HHH vs KANP vs STRS Stock Comparison

Howard Hughes Holdings, Kaanapali Land and Stratus Properties Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KANP Kaanapali Land Llc
$29.70 -7.2% 1M -17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$53.24M
P/E
5.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.83M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
STRS Stratus Properties Inc
$17.61 -4.0% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$140.58M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.66M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Kaanapali Land leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Kaanapali Land 4, Stratus Properties 4, Howard Hughes Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHHHKANPSTRSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.80B $53.24M $140.58M HHH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.9x 5.2x 6.5x KANP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.0% +1,110.9% -12.4% KANP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.3% 48.2% 75.0% STRS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.0% — 4.4% STRS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.0x — 1.8x STRS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.8% -17.5% -9.7% STRS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.0%/yr +4.3%/yr -12.5%/yr KANP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.7% 35.9% 41.0% HHH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 98/100 53/100 KANP

Percentile Scorecard

HHHKANPSTRS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHHHKANPSTRS
Valuation 84 #7 of 39 100 #1 of 39 47 #21 of 39
Growth 77 #8 of 32 100 #1 of 32 42 #19 of 32
Profitability 75 #8 of 29 93 #3 of 29 36 #19 of 29
Financial Health 24 #29 of 38 – 70 #12 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 69 #5 of 14
Overall 65 98 53
  • HHH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • KANP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • STRS ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHHHKANPSTRSSPY
1 month +7.0%-7.2%-4.0% -0.2%
3 months +9.1%-1.0%-10.1% +3.9%
6 months +14.5%+16.4%-41.3% +8.2%
Year to date -8.2%+8.0%-27.2% +12.9%
1 year -10.8%-17.5%-9.7% +12.3%
3 years +17.1%+24.3%-29.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +5.4%+7.5%-11.0% +23.3%
5 years -13.9%+23.2%-48.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.0%+4.3%-12.5% +10.9%
10 years -28.2%+3.8%-26.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year -3.3%+0.4%-3.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHHHKANPSTRSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.7%35.9%41.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.4%74.1%43.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.790.260.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.32-0.49-0.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.0%-42.0%-66.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-17.5%-45.5% -1.2%
52-week high $89.85$36.00$32.34 $779.14
52-week low $60.20$25.50$17.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHHHKANPSTRS
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 7.9x 5.2xmedian 7.9x 6.5xmedian 7.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 4.7x 2.4xmedian 4.7x 4.9xmedian 4.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 11.2x 3.2xmedian 11.2x 5.5xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 6.2x 3.1xmedian 6.2x -3.9xmedian 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.6x 0.6xmedian 0.6x 0.4xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.47median 0.32 0.17median 0.32 -0.18median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHHHKANPSTRS
Revenue $2.37B $21.83M $28.66M
Gross profit $1.79B $9.58M -$9.32M
Operating income $505.99M $4.63M $29.79M
Net income $290.16M $10.53M $20.07M
Free cash flow $628.36M $16.94M -$35.66M
EPS (diluted) $4.94 $5.71 $2.67
Cash & equivalents $2.65B $37.96M $73.54M
Total debt $5.46B – $143.76M
Shares (diluted) 59.15M 1.85M 8.06M
Enterprise value -$3.56B -$56.32M $17.04M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHHHKANPSTRS
P/E 12.9x 5.2x 6.5x
P/FCF 6.1x 3.1x -3.9x
P/Operating cash flow 4.8x 3.0x -4.4x
P/S 1.6x 2.4x 4.9x
P/B 0.9x 0.6x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 0.6x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA 9.4x 3.2x 5.5x
EV/EBIT 13.0x 3.3x 7.1x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 0.7x 7.4x
EV/FCF 10.5x 0.9x -5.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.4x 0.9x -6.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.47 0.17 -0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHHHKANPSTRS
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.0% 1,111% -12.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.1% 63.4% -10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 67.9% 2,581% -384.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.7% 67.8% -57.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -11.9% 181.8% 415.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.1% 43.6% 58.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 27.3% 392.9% 314.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 34.5% 30.5% -37.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.1% 392.9% 491.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.2% 30.5% -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.7% 524.9% -23.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 84.6% 16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 120.5% 369.6% 30.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 78.9% 30.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHHHKANPSTRS
Gross margin 75.6% 43.9% -32.5%
EBITDA margin 29.4% 21.9% 133.0%
Operating margin 21.3% 21.2% 103.9%
Pretax margin 16.0% 45.9% 95.7%
Net margin 12.3% 48.2% 75.0%
FCF margin 26.5% 77.6% -124.4%
Operating cash flow margin 33.2% 80.5% -111.6%
Return on equity 7.4% 11.8% 5.8%
Return on assets 2.1% 10.8% 3.7%
Return on invested capital 4.0% – 4.4%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x 1.7x -1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 8.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHHHKANPSTRS
Debt / assets 34.3% – 27.0%
Debt / equity 1.4x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.0x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF 8.7x – -4.0x
Liabilities / assets 74.6% 8.6% 34.2%
Equity / assets 25.4% 91.4% 65.8%
Interest coverage 2.9x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHHHKANPSTRS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 2.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHHHKANPSTRS
Forward P/E 15.9xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.01FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +81.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -14.2% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.70BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +83.4%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -3.0% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHHHKANPSTRS
Held by institutions 90.7% – 49.1%
Institutions holding 303 – 55
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% – -6.5%
Institutions buying 170 – 26
Institutions selling 87 – 17
Buyers to sellers 1.95 – 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HHHKANPSTRS
HHH 1.00 -0.03 0.11
KANP -0.03 1.00 -0.05
STRS 0.11 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HHH, KANP and STRS?

Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) $3.80B, Kaanapali Land (KANP) $53.24M, Stratus Properties (STRS) $140.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, HHH, KANP and STRS?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 12.9x, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 5.2x, Stratus Properties (STRS) 6.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kaanapali Land (KANP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) +34.0%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +1,110.9%, Stratus Properties (STRS) -12.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Stratus Properties (STRS) has the highest net margin (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 12.3%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 48.2%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 75.0%). On return on invested capital, Stratus Properties (STRS) leads (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 4.0%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 4.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stratus Properties (STRS) returned the most: Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -10.8%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) -17.5%, Stratus Properties (STRS) -9.7%. Over five years, Kaanapali Land (KANP) compounded fastest (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) -3.0%/yr, Kaanapali Land (KANP) +4.3%/yr, Stratus Properties (STRS) -12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) has been the steadiest (Howard Hughes Holdings (HHH) 33.7%, Kaanapali Land (KANP) 35.9%, Stratus Properties (STRS) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HHH, KANP and STRS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kaanapali Land (KANP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.