. The company’s competitive advantages include ownership of high‑grade silver assets, a strategic joint venture that expands its resource base, and the First Mint facility which enables direct sales of bullion to investors and retailers reducing reliance on intermediary channels. While the mining sector features numerous competitors such as other silver‑focused producers and diversified precious metals companies First Majestic differentiates itself through its integrated approach from mine to finished bullion product.

The company sells its metal production to a range of customers including bullion dealers, industrial users and investors. Through its First Mint facility First Majestic also provides investment‑grade silver bars and rounds directly to shareholders retail bullion customers and precious metal distributors. Specific customer names are not disclosed in the filing but the customer base comprises both wholesale market participants and individual investors seeking precious metal exposure.

Investment Thesis

▲ Bull case

First Majestic Silver (AG) is demonstrating a significant structural improvement in profitability driven by a deliberate strategic shift to lower cutoff grades, which has increased throughput and extended mine life without proportionally increasing costs, as evidenced by Q1 FY26 operating margins expanding nearly 4x year-over-year to $52 per ounce from $13 per ounce, despite only modest cost increases due to higher throughput. This approach is not a temporary tactic but a sustainable operational model validated by consistent production exceeding guidance—3.5 million ounces of silver at 26% of midpoint annual guidance in Q1 alone—and supported by the company’s ability to reinvest strong free cash flow ($224 million corporate-wide) into high-return expansion projects like the Santa Elena and Los Gatos mill upgrades, which are progressing on schedule and will further unlock value from existing assets. The decision to hold back 676,000 ounces of silver and 2,700 ounces of gold valued at $63 million reflects management’s confidence in sustained price strength and disciplined capital allocation, turning what could be seen as deferred revenue into a strategic treasury buffer that enhances downside protection while maintaining upside leverage to precious metals.
The Jerritt Canyon restart represents a de-risked, high-potential catalyst that is underappreciated by the market, with Alexander Thompson’s appointment as Managing Director bringing proven expertise from BHP and global mine operations to accelerate timelines, as evidenced by the $75 million invested in 2026, ongoing underground preparation, and procurement of critical equipment like the oxygen plant and underground fleet with 10–12 month lead times already underway—positioning the asset for H2 2027 production as targeted. Unlike typical restart narratives burdened by permitting delays or technical uncertainty, Jerritt Canyon benefits from existing infrastructure, a pre-established resource base now upgraded to 7.8 million ounces of gold (a significant increase from prior disclosures), and a clear path to blend open-pit and underground operations, reducing execution risk while leveraging proximity to Elko for labor sourcing—a factor highlighted by management noting strong local interest and potential talent inflow from Newmont’s operational turbulence, which could significantly ease hiring challenges and reduce ramp-up costs.
First Majestic Silver’s aggressive exploration program—300,000 meters drilled company-wide in FY26 including 42,000 meters at Jerritt Canyon—is generating tangible near-term value, with the 90 million ounce silver resource increase at Santa Elena from Santo Niño and Navidad discoveries already validated and poised for mill integration, directly supporting future production growth without requiring new capital-intensive discoveries. This exploration success is not being fully priced in because management frames it as ongoing work, yet the scale and early results indicate a high probability of additional reserve upgrades throughout the year, particularly as studies advance on these high-grade zones, which could meaningfully extend mine life and improve head grades beyond current conservative cutoff grade assumptions, thereby creating a hidden lever for margin expansion and production flexibility that is not reflected in current guidance or valuation multiples.

First Majestic Silver (AG) is demonstrating a significant structural improvement in profitability driven by a deliberate strategic shift to lower cutoff grades, which has increased throughput and extended mine life without proportionally increasing costs, as evidenced by Q1 FY26 operating margins expanding nearly 4x year-over-year to $52 per ounce from $13 per ounce, despite only modest cost increases due to higher throughput. This approach is not a temporary tactic but a sustainable operational model validated by consistent production exceeding guidance—3.5 million ounces of silver at 26% of midpoint annual guidance in Q1 alone—and supported by the company’s ability to reinvest strong free cash flow ($224 million corporate-wide) into high-return expansion projects like the Santa Elena and Los Gatos mill upgrades, which are progressing on schedule and will further unlock value from existing assets. The decision to hold back 676,000 ounces of silver and 2,700 ounces of gold valued at $63 million reflects management’s confidence in sustained price strength and disciplined capital allocation, turning what could be seen as deferred revenue into a strategic treasury buffer that enhances downside protection while maintaining upside leverage to precious metals.
The Jerritt Canyon restart represents a de-risked, high-potential catalyst that is underappreciated by the market, with Alexander Thompson’s appointment as Managing Director bringing proven expertise from BHP and global mine operations to accelerate timelines, as evidenced by the $75 million invested in 2026, ongoing underground preparation, and procurement of critical equipment like the oxygen plant and underground fleet with 10–12 month lead times already underway—positioning the asset for H2 2027 production as targeted. Unlike typical restart narratives burdened by permitting delays or technical uncertainty, Jerritt Canyon benefits from existing infrastructure, a pre-established resource base now upgraded to 7.8 million ounces of gold (a significant increase from prior disclosures), and a clear path to blend open-pit and underground operations, reducing execution risk while leveraging proximity to Elko for labor sourcing—a factor highlighted by management noting strong local interest and potential talent inflow from Newmont’s operational turbulence, which could significantly ease hiring challenges and reduce ramp-up costs.
First Majestic Silver’s aggressive exploration program—300,000 meters drilled company-wide in FY26 including 42,000 meters at Jerritt Canyon—is generating tangible near-term value, with the 90 million ounce silver resource increase at Santa Elena from Santo Niño and Navidad discoveries already validated and poised for mill integration, directly supporting future production growth without requiring new capital-intensive discoveries. This exploration success is not being fully priced in because management frames it as ongoing work, yet the scale and early results indicate a high probability of additional reserve upgrades throughout the year, particularly as studies advance on these high-grade zones, which could meaningfully extend mine life and improve head grades beyond current conservative cutoff grade assumptions, thereby creating a hidden lever for margin expansion and production flexibility that is not reflected in current guidance or valuation multiples.

▼ Bear case

First Majestic Silver (AG) faces significant near-term margin pressure from rising input costs tied to its strategic shift to lower cutoff grades, which, while increasing throughput and mine life, is driving higher cost per ton due to processing more waste rock—a dynamic management acknowledged but downplayed by emphasizing margin expansion from silver prices, yet the company’s own data shows all-in sustaining costs per ounce rose in Q1 FY26 despite cost per ton being at a low for a while, indicating that the benefits of lower grades are being offset by inflation in energy, labor, and consumables, particularly as the fixed 75:1 silver-to-gold ratio used in cost calculations may not reflect actual market volatility, creating a risk that if gold outperforms silver, the reported cost structure becomes misleading and actual profitability could deteriorate faster than suggested by headline margin figures.
The Jerritt Canyon restart, while progressing on schedule, carries substantial execution risk that is being minimized in communications, with management’s reliance on third-party contractors for critical underground fleet and oxygen plant procurement introducing potential delays given the 10–12 month lead times and the complexity of integrating new equipment into an aging facility, compounded by the lack of detailed updates on permitting or dewatering progress despite the asset’s history of operational challenges, and the fact that production is still targeted for H2 2027—over a year away—means any delay in equipment delivery, labor onboarding, or underground development could push commercial production into 2028, eroding the near-term value of the $75 million already spent and increasing the opportunity cost of capital that could otherwise be deployed to higher-margin, lower-risk expansions at existing Mexican operations.
First Majestic Silver’s balance sheet strength, while impressive with over $1.1 billion in treasury, is increasingly dependent on sustained high silver prices, and the company’s leveraged exposure to commodity volatility creates a vulnerability if prices correct, particularly given that the record Q1 FY26 revenue of $477 million was driven by a 95% year-over-year increase in realized silver price to $86.35—far above historical averages—and the decision to hold back inventory valued at $63 million suggests management is betting on further price appreciation, yet this strategy becomes perilous if macroeconomic shifts, such as a stronger U.S. dollar or reduced industrial demand, trigger a silver price correction, which would simultaneously reduce revenue, devalue held inventory, and increase the relative burden of fixed costs, potentially turning the current cash flow strength into a rapid deterioration that is not fully reflected in the company’s optimistic forward-looking statements about continued price strength.

First Majestic Silver (AG) faces significant near-term margin pressure from rising input costs tied to its strategic shift to lower cutoff grades, which, while increasing throughput and mine life, is driving higher cost per ton due to processing more waste rock—a dynamic management acknowledged but downplayed by emphasizing margin expansion from silver prices, yet the company’s own data shows all-in sustaining costs per ounce rose in Q1 FY26 despite cost per ton being at a low for a while, indicating that the benefits of lower grades are being offset by inflation in energy, labor, and consumables, particularly as the fixed 75:1 silver-to-gold ratio used in cost calculations may not reflect actual market volatility, creating a risk that if gold outperforms silver, the reported cost structure becomes misleading and actual profitability could deteriorate faster than suggested by headline margin figures.
The Jerritt Canyon restart, while progressing on schedule, carries substantial execution risk that is being minimized in communications, with management’s reliance on third-party contractors for critical underground fleet and oxygen plant procurement introducing potential delays given the 10–12 month lead times and the complexity of integrating new equipment into an aging facility, compounded by the lack of detailed updates on permitting or dewatering progress despite the asset’s history of operational challenges, and the fact that production is still targeted for H2 2027—over a year away—means any delay in equipment delivery, labor onboarding, or underground development could push commercial production into 2028, eroding the near-term value of the $75 million already spent and increasing the opportunity cost of capital that could otherwise be deployed to higher-margin, lower-risk expansions at existing Mexican operations.
First Majestic Silver’s balance sheet strength, while impressive with over $1.1 billion in treasury, is increasingly dependent on sustained high silver prices, and the company’s leveraged exposure to commodity volatility creates a vulnerability if prices correct, particularly given that the record Q1 FY26 revenue of $477 million was driven by a 95% year-over-year increase in realized silver price to $86.35—far above historical averages—and the decision to hold back inventory valued at $63 million suggests management is betting on further price appreciation, yet this strategy becomes perilous if macroeconomic shifts, such as a stronger U.S. dollar or reduced industrial demand, trigger a silver price correction, which would simultaneously reduce revenue, devalue held inventory, and increase the relative burden of fixed costs, potentially turning the current cash flow strength into a rapid deterioration that is not fully reflected in the company’s optimistic forward-looking statements about continued price strength.

Peer Comparison

Companies in the Silver

S.No.	Ticker	Company	Market Cap	P/E	P/S	Total Debt (Qtr)
1	AG	First Majestic Silver Corp	8.16 Bn	0.00 Bn	6.49	292.22 Mn
2	EXK	Endeavour Silver Corp	2.36 Bn	4.53 Bn	3.84	101.40 Mn
3	SVM	Silvercorp Metals Inc	2.21 Bn	0.00 Bn	0.00	0.88 Mn
4	NEWP	New Pacific Metals Corp	0.74 Bn	0.00 Bn	-	-
5	HSLV	Highlander Silver Corp.	0.69 Bn	0.00 Bn	37.44	-
6	BHLL	Bunker Hill Mining Corp.	0.15 Bn	0.00 Bn	-	85.61 Mn

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Research Tools

Developers

About

Investment Thesis

Segments [axis] Breakdown of Revenue (2025)

Peer Comparison

Create an account

Sign In

Reset Password