SO vs TLN vs VST Stock Comparison

Southern, Talen Energy and Vistra Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SO Southern Co
$92.89 +11.3% 1M -3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$105.25B
P/E
22.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.18B
Div. yield
0.03%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
6 wins
TLN Talen Energy Corp
$327.91 +9.2% 1M -14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$15.51B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.44B
Div. yield
–
Independent Power Producers Utilities
1 win
VST Vistra Corp.
$140.15 +1.6% 1M -26.8% 1Y
Market cap
$47.77B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.21B
Div. yield
0.01%
Independent Power Producers Utilities
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Southern leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Southern 6, Vistra 5, Talen Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSOTLNVSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $105.25B $15.51B $47.77B SO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.6x -83.8x 23.6x SO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.2x 16.0x 15.9x VST
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.4% +60.8% +3.8% TLN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.4% -5.4% 10.6% SO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.1% 0.9% 11.3% VST
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 19.3x 2.8x VST
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.01% SO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.4% -14.6% -26.8% SO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.1%/yr — +49.0%/yr VST
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 17.9% 57.4% 51.0% SO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 43/100 68/100 VST

Percentile Scorecard

SOTLNVST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSOTLNVST
Valuation 33 #45 of 67 26 #18 of 24 74 #7 of 24
Growth 55 #30 of 65 59 #10 of 23 55 #11 of 23
Profitability 75 #17 of 65 36 #15 of 23 100 #1 of 23
Financial Health 37 #42 of 66 9 #22 of 24 39 #15 of 24
Shareholder Returns 15 #57 of 67 84 #4 of 20 74 #6 of 20
Overall 43 43 68
  • SO ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • TLN ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • VST ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSOTLNVSTSPY
1 month +11.3%+9.2%+1.6% -1.0%
3 months -4.5%-8.9%-14.2% +2.9%
6 months -0.6%-10.0%-14.7% +6.4%
Year to date +6.5%-12.5%-13.1% +11.4%
1 year -3.4%-14.6%-26.8% +13.1%
3 years +39.8%+516.5%+328.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +11.8%+83.4%+62.5% +21.5%
5 years +47.6%—+633.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +8.1%—+49.0% +10.9%
10 years +83.8%—+792.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year +6.3%—+24.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureSOTLNVSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 17.9%57.4%51.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 17.5%61.4%55.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.232.031.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.19-0.25-0.52 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -23.3%-35.7%-48.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.3%-25.2%-30.4% -2.5%
52-week high $99.11$438.12$201.47 $779.14
52-week low $82.35$286.52$134.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSOTLNVST
P/E now vs peer median 22.7xmedian 20.8x -81.4xmedian 24.1x 23.3xmedian 24.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.8x 4.6xmedian 2.6x 2.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 13.1x 51.9xmedian 11.3x 10.2xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -32.7xmedian 36.7x 27.7xmedian 12.9x 20.9xmedian 12.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.7x 9.6xmedian 2.1x 8.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.71median 2.27 —median 0.59 1.47median 0.59

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSOTLNVST
Revenue $30.18B $3.44B $19.21B
Gross profit $25.14B – –
Operating income $7.31B $88.00M $3.56B
Net income $4.66B -$185.00M $2.22B
Free cash flow -$3.27B $568.00M $2.26B
EPS (diluted) $4.08 $-4.03 $5.98
Cash & equivalents $2.98B $231.00M $435.00M
Total debt $295.00B $9.57B $19.60B
Shares (diluted) 1.14B 45.90M 339.23M
Enterprise value $96.30B $13.07B $40.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSOTLNVST
P/E 22.7x -81.4x 23.3x
P/FCF -32.7x 27.7x 20.9x
P/Operating cash flow 10.0x 19.7x 9.2x
P/S 3.5x 4.6x 2.5x
P/B 2.5x 9.6x 8.6x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 9.6x 14.7x
EV/EBITDA 13.1x 51.9x 10.2x
EV/EBIT 24.6x 284.6x 18.2x
EV/Revenue 5.9x 7.3x 3.4x
EV/FCF -54.9x 44.1x 28.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.8x 31.5x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.71 – 1.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSOTLNVST
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.4% 60.8% 3.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% – 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.5% -34.3% -0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.7% – 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.7% -206.9% -8.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.2% – 11.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.6% -203.2% -6.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.9% – 15.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.5% 1,121% 21.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.7% – 6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -152.2% 422.7% 36.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.1% – -4.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSOTLNVST
Gross margin 83.3% – –
EBITDA margin 45.2% 14.1% 33.0%
Operating margin 24.2% 2.6% 18.5%
Pretax margin 17.4% -3.6% 14.6%
Net margin 15.4% -5.4% 10.6%
FCF margin -10.8% 16.5% 11.7%
Operating cash flow margin 35.3% 23.2% 26.7%
Return on equity 9.2% -13.6% 40.0%
Return on assets 2.9% -1.4% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 5.1% 0.9% 11.3%
Return on capital employed 5.1% 0.8% 11.3%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -4.3x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSOTLNVST
Debt / assets 46.6% 63.5% 46.0%
Debt / equity 1.8x 5.8x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 19.3x 2.8x
Debt / FCF -23.1x 16.9x 8.7x
Liabilities / assets 73.9% 89.1% 87.1%
Equity / assets 26.1% 10.9% 12.9%
Interest coverage 2.3x 0.2x 3.1x
Current ratio 0.8x 0.8x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 0.84 1.52

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSOTLNVST
Dividend yield 3.2% – 0.7%
Net buyback yield – 1.9% 2.4%
Shareholder yield 3.2% 1.9% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 66.6% – 13.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) -94.8% – 13.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.7% – 0.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – 0.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSOTLNVST
Forward P/E 19.2xFY2026 16.0xFY2026 15.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.84FY2026 $20.49FY2026 $8.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 – +305.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -2.9% +60.7% +21.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $31.53BFY2026 $4.60BFY2026 $21.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.7%FY2026 +78.4%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% +5.1% +21.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSOTLNVST
Held by institutions 72.5% 100.0% 84.4%
Institutions holding 2,363 637 1,403
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.7% +5.4% +2.7%
Institutions buying 1,248 379 852
Institutions selling 724 190 415
Buyers to sellers 1.72 1.99 2.05

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SOTLNVST
SO 1.00 0.00 0.05
TLN 0.00 1.00 0.82
VST 0.05 0.82 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SO, TLN and VST?

Southern (SO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Southern (SO) $105.25B, Talen Energy (TLN) $15.51B, Vistra (VST) $47.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, SO, TLN and VST?

Southern (SO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Southern (SO) 22.6x, Talen Energy (TLN) -83.8x, Vistra (VST) 23.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Vistra (VST) is cheapest (Southern (SO) 19.2x, Talen Energy (TLN) 16.0x, Vistra (VST) 15.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Talen Energy (TLN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Southern (SO) +6.4%, Talen Energy (TLN) +60.8%, Vistra (VST) +3.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Southern (SO) has the highest net margin (Southern (SO) 15.4%, Talen Energy (TLN) -5.4%, Vistra (VST) 10.6%). On return on invested capital, Vistra (VST) leads (Southern (SO) 5.1%, Talen Energy (TLN) 0.9%, Vistra (VST) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Southern (SO) returned the most: Southern (SO) -3.4%, Talen Energy (TLN) -14.6%, Vistra (VST) -26.8%. Over five years, Vistra (VST) compounded fastest (Southern (SO) +8.1%/yr, Vistra (VST) +49.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Southern (SO) has the highest dividend yield: Southern (SO) 0.03%, Talen Energy (TLN) 0.00%, Vistra (VST) 0.01%. Talen Energy (TLN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Southern (SO) has been the steadiest (Southern (SO) 17.9%, Talen Energy (TLN) 57.4%, Vistra (VST) 51.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SO, TLN and VST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Southern (SO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.