PLG vs WPM Stock Comparison

Platinum Group Metals and Wheaton Precious Metals Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd
$1.06 -21.5% 1M -53.1% 1Y
Market cap
$112.29M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$50.98M
Div. yield
–
Platinum and Palladium Basic Materials
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
$120.87 -16.9% 1M +23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$55.54B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
-$35.66M
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Wheaton Precious Metals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Wheaton Precious Metals 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLGWPMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $112.29M $55.54B WPM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -22.2x 27.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -6.5% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -9.9% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 18.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.1% +23.0% WPM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.9%/yr +23.9%/yr WPM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 76.0% 50.7% WPM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 78/100 WPM

Percentile Scorecard

PLGWPM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLGWPM
Valuation 68 #52 of 162 75 #46 of 183
Growth 15 #125 of 147 92 #10 of 113
Profitability 43 #70 of 122 98 #4 of 131
Financial Health 90 #17 of 166 76 #41 of 168
Shareholder Returns 9 #98 of 107 48 #40 of 76
Overall 45 78
  • PLG ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • WPM ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLGWPMSPY
1 month -21.5%-16.9% -1.0%
3 months -16.5%+8.4% +2.9%
6 months -40.8%-13.3% +6.4%
Year to date -55.1%+2.9% +11.4%
1 year -53.1%+23.0% +13.1%
3 years -4.5%+176.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year -1.5%+40.4% +21.5%
5 years -55.5%+192.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -14.9%+23.9% +10.9%
10 years -94.8%+396.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year -25.6%+17.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePLGWPMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 76.0%50.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.7%54.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.231.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.700.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.5%-43.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.5%-27.1% -2.5%
52-week high $3.48$165.72 $779.14
52-week low $1.06$94.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLGWPM
P/E now vs peer median -22.1xmedian 12.7x 26.9xmedian 33.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.1x -1,539xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.9x 21.6xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x 21.6xmedian 13.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.1x 5.7xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.44median 0.27 0.46median 0.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLGWPM
Revenue $50.98M -$35.66M
Gross profit – $2.40B
Operating income – $2.28B
Net income -$5.06M $2.05B
Free cash flow – $2.54B
EPS (diluted) $-0.05 $4.48
Cash & equivalents $44.68M $100.19M
Total debt – $1.99B
Shares (diluted) 105.44M 454.69M
Enterprise value -$7.27M $50.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLGWPM
P/E -22.1x 26.9x
P/FCF – 21.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 21.6x
P/S 2.3x -1,539x
P/B 1.6x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – 21.6x
EV/EBIT – 24.9x
EV/Revenue 1.5x -1,592x
EV/FCF – 22.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 22.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.44 0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLGWPM
Revenue growth (1Y) – -6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -17.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 114.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 69.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 149.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 73.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 3.1% 159.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -53.7% 49.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.0% 158.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.4% 58.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 88.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 56.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 88.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 56.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLGWPM
Gross margin – –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin – –
Pretax margin – –
Net margin -9.9% –
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – -7,135%
Return on equity -5.2% 21.5%
Return on assets -4.4% 18.5%
Return on invested capital – 18.7%
Return on capital employed – 21.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 2.8% -67.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLGWPM
Debt / assets – 16.3%
Debt / equity – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x
Debt / FCF – 0.8x
Liabilities / assets 27.3% 20.3%
Equity / assets 72.7% 79.7%
Interest coverage – 61.9x
Current ratio 58.5x 0.5x
Quick ratio 58.3x 0.5x
Cash ratio 58.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 14.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLGWPM
Dividend yield – 0.6%
Net buyback yield -38.9% 0.0%
Shareholder yield -38.9% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 23.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 19.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLGWPM
Forward P/E – 27.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.07FY2026 $4.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +44.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +24.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2023 $3.39BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +46.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLGWPM
Held by institutions 15.8% 63.9%
Institutions holding 66 846
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.0% +2.8%
Institutions buying 31 419
Institutions selling 21 266
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLGWPM
PLG 1.00 0.76
WPM 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PLG and WPM?

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Platinum Group Metals (PLG) $112.29M, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) $55.54B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) returned the most: Platinum Group Metals (PLG) -53.1%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +23.0%. Over five years, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) compounded fastest (Platinum Group Metals (PLG) -14.9%/yr, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) +23.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Platinum Group Metals (PLG) 0.00%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 0.01%. Platinum Group Metals (PLG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) has been the steadiest (Platinum Group Metals (PLG) 76.0%, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) 50.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do PLG and WPM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.76, a strong positive relationship. Holding both adds little diversification.

Which is the better stock, PLG and WPM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.