HGYN vs KRT vs PFGC Stock Comparison

Hong Yuan Holding, Karat Packaging and Performance Food Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HGYN Hong Yuan Holding Group
$0.04 -20.0% 1M -20.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.99M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$559.73K
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
KRT Karat Packaging Inc.
$54.47 +2.6% 1M +118.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.07B
P/E
21.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$493.38M
Div. yield
0.03%
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
8 wins
PFGC Performance Food Group Co
$96.21 +5.1% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$15.06B
P/E
41.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$67.84B
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Karat Packaging leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Karat Packaging 8, Performance Food 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHGYNKRTPFGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.99M $1.07B $15.06B PFGC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -29.9x 21.3x 41.9x KRT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 19.2x 16.5x PFGC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.1% +11.6% +7.2% KRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -17.9% 10.2% 0.5% KRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 24.0% 6.6% KRT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.3x 2.9x KRT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.0% +118.2% -3.7% KRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.8%/yr +19.5%/yr +16.0%/yr KRT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 346.6% 37.3% 29.2% PFGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 68/100 41/100 KRT

Percentile Scorecard

HGYNKRTPFGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHGYNKRTPFGC
Valuation 3 #39 of 40 31 #28 of 40 56 #18 of 40
Growth 24 #29 of 38 84 #7 of 38 60 #16 of 38
Profitability 11 #32 of 36 97 #2 of 36 43 #21 of 36
Financial Health 5 #38 of 40 90 #5 of 40 44 #23 of 40
Shareholder Returns – 41 #17 of 28 4 #27 of 28
Overall 11 68 41
  • HGYN ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • KRT ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • PFGC ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHGYNKRTPFGCSPY
1 month -20.0%+2.6%+5.1% -0.2%
3 months +33.3%+30.7%-16.7% +3.9%
6 months -55.6%+90.1%+9.5% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%+141.3%+7.0% +12.9%
1 year -20.0%+118.2%-3.7% +12.3%
3 years +100.0%+168.6%+74.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +26.0%+39.0%+20.5% +23.3%
5 years -78.9%+143.5%+109.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -26.8%+19.5%+16.0% +10.9%
10 years ——+304.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+15.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHGYNKRTPFGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 346.6%37.3%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 534.9%31.0%29.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.610.590.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.063.17-0.13 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.7%-46.3%-32.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -73.3%-0.4%-17.6% -1.2%
52-week high $0.15$54.68$116.71 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$21.06$81.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHGYNKRTPFGC
P/E now vs peer median -29.9xmedian 22.1x 21.6xmedian 22.1x 41.7xmedian 22.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 0.5x 2.2xmedian 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -33.8xmedian 9.7x 14.6xmedian 9.7x 11.6xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -78.9xmedian 17.5x 19.5xmedian 17.5x 14.6xmedian 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median -13.0xmedian 2.9x 6.2xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.29median 1.19 1.19median 1.19 -12.02median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHGYNKRTPFGC
Revenue $559.73K $493.38M $67.84B
Gross profit $370.82K $200.95M $8.09B
Operating income -$91.58K $63.11M $887.50M
Net income -$99.38K $51.59M $359.30M
Free cash flow -$37.82K $55.58M $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $2.50 $2.29
Cash & equivalents $13.37K $38.40M $92.40M
Total debt – $34.60M $5.01B
Shares (diluted) 74.64M 20.11M 157.00M
Enterprise value $3.02M $900.55M $14.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHGYNKRTPFGC
P/E -29.9x 21.6x 41.7x
P/FCF -78.9x 19.5x 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow -78.9x 19.1x 10.6x
P/S 5.3x 2.2x 0.2x
P/B -13.0x 6.2x 3.1x
P/Tangible book -12.3x 6.2x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA -33.8x 14.6x 11.6x
EV/EBIT -32.5x 16.9x 22.5x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 2.2x 0.3x
EV/FCF -78.6x 19.2x 19.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -78.6x 18.8x 14.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.29 1.19 -12.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHGYNKRTPFGC
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.1% 11.6% 7.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.6% 5.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.9% 16.0% 9.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.8% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -268.5% 47.0% 8.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.6% 17.6% 5.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -2,581% 56.4% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -22.9% 19.1% -3.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -362.0% 57.3% 5.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -23.2% 18.2% -3.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 25.4% 16.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.0% 19.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 25.2% 46.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.3% 22.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHGYNKRTPFGC
Gross margin 66.2% 40.7% 11.9%
EBITDA margin -15.7% 14.8% 2.5%
Operating margin -16.4% 12.8% 1.3%
Pretax margin -16.4% 13.8% 0.7%
Net margin -17.9% 10.2% 0.5%
FCF margin -6.8% 11.3% 1.5%
Operating cash flow margin -6.8% 11.5% 2.1%
Return on equity – 31.3% 7.5%
Return on assets -16.4% 17.2% 1.9%
Return on invested capital – 24.0% 6.6%
Return on capital employed – 29.9% 6.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.6x 3.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.1x 3.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.2% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHGYNKRTPFGC
Debt / assets – 10.9% 26.6%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.3x 2.9x
Debt / FCF – 0.6x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 136.2% 45.0% 74.0%
Equity / assets -36.2% 55.0% 26.0%
Interest coverage – 33.9x 2.1x
Current ratio 0.8x 2.3x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.6x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -214.31 7.56 4.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHGYNKRTPFGC
Dividend yield – 3.3% –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% -0.3%
Shareholder yield – 3.3% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 69.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 64.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 72.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHGYNKRTPFGC
Forward P/E – 19.2xFY2026 16.5xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.83FY2026 $5.82FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – +75.8%FY2026 +27.9%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – -15.2% +19.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $539.09MFY2026 $75.58BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY – +15.3%FY2026 +11.4%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.3% +5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHGYNKRTPFGC
Held by institutions – 35.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 142 529
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.4% -0.9%
Institutions buying – 92 303
Institutions selling – 33 152
Buyers to sellers – 2.79 1.99

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HGYNKRTPFGC
HGYN 1.00 0.06 -0.02
KRT 0.06 1.00 0.17
PFGC -0.02 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HGYN, KRT and PFGC?

Performance Food (PFGC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) $2.99M, Karat Packaging (KRT) $1.07B, Performance Food (PFGC) $15.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, HGYN, KRT and PFGC?

Karat Packaging (KRT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -29.9x, Karat Packaging (KRT) 21.3x, Performance Food (PFGC) 41.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Performance Food (PFGC) is cheapest (Karat Packaging (KRT) 19.2x, Performance Food (PFGC) 16.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Karat Packaging (KRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) +6.1%, Karat Packaging (KRT) +11.6%, Performance Food (PFGC) +7.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Karat Packaging (KRT) has the highest net margin (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -17.9%, Karat Packaging (KRT) 10.2%, Performance Food (PFGC) 0.5%). On return on invested capital, Karat Packaging (KRT) leads (Karat Packaging (KRT) 24.0%, Performance Food (PFGC) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Karat Packaging (KRT) returned the most: Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -20.0%, Karat Packaging (KRT) +118.2%, Performance Food (PFGC) -3.7%. Over five years, Karat Packaging (KRT) compounded fastest (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) -26.8%/yr, Karat Packaging (KRT) +19.5%/yr, Performance Food (PFGC) +16.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Karat Packaging (KRT) 0.03%, Performance Food (PFGC) 0.00%. Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) and Performance Food (PFGC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Performance Food (PFGC) has been the steadiest (Hong Yuan Holding (HGYN) 346.6%, Karat Packaging (KRT) 37.3%, Performance Food (PFGC) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HGYN, KRT and PFGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Karat Packaging (KRT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.