LMT vs RKLB Stock Comparison

Lockheed Martin and Rocket Lab Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LMT Lockheed Martin Corp
$604.47 +15.3% 1M +23.9% 1Y
Market cap
$146.40B
P/E
22.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.12B
Div. yield
0.02%
Defense Industrials
7 wins
RKLB Rocket Lab Corp
$52.60 -25.2% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$33.90B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$769.15M
Div. yield
–
Space Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Lockheed Martin leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lockheed Martin 7, Rocket Lab 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionLMTRKLBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $146.40B $33.90B LMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.5x -204.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.6x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.9% +52.5% RKLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.2% -21.5% LMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.5% -6.7% LMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 14.4x LMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.9% -17.3% LMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.0%/yr +32.3%/yr RKLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.5% 92.6% LMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 42/100 LMT

Percentile Scorecard

LMTRKLB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisLMTRKLB
Valuation 70 #31 of 100 18 #82 of 100
Growth 62 #38 of 97 50 #49 of 97
Profitability 88 #12 of 96 31 #67 of 96
Financial Health 41 #63 of 106 88 #14 of 106
Shareholder Returns 41 #39 of 65 22 #51 of 65
Overall 60 42
  • LMT ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • RKLB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodLMTRKLBSPY
1 month +15.3%-25.2% -1.0%
3 months +3.7%-17.7% +2.9%
6 months +17.7%-34.0% +6.4%
Year to date +25.0%-24.6% +11.4%
1 year +23.9%-17.3% +13.1%
3 years +37.1%+1,170.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +11.1%+133.5% +21.5%
5 years +61.4%+304.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +10.0%+32.3% +10.9%
10 years +162.2%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +10.1%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureLMTRKLBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.5%92.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.4%90.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.103.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.81-0.19 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.2%-78.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.7%-65.0% -2.5%
52-week high $676.70$150.23 $779.14
52-week low $439.19$39.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleLMTRKLB
P/E now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 26.2x -200.2xmedian 26.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.9x 40.9xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.7x -182.9xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 24.9x -84.8xmedian 24.9x
P/B now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 2.4x 9.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 61.37median 0.92 -24.20median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsLMTRKLB
Revenue $79.12B $769.15M
Gross profit $9.28B $286.62M
Operating income $9.32B -$223.49M
Net income $6.51B -$165.46M
Free cash flow $8.38B -$371.14M
R&D – $312.42M
EPS (diluted) $28.13 $-0.26
Cash & equivalents $5.96B $2.13B
Total debt $83.92B $1.72M
Shares (diluted) 231.50M 629.68M
Enterprise value $130.63B $28.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricLMTRKLB
P/E 21.4x -200.2x
P/FCF 16.7x -84.8x
P/Operating cash flow 13.8x -141.4x
P/S 1.8x 40.9x
P/B 13.9x 9.0x
P/Tangible book 16.8x 9.9x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x -182.9x
EV/EBIT 16.5x -130.5x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 37.9x
EV/FCF 18.4x -78.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.2x -131.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 61.37 -24.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricLMTRKLB
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.9% 52.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 49.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 55.0% 95.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 109.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 52.8% -0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% -11.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 55.1% 28.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.2% -0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 55.9% 41.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 8.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 59.0% -100.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -44.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 82.5% -81.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.0% -45.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricLMTRKLB
Gross margin 11.7% 37.3%
EBITDA margin 13.9% -20.7%
Operating margin 11.8% -29.1%
Pretax margin 9.7% -24.9%
Net margin 8.2% -21.5%
FCF margin 10.6% -48.3%
Operating cash flow margin 12.8% -28.9%
Return on equity 69.2% -5.7%
Return on assets 10.3% -4.7%
Return on invested capital 26.5% -6.7%
Return on capital employed 23.9% -7.5%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 10.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricLMTRKLB
Debt / assets 31.8% 0.0%
Debt / equity 2.0x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 14.4x
Debt / FCF 2.4x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 84.4% 16.6%
Equity / assets 15.6% 83.4%
Interest coverage 8.6x -13.9x
Current ratio 1.3x 5.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 4.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 4.4x
Altman Z-score 3.73 27.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricLMTRKLB
Dividend yield 2.3% –
Net buyback yield 0.5% -7.3%
Shareholder yield 2.8% -7.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 49.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 38.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusLMTRKLB
Forward P/E 20.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $29.31FY2026 $-0.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +36.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +7.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $85.60BFY2026 $917.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.1%FY2026 +52.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +52.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersLMTRKLB
Held by institutions 75.5% 51.2%
Institutions holding 2,779 1,128
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% +10.9%
Institutions buying 1,336 810
Institutions selling 1,026 238
Buyers to sellers 1.30 3.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

LMTRKLB
LMT 1.00 0.16
RKLB 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, LMT and RKLB?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Lockheed Martin (LMT) $146.40B, Rocket Lab (RKLB) $33.90B.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Lab (RKLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Lockheed Martin (LMT) +7.9%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) +52.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has the highest net margin (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 8.2%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -21.5%). On return on invested capital, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 26.5%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -6.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lockheed Martin (LMT) returned the most: Lockheed Martin (LMT) +23.9%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -17.3%. Over five years, Rocket Lab (RKLB) compounded fastest (Lockheed Martin (LMT) +10.0%/yr, Rocket Lab (RKLB) +32.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Lockheed Martin (LMT) 0.02%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) 0.00%. Rocket Lab (RKLB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lockheed Martin (LMT) has been the steadiest (Lockheed Martin (LMT) 29.5%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) 92.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do LMT and RKLB move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.16, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, LMT and RKLB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lockheed Martin (LMT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.