IMO vs PSX vs SU Stock Comparison

Imperial Oil, Phillips 66 and Suncor Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IMO Imperial Oil Ltd
$134.49 +9.5% 1M +47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$64.40B
P/E
21.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.53B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins
PSX Phillips 66
$288.74 +12.9% 1M +113.9% 1Y
Market cap
$112.35B
P/E
15.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$156.36B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins
SU Suncor Energy Inc
$79.48 +16.5% 1M +99.5% 1Y
Market cap
$95.96B
P/E
7.0x
Revenue (TTM)
-$3.60B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Phillips 66 leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Phillips 66 4, Suncor Energy 4, Imperial Oil 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIMOPSXSULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $64.40B $112.35B $95.96B PSX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.4x 15.8x 7.0x SU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x 9.0x 8.6x SU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.5% +15.5% -108.8% PSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 4.5% — IMO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.4% 14.8% — IMO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 1.3x 0.5x IMO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% -0.03% PSX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +47.8% +113.9% +99.5% PSX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.6%/yr +30.2%/yr +28.3%/yr IMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.8% 32.0% 27.5% SU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 54/100 64/100 SU

Percentile Scorecard

IMOPSXSU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIMOPSXSU
Valuation 32 #68 of 99 46 #54 of 99 74 #27 of 99
Growth 55 #44 of 97 85 #15 of 97 65 #35 of 97
Profitability 64 #35 of 96 48 #50 of 96 72 #28 of 96
Financial Health 82 #19 of 102 49 #53 of 102 75 #26 of 102
Shareholder Returns 83 #14 of 76 41 #45 of 76 35 #50 of 76
Overall 63 54 64
  • IMO ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • PSX ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • SU ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIMOPSXSUSPY
1 month +9.5%+12.9%+16.5% -0.8%
3 months +7.0%+39.0%+24.2% +3.5%
6 months +6.8%+76.0%+23.3% +7.0%
Year to date +55.8%+123.8%+79.2% +12.2%
1 year +47.8%+113.9%+99.5% +13.0%
3 years +133.3%+160.3%+144.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +32.7%+37.6%+34.8% +23.1%
5 years +280.2%+273.3%+247.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +30.6%+30.2%+28.3% +11.0%
10 years +312.2%+256.2%+169.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +15.2%+13.5%+10.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureIMOPSXSUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.8%32.0%27.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.6%29.0%28.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.11-0.34-0.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.663.563.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.1%-46.2%-37.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.8%-2.8%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $138.33$297.20$79.48 $779.14
52-week low $83.72$127.75$39.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIMOPSXSU
P/E now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 13.5x 16.3xmedian 13.5x 7.1xmedian 13.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.1x 0.7xmedian 2.1x -26.4xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 5.9x 10.3xmedian 5.9x 11.4xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 11.0x 18.0xmedian 11.0x 4.8xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.5x 3.5xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -4.23median 2.27 -1.67median 2.27 0.19median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIMOPSXSU
Revenue $37.53B $156.36B -$3.60B
Gross profit – $24.12B –
Operating income – $10.04B $1.71B
Net income $3.01B $7.19B $8.93B
Free cash flow $3.64B $6.39B $19.78B
R&D $6.51M – –
EPS (diluted) $6.21 $17.62 $11.22
Cash & equivalents $2.00B $4.10B $5.37B
Total debt $2.81B $20.57B $9.85B
Shares (diluted) 484.90M 402.62M 1.22B
Enterprise value $59.49B $100.14B $81.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIMOPSXSU
P/E 21.6x 16.3x 7.1x
P/FCF 17.9x 18.0x 4.8x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 12.9x 6.0x
P/S 1.7x 0.7x -26.4x
P/B 3.8x 3.5x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 3.6x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 11.3x 10.3x 11.4x
EV/EBIT 16.7x 13.1x 58.2x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 0.8x -27.6x
EV/FCF 18.1x 20.6x 5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 14.8x 6.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.23 -1.67 0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIMOPSXSU
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.5% 15.5% -108.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.2% -0.9% -27.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 53.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 223.6% 18.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -13.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) -10.5% 293.4% 57.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.9% -14.1% 13.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.8% 318.3% 55.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.1% -9.8% 36.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.5% 165.5% 9.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -3.9% 8.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% 329.7% 5.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -7.1% 17.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIMOPSXSU
Gross margin – 15.4% –
EBITDA margin 15.6% 8.2% –
Operating margin – 6.4% –
Pretax margin 10.5% 5.7% –
Net margin 8.0% 4.5% –
FCF margin 9.7% 4.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% 5.7% -438.8%
Return on equity 17.9% 23.1% 29.1%
Return on assets 9.1% 8.7% 14.6%
Return on invested capital 15.4% 14.8% –
Return on capital employed 15.2% 15.5% 2.1%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.9x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – -3.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIMOPSXSU
Debt / assets 8.3% 25.1% 10.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 1.3x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.8x 3.2x 0.5x
Liabilities / assets 48.7% 60.0% 49.2%
Equity / assets 51.3% 40.0% 50.8%
Interest coverage 147.4x 8.7x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.3x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 4.67 4.43 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIMOPSXSU
Dividend yield 2.3% 1.7% 3.0%
Net buyback yield 3.6% 0.9% -3.8%
Shareholder yield 5.9% 2.6% -0.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 36.0% 27.6% 31.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 29.8% 31.0% 14.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.1% 4.1% -0.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 1.8% -1.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIMOPSXSU
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 9.0xFY2026 8.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.85FY2026 $32.20FY2026 $9.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +74.7%FY2026 +400.0%FY2026 +173.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +7.7% -1.4% -18.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $46.10BFY2026 $165.53BFY2026 $45.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.5%FY2026 +21.6%FY2026 +27.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.7% -4.2% -11.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIMOPSXSU
Held by institutions 26.7% 78.8% 65.2%
Institutions holding 413 2,102 752
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.1% +1.3% -5.1%
Institutions buying 185 967 367
Institutions selling 141 729 252
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.33 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IMOPSXSU
IMO 1.00 0.51 0.80
PSX 0.51 1.00 0.54
SU 0.80 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IMO, PSX and SU?

Phillips 66 (PSX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Imperial Oil (IMO) $64.40B, Phillips 66 (PSX) $112.35B, Suncor Energy (SU) $95.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, IMO, PSX and SU?

Suncor Energy (SU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Imperial Oil (IMO) 21.4x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 15.8x, Suncor Energy (SU) 7.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Suncor Energy (SU) is cheapest (Imperial Oil (IMO) 12.4x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 9.0x, Suncor Energy (SU) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phillips 66 (PSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Imperial Oil (IMO) +5.5%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +15.5%, Suncor Energy (SU) -108.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Imperial Oil (IMO) has the highest net margin (Imperial Oil (IMO) 8.0%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 4.5%). On return on invested capital, Imperial Oil (IMO) leads (Imperial Oil (IMO) 15.4%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 14.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phillips 66 (PSX) returned the most: Imperial Oil (IMO) +47.8%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +113.9%, Suncor Energy (SU) +99.5%. Over five years, Imperial Oil (IMO) compounded fastest (Imperial Oil (IMO) +30.6%/yr, Phillips 66 (PSX) +30.2%/yr, Suncor Energy (SU) +28.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Phillips 66 (PSX) has the highest dividend yield: Imperial Oil (IMO) 0.02%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 0.02%, Suncor Energy (SU) -0.03%. Suncor Energy (SU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suncor Energy (SU) has been the steadiest (Imperial Oil (IMO) 28.8%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 32.0%, Suncor Energy (SU) 27.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IMO, PSX and SU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phillips 66 (PSX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.