MBLY vs QCOM vs WRD Stock Comparison

Mobileye Global, Qualcomm and WeRide Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc.
$6.66 -17.1% 1M -50.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.02B
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
1 win
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$179.60 -11.1% 1M +6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$194.85B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins
WRD WeRide Inc.
$4.18 -24.4% 1M -60.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$92.10M
Div. yield
–
Autonomous Driving Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 5, WeRide 2, Mobileye Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionMBLYQCOMWRDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.62B $194.85B $1.35B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.4x 21.0x -6.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x 16.6x — MBLY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.0% +1.9% +244.8% WRD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -201.5% 21.0% -243.6% QCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 20.5% -24.9% QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -50.4% +6.3% -60.7% QCOM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +6.5%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.0% 53.1% 60.2% QCOM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 62/100 70/100 WRD

Percentile Scorecard

MBLYQCOMWRD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisMBLYQCOMWRD
Valuation 92 #2 of 13 80 #20 of 95 58 #6 of 13
Growth 36 #8 of 12 34 #62 of 93 91 #2 of 12
Profitability 91 #2 of 12 87 #13 of 91 82 #3 of 12
Financial Health 58 #6 of 13 28 #73 of 101 50 #7 of 13
Shareholder Returns – 80 #16 of 75 –
Overall 69 62 70
  • MBLY ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • QCOM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • WRD ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodMBLYQCOMWRDSPY
1 month -17.1%-11.1%-24.4% -0.8%
3 months -16.9%+5.6%-25.8% +3.5%
6 months -26.1%+19.5%-48.8% +7.0%
Year to date -36.2%+5.0%-51.8% +12.2%
1 year -50.4%+6.3%-60.7% +13.0%
3 years -81.0%+68.7%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -42.5%+19.1%— +23.1%
5 years —+36.9%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —+6.5%— +11.0%
10 years —+163.3%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+10.2%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureMBLYQCOMWRDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.0%53.1%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.6%52.5%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.142.072.25 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.900.12-1.01 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.1%-45.6%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.3%-28.5%-64.3% -1.8%
52-week high $13.41$251.02$11.72 $779.14
52-week low $6.54$124.07$4.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleMBLYQCOMWRD
P/E now vs peer median -1.3x 20.5xmedian 42.1x -5.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 17.8x 4.3xmedian 7.1x 14.0xmedian 17.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.1x 16.5xmedian 27.5x —
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.0x 18.2xmedian 37.2x —median 14.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.0x 6.9xmedian 4.2x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01 4.93median 2.23 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsMBLYQCOMWRD
Revenue $2.02B $44.07B $92.10M
Gross profit $955.00M $23.90B $39.20M
Operating income -$4.18B $10.22B -$260.29M
Net income -$4.06B $9.26B -$237.93M
Free cash flow $388.00M $10.42B –
R&D $1.12B $9.89B $219.70M
EPS (diluted) $-4.97 $8.66 –
Cash & equivalents $1.31B $4.53B $629.27M
Total debt – $12.78B $194.84M
Shares (diluted) 818.00M 1.07B –
Enterprise value -$483.25M $154.77B -$1.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricMBLYQCOMWRD
P/E -1.3x 20.5x -5.8x
P/FCF 14.0x 18.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 11.1x 15.3x –
P/S 2.7x 4.3x 14.0x
P/B 0.7x 6.9x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 0.8x 7.3x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA -1.1x 16.5x –
EV/EBIT -1.0x 19.0x -2.7x
EV/Revenue 2.1x 4.4x 7.5x
EV/FCF 10.7x 18.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.4x 15.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 4.93 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricMBLYQCOMWRD
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.0% 1.9% 244.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 4.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.9% -0.8% 142.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.2% 3.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -35.4% -15.0% -22.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -231.1% 0.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -37.5% -20.0% 29.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -221.7% 2.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -36.5% -17.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -220.0% 4.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -24.8% -2.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.3% 12.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.1% -10.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 14.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricMBLYQCOMWRD
Gross margin 47.4% 54.2% 42.6%
EBITDA margin -180.9% 26.8% –
Operating margin -207.1% 23.2% -282.6%
Pretax margin -204.2% 25.4% -258.0%
Net margin -201.5% 21.0% -243.6%
FCF margin 19.2% 23.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 24.3% 28.1% –
Return on equity -49.6% 33.7% -24.1%
Return on assets -46.2% 16.2% -20.5%
Return on invested capital – 20.5% -24.9%
Return on capital employed -50.1% 22.3% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.8x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 15.6% 7.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricMBLYQCOMWRD
Debt / assets – 22.3% 6.3%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 7.1% 51.8% 17.5%
Equity / assets 92.9% 48.2% 82.5%
Interest coverage – 14.8x –
Current ratio 4.6x 2.0x 5.4x
Quick ratio 3.4x 1.1x 4.0x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.7x 3.7x
Altman Z-score 2.94 6.10 2.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricMBLYQCOMWRD
Dividend yield – 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – 4.6% –
Shareholder yield – 6.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusMBLYQCOMWRD
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 16.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.47FY2026 $10.79FY2026 $-0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.6%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +2.1% -3.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.11BFY2026 $45.55BFY2026 $149.56MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.7%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +52.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.9% -5.0% +88.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersMBLYQCOMWRD
Held by institutions 21.9% 79.7% 26.0%
Institutions holding 294 3,029 110
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +2.8% -1.2%
Institutions buying 169 1,416 51
Institutions selling 82 1,332 35
Buyers to sellers 2.06 1.06 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

MBLYQCOMWRD
MBLY 1.00 0.29 0.25
QCOM 0.29 1.00 0.26
WRD 0.25 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, MBLY, QCOM and WRD?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobileye Global (MBLY) $5.62B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $194.85B, WeRide (WRD) $1.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

WeRide (WRD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mobileye Global (MBLY) +5.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, WeRide (WRD) +244.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest net margin (Mobileye Global (MBLY) -201.5%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, WeRide (WRD) -243.6%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%, WeRide (WRD) -24.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Qualcomm (QCOM) returned the most: Mobileye Global (MBLY) -50.4%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.3%, WeRide (WRD) -60.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mobileye Global (MBLY) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%, WeRide (WRD) 0.00%. Mobileye Global (MBLY) and WeRide (WRD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Qualcomm (QCOM) has been the steadiest (Mobileye Global (MBLY) 56.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.1%, WeRide (WRD) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, MBLY, QCOM and WRD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.