LRCX vs MKSI vs PPG Stock Comparison

Lam Research, Mks and Ppg Industries Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$254.39 -21.5% 1M +58.3% 1Y
Market cap
$297.52B
P/E
35.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
8 wins
MKSI Mks Inc
$216.17 -18.7% 1M +52.9% 1Y
Market cap
$13.55B
P/E
30.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.35B
Div. yield
0.00%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
PPG Ppg Industries Inc
$120.05 +13.3% 1M +21.1% 1Y
Market cap
$26.56B
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.69B
Div. yield
0.02%
Paints and Coatings Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 8, Ppg Industries 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLRCXMKSIPPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $297.52B $13.55B $26.56B LRCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.2x 30.8x 16.9x PPG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 16.0x 14.7x PPG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.4% +16.3% +6.4% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.3% 10.1% 9.4% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 49.6% 8.9% 11.1% LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 3.2x 1.9x LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% PPG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.3% +52.9% +21.1% LRCX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.2%/yr +7.6%/yr -5.7%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.7% 61.8% 30.4% PPG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 55/100 65/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

LRCXMKSIPPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLRCXMKSIPPG
Valuation 47 #50 of 94 76 #23 of 94 60 #38 of 94
Growth 82 #17 of 92 73 #26 of 92 68 #30 of 92
Profitability 94 #6 of 88 62 #34 of 88 84 #15 of 86
Financial Health 45 #53 of 96 1 #95 of 96 45 #52 of 93
Shareholder Returns 62 #28 of 72 63 #27 of 72 70 #22 of 71
Overall 66 55 65
  • LRCX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MKSI ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • PPG ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLRCXMKSIPPGSPY
1 month -21.5%-18.7%+13.3% +0.7%
3 months -14.6%-26.3%+7.1% +3.7%
6 months -1.3%-23.8%+10.6% +7.1%
Year to date +48.6%+35.3%+17.2% +12.8%
1 year +58.3%+52.9%+21.1% +11.9%
3 years +336.0%+230.9%-1.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +63.4%+49.1%-0.5% +22.8%
5 years +351.4%+44.1%-25.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +35.2%+7.6%-5.7% +10.9%
10 years +2,544.4%+335.4%+29.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +38.8%+15.9%+2.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureLRCXMKSIPPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.7%61.8%30.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.3%65.8%30.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.262.821.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.890.860.69 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.8%-67.5%-47.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.3%-51.4%-8.7% -1.2%
52-week high $433.33$444.80$131.56 $779.14
52-week low $139.59$137.20$94.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLRCXMKSIPPG
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 46.4x 33.2xmedian 46.4x 17.0xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.2xmedian 7.8x 3.4xmedian 7.8x 1.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.0xmedian 27.5x 17.2xmedian 27.5x 11.5xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.6xmedian 40.1x 32.1xmedian 40.1x 20.7xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 4.7x 4.9xmedian 4.7x 3.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.21median 2.10 1.08median 2.10 3.03median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLRCXMKSIPPG
Revenue $26.13B $4.35B $16.69B
Gross profit $13.34B $2.04B $6.83B
Operating income $9.65B $681.00M $2.24B
Net income $8.45B $439.00M $1.57B
Free cash flow $6.54B $455.00M $1.28B
R&D $2.47B $310.00M $458.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.73 $6.05 $7.03
Cash & equivalents $7.44B $611.00M $1.59B
Total debt $16.44B $3.94B $6.84B
Shares (diluted) 1.26B 72.70M 223.20M
Enterprise value $273.57B $10.99B $19.49B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIPPG
P/E 37.7x 33.2x 17.0x
P/FCF 48.6x 32.1x 20.7x
P/Operating cash flow 41.9x 23.0x 13.0x
P/S 12.2x 3.4x 1.6x
P/B 22.8x 4.9x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 22.8x 15.0x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 31.0x 17.2x 11.5x
EV/EBIT 32.5x 26.4x 14.2x
EV/Revenue 12.0x 4.1x 1.9x
EV/FCF 48.0x 39.4x 24.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.5x 28.3x 15.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.21 1.08 3.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIPPG
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.4% 16.3% 6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 4.2% 1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 38.1% 15.4% 5.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 23.4% 6.7% 2.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.3% 33.5% 4.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.0% 35.4% 1.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.4% 64.4% 59.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 31.0% 2.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 47.0% 52.8% 60.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 30.7% 5.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% -1.6% 46.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 20.7% -1.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.8% -13.3% 79.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 22.9% -7.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIPPG
Gross margin 51.1% 47.0% 40.9%
EBITDA margin 38.7% 24.0% 16.6%
Operating margin 37.0% 15.7% 13.4%
Pretax margin 37.2% 11.2% 12.6%
Net margin 32.3% 10.1% 9.4%
FCF margin 25.0% 10.5% 7.7%
Operating cash flow margin 29.0% 14.6% 12.3%
Return on equity 64.1% 15.2% 18.5%
Return on assets 33.9% 5.0% 7.0%
Return on invested capital 49.6% 8.9% 11.1%
Return on capital employed 54.8% 10.6% 12.9%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.3% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIPPG
Debt / assets 14.2% 44.1% 30.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.3x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.4x 3.2x 1.9x
Debt / FCF 0.6x 8.7x 5.3x
Liabilities / assets 47.2% 66.6% 61.8%
Equity / assets 52.8% 33.4% 38.2%
Interest coverage – 3.7x 8.7x
Current ratio 2.5x 1.1x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.8x 0.6x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 19.99 2.40 3.84

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLRCXMKSIPPG
Dividend yield 0.4% 0.4% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – 1.6%
Shareholder yield 1.6% 0.4% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 14.4% 40.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 13.8% 50.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.8% 2.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.4% 2.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLRCXMKSIPPG
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2027 16.0xFY2026 14.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.12FY2027 $13.48FY2026 $8.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +73.9%FY2027 +71.1%FY2026 +7.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% +34.9% +10.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.96BFY2027 $5.43BFY2026 $17.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.9%FY2027 +38.1%FY2026 +10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.0% +8.0% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLRCXMKSIPPG
Held by institutions 85.6% 100.0% 90.3%
Institutions holding 3,133 776 1,097
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.2% +2.8% +0.1%
Institutions buying 1,697 455 521
Institutions selling 1,163 253 356
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.80 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LRCXMKSIPPG
LRCX 1.00 0.84 0.23
MKSI 0.84 1.00 0.24
PPG 0.23 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LRCX, MKSI and PPG?

Lam Research (LRCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lam Research (LRCX) $297.52B, Mks (MKSI) $13.55B, Ppg Industries (PPG) $26.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, LRCX, MKSI and PPG?

Ppg Industries (PPG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Lam Research (LRCX) 35.2x, Mks (MKSI) 30.8x, Ppg Industries (PPG) 16.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ppg Industries (PPG) is cheapest (Lam Research (LRCX) 25.1x, Mks (MKSI) 16.0x, Ppg Industries (PPG) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Mks (MKSI) +16.3%, Ppg Industries (PPG) +6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Mks (MKSI) 10.1%, Ppg Industries (PPG) 9.4%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%, Mks (MKSI) 8.9%, Ppg Industries (PPG) 11.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lam Research (LRCX) returned the most: Lam Research (LRCX) +58.3%, Mks (MKSI) +52.9%, Ppg Industries (PPG) +21.1%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Lam Research (LRCX) +35.2%/yr, Mks (MKSI) +7.6%/yr, Ppg Industries (PPG) -5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ppg Industries (PPG) has the highest dividend yield: Lam Research (LRCX) 0.00%, Mks (MKSI) 0.00%, Ppg Industries (PPG) 0.02%. Lam Research (LRCX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ppg Industries (PPG) has been the steadiest (Lam Research (LRCX) 65.7%, Mks (MKSI) 61.8%, Ppg Industries (PPG) 30.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, LRCX, MKSI and PPG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.