HRL vs SJM vs TSN Stock Comparison

Hormel Foods, J M Smucker and Tyson Foods Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HRL Hormel Foods Corp /De/
$20.62 +3.3% 1M -12.8% 1Y
Market cap
$11.49B
P/E
33.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.15B
Div. yield
0.06%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
4 wins
SJM J M SMUCKER Co
$125.50 +4.0% 1M +19.7% 1Y
Market cap
$13.48B
P/E
58.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.16B
Div. yield
0.03%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
6 wins
TSN Tyson Foods, Inc.
$55.36 +8.7% 1M +6.2% 1Y
Market cap
$19.71B
P/E
34.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.69B
Div. yield
0.04%
Meat and Poultry Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

J M Smucker leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (J M Smucker 6, Hormel Foods 4, Tyson Foods 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHRLSJMTSNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.49B $13.48B $19.71B TSN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.5x 58.7x 34.3x HRL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.7x 11.1x 16.9x SJM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.7% +5.1% +2.9% SJM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% 2.5% 1.0% HRL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% SJM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 4.9x 2.8x HRL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.06% 0.03% 0.04% HRL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.8% +19.7% +6.2% SJM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.4%/yr +0.4%/yr -7.1%/yr SJM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.0% 28.7% 26.7% TSN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 58/100 52/100 SJM

Percentile Scorecard

HRLSJMTSN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHRLSJMTSN
Valuation 68 #15 of 45 59 #19 of 45 52 #17 of 34
Growth 27 #31 of 42 95 #3 of 42 55 #14 of 30
Profitability 49 #21 of 40 80 #9 of 40 41 #17 of 28
Financial Health 74 #13 of 47 28 #34 of 47 66 #13 of 36
Shareholder Returns 30 #22 of 31 27 #23 of 31 48 #13 of 24
Overall 50 58 52
  • HRL ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • SJM ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • TSN ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHRLSJMTSNSPY
1 month +3.3%+4.0%+8.7% +0.9%
3 months -20.1%-0.7%-9.3% +5.9%
6 months -1.2%+29.6%-12.9% +8.5%
Year to date -13.0%+28.3%-5.6% +13.3%
1 year -12.8%+19.7%+6.2% +12.4%
3 years -34.3%+11.3%+21.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year -13.1%+3.6%+6.7% +23.5%
5 years -51.3%+2.1%-30.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year -13.4%+0.4%-7.1% +11.0%
10 years -46.0%-4.9%-20.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year -6.0%-0.5%-2.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureHRLSJMTSNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.0%28.7%26.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.8%25.1%25.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.18-0.31-0.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.430.690.23 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.0%-44.9%-54.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.2%-5.9%-19.5% -0.9%
52-week high $26.51$133.40$68.75 $779.14
52-week low $19.20$89.53$50.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHRLSJMTSN
P/E now vs peer median 33.1xmedian 22.2x 58.4xmedian 22.2x 33.9xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.4xmedian 12.2x 14.6xmedian 12.2x 10.4xmedian 9.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 13.4x 8.4xmedian 13.4x 16.8xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.6x 2.3xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median -1.23median 0.56 0.29median 0.56 1.79median 1.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHRLSJMTSN
Revenue $12.15B $9.16B $55.69B
Gross profit $1.90B $3.54B $3.42B
Operating income $573.89M $826.20M $1.26B
Net income $342.71M $229.50M $598.00M
Free cash flow $780.87M $1.59B $1.16B
EPS (diluted) $0.62 $2.14 $1.62
Cash & equivalents $839.64M $43.20M $740.00M
Total debt $2.86B $6.74B $8.01B
Shares (diluted) 551.07M 107.10M 355.00M
Enterprise value $8.16B $13.26B $15.96B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHRLSJMTSN
P/E 33.1x 58.4x 33.9x
P/FCF 14.5x 8.4x 16.8x
P/Operating cash flow 10.4x 7.0x 9.7x
P/S 0.9x 1.5x 0.3x
P/B 1.4x 2.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 106.6x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 12.4x 14.6x 10.4x
EV/EBIT 23.2x 24.3x 21.3x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.2x 0.5x
EV/FCF 17.1x 12.7x 23.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.2x 10.5x 13.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.23 0.29 1.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHRLSJMTSN
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.7% 5.1% 2.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% 2.7% 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.2% 15.6% -12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 6.8% -0.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -43.2% 184.5% -14.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -21.1% 43.2% 14.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -54.6% 115.7% -26.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 147.2% 21.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -54.6% 131.3% -26.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.0% 200.5% 19.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.3% 86.0% -10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.3% 9.6% -3.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 136.2% -10.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 20.3% 128.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHRLSJMTSN
Gross margin 15.7% 38.7% 6.1%
EBITDA margin 8.9% 15.0% 4.6%
Operating margin 4.7% 9.0% 2.3%
Pretax margin 4.3% 4.6% 1.5%
Net margin 2.8% 2.5% 1.0%
FCF margin 6.4% 17.3% 2.1%
Operating cash flow margin 9.0% 20.9% 3.6%
Return on equity 4.3% 4.1% 3.3%
Return on assets 2.6% 1.4% 1.7%
Return on invested capital 3.5% 3.6% 3.5%
Return on capital employed 5.0% 5.9% 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.6x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.2x 8.3x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHRLSJMTSN
Debt / assets 21.5% 41.6% 22.5%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 4.9x 2.8x
Debt / FCF 3.7x 4.2x 6.9x
Liabilities / assets 40.9% 64.5% 48.9%
Equity / assets 59.1% 35.5% 51.1%
Interest coverage 7.3x – 3.1x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.24 1.49 3.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHRLSJMTSN
Dividend yield 5.6% 3.5% 3.7%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 5.6% 3.6% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 187.0% 203.5% 117.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 82.1% 29.4% 60.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.9% 2.1% 1.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.1% 2.8% 1.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHRLSJMTSN
Forward P/E 14.7xFY2026 11.1xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.40FY2026 $11.33FY2026 $3.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +23.8%FY2026 -20.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.9% -8.3% +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.68BFY2026 $9.52BFY2026 $59.23BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.5%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026 +8.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% -2.7% -9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHRLSJMTSN
Held by institutions 43.8% 43.8% 91.8%
Institutions holding 622 888 877
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.0% -2.8% +3.8%
Institutions buying 323 494 407
Institutions selling 230 260 353
Buyers to sellers 1.40 1.90 1.15

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HRLSJMTSN
HRL 1.00 0.37 0.20
SJM 0.37 1.00 0.25
TSN 0.20 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HRL, SJM and TSN?

Tyson Foods (TSN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hormel Foods (HRL) $11.49B, J M Smucker (SJM) $13.48B, Tyson Foods (TSN) $19.71B.

Which stock is cheaper, HRL, SJM and TSN?

Hormel Foods (HRL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hormel Foods (HRL) 33.5x, J M Smucker (SJM) 58.7x, Tyson Foods (TSN) 34.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, J M Smucker (SJM) is cheapest (Hormel Foods (HRL) 14.7x, J M Smucker (SJM) 11.1x, Tyson Foods (TSN) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

J M Smucker (SJM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hormel Foods (HRL) +0.7%, J M Smucker (SJM) +5.1%, Tyson Foods (TSN) +2.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hormel Foods (HRL) has the highest net margin (Hormel Foods (HRL) 2.8%, J M Smucker (SJM) 2.5%, Tyson Foods (TSN) 1.0%). On return on invested capital, J M Smucker (SJM) leads (Hormel Foods (HRL) 3.5%, J M Smucker (SJM) 3.6%, Tyson Foods (TSN) 3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year J M Smucker (SJM) returned the most: Hormel Foods (HRL) -12.8%, J M Smucker (SJM) +19.7%, Tyson Foods (TSN) +6.2%. Over five years, J M Smucker (SJM) compounded fastest (Hormel Foods (HRL) -13.4%/yr, J M Smucker (SJM) +0.4%/yr, Tyson Foods (TSN) -7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Hormel Foods (HRL) has the highest dividend yield: Hormel Foods (HRL) 0.06%, J M Smucker (SJM) 0.03%, Tyson Foods (TSN) 0.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tyson Foods (TSN) has been the steadiest (Hormel Foods (HRL) 30.0%, J M Smucker (SJM) 28.7%, Tyson Foods (TSN) 26.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HRL, SJM and TSN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, J M Smucker (SJM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.