MH vs NYT vs WLY Stock Comparison

McGraw Hill, New York Times and John Wiley & Sons Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MH McGraw Hill, Inc.
$14.12 +11.0% 1M +11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.70B
P/E
29.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
1 win
NYT New York Times Co
$69.80 +9.3% 1M +21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$11.20B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.98B
Div. yield
1.25%
Publishing Communication Services
6 wins
WLY John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
$52.65 +10.7% 1M +42.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.67B
P/E
13.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.67B
Div. yield
2.71%
Publishing Communication Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

New York Times leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (New York Times 6, John Wiley & Sons 5, McGraw Hill 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMHNYTWLYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.70B $11.20B $2.67B NYT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.1x 28.8x 13.5x WLY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.8x 25.8x 10.6x MH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.1% +10.8% -0.3% NYT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.4% 13.2% 11.9% NYT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% — 13.7% WLY
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x — 3.1x WLY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.25% 2.71% WLY
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.4% +21.8% +42.6% WLY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +5.2%/yr -0.7%/yr NYT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.9% 31.9% 36.8% NYT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 78/100 74/100 NYT

Percentile Scorecard

MHNYTWLY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMHNYTWLY
Valuation 75 #14 of 53 31 #37 of 53 71 #16 of 53
Growth 70 #14 of 44 98 #2 of 44 95 #3 of 44
Profitability 90 #5 of 42 98 #2 of 42 93 #4 of 42
Financial Health 22 #48 of 61 90 #7 of 61 57 #27 of 61
Shareholder Returns 4 #25 of 26 76 #7 of 26 52 #13 of 26
Overall 52 78 74
  • MH ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NYT ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media
  • WLY ranked among 61 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMHNYTWLYSPY
1 month +11.0%+9.3%+10.7% -0.2%
3 months +27.9%-7.2%-3.0% +3.9%
6 months +15.5%-11.0%+28.4% +8.2%
Year to date -14.4%+0.5%+71.9% +12.9%
1 year +11.4%+21.8%+42.6% +12.3%
3 years —+74.7%+75.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+20.4%+20.5% +23.3%
5 years —+29.1%-3.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+5.2%-0.7% +10.9%
10 years —+534.5%+4.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+20.3%+0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureMHNYTWLYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.9%31.9%36.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%38.4%35.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.140.090.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.190.681.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.4%-50.0%-50.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.5%-18.7%-5.5% -1.2%
52-week high $17.99$85.86$55.74 $779.14
52-week low $9.11$56.09$28.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMHNYTWLY
P/E now vs peer median 29.1xmedian 18.4x 28.8xmedian 18.4x 13.5xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 0.6x 3.8xmedian 0.6x 1.6xmedian 0.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 10.5x 18.9xmedian 10.5x 10.2xmedian 10.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 9.0x 18.0xmedian 9.0x 11.1xmedian 9.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 1.5x 5.5xmedian 1.5x 3.4xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 0.92median 0.44 0.17median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMHNYTWLY
Revenue $2.12B $2.98B $1.67B
Gross profit $1.73B $1.53B $1.24B
Operating income $294.84M $475.01M $248.83M
Net income $92.68M $392.83M $198.19M
Free cash flow $335.92M $623.02M $239.89M
R&D – $274.41M –
EPS (diluted) $0.48 $2.41 $3.91
Cash & equivalents $193.64M $232.66M $106.43M
Total debt $2.57B – $1.29B
Shares (diluted) 191.31M 163.04M 50.75M
Enterprise value $1.28B $8.69B $2.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMHNYTWLY
P/E 29.1x 28.8x 13.5x
P/FCF 8.0x 18.0x 11.1x
P/Operating cash flow 6.3x 17.0x 9.2x
P/S 1.3x 3.8x 1.6x
P/B 3.4x 5.5x 3.4x
P/Tangible book -7.0x 6.1x -47.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.4x 18.9x 10.2x
EV/EBIT 17.2x 22.2x 15.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 3.5x 2.3x
EV/FCF 15.1x 16.9x 16.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.9x 16.0x 13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.92 0.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMHNYTWLY
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.1% 10.8% -0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.1% 13.8% 0.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.9% 22.3% 11.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 27.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 222.1% 22.6% 103.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 30.6% 76.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 206.4% 23.6% 116.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 31.1% 79.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -22.5% 34.4% 40.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 37.3% 0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.2% 36.9% 62.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 40.3% 6.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMHNYTWLY
Gross margin 81.7% 51.4% 74.6%
EBITDA margin 28.6% 18.8% 22.6%
Operating margin 13.9% 16.0% 14.9%
Pretax margin 3.5% 16.8% 11.1%
Net margin 4.4% 13.2% 11.9%
FCF margin 15.9% 20.9% 14.4%
Operating cash flow margin 20.2% 22.1% 17.4%
Return on equity 12.2% 19.4% 24.1%
Return on assets 1.7% 13.4% 6.9%
Return on invested capital 8.9% – 13.7%
Return on capital employed 6.9% 20.9% 11.4%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.6x 1.7x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 2.6% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMHNYTWLY
Debt / assets 47.9% – 41.2%
Debt / equity 3.3x – 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x – 3.1x
Debt / FCF 7.7x – 5.4x
Liabilities / assets 85.3% 31.4% 74.6%
Equity / assets 14.7% 68.6% 25.4%
Interest coverage – – 5.3x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.6x 0.6x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 0.56 10.09 2.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMHNYTWLY
Dividend yield – 1.2% 2.7%
Net buyback yield -14.7% 1.6% 3.8%
Shareholder yield -14.7% 2.8% 6.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 32.1% 37.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 20.3% 30.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 33.6% -3.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 26.0% -1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMHNYTWLY
Forward P/E 6.8xFY2026 25.8xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.08FY2026 $2.71FY2026 $4.95FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.4% +18.8% +4.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.09BFY2026 $3.24BFY2026 $1.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.5%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026 -2.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.5% +6.7% +13.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMHNYTWLY
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 99.1%
Institutions holding 111 630 264
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.3% +2.3% -0.6%
Institutions buying 60 313 142
Institutions selling 36 223 77
Buyers to sellers 1.67 1.40 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MHNYTWLY
MH 1.00 0.21 0.29
NYT 0.21 1.00 0.20
WLY 0.29 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MH, NYT and WLY?

New York Times (NYT) is the largest by market capitalisation: McGraw Hill (MH) $2.70B, New York Times (NYT) $11.20B, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) $2.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, MH, NYT and WLY?

John Wiley & Sons (WLY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (McGraw Hill (MH) 29.1x, New York Times (NYT) 28.8x, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 13.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, McGraw Hill (MH) is cheapest (McGraw Hill (MH) 6.8x, New York Times (NYT) 25.8x, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

New York Times (NYT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: McGraw Hill (MH) +0.1%, New York Times (NYT) +10.8%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) -0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

New York Times (NYT) has the highest net margin (McGraw Hill (MH) 4.4%, New York Times (NYT) 13.2%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 11.9%). On return on invested capital, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) leads (McGraw Hill (MH) 8.9%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 13.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year John Wiley & Sons (WLY) returned the most: McGraw Hill (MH) +11.4%, New York Times (NYT) +21.8%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) +42.6%. Over five years, New York Times (NYT) compounded fastest (New York Times (NYT) +5.2%/yr, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) -0.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

John Wiley & Sons (WLY) has the highest dividend yield: New York Times (NYT) 1.25%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 2.71%. McGraw Hill (MH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, New York Times (NYT) has been the steadiest (McGraw Hill (MH) 59.9%, New York Times (NYT) 31.9%, John Wiley & Sons (WLY) 36.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MH, NYT and WLY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, New York Times (NYT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.